Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

1 Girl's Opinion on Modern FPS games (Console & Pc)

24

Comments

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by GTwander
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by GTwander
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt

    BTW to everyone that is refering me to a game I never stated I was looking for a game did I?

    Their point is that those kinda of games exist, but are as *niche* as they get, only adding to the point that what sells the most is the most unrealistic. Plus, Arma 2 wouldn't even be on the radar these days if not for the whole DayZ mod, which again, is dividing players by their penchant for realism. Some just can't hack it.

    Once again though I'm not actually asking for some games company to come on here read my post and say "Oh we must make a game like this" now am I? I am simply just making a Point.

    Then read my take on your points. Some of it should change your mind, and if not, I'm not doing it right...

    is it possible you can send me your points in a message ? if your points are that good then you wont mind doing so :3 ty

    ....

    Bottom of page 1

    http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/post/5048094#5048094

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • Mage_FrancisMage_Francis Member Posts: 53
    Originally posted by nateslo
    Originally posted by Mage_Francis

    Wow that's a big wall of text and honestly didn't read it.  Have you played arma 2?  

     

    Read a little and it seems like your souly describing COD, and it's not a "aimer" it's a recticle...

    Actually, it's not "recticle", it's a reticle...

    My bad your right :)

  • AdamTMAdamTM Member Posts: 1,376
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by AdamTM
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt

    AdamTM I'm not going to argue about this with you, I know there was female soldiers & thats the end of it, I dont care what you say, seriusly do you get a kick off people mis spelling things just cus they may or maynot be dyslexic ? maybe your just a bully ? ever considered that ?

    Im telling you because your post is borderline unreadable.

    I can take a fair amount of errors, and i dont have perfect spelling and grammar myself either, I also dont care about apostrophes, as you can clearly tell.

    This is feedback, for you.

    On the internet, how you write, so you are perceived.

    PS: you are still wrong on your history.

    well it obviusly reads perfectly fine as you read it didnt you? lol so if you can read it then its fine just leave it, also I never asking people to come along & start telling me how I should & Should not right MY Thread, francly your being completely off topic & if you dont stop I will report you for abusive behaviuor.

    PS: I'm not, you go talk to vetran's from the German, US & UK militaries that can tell you themselfs that there was & then maybe you can talk to me lol

    Take or leave my criticism, but don't threaten me with moderation.

    Also you are still wrong about the history, just prove me wrong if I am, I will appreciate the correction and new information.

    Especially as a German I would be very happy to learn some new facts about my country.

    image
  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by AdamTM
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by AdamTM
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt

    AdamTM I'm not going to argue about this with you, I know there was female soldiers & thats the end of it, I dont care what you say, seriusly do you get a kick off people mis spelling things just cus they may or maynot be dyslexic ? maybe your just a bully ? ever considered that ?

    Im telling you because your post is borderline unreadable.

    I can take a fair amount of errors, and i dont have perfect spelling and grammar myself either, I also dont care about apostrophes, as you can clearly tell.

    This is feedback, for you.

    On the internet, how you write, so you are perceived.

    PS: you are still wrong on your history.

    well it obviusly reads perfectly fine as you read it didnt you? lol so if you can read it then its fine just leave it, also I never asking people to come along & start telling me how I should & Should not right MY Thread, francly your being completely off topic & if you dont stop I will report you for abusive behaviuor.

    PS: I'm not, you go talk to vetran's from the German, US & UK militaries that can tell you themselfs that there was & then maybe you can talk to me lol

    Take or leave my criticism, but don't threaten me with moderation.

    Also you are still wrong about the history, just prove me wrong if I am, I will appreciate the correction and new information.

    Especially as a German I would be very happy to learn some new facts about my country.

    [mod edit]

    if I could go find the war vetran's sure I would love to get them for you to talk to but I dont fancy tracking down some old people that traveled Hundreds of Miles to be at a War comemoration & Reanactment show, at the end of the day you believe what you want to believe its not like it matters anyway, I know I'm right & thats what matters to me & I'm happy with that. 

