Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Karl Rove Admits McCain went "too far"(video)

 

 

To me this is like Satan saying hey, even I wouldnt do that.  Who's on who's side anymore?  Heaven, Hell, and John McCain lol.

 

But this goes back to a post I made earlierthat John McCain has lost his intergrity.  Either that or Karl Rove is just jealous he can't hold the title "Prince of Darkness".

Comments

  • PyrichPyrich Member Posts: 1,040

    Karl Rove...  the man who almost singly handed destroyed McCains, Gores and Kerrys reputation when he was in charge,  that Karl Rove?

    Not surprised really.  He is a parasite that makes a living like Micheal Moore,  if he isnt spouting out bile and poison he is nothing.

  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384

    ok...I usually hate to post in political threads these days as they are pretty much a dime a dozen but i feel i need to explain to you why Rove did what he did.

    He's a political strategist. This whole things is a like a massive chest game to him. You have to see beyond the words and see what Rove is actually trying to do. In the other videos where he said McCain went to far just as Obama has he has (or trying to achieve two things):

    1. Rove is trying to get the public to agree with him as Rove seems to be taken the middle ground. But he isn't. In a few weeks Rove will be talking kindly about McCain and those people who heard Rove say what he said this week will think "Hmm...well...Rove was reasonable this week so what he's saying today about McCain is fair."
    2. He's trying to portray McCain as anti Bush. This is always a good thing for many voting Americans.

    You got to see this as a chess game for Rove.

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • frodusfrodus Member Posts: 2,396
    Originally posted by Enigma


    ok...I usually hate to post in political threads these days as they are pretty much a dime a dozen but i feel i need to explain to you why Rove did what he did.
    He's a political strategist. This whole things is a like a massive chest game to him. You have to see beyond the words and see what Rove is actually trying to do. In the other videos where he said McCain went to far just as Obama has he has (or trying to achieve two things):

    Rove is trying to get the public to agree with him as Rove seems to be taken the middle ground. But he isn't. In a few weeks Rove will be talking kindly about McCain and those people who heard Rove say what he said this week will think "Hmm...well...Rove was reasonable this week so what he's saying today about McCain is fair."
    He's trying to portray McCain as anti Bush. This is always a good thing for many voting Americans.

    You got to see this as a chess game for Rove.

    Agreed

     

    Trade in material assumptions for spiritual facts and make permanent progress.

  • PyrichPyrich Member Posts: 1,040
    Originally posted by frodus

    Originally posted by Enigma


    ok...I usually hate to post in political threads these days as they are pretty much a dime a dozen but i feel i need to explain to you why Rove did what he did.
    He's a political strategist. This whole things is a like a massive chest game to him. You have to see beyond the words and see what Rove is actually trying to do. In the other videos where he said McCain went to far just as Obama has he has (or trying to achieve two things):

    Rove is trying to get the public to agree with him as Rove seems to be taken the middle ground. But he isn't. In a few weeks Rove will be talking kindly about McCain and those people who heard Rove say what he said this week will think "Hmm...well...Rove was reasonable this week so what he's saying today about McCain is fair."
    He's trying to portray McCain as anti Bush. This is always a good thing for many voting Americans.

    You got to see this as a chess game for Rove.

    Agreed

     

     "Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" - ads against McCain in 2000 republican primarys in key battle ground states

    Swift boat voters.

    Here is an interesting read.

    www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/03/21/the_anatomy_of_a_smear_campaign/

     

    Okay,  when he goes after people like Gore i do kind of smile a little.  But his type of politics  are a discredit to us all.

  • frodusfrodus Member Posts: 2,396
    Originally posted by Pyrich

    Originally posted by frodus

    Originally posted by Enigma


    ok...I usually hate to post in political threads these days as they are pretty much a dime a dozen but i feel i need to explain to you why Rove did what he did.
    He's a political strategist. This whole things is a like a massive chest game to him. You have to see beyond the words and see what Rove is actually trying to do. In the other videos where he said McCain went to far just as Obama has he has (or trying to achieve two things):

    Rove is trying to get the public to agree with him as Rove seems to be taken the middle ground. But he isn't. In a few weeks Rove will be talking kindly about McCain and those people who heard Rove say what he said this week will think "Hmm...well...Rove was reasonable this week so what he's saying today about McCain is fair."
    He's trying to portray McCain as anti Bush. This is always a good thing for many voting Americans.

    You got to see this as a chess game for Rove.

    Agreed

     

     "Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" - ads against McCain in 2000 republican primarys in key battle ground states

    Swift boat voters.

    Here is an interesting read.

    www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/03/21/the_anatomy_of_a_smear_campaign/

     



     

    Why would care what color a baby is,or if Mc cain had a out of wed-lock child.the dow drops 504 points today and the world is on fire and i have to pee.mostly im voting against the dems.

    Trade in material assumptions for spiritual facts and make permanent progress.

  • PyrichPyrich Member Posts: 1,040
    Originally posted by frodus




     
    Why would care what color a baby is,or if Mc cain had a out of wed-lock child.the dow drops 504 points today and the world is on fire and i have to pee.mostly im voting against the dems.



     

    Bush is losing to this other,  more experianced,  better qualified,  proven record REAL war veteran. 

    What do you do?  Put out and feel everything with crap like this until people begin to think "Well,  it is all pretty outragous.  But there is just so much of it,  some of it must be true".

     

    Rinse and repeat all the way.  Without Karl Rove the 2000 election would of been Al Gore vrs McCain.

     

    **Well,  not certain,  but still.  Those types of attacks are not for a better America.

  • frodusfrodus Member Posts: 2,396
    Originally posted by Pyrich

    Originally posted by frodus




     
    Why would care what color a baby is,or if Mc cain had a out of wed-lock child.the dow drops 504 points today and the world is on fire and i have to pee.mostly im voting against the dems.



     

    Bush is losing to this other,  more experianced,  better qualified,  proven record REAL war veteran. 

    What do you do?  Put out and feel everything with crap like this until people begin to think "Well,  it is all pretty outragous.  But there is just so much of it,  some of it must be true".

     

    Rinse and repeat all the way.  Without Karl Rove the 2000 election would of been Al Gore vrs McCain.

     

    **Well,  not certain,  but still.  Those types of attacks are not for a better America.



     

    Well pyrich you might be right, politics is the most unpredictable sport their is.The facts are like this 60% of the country is conservative and noted by the latest Battleground poll.Rowe plays to where the polls are headed.The candidates have no control over 3rd party ads.

    Trade in material assumptions for spiritual facts and make permanent progress.

  • PyrichPyrich Member Posts: 1,040
    Originally posted by frodus




     
    Well pyrich you might be right, politics is the most unpredictable sport their is.The facts are like this 60% of the country is conservative and noted by the latest Battleground poll.Rowe plays to where the polls are headed.The candidates have no control over 3rd party ads.



     

    This election is not nearly as heated or insane as the last two.  And no,  canidates have no control over 3rd party ads.  But what about hiring people to hire people to make those adds.

    Just seen that New York State is almost in the 5% margin.  New York is close to being considered a swing state.  Just by allowing both sides to state their plans and leaving the hoopla out of it.  Of course you really can't believe any of the polls they take.  Only the last one counts,  and it ask more than a few thousand people.

    Im sure it'll stay blue,  just saying.

Sign In or Register to comment.