Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Obama Tried to Stall GI's Iraq Withdrawal

 of course the anti iraq war stance that 67% of you currently share is do to politicians giving you your opinion over the course of the last 5 years. half of the 67% of you are legitimate, ill concede.

So now success has come and Obama and the democrats want it. 

the snake in the grass, obama.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09152008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obama_tried_to_stall_gis_iraq_withdrawal_129150.htm

 

-I will subtlety invade your psyche-

Comments

  • BrianshoBriansho Member UncommonPosts: 3,586

    Let me guess,

    Barack Obama does not care about American winning in Iraq? LOL

    Don't be terrorized! You're more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder! More people die every year from prescription drugs than terrorism LOL!

  • DekronDekron Member UncommonPosts: 7,359

    "Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops..."

    That is a big NO. Congress has no authority to be in negotiations with troops actions. That is the Commander-in-Cheif''s job. Congress would seriously be overstepping their bounds.

  • baffbaff Member Posts: 9,457

    I used to think they had won.

     

    Until about a week ago.

     

     

    When the democratic government of Iraq sold their oil rights to China.

  • PyrichPyrich Member Posts: 1,040
    Originally posted by Briansho


    Let me guess,
    Barack Obama does not care about American winning in Iraq? LOL



     

    No some Iraqi leaders are saying that behind closed doors Obama is saying something completely different to them than what he is telling the voters.

    Hmmm,   i dont believe the Iraqis or Obama just yet.  Lets see if this story is anything more than their goverment trying to throw mud at ours.

     

    Taken with a grain of sand for now,  but still dually noted.  If they can ever bring any actual evidence....,  but as for now its Obama vrs them.

  • BrianshoBriansho Member UncommonPosts: 3,586
    Originally posted by Pyrich

    Originally posted by Briansho


    Let me guess,
    Barack Obama does not care about American winning in Iraq? LOL



     

    No some Iraqi leaders are saying that behind closed doors Obama is saying something completely different to them than what he is telling the voters.

    Hmmm,   i dont believe the Iraqis or Obama just yet.  Lets see if this story is anything more than their goverment trying to throw mud at ours.

     

    Taken with a grain of sand for now,  but still dually noted.  If they can every bring any actual evidence,  but as for know its Obama vrs them.

     

    What about the generals coming out saying things aren't going as planned over there? Who should we believe?

    Don't be terrorized! You're more likely to die of a car accident, drowning, fire, or murder! More people die every year from prescription drugs than terrorism LOL!

  • frodusfrodus Member Posts: 2,396

    Leading congressmen and senators insisted that a security guarantee would raise the Strategic Framework Agreement to the level of a treaty requiring Senate ratification--which is true. They also made clear that no such ratification would be forthcoming if the document bound the next administration. The Bush administration therefore had to tell Baghdad at the outset that America would not match the commitment we were asking the Iraqis to make with an equal commitment of our own. American domestic politics also prevented the administration from placing the security agreement in the larger context of a U.S.-Iraqi strategic partnership, since that concept was ridiculed by those who refused to accept the possibility of success in Iraq.

    The Iranians sensed an opportunity and responded with a massive public information campaign in Iraq and a virulent private campaign to put pressure on Iraq's leaders. America's refusal to offer a long-term security guarantee gave weight to the constant Iranian refrain that Iran will always be there, while America will ultimately leave Iraq to its fate. Shrewdly refusing to admit the degree of direct Iranian pressure, Maliki and his associates used the cloak of "Iraqi sovereignty" to conceal their uneasiness at taking responsibility for making a deal with the United States--uneasiness not before their own people, but before Tehran. As a result, the negotiations have dragged on, Iraqi demands have increased, and it is possible that Maliki will now wait until after the American election to see who wins--all because domestic political constraints prevented the Bush administration from making the necessary opening bid.

    The Endgame in Iraq

     

    Trade in material assumptions for spiritual facts and make permanent progress.

  • Rayx0rRayx0r Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 2,902

    image

    “"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a robot foot stomping on a human face -- forever."
  • PrecusorPrecusor Member UncommonPosts: 3,589
    Originally posted by bluberryhaze


     OBAMA TRIED TO STALL GIS' IRAQ WITHDRAWAL
    http://www.nypost.com/seven/09152008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obama_tried_to_stall_gis_iraq_withdrawal_129150.htm
     

     

    Logically obama will try to deny everything.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act

  • BushMonkeyBushMonkey Member Posts: 1,406
    Originally posted by Rayx0r


    and the truth shall set you free...



     

    Withdrawl from Iraq,and send them to Pakistan? www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/01/2907/

    The senator warned Pakistani President Gen Pervez Musharraf that, under an Obama presidency, he would have to do more to shut down terrorist operations in his country and evict foreign fighters or risk a US troop invasion and losing hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid.

    Or is that just a lie to generate votes?

Sign In or Register to comment.