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49

    GT I read your commenst & I do Agree with much of what you said but there is much I dont Agree with, if you would like to talk more about it feel free to leave me a message but I think as for this Thread I dont fancy posting much more as I have allready had to report 2 people & I dont fancy adding fuel to the flames.

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035

    Jesus.... don't report people for disagreeing with you. I have yet to see anything aimed at you, as a person, to warrant it.

    If you are reporting based on people being sexist, well, that's the very reason they won't make female avatars in the first place. Again, it's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. Bet your money that someone will cry louder the moment they have female avatars that die in horrible ways during multiplayert, calling it a travesty to portray women in that way. This is the kind of stuff the evening news feeds would KILL for.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by GTwander

    Jesus.... don't report people for disagreeing with you. I have yet to see anything aimed at you, as a person, to warrant it.

    I didnt report anyone for there opinion just the people that went off Topic & started slagging off my Spelling

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49

    I did actually give Prior warning to people about that so its there own fualt for harrassing me, I dont take bullying or Harrasment of any kind light heartedly

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035

    I got reported once for telling a guy that "nobody should use the word 'ridiculous' if they can't spell it right'.

    I call BS.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by GTwander

    I got reported once for telling a guy that "nobody should use the word 'ridiculous' if they can't spell it right'.

    I call BS.

    like I said I did give Prior Warning they could have stopped now couldnt they ?

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035

    "no means no", yeah?

    /buhdumtish

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by GTwander

    "no means no", yeah?

    /buhdumtish

    well if I ask someone to stop Harrassing me I expect them to stop not continue to Harras me, espcially because it had nothing to do with the topic at hand.

    flame me for what I said is 1 thing but flame me because my spelling standards dont meet that persons standards then thats just Harrasment & that I do not stand for at all, I take it deadly seriuos & will allways do so as I detest any form of bullying

  • zytinzytin Member UncommonPosts: 202

     

    The problem is that you threw up on this post all sorts of complaints that you have about a specific genre, and when anyone tries to point out that there actually ARE games that do not have the issues that you have a problem with, you say you aren't interested in them.  Because of this, it is very difficult to understand what your point is.

     

    But I'll respond to your original post point for point.  

     

    1. Limited amount of attachments.  Buttstocks are basically all the same thing.  Some are kaleidoscopes, some fold, but they all function the same.  There's really going to be no difference between using one buttstock over the other, except for a recent one that has just been made that allows you to do slide button firing with it (http://www.gunblast.com/SlideFire.htm).  I am hoping to get this to replace the buttstock on my AR15.  Other attachments would include things such as attaching various scopes/sites/magnifiers, flashlights, bayonets, etc, and most of those attachments really aren't going to improve your situation in a highly stressful fire fight.  You can also add all the other things you listed, but it would not be practical or even possible to add them all.  If you are using a high powered scope to snipe with at 1k yards, for example, you really have no need for a laser or holographic sight, or even a magnifier. If you have a grenade launcher attached to the bottom of your gun, you aren't going to have a tripod.

    2.  Good point, but pointless in the sort of games that BF and CoD are.  There are a few games that actually do this, and not many people play them.

    3. I have never met a US female infantry person.

    4. This is why it's a game.  So what?  It would be the same thing as calling in an airstrike in RL, except because it's a video game, they let you have a little role switching in the middle of the story (the combat).  For a few moments you get to play a gunner on a plane or helicopter or whatever. 

    5. There are games like this.  You can play them.  There are games that don't do this, you can play those.  The choice really is yours.  You're complaining about having to play something you don't have to play....

    6. Good idea, and makes more sense.

    7. There are games like this.  Not many people play them comparably to CoD or BF games

    8.  If you wanted to introduce weather as a factor in battles, then you would also have to implement whether a military force has had any training in those environments.  Russians destroyed the Germans in WW2 because it was so damn cold, and the Germans weren't used to it.  US forces train all over the state and in other countries because of the different climates and altitudes so that they are acclimated to those conditions when they have to fight in them.

