It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
With today's announcement that ArenaNet would be dropping the price of Guild Wars 2, lots of players have expressed interesting in knowing some of the reasons behind that decision. We participated in a conference call with Colin Johanson to find out more about the decision and more about Guild Wars 2 going forward.
"Guild Wars 2 is in a solid place. The drop in price aligns almost exactly with what we did with Guild Wars 1. It held its value over a long period of time and we feel that Guild Wars 2 will do the same. We don't feel we need a big price drop. The game is in a really good place with consistent, steady growth."
Read more of Suzie Ford's Guild Wars 2: 'Consistent Steady Growth Puts Us in a Good Place'.
Try to be excellent to everyone you meet. You never know what someone else has seen or endured.
Comments
Best valued MMORPG out there. So much free content, so many choices of gameplay, and such fun gameplay at that. Really can't beat it (that is, unless Wildstar is going to be B2P, then it might be beat).
Can't wait for next Tuesday's big WvW Ascended patch (of course, with the ending Southsun Shores content as well).
"If I offended you, you needed it" -Corey Taylor
Umm no one even said anything negative or it was just a pre emptive damage control?
Read again
"If I offended you, you needed it" -Corey Taylor
that sir is pre emptive damage control at its finest
GW2 is in the same situation as F2P games in the sense, that they can do nothing but grow. We are going to need to start pushing for other metrics if we are really interested in "how well" a game is doing. If a sub game loses 5 players and sells 2 boxes it is shrinking, but if F2P or B2P games sell a box or a new account is created it is growing, there is no good way to really measure "loss" in non sub based games. We can look at financials, but many of the companies are privately owned and don't have to report that info. So as long as we feel the need to compare game populations for whatever reason, there isn't going to be a really good way to do this with B2P or F2P games.
The main reason I said all that is mainly to point out that "growing" doesn't mean much if we don't really know what is gained vs. lost because really nothing (accounts) can't really go down or be lost.
Edit: And just to be clear on this, I'm not trying to pick on GW2, it just happens to be the big news piece right now. Really the issue I raise is universal for F2P and B2P games that don't offer any kinid of sub that can be canceled. It will be perpetually growing because you can't (and there is no need to) "cancel."
No - usually the first 2-3 comments are usually negative with articles about GW2 or the title of the thread is negative - like this thread - http://www.mmorpg.com/discussion2.cfm/thread/385205/Im-so-confused-about-how-this-game-is-thriving.html
If that isn't negative, I don't know what is.
Game pop has never been a good metric. Revenue is the only reliable metric you can use to judge by.
I did battle with ignorance today, and ignorance won.
To exercise power costs effort and demands courage. That is why so many fail to assert rights to which they are perfectly entitled - because a right is a kind of power but they are too lazy or too cowardly to exercise it. The virtues which cloak these faults are called patience and forbearance.
You guys are great
"If I offended you, you needed it" -Corey Taylor
E.g. unique logins per week.
I would tend to agree, my main point was that in the past when sub games dominated the market, game population and income could often be used as a proxy because everyone playing had to pay to do so. Today you can't tell as readily how many people are playing from revenue.
So are you saying that NCsoft's managing director, Nah Seong Chan is hater and dont like the game ??
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2013-05-13-ncsoft-profits-up-yoy-but-down-on-last-quarter
So, did ESO have a successful launch? Yes, yes it did.By Ryan Getchell on April 02, 2014.
**On the radar: http://www.cyberpunk.net/ **
you can
How many unique people log in per week
How many hours per week does the average player play
Done
You can't derive that from revenue. And virtually nobody will tell you that after the initial couple of months after release. EVE tells you this every time you log in, but nobody else does that I'm aware of. I know Planetside 2 did that a while back, but how many times have they provided this info and when was the most recent? It is the same reason nobody other than wow (and they stopped) gave regular sub updates. If it can't be used for marketing then they aren't going to give the info.
Sony gave out that info on PS2 (and their other games like EQ & EQ2) in their march report
But yeah i know what you mean, they aren't going to give this out. but surely if GW2 has "consistent heavy growth", they would want to show off their player metrics and data, for marketing.
If that is the case then one can easily argue that Eve is not the sandbox messiah many of you claim it is. The number of players logged in has not changed much in 3 years.
I did battle with ignorance today, and ignorance won.
To exercise power costs effort and demands courage. That is why so many fail to assert rights to which they are perfectly entitled - because a right is a kind of power but they are too lazy or too cowardly to exercise it. The virtues which cloak these faults are called patience and forbearance.
The server status is a flat out lie, they did this in TERA and SWTOR as well, I remember when my server was medium and there would be a queue for all maps in WvW and 160 16/16 games in SPvP.
Now if there's no queue on any map and around 30 16/16 games my server says full. Yeah, i'm sure it's full.
lol.... Shoot... Score.
This doom and gloom thread was brought to you by Chin Up the new ultra high caffeine soft drink for gamers who just need that boost of happiness after a long forum session.
Fortunately for you, GW2 goes by Concurrent users. Yea they sold 3mil boxes but it seems those concurrent users are increasing with the rise in people playing WvW and SPvP.
They never come right out and say it but it seems like that's the case.
This is not a game.
I think he's referring to the bazillion other articles where the GW2 team claims the game is doing well and everyone shits their pants over it (ie: "articles recently"). Honestly, I don't see the point. The only AAA game I truly hated in years was TSW and I don't hope their team fails at everything they do, I just don't play it. But if anyone asks how the combat is, well...