Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Is this game like Vanguard?

HerodesHerodes Member UncommonPosts: 1,494

Well... whatever you people do make out of the title:

Despite Vanguards release it is a very good PvE game. The freedom, world, the crafting, horizontal content, many races, many interesting classes.

For those people who acknowledged both games: are there many similarities?
Ok, as Vanguard did, SE seemed to be stupid enough to set the Graphics bar too high, but what about the rest?

Comments

  • orlacorlac Member Posts: 549

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.

  • Garvon3Garvon3 Member CommonPosts: 2,898

    Originally posted by orlac

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.

    You mean, problems that haven't been a problem for years now? 

     

    Vanguard is probably the best PvE game on the market right now, guess XIV just isn't good enough. 

  • SnarlingWolfSnarlingWolf Member Posts: 2,697

    We can only hope no game will be like Vanguard ever again. Gives me chills just thinking about the money that should be in my pocket right now instead of in the hands of some developer or coder that had no clue.

  • mmoguy43mmoguy43 Member UncommonPosts: 2,770

    Originally posted by Herodes

    Despite Vanguards release it is a very good PvE game. The freedom, world, the crafting, horizontal content, many races, many interesting classes.

     

    I'm curious about the same thing and waiting on an actual answer.

  • natuxatunatuxatu Member UncommonPosts: 1,364

    Originally posted by Garvon3

    Originally posted by orlac

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.

    You mean, problems that haven't been a problem for years now? 

     

    Vanguard is probably the best PvE game on the market right now, guess XIV just isn't good enough. 

     Your post has no thought process.. what does Vanguard being the best have to do with XIV not being good enough. *rolls eyes*

    I've played both and can tell you there is really nothing these two have in common. PvE is good in both but FFXIV will probably be better in that it will have a more solid community, more stable with still beautiful graphics, and have a more focused story to follow than both Vanguard and FFXI.

    image

  • slntnsntyslntnsnty Member UncommonPosts: 67

    Originally posted by natuxatu

    Originally posted by Garvon3


    Originally posted by orlac

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.

    You mean, problems that haven't been a problem for years now? 

     

    Vanguard is probably the best PvE game on the market right now, guess XIV just isn't good enough. 

     Your post has no thought process.. what does Vanguard being the best have to do with XIV not being good enough. *rolls eyes*

    I've played both and can tell you there is really nothing these two have in common. PvE is good in both but FFXIV will probably be better in that it will have a more solid community, more stable with still beautiful graphics, and have a more focused story to follow than both Vanguard and FFXI.

    Add plus -  FFXIV will also likely have more than one active developer. 

  • elockeelocke Member UncommonPosts: 4,335


    Originally posted by orlac
    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.

    Biggest difference is Story. VG doesn't have one. FF is all about story.

  • LegalizeITLegalizeIT Member Posts: 23
    Do any of you actually understand what he is asking, or do you just like to reply, annoyingly, to every post you see? I didn't love vanguard either, but his question makes sense. I know I am adding another useless reply to this post, but please, everyone quit being angry children and reply when you have something to say that at least one person other than yourself may find even slightly worth reading.

    In other words, shit talking vanguard is useless, either answer the question or go look at another post.

    _______________________________
    Gahhh!

  • popinjaypopinjay Member Posts: 6,539

    Yes, it's like Vanguard.


    It cost a lot of money to make.


    It took years to make.


    It had great scenery and art.


    It requires a pretty good rig to run on.


    It is a focused PvE group-based game first. Period.


    It is well advertised.


    It was made by people who helped make a great MMO before this one.


    It has a very big in-game world.


    It has a lot of PvP minded people lining up to say it will fail before it was launched.


    It will have an extensive crafting base where player-made gear and weapons mostly determines the economy.


    So yeah, in many ways it's just like Vanguard. Just not in EVERY way.

  • dragonbranddragonbrand Member UncommonPosts: 441

    Originally posted by Herodes

    Well... whatever you people do make out of the title:

    Despite Vanguards release it is a very good PvE game. The freedom, world, the crafting, horizontal content, many races, many interesting classes.

    For those people who acknowledged both games: are there many similarities?

    Ok, as Vanguard did, SE seemed to be stupid enough to set the Graphics bar too high, but what about the rest?

     I dont know. FF isnt out yet, so I cant compare. I wasnt in any of the testing phases either.

     

     

    *adding another useless post

    Gaming since Avalon Hill was making board games.

    Played SWG, EVE, Fallen Earth, LOTRO, Rift, Vanguard, WoW, SWTOR, TSW, Tera
    Tried Aoc, Aion, EQII, RoM, Vindictus, Darkfail, DDO, GW, PotBS

  • Garvon3Garvon3 Member CommonPosts: 2,898

    Originally posted by elocke

     




    Originally posted by orlac

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.