     

    So you are making a list of things that you think should be different in a genre.  You however aren't looking to play a game that fits what you want in a game.  You are arguing with anyone who tries to provide you with information on games that have exactly what you want.   And now you're reporting people who are pointing out the flaws in your PHB post.

    Troll much?   

  • chefdiablochefdiablo Member Posts: 202

    I don't play FPS games and have little to add to this thread aside from the obvious immature trolling from some people about spelling.

    This site has members from all around the world and we are generally expected to accept mispelled words. Plenty of people have challenges to overcome in order to communicate with others. A bit of maturity could be exercised here as the points raised are conversation worthy.

    Agree with the opinions or not, but the attacks are not required.

  • zytinzytin Member UncommonPosts: 202
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by GTwander

    "no means no", yeah?

    /buhdumtish

    well if I ask someone to stop Harrassing me I expect them to stop not continue to Harras me, espcially because it had nothing to do with the topic at hand.

    flame me for what I said is 1 thing but flame me because my spelling standards dont meet that persons standards then thats just Harrasment & that I do not stand for at all, I take it deadly seriuos & will allways do so as I detest any form of bullying

     

     

    It's not the spelling that anyone is complaining about.  Bad spelling can be forgiven.  I have HORRIBLE spelling.  In fact, I'll even not spell check this post just so that you can see how bad my spelling is.

     It's your grammar that is at issue. You are incorrectly using a lot of words which is making your written comments difficult to understand.  This isn't so much an issue when one is reading a paragraph or a few sentences.  It becomes tedeaous and unbearable when one is faced with a multi-page wall of text. The reader's brain has to pause to correctly identify the meaning of what you are writing, which takes extra time and becomes frustrating for the reader.  This is not aimed towards you in particular.

    The fact that you would be offended when someone attempts to help you be a better person is beyond me.  It's not harrassment when someone is pointing out that failing to grasp basic grammatical skills makes you look dumb to whoever reads what you are writing, even if you aren't dumb in real life.

    No, I'm not calling you a moron, idiot, retarded or dumb.  I'm simply pointing out that your misuse of grammar makes you appear to be uneducated.  This is an observation.  

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035
    Originally posted by zytin

    It's not the spelling that anyone is complaining about.  Bad spelling can be forgiven. 

     It's your grammar that is at issue.

    I can't see giving a shit on either side of this argument.

    Who cares?

     

    When I said the thing about not being able to use the word 'ridiculous' if you can't spell it, I was being facetious... I can't see someone getting that butt-hurt about it... but then again, I've been warned for using the term "butt-hurt" as well. Mods assist "he who bitches first", so for the love of God, just drop this trite shit.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • zytinzytin Member UncommonPosts: 202

    I agree.  I could really care less, it's just the whole 'I'm going to report you for harrassing me because you told me the difference between their there and they're!" is a bit over the top, and since I've been reported and will be banned anyway, I might as well get a couple extra licks in. ;)

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035

    Warning, at best... unless said mod chooses to take sides.

    Just, please, don't make a whole "screw you MMORPG.com" thread like the rest of em.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • KonfessKonfess Member RarePosts: 1,667

    Here, here. Great write up. Are you considering service in the military? For my MMOFPS need I played Planetside. It has all the faults you listed, but should meet the need of all those fps fans. I hate when a fps fan asks why MMORPGs don’t innovate by incorporating more fps game play. Why? For the very reasons you just listed, that’s why.

    Now let me address some of your points, on behalf of developers.

    Point #1: 2 attachments keeps the balance math simple algebra. Open it up to 8 attachments and it becomes multivariable calculus, and the devs can’t balance their game.

    Point #2: Because it’s what he player base demands. They want a phantom reticule, and no laser sight giving up their location. You make a game that doesn’t have crosshairs in the center of the screen, and you’ll get chastised for not including a standard feature.

    Point #3: Let me refer to these wiki pages regarding Women in the military, & Women in combat. Devs see women models in fps as a waste of money and memory space. I don’t have a dev on the record as saying this. I also know that female models are available for some fps as mods. The reasoning as I see it, society doesn’t want to see women avatars killed in fps. BTW Planetside has female avatars.

