This game lacks in many areas and shouldnt even be dubbed as an MMO. The fact it has a paid sub is a joke cause its not worth $15 / month. I can gt much better pvp entertainment(and less hacking) in othr online games that dont cost me a monthly fee. The reviews are accurate and the game is crap IMO, deserving of its scores
I so wanted this game to be good and was even pretty hyped about it and pre-ordered it. But then I was so burned with the beta that dissapointed me so deeply that I canceled my pre-order. The gameplay just fell flat on it's face imo and the only thing that I really liked was the costumizing. But to buy a game just for that was not worth it. Maybe if there is a demo out so I can see if things have vastly improved in terms of gameplay etc that I will think about getting it, but untill then i'm not going to risk buying it without knowing if it will be worth it.
I think the driving is definately related to the FPS you are getting in gaeme. For one, the controls are keyboard controls atm and the longer you hold onto a steering direction the further in that direction the wheels will turn. If you do not see the impact of turning in a direction and hold onto the button for a longer period of time you will definately over steer.
Different vehicles have different responses on this theory as well.
Now, IMO. If you make driving any easier you are going to get way more people edriving in the game and killing in this manner over just shooting it out. I think leaving this alone will keep more of the combat out of the cars which have issues of hitboxes and no realistic damage models. Leave it be and force more people out of cars.
I think I am <R50. I group with a number of guys that are well over this level. I am constantly going up against much higher opponents in groups. Stun guns are the SUK if you are playing a criminal. However, I still have fun and get waay more satisfaction when I can take one of these guys out!!!! Especially when they only need to hit me 2-3 times to either stun or kill. Where I have to lay into them with at least a 5-8 hits for a take down.
You still get points and rewards for dieing and losing in game. Just not as much as a win. Yes, the matches are based upon your Threat versus your rating. I think this is to make sure you are being challenged in game. If you or your group is constantly owning everything in your same level would you get bored? Would you not want to accept a more challenging PvP? By bringing together someone who is owning other groups of a same or lower threat level with another group that may not be owning every onee they come across but, are of a higher ranking. Does that not seem to be more of a challenge for you and some chance for the other group to get their tactics straight?
Seems like it would to me and I bet that was the original thought behind the current process. However, since there are so many players QQ'ing about this unfair advantage and mash up I assume it will be changed. What you will end up with is a group that uses their own VOIP. Play together constantly and will virtually OWN the whole area every time they are on.
Just remember, this is what you asked for.
Say hello, To the things you've left behind. They are more a part of your life now that you can't touch them.
Originally posted by Robsolf Unfortunate... another likely failed non-fantasy MMO... And as expected, it's largely because people play it in a way that it's not meant to be played... with one side camping out at the final objective...
show me a shooter where that doesn't happen and maybe i will believe you. Its normal and has been since objectives have been put in shooters, its called defending *gasp* making sure the other team does not win.
This game will be a runaway stellar success, just like that other multi-platinum hit CrimeCraft! So suck it up n00bs!
-Letting Derek Smart work on your game is like letting Osama bin Laden work in the White House. Something will burn.- -And on the 8th day, man created God.-
This game will be a runaway stellar success, just like that other multi-platinum hit CrimeCraft! So suck it up n00bs!
That game still exists? :S
Barely.
Apparently my /sarcasm wasn't working correctly?
-Letting Derek Smart work on your game is like letting Osama bin Laden work in the White House. Something will burn.- -And on the 8th day, man created God.-
Comments
i knew tis game gonna fail. EA games are greedy and they fail game play very offen.
This game lacks in many areas and shouldnt even be dubbed as an MMO. The fact it has a paid sub is a joke cause its not worth $15 / month. I can gt much better pvp entertainment(and less hacking) in othr online games that dont cost me a monthly fee. The reviews are accurate and the game is crap IMO, deserving of its scores
do not listen to any of these idiots, this game owns!
I so wanted this game to be good and was even pretty hyped about it and pre-ordered it. But then I was so burned with the beta that dissapointed me so deeply that I canceled my pre-order. The gameplay just fell flat on it's face imo and the only thing that I really liked was the costumizing. But to buy a game just for that was not worth it. Maybe if there is a demo out so I can see if things have vastly improved in terms of gameplay etc that I will think about getting it, but untill then i'm not going to risk buying it without knowing if it will be worth it.
Posted in another thread:
I think the driving is definately related to the FPS you are getting in gaeme. For one, the controls are keyboard controls atm and the longer you hold onto a steering direction the further in that direction the wheels will turn. If you do not see the impact of turning in a direction and hold onto the button for a longer period of time you will definately over steer.
Different vehicles have different responses on this theory as well.
Now, IMO. If you make driving any easier you are going to get way more people edriving in the game and killing in this manner over just shooting it out. I think leaving this alone will keep more of the combat out of the cars which have issues of hitboxes and no realistic damage models. Leave it be and force more people out of cars.
I think I am <R50. I group with a number of guys that are well over this level. I am constantly going up against much higher opponents in groups. Stun guns are the SUK if you are playing a criminal. However, I still have fun and get waay more satisfaction when I can take one of these guys out!!!! Especially when they only need to hit me 2-3 times to either stun or kill. Where I have to lay into them with at least a 5-8 hits for a take down.
You still get points and rewards for dieing and losing in game. Just not as much as a win. Yes, the matches are based upon your Threat versus your rating. I think this is to make sure you are being challenged in game. If you or your group is constantly owning everything in your same level would you get bored? Would you not want to accept a more challenging PvP? By bringing together someone who is owning other groups of a same or lower threat level with another group that may not be owning every onee they come across but, are of a higher ranking. Does that not seem to be more of a challenge for you and some chance for the other group to get their tactics straight?
Seems like it would to me and I bet that was the original thought behind the current process. However, since there are so many players QQ'ing about this unfair advantage and mash up I assume it will be changed. What you will end up with is a group that uses their own VOIP. Play together constantly and will virtually OWN the whole area every time they are on.
Just remember, this is what you asked for.
Say hello, To the things you've left behind. They are more a part of your life now that you can't touch them.
Unfortunate... another likely failed non-fantasy MMO...
And as expected, it's largely because people play it in a way that it's not meant to be played... with one side camping out at the final objective...
show me a shooter where that doesn't happen and maybe i will believe you. Its normal and has been since objectives have been put in shooters, its called defending *gasp* making sure the other team does not win.
Buggy, odd physics (vehicles), not so stellar shooting mechanics, repetative gameplay, yet still fun.. That about sum it up?
It's Battlefield in third person?
For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson
no seriously, this game is loads of fun.
This game will be a runaway stellar success, just like that other multi-platinum hit CrimeCraft! So suck it up n00bs!
-Letting Derek Smart work on your game is like letting Osama bin Laden work in the White House. Something will burn.-
-And on the 8th day, man created God.-
That game still exists? :S
Barely.
Apparently my /sarcasm wasn't working correctly?
-Letting Derek Smart work on your game is like letting Osama bin Laden work in the White House. Something will burn.-
-And on the 8th day, man created God.-