It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Hello everyone!
Just wanted a general opinion on the benchmark I did (3 times in a row): got 4000 on low and 2600 on high... Okay so basically I should be able to run this game at default settings... Hmmm... Default settings... The thing is that I have an i7 920 @ 2.66GHz, 6 gigs of RAM and an nVidia GeForce 295 GTX... Oh and I have a resolution of 1650x1050 (yeah I'm part of the weirdos out there that have a 16:10 monitor....).
Quite frankly I was expecting to come out in the 6000 at the very least... Is the benchmark really accurate? Do you guys see a problem / bottleneck on my system? Or should I expect to be able to run the game on high settings and disregard the benchmark results?
EDIT: I'm not a super geek regarding computers, my friend is usually taking care of buying me my system since he knows more than me... So feel free to recommend upgrades if something is kinda ''lacking'' on my setup or if you see a potential bottleneck...
Comments
Uh, I have an I7 8something, and I was around 5200 low, and 3300ish high...
god only knows. on low i got 5500 and high i got 2600. i have amd 955x4 at 3.20 and 4gb of drr3 1600. and an ati 5770 1gb drr5. i think the bench mark is off maybe
IN THE FACE!
Okay so if I got it right you guys have similar rigs to mine and getting a better result? Weird... Any ideas of what it could be? o_O
And by the way yes, I have the latest nVidia driver... Running on Win 7 64 bits too.
I have 2 gtx 295s and got a simmilar score. being that the 295 has two gpus is it possible that the bench is only utilizeing only one of the gpus on the 295?
My theme song.
Yeah that is my guess too.... Because quite frankly the rig I have is supposed to run pretty much anything on the market right now with either high, real high or extreme graphic details without any problems...
Or so I was told... So I could be wrong...
I'm a noob ><
Yeah its weird cause with my system i7 860@3.3 4gig ripjaws ddr3 1600mhz and a gtz260 216c im scoring 4100 low. Which no offence to the op my system is pumpin out more horse power then the amd guy and scoring lower then him. I mean even the gtx260 has proven alot better benchmarks then the 5770. Anyways somthing has to be up.
ah yeah, I remember them saying something, on certain cards, it only recognizes one of them, which is why you are getting such a low score.
There is a tread explaining the exact details on their forums.
Yeah, my computer is quad core, 8 gigs, ddr 3, graphics card is GTS 250 (in some aspects is better than GTX 260, memory wise has more capacity and is actually DX 10) and I scored like a 2500, this can't be right because I can run Mass Effect 2 no problems all bells and whistles. What is this nonsense?
So is there a tweak out there, an update or something so the Benchmark would consider my 2 GPUs?
Pretty sure I would top the score chart if it's the case, would probably run in the 7-8000...
I scored much, much higher. I got 7400 on low - however - I use a i7 920 @ 3.8GHz and a 5850 overclocked past a 5870's settings.
You'd be amazed how huge the results can be from overclocking.