Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Would you go back to SWG if it went F2P???

2

Comments

  • KazaraKazara Member UncommonPosts: 1,086

    If EQ2X is any sort of an example of how $OE would convert SWG to F2P, there is no chance in Hades that I would bother. It would cost more in the long run for a lot less game.,,,the nickle and diming would be epic.  The cash shop would completely devalue the crafting profession, as if it hasn't suffered enough already.

    I just don't see $OE investing the resosurces to make this game go F2P.

     

    image

  • DarLorkarDarLorkar Member UncommonPosts: 1,082

    You know, from reading on this site, you might think there had been millions of folks playing SWG before they "fixed" it: :P

    The idea that they would mess with a successful game in such a fashion, just crazy:) Obviously they had huge problems, and yes, they may well have made them tons worse, but the game was not doing as well as some folks memory has it.

     

    Now back to topic,  No, i would not mess with F2P SWG or any other game that has a sub model to it.  If you like and enjpy a game then pay the dang sub.

    It is cheaper in the end, and all these horrid cash shop games need to go away. Doubt that they will though, but i really wish they would.

  • agagaagaga Member Posts: 273

    Originally posted by arieste

    Probably not.  But I WOULD pay $30 a month sub if they redid the game with AoC's graphics engine and spent a year or so fixing & adding all the mechanics that were initially supposed to be in-game then relaunched with the Pre-NGE ruleset + JTL.  But yeah, we all know that ship's sailed.  

    I'd pay fifty bucks a month for that.

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035

    Hell yeah I would, plus, if they actually started making some scrilla through the changeover they might start adding to the game like they used to. I'd be all for that.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • WumiWumi Member UncommonPosts: 85

    Originally posted by agaga

    Originally posted by arieste

    Probably not.  But I WOULD pay $30 a month sub if they redid the game with AoC's graphics engine and spent a year or so fixing & adding all the mechanics that were initially supposed to be in-game then relaunched with the Pre-NGE ruleset + JTL.  But yeah, we all know that ship's sailed.  

    I'd pay fifty bucks a month for that.

    this

    Wumi - SWG - Bloodfin - Cancelled
    Wumi - WoW - Eu-Kazzak - Cancelled
    Bulldozer - Aion - Eu-Kahrun - Cancelled
    Wumi - Rift - EU-Riptalon - Cancelled

  • unbound55unbound55 Member UncommonPosts: 325

    Honestly, I probably would give it a whirl.

  • SurfheartSurfheart Member Posts: 18

    Only if they had classic servers.

  • El-carpetaEl-carpeta Member Posts: 6

    I dont know.  I played galaxies since 03 and I stopped 1 yr after NGE ( I gave up hope i suppose) .  With the past year I updated and payed a 15 dollar sub for a month and started to play.  15 min later i logged and never logged back on.  That was 1 dollar a minute to try the game out.  I recon if it went FTP I would update and play again.  I suppose it would be the same, I would log off 15 min later or less since its free and not play again.  I do however think of time to time all the crap I have accumulated over time and think of all my pets (deeds) in my house since i have them from Being a Bio Engineer from pre nge.   I hear they are worth alot now.   I love the space combat,  Shoot if they lowered it to 5 dollars a month just to use my slave 1 and xwing I would sub out.  So I imagine Yea just for space  I would play.  Now thinking about it I might sub, but NOT!

  • El-carpetaEl-carpeta Member Posts: 6

    Originally posted by Wumi

    Originally posted by agaga


    Originally posted by arieste

    Probably not.  But I WOULD pay $30 a month sub if they redid the game with AoC's graphics engine and spent a year or so fixing & adding all the mechanics that were initially supposed to be in-game then relaunched with the Pre-NGE ruleset + JTL.  But yeah, we all know that ship's sailed.  

    I'd pay fifty bucks a month for that.

    I pay 50 a month as well for that as long as it included a free server transfer.   LoL its funny ... Sony is sitting on a gold mine and they keep chopping wood.

  • choujiofkonochoujiofkono Member Posts: 852

    Originally posted by Wumi

    Originally posted by agaga


    Originally posted by arieste

    Probably not.  But I WOULD pay $30 a month sub if they redid the game with AoC's graphics engine and spent a year or so fixing & adding all the mechanics that were initially supposed to be in-game then relaunched with the Pre-NGE ruleset + JTL.  But yeah, we all know that ship's sailed.  

    I'd pay fifty bucks a month for that.

    this

         I think pretty much everyone would agree.

    "I'm not cheap I'm incredibly subconsciously financially optimized"
    "The worst part of censorship is ------------------"
    image

  • ShadusShadus Member UncommonPosts: 669

    pre-cu/nge yes.
    post-cu/nge no.

    I didn't quit because of the fee, I quit because it wasn't fun anymore... I was willing to wrestle through the lousy interface because i was having fun. After that ceased, just no. Why suffer a bad interface on a bad game play experience? Getting a pile of crap for free is better than getting a pile of crap for money... marginally, you're still stuck with a pile of crap.

