Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Guild Wars Two - Existence

2»

Comments

  • raizzeenraizzeen Member Posts: 185

    gw2 is going to be a big hit since it already has alot of people playing gw and waiting for gw2 i know my self il preorder soon as i can

  • grimbojgrimboj Member Posts: 2,102

    Warcraft 3: Frozen Throne has been in the Xfire top #10 games played for years.

    Guild Wars has lasted the test of time very well, its expansions were mediocre at best but people ate them up and jus kept playing it to death. It will take a lot to kill it.

    --
    Note: PlayNC will refuse to allow you access to your account if you forget your password and can't provide a scanned image of the product key for the first product you purchased..... LOL

  • F2PMMOF2PMMO Member UncommonPosts: 122
    Originally posted by donjn

    Only games with more than 1M players are massively multiplayer, that leaves us with WoW and GW, the others are mORPGs. m = minor. I get your point. 

    Some of you are hilarious. When did the definition of "massively" EVER equal one million?..lol



     

    The "I get your point."  was meant to help you catch the irony of my statement. So unless you have pleasure in laughing at yourself I would stop the lol..if I were you. So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand: whether GW is an MMO or not is open to debate and probably ever will. The debate has gone since its launch I guess. If it's not an MMO to you I don't know, but this in not for one person to decide but how the community treats it, and apparently it is debatable if it is an MMO.

    My other point was, it is seldom reflected upon what standard when it comes to number of players should be required to be able to call a game an MMO. Apparantly this is less debatable then GW status as an MMO. Is EVE with some 250.000 players really an MMO, or more literaly a sandbox? Just a taught.

    And yes I look forward to GW2, just from the solid experience with GW.

    image
  • donjndonjn Member UncommonPosts: 816
    Originally posted by FTPMMO

    Originally posted by donjn

    Only games with more than 1M players are massively multiplayer, that leaves us with WoW and GW, the others are mORPGs. m = minor. I get your point. 

    Some of you are hilarious. When did the definition of "massively" EVER equal one million?..lol

    The "I get your point."  was meant to help you catch the irony of my statement. So unless you have pleasure in laughing at yourself I would stop the lol..if I were you. So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand: whether GW is an MMO or not is open to debate and probably ever will. The debate has gone since its launch I guess. If it's not an MMO to you I don't know, but this in not for one person to decide but how the community treats it, and apparently it is debatable if it is an MMO.

    My other point was, it is seldom reflected upon what standard when it comes to number of players should be required to be able to call a game an MMO. Apparantly this is less debatable then GW status as an MMO. Is EVE with some 250.000 players really an MMO, or more literaly a sandbox? Just a taught.

    And yes I look forward to GW2, just from the solid experience with GW.

    Here is a small lesson for you: If you are going to play the "elitist" card and use condescending phrases like "So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand" you may want to try spelling "Just a taught" as "Just a thought".

     

  • F2PMMOF2PMMO Member UncommonPosts: 122
    Originally posted by donjn

    Originally posted by FTPMMO

    Originally posted by donjn

    Only games with more than 1M players are massively multiplayer, that leaves us with WoW and GW, the others are mORPGs. m = minor. I get your point. 

    Some of you are hilarious. When did the definition of "massively" EVER equal one million?..lol

    The "I get your point."  was meant to help you catch the irony of my statement. So unless you have pleasure in laughing at yourself I would stop the lol..if I were you. So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand: whether GW is an MMO or not is open to debate and probably ever will. The debate has gone since its launch I guess. If it's not an MMO to you I don't know, but this in not for one person to decide but how the community treats it, and apparently it is debatable if it is an MMO.

    My other point was, it is seldom reflected upon what standard when it comes to number of players should be required to be able to call a game an MMO. Apparantly this is less debatable then GW status as an MMO. Is EVE with some 250.000 players really an MMO, or more literaly a sandbox? Just a taught.

    And yes I look forward to GW2, just from the solid experience with GW.

    Here is a small lesson for you: If you are going to play the "elitist" card and use condescending phrases like "So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand" you may want to try spelling "Just a taught" as "Just a thought".

     

    Guess I sawed you in the end.

     

    image
  • DarwaDarwa Member UncommonPosts: 2,181

    Edited because I decided better of it :)

  • donjndonjn Member UncommonPosts: 816
    Originally posted by FTPMMO

    Originally posted by donjn

    Originally posted by FTPMMO

    Originally posted by donjn

    Only games with more than 1M players are massively multiplayer, that leaves us with WoW and GW, the others are mORPGs. m = minor. I get your point. 

    Some of you are hilarious. When did the definition of "massively" EVER equal one million?..lol

    The "I get your point."  was meant to help you catch the irony of my statement. So unless you have pleasure in laughing at yourself I would stop the lol..if I were you. So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand: whether GW is an MMO or not is open to debate and probably ever will. The debate has gone since its launch I guess. If it's not an MMO to you I don't know, but this in not for one person to decide but how the community treats it, and apparently it is debatable if it is an MMO.

    My other point was, it is seldom reflected upon what standard when it comes to number of players should be required to be able to call a game an MMO. Apparantly this is less debatable then GW status as an MMO. Is EVE with some 250.000 players really an MMO, or more literaly a sandbox? Just a taught.

    And yes I look forward to GW2, just from the solid experience with GW.

    Here is a small lesson for you: If you are going to play the "elitist" card and use condescending phrases like "So to write it out plainly for all of your kind to understand" you may want to try spelling "Just a taught" as "Just a thought".

    Guess I sawed you in the end.

    Cats sing with stairs that turn rock and plants.

  • JupstoJupsto Member UncommonPosts: 2,075
    Originally posted by Sneaky_Andy

    Originally posted by raizzeen


    i just hope gw 2 stays true to the pvp since gw is the only mmorpg with truly proffesional skilled pvp system

     

    ok im not saying theres no skill to it but Cookie cutter builds kinda take the skill out of most of it, i mean theres guild in the top 50 how henchwayed and Sineptitude there way up there, coming up with these builds does require some good mount of skill tho

    yeah i hate cookie cutters. alot of people think you are a noob in the game if your not a cookie cutter. I love coming up with the builds, I came up with a few popular ones but mostly ones that no-one else agreed where good, but I still kicked ass with ;)

    how do you cure the cookie cutter aspect of GW though?

    for me the main issue of GW is monks and healing. take them out of the game and it would be so much funner.

    My blog: image

Sign In or Register to comment.