300$ for a monitor.

dg29031994

I use for gaming and watch movie. Don't need to have a buildin speaker. I am deciding b/w 3 of this. If you have any other sugestion, feel free to write below. Only 300$ and bellow . Thanks

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009302

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824116568

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236302&nm_mc=EMC-IGNEFL110612&cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL110612-_-EMC-110612-Index-_-LCDMonitors-_-24236302-L013A

(the third one is 300$+ but i have promotion code, that makes it 280$)

Cleffy

Last one is the best.  The first one is a lower end 27" ASUS monitor.  You can tell by the numbering between the first and last one.  The last one was a 278, the first was a 274.  There is also an ASUS 276.

The second one lacks a display port input which leads me to believe its an older model.

AvsRock21

Go with either the Acer or the ASUS. It's a tough choice between the two you posted. The ASUS has a better response time but the Acer has a better contrast ratio. I'd probably go with the Acer. You won't notice a difference between 1ms and 5ms of response time, but you will slightly notice the difference between 80000000:1 and 100000000:1 contrast ratios. Also, Acers never seem to die, they just keep working year after year. Of course, you will start to notice color changes on any of these monitors once they get over 5+ years old though.

dg29031994

Is it worth to buy one? I really want a new 27" monitor. I'm currently using 24" 1080p monitor, and it works fine. I asked because i did some research and they say it is best to buy 27" with 1440p. 

Cleffy

At this point if you have a 1080 24" monitor, its best to wait for ultra HD which should be out in a couple years.  It has twice the pixel depth as current resolution formats.

dg29031994

Originally posted by Cleffy
At this point if you have a 1080 24" monitor, its best to wait for ultra HD which should be out in a couple years.  It has twice the pixel depth as current resolution formats.

Couple years ?

Quizzical

Those are also very, very expensive, and are currently limited to 30 frames per second.  If you want 60 frames per second at 4k resolutions, you'll need double the monitor bandwidth that current ports offer.

Cleffy

Thats currently.  Like all technology the price will drop, the bandwidth is possible with DisplayPort which is standard on all Discrete Video cards.

Zadawn

The hardware god quizzical has answered.

 

/thread

dg29031994

4k resolution ? O.O oh no no no If the 27" i wanted to get with 1080p is not worthy then i think ill save for this 27" with 1440p. any comment on this one?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236294

odinsrath

id just buy a tv with hd...its what i have used for a long time now / shrug*

eye_m

I'd take the ASUS 

Toxia

between the asus and the acer, it doesnt REALLY matter.

personally, i hate that really glossy look the acer one has. edges of a screen shouldnt be that reflective. would fuck with me non stop lol. might just be the picture tho.