Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Star Citizen - current ship pipeline status

1101113151634

Comments

  • QuesaQuesa Member UncommonPosts: 1,432
    To add to the 'numbers' issues, I see little reason to consider any Roberts/CIG data to be reliable on their face.    External verification of some sort required.  Talking to folks who worked with Roberts in the past will lead you to those sorts of conclusions.
    That's a totally unrealistic standard, which is probably why you brought it up.
    Star Citizen Referral Code: STAR-DPBM-Z2P4
  • TheYear1500TheYear1500 Member UncommonPosts: 531
    Talonsin said:
    Erillion said:
    Well, maybe the 100.000+ backers that joined SC  since the Alpha is available do not consider themselves part of that "Most of us" claim ?

    Maybe that is the source of Chris Roberts "delusions" ? Another 100k extra players must have warped his personal perception of the situation.


    When do you consider the "Alpha" launched?  Until 2.0 released, there wasnt anything resembling an alpha.  2.0 released Dec 12th and your spreadsheet shows about 840k backers while today it shows 906k backers.  I dont know what math you are using but that is only 60k and nothing near the 100k you said they have.
    That number is not backers, just the number of people that have made an account on the website.  
    This number that is on 906k+ at the moment is sold ship hulls, confirmed by lando
    I just don' t know how or if it's handling melting ships.
    Ah sorry, yes it handles melted ships, you can see it drop when there is a large ship sale (as people melt smaller ships to purchase one large one)
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    edited January 2016
    Looks like CIG has three ships in concept stage at the moment:

    *  Pirate Interceptor
    *  light corvette
    *  Tevarian boarding ship: Prowler

    See transcript of the last "Reverse the Verse".

    http://imperialnews.network/2016/01/reverse-the-verse-episode-79/

    The Prowler is the 61 M$ Stretch Goal:

    "Espera Prowler – Named after the UPE military designation, the Prowler is a modernized version of the infamous Tevarin boarding craft from the First Tevarin War. With the recent discovery of the lost Tevarin planet in Kabal System, Espera’s engineers were given unmitigated access to examine the preserved ships found in several of the caches, before meticulously recreating the design choices. The Prowler’s effectiveness as a rapid personnel deployment vehicle was mainly due to its silence. The boarding was constructed using a variety of techniques to minimize its signatures and get close to unsuspecting vessels before quickly deploying their boarders via EVA. With the updated Prowler model, you will find the perfect fusion of two culture: the elegance and effectiveness of the Tevarin war machine combined with the reliability of modern UEE technology. (While lacking some of the upgrades of the modern version, vintage Tevarin-built Prowlers restored for modern spaceflight are prized by owners lucky enough to locate them.)"



    Have fun


  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    edited January 2016
    Talonsin said:
    Erillion said:
    Well, maybe the 100.000+ backers that joined SC  since the Alpha is available do not consider themselves part of that "Most of us" claim ?

    Maybe that is the source of Chris Roberts "delusions" ? Another 100k extra players must have warped his personal perception of the situation.


    When do you consider the "Alpha" launched?  Until 2.0 released, there wasnt anything resembling an alpha.  2.0 released Dec 12th and your spreadsheet shows about 840k backers while today it shows 906k backers.  I dont know what math you are using but that is only 60k and nothing near the 100k you said they have.

    Yep ... lets talk about ships .. after all this is a thread about ships:


    Well, maybe the 68.098 bought ships and their owners that joined SC  since the Alpha has been introduced do not consider themselves part of that "Most of us" claim ?

    Maybe that is the source of Chris Roberts "delusions" ? Another 68k extra ships must have warped his personal perception of the situation.

    To anyone that has contacted the owners of those 68.098 ships to confirm that they are amongst the "Most of us" crowd - hat off for accomplishing such a monumental task. Especially as they had no contact data in the first place.


    Have fun



  • LoveRemovalMachineLoveRemovalMachine Member UncommonPosts: 213
    edited January 2016
    Amana said:
    Posting about and linking to new/upcoming ships in a thread about Star Citizen's ships is not "spamming". Going to remove some of the off-topic discussion around this topic. 

    Let's take a look at the facts here. This is a FORUM to DISCUSS games and game content. Correct?

    1. Is this thread a discussion thread about ships?
    No
    2. Is this thread a copy and paste thread from the original CIG Forums?
    Yes
    3. Has any information or opinion been added to the posts? Has work been done to make this information more valuable than the original information on the CIG website?
    No
    4. Are these all similar posts?
    Yes
    5. Is a product being advertised?
    Yes, Ships

    From your rules:
    • Spamming
      • Posting the same or similar messages over and over again for the sole purpose of disrupting a board's activity is against the rules.
    • Advertisements
      • MMORPG.com does not allow users to advertise products or companies in our forums. If you want to advertise, contact admin@mmorpg.com.