    Point #5: Fans of fps have always been against the trinity in MMORPGs. The claim to want their games to be about skill and tactics. But fps fans cry bloody murder when a game employs healing and/or death penalty as an incentive for tactical play.

    Point #7: Fans of fps hate reality in their fps game play.

    Point #8: Once again Planeside had all that weather, but no night. Fans of fps don’t want their visibility impaired. You give them night and they will turn it off or correct for it with settings or hacks. What do I hear from fans of fps with night? They just don’t play in the night cycles.

    Congratulations on your post. It just confirms for me, that regardless what fans of fps say about MMORPG combat being faceroll. Fps combat is the most dumbed down, and simplistic combat system deployed in gaming today. And should never be considered as innovation for MMORPGs.

    Pardon any spelling errors
    Konfess your cyns and some maybe forgiven
    Boy: Why can't I talk to Him?
    Mom: We don't talk to Priests.
    As if it could exist, without being payed for.
    F2P means you get what you paid for. Pay nothing, get nothing.
    Even telemarketers wouldn't think that.
    It costs money to play.  Therefore P2W.

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by zytin

     

    The problem is that you threw up on this post all sorts of complaints that you have about a specific genre, and when anyone tries to point out that there actually ARE games that do not have the issues that you have a problem with, you say you aren't interested in them.  Because of this, it is very difficult to understand what your point is.

    I put the post as to see other peoples opinions on Realism VS Modern FPS games, just to clear that up for you. 

    But I'll respond to your original post point for point.  

     

    1. Limited amount of attachments.  Buttstocks are basically all the same thing.  Some are kaleidoscopes, some fold, but they all function the same.  There's really going to be no difference between using one buttstock over the other, except for a recent one that has just been made that allows you to do slide button firing with it (http://www.gunblast.com/SlideFire.htm).  I am hoping to get this to replace the buttstock on my AR15.  Other attachments would include things such as attaching various scopes/sites/magnifiers, flashlights, bayonets, etc, and most of those attachments really aren't going to improve your situation in a highly stressful fire fight.  You can also add all the other things you listed, but it would not be practical or even possible to add them all.  If you are using a high powered scope to snipe with at 1k yards, for example, you really have no need for a laser or holographic sight, or even a magnifier. If you have a grenade launcher attached to the bottom of your gun, you aren't going to have a tripod.

    yes they maybe mostly pointless in a heavy fire fight but in reality they would still be there, but that would be more as the gun you get issued would come with it allready attached, also I never said you could have a Bipod & Grenade Luancher I Siad you could have a Bipod & Fore Grip (this is a common thing to have attached in the UK Military)

    2.  Good point, but pointless in the sort of games that BF and CoD are.  There are a few games that actually do this, and not many people play them.

    I didnt actually cliam it to be a good Idea I just personnaly would like to play a game that does have this feature :3

    3. I have never met a US female infantry person.

    thats because there arent any in the Infantry but there are in Special Ops, Navy, Sniper Cores (in the UK there are anyway) & many other roles in the Military, but there are Females in the UK Infantry & some European Military's.

    4. This is why it's a game.  So what?  It would be the same thing as calling in an airstrike in RL, except because it's a video game, they let you have a little role switching in the middle of the story (the combat).  For a few moments you get to play a gunner on a plane or helicopter or whatever.

    I get that but thats why there are games were you can choose to start a round in a Helicopter etc, personnaly I dont feel as if there is the need for it to be a instant switch you can do just cus you killed say 7 or 8 people in a row.

    5. There are games like this.  You can play them.  There are games that don't do this, you can play those.  The choice really is yours.  You're complaining about having to play something you don't have to play....

    I actually never complianed about having to play anything I was just pointing things out :3

    6. Good idea, and makes more sense.

    TY I think it would make a much better system then Perks as it makes leveling your character more indepth, persoannly I like that sort of thing but once again thats just me.

    7. There are games like this.  Not many people play them comparably to CoD or BF games.

    True but still not asking for some game to play.

