Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

WoW will be happy to hear - Palin gone Rogue.

2»

Comments

  • olddaddyolddaddy Member Posts: 3,356
    Originally posted by Narug  
    Edit:  I still challenge someone to provide a station other than Fox that equals positive and negative coverage of Republicans which you tinfoil hats call the righ channel.  CNN is defnitely not that station.



     

    CBC.

     

  • NarugNarug Member UncommonPosts: 756
    Originally posted by olddaddy

    Originally posted by Narug  
    Edit:  I still challenge someone to provide a station other than Fox that equals positive and negative coverage of Republicans which you tinfoil hats call the righ channel.  CNN is defnitely not that station.



     

    CBC.

     

    Even if I were to conceed  that, and not saying I am, you're still letting the point coast right past your mind. *whoosh!*

     

    Let me try this again.  Equally positive and negative coverage of Republicans on televisions is outnumbered by negative coverage on statioins like ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN. 

    Take a guess how much negative coverage Obama is getting on stations like Obama headquarters aka NBC.  You and every other leftist is going to ignore that point though aren't ya.  Yeah.  Thought so.

    AC2 Player RIP Final Death Jan 31st 2017

    Refugee of Auberean

    Refugee of Dereth

  • olddaddyolddaddy Member Posts: 3,356
    Originally posted by Narug

    Originally posted by olddaddy

    Originally posted by Narug  
    Edit:  I still challenge someone to provide a station other than Fox that equals positive and negative coverage of Republicans which you tinfoil hats call the righ channel.  CNN is defnitely not that station.



     

    CBC.

     

    Even if I were to conceed  that, and not saying I am, you're still letting the point coast right past your mind. *whoosh!*

     

    Let me try this again.  Equally positive and negative coverage of Republicans on televisions is outnumbered by negative coverage on statioins like ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN. 

    Take a guess how much negative coverage Obama is getting on stations like Obama headquarters aka NBC.  You and every other leftist is going to ignore that point though aren't ya.  Yeah.  Thought so.



     

    It's early still, I have an entire day ahead of me. Just let me have another cup of coffee and think on it some more......

    Coverage of Obama and coverage of McCain are still balanced on the CBC. Canadians don't give a shit. I bet there's alot of countries in the world in which the television stations provide comparable coverage to that given by the CBC because their viewers don't give a shit. Hey, you asked for a station, I gave it to you. Please show me where you specified that it had to be a United States station? Just cause you ain't happy with the answer doesn't mean that you asked the right question. 

  • NarugNarug Member UncommonPosts: 756
    Originally posted by olddaddy
    It's early still, I have an entire day ahead of me. Just let me have another cup of coffee and think on it some more......
    Coverage of Obama and coverage of McCain are still balanced on the CBC. Canadians don't give a shit. I bet there's alot of countries in the world in which the television stations provide comparable coverage to that given by the CBC because their viewers don't give a shit. Hey, you asked for a station, I gave it to you. Please show me where you specified that it had to be a United States station? Just cause you ain't happy with the answer doesn't mean that you asked the right question. 



     

    The point coasts past your mind again. *whoosh!*  Let me try to simplify it for you to understand.

    Let me ask a question of you.  Do you conceed that American voters would be watching an American station for coverage of the candidates?  Then they would follow up with their own research for a decision.

    If you can answer yes then you understand why it's important for American coverage to be balcanced for an American election.

    So anyway.  What say you?

    AC2 Player RIP Final Death Jan 31st 2017

    Refugee of Auberean

    Refugee of Dereth

  • olddaddyolddaddy Member Posts: 3,356
    Originally posted by Narug

    Originally posted by olddaddy
    It's early still, I have an entire day ahead of me. Just let me have another cup of coffee and think on it some more......
    Coverage of Obama and coverage of McCain are still balanced on the CBC. Canadians don't give a shit. I bet there's alot of countries in the world in which the television stations provide comparable coverage to that given by the CBC because their viewers don't give a shit. Hey, you asked for a station, I gave it to you. Please show me where you specified that it had to be a United States station? Just cause you ain't happy with the answer doesn't mean that you asked the right question. 

    The point coasts past your mind again. *whoosh!*  Let me try to simplify it for you to understand.

    Let me ask a question of you.  Do you conceed that American voters would be watching an American station for coverage of the candidates?  Then they would follow up with their own research for a decision.

    If you can answer yes then you understand why it's important for American coverage to be balcanced for an American election.

    So anyway.  What say you?



     

    You didn't specify American coverage. Besides that, I am sick of election coverage. Why should I spend my evenings listening to two bimbos from two different political parties earn a failure grade in economics? Or in foreign policy, for that matter?

    Maybe you believe these two are the cream of the crop, and worth getting worked up about. I don't for an instant.

    Frankly, I don't care what they have to say about each other, I want to hear what they will do FOR the country. Both are a few cans short of a six pack when it comes to mentioning that.

