Hey what are some Better B2P MMORPG than Guild Wars ?

knighthonor

Hey what are some better B2P MMORPG than Guild Wars?

Iam currently playing Guild Wars, and would like to move on to a new game with Fantasy theme but with no subscription like Guild Wars.

Do any B2P mmorpg's have faction based PvP(RvR)? Cause I find that more fun than FFA PvP, and better role playing PvP value.

Rockgod99

I believe Global Agenda is like that. Other than that I havent heard many games using that model.

kaiser3282

Yeah, theres not too many, at least not popular ones, that have that model, mostly all P2P with subs, or F2P. Honestly cant think of any other good pvp ones besides GW.

Gabby-air

Like stated i'm really only aware of 3 B2P games which are guild wars, global agenda although its not really a MMO without the sub and alganon which i would suggest to not play.

mrcalhou

Global Agenda.

Now to address your sig, aside from the horrible phrashing and random capital letters, why does it matter? If war/monk is essientially paladin, do you really need a paladin class? To make a paladin/monk? Why not just have a "templar" class or something and forego the dual-classing all together?

knighthonor

Originally posted by mrcalhou


Global Agenda.
Now to address your sig, aside from the horrible phrashing and random capital letters, why does it matter? If war/monk is essientially paladin, do you really need a paladin class? To make a paladin/monk? Why not just have a "templar" class or something and forego the dual-classing all together?

 

Same could be said about the Necromancer class.

Same thing as a Mesmer/Ritulist right? Why not play that and delete Necro class?

not likeing that are ya. Same thing here. The Para class was lame for a crusader, and the War/Monk War/Necro had a lame combow. I like to have Crusader classes built from the ground up to be classes. not gimick builds or lame Para classes

mrcalhou

Originally posted by knighthonor

Originally posted by mrcalhou


Global Agenda.
Now to address your sig, aside from the horrible phrashing and random capital letters, why does it matter? If war/monk is essientially paladin, do you really need a paladin class? To make a paladin/monk? Why not just have a "templar" class or something and forego the dual-classing all together?

 

Same could be said about the Necromancer class.

Same thing as a Mesmer/Ritulist right? Why not play that and delete Necro class?

not likeing that are ya. Same thing here. The Para class was lame for a crusader, and the War/Monk War/Necro had a lame combow. I like to have Crusader classes built from the ground up to be classes. not gimick builds or lame Para classes

 

To be technical, the Necro came before the Ritualist. But in any case most, if not all, of the classes can be viewed as a combination of other things. The Monk is really a Cleric/Enchanter. The Ranger is an Archer/Beast Master. Where do you stop? Sometimes things have to be sacrficed for balance, such as semantics.

knighthonor

Originally posted by mrcalhou

Originally posted by knighthonor

Originally posted by mrcalhou


Global Agenda.
Now to address your sig, aside from the horrible phrashing and random capital letters, why does it matter? If war/monk is essientially paladin, do you really need a paladin class? To make a paladin/monk? Why not just have a "templar" class or something and forego the dual-classing all together?

 

Same could be said about the Necromancer class.

Same thing as a Mesmer/Ritulist right? Why not play that and delete Necro class?

not likeing that are ya. Same thing here. The Para class was lame for a crusader, and the War/Monk War/Necro had a lame combow. I like to have Crusader classes built from the ground up to be classes. not gimick builds or lame Para classes

 

To be technical, the Necro came before the Ritualist. But in any case most, if not all, of the classes can be viewed as a combination of other things. The Monk is really a Cleric/Enchanter. The Ranger is an Archer/Beast Master. Where do you stop? Sometimes things have to be sacrficed for balance, such as semantics.

 

Well Balance cant be displayed when Mechanics for the game havnt been shown to the plublic. So whats to Balance about Crusader Classes when we know nothing about mechanics?

You seem to be blinded as if the idea of a new class in GW2 cant be balanced to fit the game.

mrcalhou

Originally posted by knighthonor

Originally posted by mrcalhou

Originally posted by knighthonor

Originally posted by mrcalhou


Global Agenda.
Now to address your sig, aside from the horrible phrashing and random capital letters, why does it matter? If war/monk is essientially paladin, do you really need a paladin class? To make a paladin/monk? Why not just have a "templar" class or something and forego the dual-classing all together?

 

Same could be said about the Necromancer class.

Same thing as a Mesmer/Ritulist right? Why not play that and delete Necro class?

not likeing that are ya. Same thing here. The Para class was lame for a crusader, and the War/Monk War/Necro had a lame combow. I like to have Crusader classes built from the ground up to be classes. not gimick builds or lame Para classes

 

To be technical, the Necro came before the Ritualist. But in any case most, if not all, of the classes can be viewed as a combination of other things. The Monk is really a Cleric/Enchanter. The Ranger is an Archer/Beast Master. Where do you stop? Sometimes things have to be sacrficed for balance, such as semantics.

 

Well Balance cant be displayed when Mechanics for the game havnt been shown to the plublic. So whats to Balance about Crusader Classes when we know nothing about mechanics?

You seem to be blinded as if the idea of a new class in GW2 cant be balanced to fit the game.

 

No, I'm blinded by your sig. I honestly don't care what the classes are or what they are called. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. It's just that every thing about that signature of yours causes my brain to produce chemicals that say "raaaage!" If I role-played with someone that writes like that I would shoot myself. I think it is so utterly offensive, that while I support your point, I'd never join your crusade.

Loke666

There is currently no better B2P MMO than Guildwars, you have to wait for Guildwars 2 as the rest of us...

But while you wait you could have a look on DDO, it is F2P but the itemshop is really no breaker in it and you do earn some itemshop money while playing it.