Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

StarCraft two Highway robbery

2»

Comments

  • MMORPDEATHMMORPDEATH Member Posts: 414
    Originally posted by Bigdavo

    Originally posted by MMORPDEATH 
    I wouldnt have a problem with this if they released, say ,three $19.99 games. Instead of 50, you pay 60 but you get more content as promised so its not so bad. HOWEVER knowing Blizzard they will charge 25-30 per game AT LEAST and that price wont lower for a decade.
    Nevertheless, I'm more worried about Starcraft becoming a micromanaged "rpg/rts hybrid" like Warcraft 3. IMO Warcraft 2 blows Warcraft 3 out of the water.



     

    'micromanaged "rpg/rts" hybrid'... LOL!!!

    I'm sorry, but if you think Warcraft 3 takes 'micromanagment' than for the first time on any forum I say to you - Learn to play. I wouldn't normally resort to such a childish remark but I can't find a better phrase suitable for this.

    I'd hate to watch you struggle on a game that actually takes micromanagement such as the Civilization series, Sim City series, etc.

     

    It is combat micromanagement n00b. I dont mind economic/research micromanagement as long as my combat is at the "big picture" macro level a la the Total War series.

    Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice.

  • wapepewapepe Member Posts: 6

    Will Blizzard sell them at full price each game, or at the price normally reserved for an expansion? If it's the latter, then I guess it's not too big a problem, but if it's the former, then it could be considered highway robbery.

  • tvalentinetvalentine Member, Newbie CommonPosts: 4,216
    Originally posted by MMORPDEATH

    Originally posted by Bigdavo

    Originally posted by MMORPDEATH 
    I wouldnt have a problem with this if they released, say ,three $19.99 games. Instead of 50, you pay 60 but you get more content as promised so its not so bad. HOWEVER knowing Blizzard they will charge 25-30 per game AT LEAST and that price wont lower for a decade.
    Nevertheless, I'm more worried about Starcraft becoming a micromanaged "rpg/rts hybrid" like Warcraft 3. IMO Warcraft 2 blows Warcraft 3 out of the water.



     

    'micromanaged "rpg/rts" hybrid'... LOL!!!

    I'm sorry, but if you think Warcraft 3 takes 'micromanagment' than for the first time on any forum I say to you - Learn to play. I wouldn't normally resort to such a childish remark but I can't find a better phrase suitable for this.

    I'd hate to watch you struggle on a game that actually takes micromanagement such as the Civilization series, Sim City series, etc.

     

    It is combat micromanagement n00b. I dont mind economic/research micromanagement as long as my combat is at the "big picture" macro level a la the Total War series.

    yeah ill agree with MMORPDEATH, Warcraft 3 could never compare with Starcraft. In warcraft you could only have a supply limit of 90 and you couldnt have nearly as many units as you can in starcraft.

     

    and SC2 isnt going to be like WC3, i assure you its still the same SC we all know and love, unless the demo they let us play at the blizzcon wasnt a reflection of the finished product.

    image

    Playing: EVE Online
    Favorite MMOs: WoW, SWG Pre-cu, Lineage 2, UO, EQ, EVE online
    Looking forward to: Archeage, Kingdom Under Fire 2
    KUF2's Official Website - http://www.kufii.com/ENG/ -

  • nutrifactsnutrifacts Member Posts: 7
    Originally posted by tvalentine

    Originally posted by MMORPDEATH

    Originally posted by Bigdavo

    Originally posted by MMORPDEATH 
    I wouldnt have a problem with this if they released, say ,three $19.99 games. Instead of 50, you pay 60 but you get more content as promised so its not so bad. HOWEVER knowing Blizzard they will charge 25-30 per game AT LEAST and that price wont lower for a decade.
    Nevertheless, I'm more worried about Starcraft becoming a micromanaged "rpg/rts hybrid" like Warcraft 3. IMO Warcraft 2 blows Warcraft 3 out of the water.



     

    'micromanaged "rpg/rts" hybrid'... LOL!!!

    I'm sorry, but if you think Warcraft 3 takes 'micromanagment' than for the first time on any forum I say to you - Learn to play. I wouldn't normally resort to such a childish remark but I can't find a better phrase suitable for this.

    I'd hate to watch you struggle on a game that actually takes micromanagement such as the Civilization series, Sim City series, etc.

     

    It is combat micromanagement n00b. I dont mind economic/research micromanagement as long as my combat is at the "big picture" macro level a la the Total War series.

    yeah ill agree with MMORPDEATH, Warcraft 3 could never compare with Starcraft. In warcraft you could only have a supply limit of 90 and you couldnt have nearly as many units as you can in starcraft.

     

    and SC2 isnt going to be like WC3, i assure you its still the same SC we all know and love, unless the demo they let us play at the blizzcon wasnt a reflection of the finished product.

    >.<

     

Sign In or Register to comment.