    8.  If you wanted to introduce weather as a factor in battles, then you would also have to implement whether a military force has had any training in those environments.  Russians destroyed the Germans in WW2 because it was so damn cold, and the Germans weren't used to it.  US forces train all over the state and in other countries because of the different climates and altitudes so that they are acclimated to those conditions when they have to fight in them.

    Very True & good point but I gues cus it is a game you could put everyone on even footing, or you could make it anouther thing that your character can progress in, like you char gets better in certian conditions as you play more in them conditions.

    So you are making a list of things that you think should be different in a genre.  You however aren't looking to play a game that fits what you want in a game.  You are arguing with anyone who tries to provide you with information on games that have exactly what you want.   And now you're reporting people who are pointing out the flaws in your PHB post.

    1. I'm just making Valid Points.

    2. I'm not Reporting anyone who is making a good point, I;m only reporting people who are directly bulllying me just cus my Spelling standard isnt to there taste.

    Troll much?

    I dont Troll I discuss :3 & just cus I dont accept any form of bullying dont make it Trolling :3

     

  • zytinzytin Member UncommonPosts: 202

    Awwwwe.  But...Please?  I've got this soapbox I've been constructing in my basement for the last year....And I'm just itching for a reason to stand on it...

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by zytin
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by GTwander

    "no means no", yeah?

    /buhdumtish

    well if I ask someone to stop Harrassing me I expect them to stop not continue to Harras me, espcially because it had nothing to do with the topic at hand.

    flame me for what I said is 1 thing but flame me because my spelling standards dont meet that persons standards then thats just Harrasment & that I do not stand for at all, I take it deadly seriuos & will allways do so as I detest any form of bullying

     

     

    It's not the spelling that anyone is complaining about.  Bad spelling can be forgiven.  I have HORRIBLE spelling.  In fact, I'll even not spell check this post just so that you can see how bad my spelling is.

     It's your grammar that is at issue. You are incorrectly using a lot of words which is making your written comments difficult to understand.  This isn't so much an issue when one is reading a paragraph or a few sentences.  It becomes tedeaous and unbearable when one is faced with a multi-page wall of text. The reader's brain has to pause to correctly identify the meaning of what you are writing, which takes extra time and becomes frustrating for the reader.  This is not aimed towards you in particular.

    The fact that you would be offended when someone attempts to help you be a better person is beyond me.  It's not harrassment when someone is pointing out that failing to grasp basic grammatical skills makes you look dumb to whoever reads what you are writing, even if you aren't dumb in real life.

    No, I'm not calling you a moron, idiot, retarded or dumb.  I'm simply pointing out that your misuse of grammar makes you appear to be uneducated.  This is an observation.  

    well please look at it from my point of view, wear I'm from what I wrote read perfectly fine, just because it dont were your from dont mean you should judge people, & frankly they were not trying to help me be a better person & picking out every other thing you say that may be su standard is bullying not helping, you wanna help please do it somewhere else or in some other way.

  • GTwanderGTwander Member UncommonPosts: 6,035
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt

    well please look at it from my point of view, wear I'm from what I wrote read perfectly fine...

    I'd tell you that *wear* should be *where*, but I asssume it was a trap to being with.

    Writer / Musician / Game Designer

    Now Playing: Skyrim, Wurm Online, Tropico 4
    Waiting On: GW2, TSW, Archeage, The Rapture

  • zytinzytin Member UncommonPosts: 202
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt
    Originally posted by zytin

     

    The problem is that you threw up on this post all sorts of complaints that you have about a specific genre, and when anyone tries to point out that there actually ARE games that do not have the issues that you have a problem with, you say you aren't interested in them.  Because of this, it is very difficult to understand what your point is.

    I put the post as to see other peoples opinions on Realism VS Modern FPS games, just to clear that up for you. 

    But I'll respond to your original post point for point.  