  • JestorRodoJestorRodo Member UncommonPosts: 2,642
    Originally posted by Narug

    Originally posted by olddaddy

    Originally posted by Narug  
    Edit:  I still challenge someone to provide a station other than Fox that equals positive and negative coverage of Republicans which you tinfoil hats call the righ channel.  CNN is defnitely not that station.



     

    CBC.

     

    Even if I were to conceed  that, and not saying I am, you're still letting the point coast right past your mind. *whoosh!*

     

    Let me try this again.  Equally positive and negative coverage of Republicans on televisions is outnumbered by negative coverage on statioins like ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN. 

    Take a guess how much negative coverage Obama is getting on stations like Obama headquarters aka NBC.  You and every other leftist is going to ignore that point though aren't ya.  Yeah.  Thought so.

       Speaking of NBC , Palin has been hiding from them. You know that Matt Lauer  would grill her little snow bunny ass. Katire Coric was good but Matt would put the smack down on her. 

     

     

    Unaware of the Jestor?
    http://about.me/JestorRodo/

    Friends enjoy his classic Vblog - https://www.facebook.com/GoodOldReliableNathan

  • MickeyMannMickeyMann Member Posts: 66

     Just watched that way hot Tina Fey doing her Palin impersonation "Going Rogue" and selling her 2012 T-shirts on QVC on SNL.  I love the net , even us blokes here are enjoying the election.

  • konrad16660konrad16660 Member Posts: 182
    Originally posted by Fishermage

    Originally posted by declaredemer


    She just represents the terribleness of American politics:

    Caustic
    Sarcastic
    Negative
    Superstitious
    Not very bright

     
     
    It still shocks me, what a fascinating and terrible choice, for Vice President of the United States of America.

    Far better than the choice Democrats made for the President of the United States of America.

    She is:

    less caustic than Obama

    less sarcastic than Obama

    less negative than Obama

    I see no evidence eof superstition either way, but I would prefer a Pentacostal Christian than a racist liberation theology Christian

    at least as smart as Obama



     

    No, Declaredemer got it right.  Palin is a complete idiot and she is devicive.  All around a horrible person.

  • FishermageFishermage Member Posts: 7,562
    Originally posted by konrad16660

    Originally posted by Fishermage

    Originally posted by declaredemer


    She just represents the terribleness of American politics:

    Caustic
    Sarcastic
    Negative
    Superstitious
    Not very bright

     
     
    It still shocks me, what a fascinating and terrible choice, for Vice President of the United States of America.

    Far better than the choice Democrats made for the President of the United States of America.

    She is:

    less caustic than Obama

    less sarcastic than Obama

    less negative than Obama

    I see no evidence eof superstition either way, but I would prefer a Pentacostal Christian than a racist liberation theology Christian

    at least as smart as Obama



     

    No, Declaredemer got it right.  Palin is a complete idiot and she is devicive.  All around a horrible person.

     

    No, Declaredemer once again let his prejudices and his penchant for attacking people get the better of him. Palin is much better than Obama in all ways.

    The most basic is that Obama firmly believes he is chosen to vastly expand our government, and subsequently vastly diminish our liberty. Palin is against that. She is therefore better than  him by definition.

  • DailyBuzzDailyBuzz Member Posts: 2,306
    Originally posted by MickeyMann


     Just watched that way hot Tina Fey doing her Palin impersonation "Going Rogue" and selling her 2012 T-shirts on QVC on SNL.  I love the net , even us blokes here are enjoying the election.

     

    That was the best skit yet. The first one where Tina Fey spoofed Palin with Hillary was pretty good, but I liked this one even better. OMG, the products they were selling. . .just hilarious. Hilarious, the whole way through. Plus, an appearance by Cindy McCain.

    Anyway, just watch it if you happened to miss it last night. Or, watch it again.

    You just know McCain was thinking "I should have picked Tina Fey!".

  • JestorRodoJestorRodo Member UncommonPosts: 2,642
    Originally posted by DailyBuzz

    Originally posted by MickeyMann


     Just watched that way hot Tina Fey doing her Palin impersonation "Going Rogue" and selling her 2012 T-shirts on QVC on SNL.  I love the net , even us blokes here are enjoying the election.

     

    That was the best skit yet. The first one where Tina Fey spoofed Palin with Hillary was pretty good, but I liked this one even better. OMG, the products they were selling. . .just hilarious. Hilarious, the whole way through. Plus, an appearance by Cindy McCain.

    Anyway, just watch it if you happened to miss it last night. Or, watch it again.

    You just know McCain was thinking "I should have picked Tina Fey!".

     

       With the election tommorrow , one would have to think real hard. Do we really want this whack job governor running around DC the USA and the World representing the American people while we continually pray for McCain's health. Heaven forbid - the worst case scenario.

     Only you can prevent this future from occuring , Vote Obama or if you have a problem with him - Write me in.

     

     

     

    Unaware of the Jestor?
    http://about.me/JestorRodo/

    Friends enjoy his classic Vblog - https://www.facebook.com/GoodOldReliableNathan

Sign In or Register to comment.