    I'd happily pay $15/mo for swg pre-nge.

    Shadus

  • SharkypalSharkypal Member Posts: 1,137

     

     

    Maybe there is a .000001% chance this will happen if TOR messes up their TCG revenue but I think Smudlie would rather 'sunset' the game than admit defeat (which is what returning to 'classic' servers would be tantamount to).

  • SkuzSkuz Member UncommonPosts: 1,018

    If SWG went F2P I'd definitely add it to my list of other f2p titles I enjoy and play it some.

  • ZoeMcCloskeyZoeMcCloskey Member UncommonPosts: 1,372

    Unless it was a Classic server with the original game setup, absolutely positively unequivocally NO never zero chance. 

    I hate the changes they made and could explode vile venomous words all over the screen about my thoughts on their NGE debacle.

    image
  • Kaynos1972Kaynos1972 Member Posts: 2,316

    Nope unless they open a pre-ncu server.

  • musicmannmusicmann Member UncommonPosts: 1,095

    From someone who played at launch and very little of the NGE, i went back to the other pre cu server and i will admit, even though it evoked some old fond memories, it was like watching paint dry.

    The game back then just lacked any real SW content and it is just painful to look at compared to what is coming out in the near future.

  • dragonbranddragonbrand Member UncommonPosts: 441

    Originally posted by TruthXHurts

    (Mod Edit)

     Since the OP stated "pre-CU" in his post I doubt that I am the moron, as it seems you were the one that took the liberty to make an ignorant comparison. And as you so eloquently stated pre-CU was released before WOW (as the other poster stated who disagreed with your WOW-clone comment), which only furthers the arguments made that SWG is not a WOW-clone.

    For the rest of us, SWG is pre-CU. What came after is a different game. That you assume for us SWG vets, that anything after NGE is also SWG, you fail. 

    So keep punching yourself in the face . . . its humorous.

    Gaming since Avalon Hill was making board games.

    Played SWG, EVE, Fallen Earth, LOTRO, Rift, Vanguard, WoW, SWTOR, TSW, Tera
    Tried Aoc, Aion, EQII, RoM, Vindictus, Darkfail, DDO, GW, PotBS

  • agagaagaga Member Posts: 273

    Originally posted by Sharkypal

     

     

    Maybe there is a .000001% chance this will happen if TOR messes up their TCG revenue but I think Smudlie would rather 'sunset' the game than admit defeat (which is what returning to 'classic' servers would be tantamount to).

    I agree with this.

    I think after it became generally accepted that SWG was a failure, the situation suddenly was not about the money.

    If Smedley brought bacl a classic pre-NGE server he would be admitting that he was wrong to bring in the NGE in the first place. That would mean all the bonuses and wages he got from Sony since 2005 were misplaced - it would also mean that LA had been working with a partner that had seriously downgraded its revenue stream for five years. He'd never be able to survive in the job. And that's why they can never bring back classic SWG - to save Smedley's face.

  • SanHorSanHor Member UncommonPosts: 336

    Originally posted by agaga

    Originally posted by Sharkypal

     

     

    Maybe there is a .000001% chance this will happen if TOR messes up their TCG revenue but I think Smudlie would rather 'sunset' the game than admit defeat (which is what returning to 'classic' servers would be tantamount to).

    I agree with this.

    I think after it became generally accepted that SWG was a failure, the situation suddenly was not about the money.

    If Smedley brought bacl a classic pre-NGE server he would be admitting that he was wrong to bring in the NGE in the first place. That would mean all the bonuses and wages he got from Sony since 2005 were misplaced - it would also mean that LA had been working with a partner that had seriously downgraded its revenue stream for five years. He'd never be able to survive in the job. And that's why they can never bring back classic SWG - to save Smedley's face.

    He doesn't have to. Everyone knows (including himself) that NGE was a bad idea. Keeping NGE running does not prove the opposite...

  • BloodnokBloodnok Member UncommonPosts: 75

    I would return if it went F2P. Sure, I know the combat mechanics stink worse than a dead tauntaun, but I miss the atmosphere and ambience, especially on Tatooine. I'd just hang around there.

    image

  • summitussummitus Member UncommonPosts: 1,414

    Yup sure would.  :)

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,060

    I certainly would give it a try (never have) if it went F2P, always wondered what the game was like, even in its current faded state.

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • Daffid011Daffid011 Member UncommonPosts: 7,945

    No.  The subscription fee is not what keeps me away from the game.  In any of its versions. 

     

  • BurntvetBurntvet Member RarePosts: 3,465

    Since I could play this game anytime I want, for free (gave my main acct away to a friend that still plays) and don't, I am going with NO.

    For me, this game is not worth my somewhat limited free time.

  • sungodrasungodra Member Posts: 1,376

    yes, probably.

    image


    "When it comes to GW2 any game is fair game"

Sign In or Register to comment.