The superior geometry performance of the recent architectures for GeForce cards mean that they're better at CSAA than Radeon cards. The Radeon HD 6950 and 6970 are the only AMD cards that even offer CSAA, though I'd expect that future cards of the same and future architectures will offer it as well.
Edited your post for the quote..lol. Wow...always wondered about this stuff but was too lazy to look around for the info. Now I know. Thanks for the good and very informative read.
Edit: Unlike some others..I don't care if you are or are not a mathematician...you taught me something and that's good enough.
I don't think he claimed to be. But he clearly has a very strong background in it.
Actually, I originally did, but then edited that out of the post. My real point was that Shinami is trying to use terminology and notation that he doesn't understand (though he might have understood it at some point in the past, as it's not quite as bad as a student who tries to substitute O = 6), and is using it wildly wrong.
I don't think he claimed to be. But he clearly has a very strong background in it.
Actually, I originally did, but then edited that out of the post. My real point was that Shinami is trying to use terminology and notation that he doesn't understand (though he might have understood it at some point in the past, as it's not quite as bad as a student who tries to substitute O = 6), and is using it wildly wrong.
Unfortunately, I'm probably the one person who couldn't criticize him there. It's well known that biologists are the worst mathematicians on the face of the Earth. That's why it's good that most of our science is qualitative
Comments
Edited your post for the quote..lol. Wow...always wondered about this stuff but was too lazy to look around for the info. Now I know. Thanks for the good and very informative read.
Edit: Unlike some others..I don't care if you are or are not a mathematician...you taught me something and that's good enough.
Actually, I originally did, but then edited that out of the post. My real point was that Shinami is trying to use terminology and notation that he doesn't understand (though he might have understood it at some point in the past, as it's not quite as bad as a student who tries to substitute O = 6), and is using it wildly wrong.
Unfortunately, I'm probably the one person who couldn't criticize him there. It's well known that biologists are the worst mathematicians on the face of the Earth. That's why it's good that most of our science is qualitative