     

    1. Limited amount of attachments.  Buttstocks are basically all the same thing.  Some are kaleidoscopes, some fold, but they all function the same.  There's really going to be no difference between using one buttstock over the other, except for a recent one that has just been made that allows you to do slide button firing with it (http://www.gunblast.com/SlideFire.htm).  I am hoping to get this to replace the buttstock on my AR15.  Other attachments would include things such as attaching various scopes/sites/magnifiers, flashlights, bayonets, etc, and most of those attachments really aren't going to improve your situation in a highly stressful fire fight.  You can also add all the other things you listed, but it would not be practical or even possible to add them all.  If you are using a high powered scope to snipe with at 1k yards, for example, you really have no need for a laser or holographic sight, or even a magnifier. If you have a grenade launcher attached to the bottom of your gun, you aren't going to have a tripod.

    yes they maybe mostly pointless in a heavy fire fight but in reality they would still be there, but that would be more as the gun you get issued would come with it allready attached, also I never said you could have a Bipod & Grenade Luancher I Siad you could have a Bipod & Fore Grip (this is a common thing to have attached in the UK Military)

    2.  Good point, but pointless in the sort of games that BF and CoD are.  There are a few games that actually do this, and not many people play them.

    I didnt actually cliam it to be a good Idea I just personnaly would like to play a game that does have this feature :3

    3. I have never met a US female infantry person.

    thats because there arent any in the Infantry but there are in Special Ops, Navy, Sniper Cores (in the UK there are anyway) & many other roles in the Military, but there are Females in the UK Infantry & some European Military's.

    4. This is why it's a game.  So what?  It would be the same thing as calling in an airstrike in RL, except because it's a video game, they let you have a little role switching in the middle of the story (the combat).  For a few moments you get to play a gunner on a plane or helicopter or whatever.

    I get that but thats why there are games were you can choose to start a round in a Helicopter etc, personnaly I dont feel as if there is the need for it to be a instant switch you can do just cus you killed say 7 or 8 people in a row.

    5. There are games like this.  You can play them.  There are games that don't do this, you can play those.  The choice really is yours.  You're complaining about having to play something you don't have to play....

    I actually never complianed about having to play anything I was just pointing things out :3

    6. Good idea, and makes more sense.

    TY I think it would make a much better system then Perks as it makes leveling your character more indepth, persoannly I like that sort of thing but once again thats just me.

    7. There are games like this.  Not many people play them comparably to CoD or BF games.

    True but still not asking for some game to play.

    8.  If you wanted to introduce weather as a factor in battles, then you would also have to implement whether a military force has had any training in those environments.  Russians destroyed the Germans in WW2 because it was so damn cold, and the Germans weren't used to it.  US forces train all over the state and in other countries because of the different climates and altitudes so that they are acclimated to those conditions when they have to fight in them.

    Very True & good point but I gues cus it is a game you could put everyone on even footing, or you could make it anouther thing that your character can progress in, like you char gets better in certian conditions as you play more in them conditions.

    So you are making a list of things that you think should be different in a genre.  You however aren't looking to play a game that fits what you want in a game.  You are arguing with anyone who tries to provide you with information on games that have exactly what you want.   And now you're reporting people who are pointing out the flaws in your PHB post.

    1. I'm just making Valid Points.

    2. I'm not Reporting anyone who is making a good point, I;m only reporting people who are directly bulllying me just cus my Spelling standard isnt to there taste.

    Troll much?

    I dont Troll I discuss :3 & just cus I dont accept any form of bullying dont make it Trolling :3

     

    Thank you for claifying.  Your origional post appeared to be "a woman's view on current modern day FPS games" and a list of complaints about how unrealistic they are, which I think was the basis for many of the responses that fallowed and the assumption of trolling regarding your responses.  I'll take back the trolling accusation.

  • MotokoHuttMotokoHutt Member Posts: 49
    Originally posted by GTwander
    Originally posted by MotokoHutt

    well please look at it from my point of view, wear I'm from what I wrote read perfectly fine...

    I'd tell you that *wear* should be *where*, but I asssume it was a trap to being with.

    please dont GT just please, this is me asking you & all people to stop it now, there is really no need for this at all, I just want to be left alone, I have dyslexia & have dealt with this in real life from my entire life, do all of you really think putting someone down is constructive at all ?

This discussion has been closed.