     

    Biggest difference is Story. VG doesn't have one. FF is all about story.

    VG does have a story actually. It's just subtle. Its not shoved in your face or linear like most other games. You uncover the history of the world much the same way you would in real life. 

  • SnarlingWolfSnarlingWolf Member Posts: 2,697

    Originally posted by popinjay

    Yes, it's like Vanguard.



    It cost a lot of money to make.

    so did SWtoR, so is that like Vanguard just because it cost money to make or is that a terrible correlation that means nothing?

    It took years to make.

    so all MMOs, so all MMOs are like Vanguard or is that a terrible correlation that means nothing?

    It had great scenery and art.

    People said the same thing about Aion, LotRO, AoC, and they are saying it about SWtoR, so once again a correlation that means nothing?

    It requires a pretty good rig to run on.

    In what world does this make a game like another game? If it's requirements were really high would that make the game at like Crysis?

    It is a focused PvE group-based game first. Period.

    This one I can say is at least a matching feature, but games can be PvE focused and be drastically different. I wouldn't say Vanguard or LotRO are at all alike. I also would argue that a lot of people originally got Vanguard because of the open world PvP world it offered.

    It is well advertised.

    In that case it is like a Ford Fusion also.

    It was made by people who helped make a great MMO before this one.

    Matter of taste there, but that also doesn't mean anything about how the games compare.

    It has a very big in-game world.

    First fair comparison, but also doesn't correlate gameplay. Once again LotRO and AC have big game worlds but aren't like each other at all, and were made by the same company which hurts your previous point

    It has a lot of PvP minded people lining up to say it will fail before it was launched.

    Humorous

    It will have an extensive crafting base where player-made gear and weapons mostly determines the economy.

    First meaningful comparison in the list

    So yeah, in many ways it's just like Vanguard. Just not in EVERY way.

     Basically you just did a big long seperated list that didn't show that the games are really even the least bit alike.

  • warmaster670warmaster670 Member Posts: 1,384

    Originally posted by Garvon3

    Originally posted by elocke

     




    Originally posted by orlac

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.





     

    Biggest difference is Story. VG doesn't have one. FF is all about story.

    VG does have a story actually. It's just subtle. Its not shoved in your face or linear like most other games. You uncover the history of the world much the same way you would in real life. 

    You go to school? sounds awfully boring for a videogame.

    Apparently stating the truth in my sig is "trolling"
    Sig typo fixed thanks to an observant stragen001.

  • mmoguy43mmoguy43 Member UncommonPosts: 2,770
  • kazmokazmo Member Posts: 715

    There isn't a single thread on this site where people don't bicker, whine and scold each other like spoiled brats.

  • popinjaypopinjay Member Posts: 6,539


    Originally posted by SnarlingWolf

     Basically you just did a big long seperated list that didn't show that the games are really even the least bit alike.


    Sure they were and you proved that, lol.


    You admitted in your post that there was a "meaningful comparison" in the list so that is the LEAST right? One? Contradict much?


    In case you missed what you agreed with in the LEAST:



    Originally posted by SnarlingWolf

    First meaningful comparison in the list


    If you chose to nitpick about the other similarities that is your choice. But those things were pretty much the same in both, regardless if they happened to be in other MMOs.. or cars.

    Cars are not MMOs. He's not asking how FFXIV is to a Ford.


    Bringing other mmos into it like SWTOR only shows that MMOS are pretty much alike.. which is what he was asking in the first place. I think it took you a whole post to figure out that was what I was pointing out.


  • TazlorTazlor Member UncommonPosts: 864

    Originally posted by aeroplane22

    There isn't a single thread on this site where people don't bicker, whine and scold each other like spoiled brats.

    lol and i bet you'll get flamed for saying that.

  • elockeelocke Member UncommonPosts: 4,335


    Originally posted by Garvon3

    Originally posted by elocke
     


    Originally posted by orlac
    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.

     
    Biggest difference is Story. VG doesn't have one. FF is all about story.


    VG does have a story actually. It's just subtle. Its not shoved in your face or linear like most other games. You uncover the history of the world much the same way you would in real life. 

    Perhaps you are mistaking background lore for story. Many people do that. They claim EQ2 and EQ have story and tout exactly what you just stated.

    History is not "current" story. FF has a "current" story, VG does not. FF's story is one of it's defining elements, therefore, FFXIV is NOT like VG.

  • SkieveSkieve Member Posts: 190

    FFXIV is nothin like vanguard, it has some similarities , but imo ffxiv is introduccing a lot of new stuf no mmo have up to now.

    And is why all the hate just keps coming.Becouse is diferent.Take a look a GW2 50min gameplay video,( just to put a random example) while it does look good to me, it looks like a solo pvp game, very similar to Dragon age , with more fluid combat, less customisation..Terra got frogster on the devs team now, and frogster means cash shops, and cash shops mean ,,,, well that.

