Clean the dust from your PC, heat up some Hot Pockets and prepare to die.
Does it interest me? No not really.
I prefer conflicts where if Im not the center piece then at least I play a pivotal role. In 150v150v150 10 people could walk away and have very little difference on the outcome of the fight.
Clean the dust from your PC, heat up some Hot Pockets and prepare to die.
Does it interest me? No not really.
I prefer conflicts where if Im not the center piece then at least I play a pivotal role. In 150v150v150 10 people could walk away and have very little difference on the outcome of the fight.
Not really my idea of a good time
I guess you never heard of leading an assault force of 10 people and capturing a facility while the rest of your faction keeps them distracted? Heck make 2 assault forces and take 2 facilities at once. I can understand your doubts but they are not founded on fact. With 100-150 people, you are an army and you can use the tactics of an army.
Clean the dust from your PC, heat up some Hot Pockets and prepare to die.
Does it interest me? No not really.
I prefer conflicts where if Im not the center piece then at least I play a pivotal role. In 150v150v150 10 people could walk away and have very little difference on the outcome of the fight.
Originally posted by ShakyMo 55v31v75 sounds great, that's the point, variety. Who needs this balance bullshit. It's great when your outnumbered and run harassment game / guerilla warfare or put on a heroic last stand defence.
Besides, with 5 objectives, it's more logical that you will get 5x 20v20v20 battles - or as noted above an ueven distribution like 30v30v2, 8v20v12, 22v5v30, 5v12v4 and 2v5v20. Lots of strategic ways to fight it. It's better to have all your resources in 3 objectives and hold those than it is to have your resources spread over 5 objectives and hold none.
Comments
Does it interest me? No not really.
I prefer conflicts where if Im not the center piece then at least I play a pivotal role. In 150v150v150 10 people could walk away and have very little difference on the outcome of the fight.
Not really my idea of a good time
I guess you never heard of leading an assault force of 10 people and capturing a facility while the rest of your faction keeps them distracted? Heck make 2 assault forces and take 2 facilities at once. I can understand your doubts but they are not founded on fact. With 100-150 people, you are an army and you can use the tactics of an army.
Let the zerg zerg, while I change the game.
That reminds me of DAOC a little.
Besides, with 5 objectives, it's more logical that you will get 5x 20v20v20 battles - or as noted above an ueven distribution like 30v30v2, 8v20v12, 22v5v30, 5v12v4 and 2v5v20. Lots of strategic ways to fight it. It's better to have all your resources in 3 objectives and hold those than it is to have your resources spread over 5 objectives and hold none.