Ive noticed that MMORPG.com, and indeed most gaming sites, are a little biased in what news they choose to report.
When it comes to a specific game, either mostly good news gets reported,or mostly bad, but almost never both. Wildstar's good sides get massive articles but the few times where all the community's complaints are mentioned, the author is trying to debunk and disagree with these complaints. In other words, I feel a side has been chosen and the reporters are not neutral informants.
Gaming reporters are not a fair and unbiased lot, other websites show the same tendencies to either prop up or shoot down a game, but I almost never meet a reporter who reports both sides of the story equally. This goes triple for MMO games.
Comments
You wont get much of an honest review from this site. Its pretty obvious if you have been reading MMORPG.com for any length of time.
AngryJoe puts out a fairly decent review of games (including Wildstar) and is much more entertaining to boot.
This only reason I hit MMORPG.com anymore is player feedback and forums.
Ive noticed that MMORPG.com, and indeed most gaming sites, are a little biased in what news they choose to report.
When it comes to a specific game, either mostly good news gets reported,or mostly bad, but almost never both. Wildstar's good sides get massive articles but the few times where all the community's complaints are mentioned, the author is trying to debunk and disagree with these complaints. In other words, I feel a side has been chosen and the reporters are not neutral informants.
Gaming reporters are not a fair and unbiased lot, other websites show the same tendencies to either prop up or shoot down a game, but I almost never meet a reporter who reports both sides of the story equally. This goes triple for MMO games.
Crashing name reservation isn't a major issue...