    SWTOR, another solo pvp game, altought if ffxiv would disapoint me this would be my next try .Um what other pve group focused game is coming ? None i think.

    randomly talking my mind out.

  • HerodesHerodes Member UncommonPosts: 1,494

    There is no need for a VG vs FF, since the Developer support for Vanguard came to a halt. I wouldn´t care much if Lotro or Everquest 2 come to a stop.
    But for me this kind of game is a loss for the MMO-community. So I hoped, Square Enix got ther sh whatever... the ideas are there.

  • skeaserskeaser Member RarePosts: 4,205

    Originally posted by Herodes

    There is no need for a VG vs FF, since the Developer support for Vanguard came to a halt. I wouldn´t care much if Lotro or Everquest 2 come to a stop.

    But for me this kind of game is a loss for the MMO-community. So I hoped, Square Enix got ther sh whatever... the ideas are there.

    Vanguard is the only good MMO out, IMNSHO.

    Sig so that badges don't eat my posts.


  • ElirionElirion Member Posts: 160

    Originally posted by Herodes

    Well... whatever you people do make out of the title:

    Despite Vanguards release it is a very good PvE game. The freedom, world, the crafting, horizontal content, many races, many interesting classes.

    For those people who acknowledged both games: are there many similarities?

    Ok, as Vanguard did, SE seemed to be stupid enough to set the Graphics bar too high, but what about the rest?

     I loved FFXI, played it for 2.5 years.  When I quit playing FFXI I tried a few different MMOs but the only one that appealed to me in the same manner as FFXI was VG.  I can't comment on FFXIV and VG but I think FFXI and VG had lots of similarities especially in the areas of group play, world immersion, and overall feel of the game.  Of course, there were lots of differences too.  Depends on which areas you focus on really.

  • MuruganMurugan Member Posts: 1,494

    Originally posted by Herodes

    Well... whatever you people do make out of the title:

    Despite Vanguards release it is a very good PvE game. The freedom, world, the crafting, horizontal content, many races, many interesting classes.

    For those people who acknowledged both games: are there many similarities?

    Ok, as Vanguard did, SE seemed to be stupid enough to set the Graphics bar too high, but what about the rest?

     

    I'll try and give you an honest answer.

     

    I played FFXI from NA release until Vanguard came out, I then played Vanguard until early this year.  What I look for in an MMO is PvE with a cooperative focus and some complexity in the game mechanics.

     

    What I love specifically about Vanguard:

     

    The world art, lore (many of the big questlines), APW, the deep class system.

     

    I feel that FFXIV improves upon most of these things that I enjoyed about Vanguard.

     

    The world art-  The Vision may have been brilliant in Vanguard, but it was never really finished.  Empty dungeons, abruptly ending quests (which never finish their storylines) are not something you will see so often in a Square Enix game.  I loved the direction of Vanguard, but I was very dissapointed that the game was never given the proper treatment.  Watching the dev interviews from FFXIV you can see how seriously they take the project, they are also not a game company which caves to much and can fund this MMO with no problem.

     

    Lore- In FFXIV, like FFXI you will have well put together cut scenes emphasising the importance of story events probably one of Square Enix's biggest strongpoints.  There is already quite an in depth system with dieties, background, in short a whole world built for FFXIV so like Vanguard it is clear this is a huge focus for them, the difference is that you will come into contact with the lore/story much more often and more directly than you did in Vanguard.

     

    The classes- I loved Vanguard's classes, and I think if you haven't taken a look at the Armory system in FFXIV you might find that it too offers a lot of different playstyles, and different playstyles within the archetypes which is something Vanguard did so well.  In the end I find the way that FFXIV handles abilities, stat choices, and even their combat offer even more variety than you found in Vanguard in terms of playstyles.

     

    The biggest similiarity to Vanguard though is the fact that they are both PvE focused, which is extremely rare these days.  If you like Vanguard for the PvE I think it is at least worth giving this game an honest shot including attempting to get around its quirks and differences from Vanguard.  It isn't often this type of MMO player is catered to by such major and stable development studios, not lately at least.

  • IllyssiaIllyssia Member UncommonPosts: 1,507
    Originally posted by Garvon3


    Originally posted by elocke

     


    Originally posted by orlac

    No, it is not like Vanguard. And if you mean by "set the graphics bar too high" mean poorly coded like Vanguard, no it's not like Vanguard.



     

    Biggest difference is Story. VG doesn't have one. FF is all about story.

    VG does have a story actually. It's just subtle. Its not shoved in your face or linear like most other games. You uncover the history of the world much the same way you would in real life. 

     

    umm...I am guessing that SOE patched in a schools system then :;
Sign In or Register to comment.