    I rest my case.
    Thanks for posting this to make it clear again, you expressed it better than me. (Mine got mod edited away when I said it about the rules and the spamming.)

    This whole thread is just all about spamming the advertising of ships you can buy and allowed by this website.

    We are always in a race what our intelligence can do for us and what our intelligence does to us.

  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,183
    edited January 2016
    Amana said:
    Posting about and linking to new/upcoming ships in a thread about Star Citizen's ships is not "spamming". Going to remove some of the off-topic discussion around this topic. 

    Let's take a look at the facts here. This is a FORUM to DISCUSS games and game content. Correct?

    1. Is this thread a discussion thread about ships?
    No
    2. Is this thread a copy and paste thread from the original CIG Forums?
    Yes
    3. Has any information or opinion been added to the posts? Has work been done to make this information more valuable than the original information on the CIG website?
    No
    4. Are these all similar posts?
    Yes
    5. Is a product being advertised?
    Yes, Ships

    From your rules:
    • Spamming
      • Posting the same or similar messages over and over again for the sole purpose of disrupting a board's activity is against the rules.
    • Advertisements
      • MMORPG.com does not allow users to advertise products or companies in our forums. If you want to advertise, contact admin@mmorpg.com.

    I rest my case.
    Thanks for posting this to make it clear again. (Mine got mod edited away when I said it about the rules and the spamming.)

    This whole thread is just all about spamming the advertising of ships you can buy and allowed by this website.
    If they viewed it as advertising they'd act on it as being so would they not?

     I don't see it that way, just looks like information on various ships, their designs as well as developmental status. Nothing in the TOS I see against that. Although I wonder what it says about following a poster into every thread they're in accusing them of being paid, a shill or what have you, I wonder if that would be harassment or trolling when done enough?

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • LoveRemovalMachineLoveRemovalMachine Member UncommonPosts: 213
    edited January 2016
    Distopia said:
    Amana said:
    Posting about and linking to new/upcoming ships in a thread about Star Citizen's ships is not "spamming". Going to remove some of the off-topic discussion around this topic. 

    Let's take a look at the facts here. This is a FORUM to DISCUSS games and game content. Correct?

    1. Is this thread a discussion thread about ships?
    No
    2. Is this thread a copy and paste thread from the original CIG Forums?
    Yes
    3. Has any information or opinion been added to the posts? Has work been done to make this information more valuable than the original information on the CIG website?
    No
    4. Are these all similar posts?
    Yes
    5. Is a product being advertised?
    Yes, Ships

    From your rules:
    • Spamming
      • Posting the same or similar messages over and over again for the sole purpose of disrupting a board's activity is against the rules.
    • Advertisements
      • MMORPG.com does not allow users to advertise products or companies in our forums. If you want to advertise, contact admin@mmorpg.com.

    I rest my case.
    Thanks for posting this to make it clear again. (Mine got mod edited away when I said it about the rules and the spamming.)

    This whole thread is just all about spamming the advertising of ships you can buy and allowed by this website.
    If they viewed it as advertising they'd act on it as being so would they not?

     I don't see it that way, just looks like information on various ships, their designs as well as developmental status. Nothing in the TOS I see against that. Although I wonder what it says about following a poster into every thread they're in accusing them of being paid, a shill or what have you, I wonder if that would be harassment or trolling when done enough?
    Seems like you are following me.

    Also I am against these monetisation schemes and whaling in games. And I fight that.
    We are always in a race what our intelligence can do for us and what our intelligence does to us.

  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,183
    edited January 2016
    Distopia said:

    Thanks for posting this to make it clear again. (Mine got mod edited away when I said it about the rules and the spamming.)

    This whole thread is just all about spamming the advertising of ships you can buy and allowed by this website.
    If they viewed it as advertising they'd act on it as being so would they not?

     I don't see it that way, just looks like information on various ships, their designs as well as developmental status. Nothing in the TOS I see against that. Although I wonder what it says about following a poster into every thread they're in accusing them of being paid, a shill or what have you, I wonder if that would be harassment or trolling when done enough?
    Seems like you are following me.
    Right, can't recall interacting with you in any way on this forum before but whatever you say there chief.. BTW I was referring to Snuffles :)

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • ArglebargleArglebargle Member EpicPosts: 3,485
    Quesa said:
    To add to the 'numbers' issues, I see little reason to consider any Roberts/CIG data to be reliable on their face.    External verification of some sort required.  Talking to folks who worked with Roberts in the past will lead you to those sorts of conclusions.
    That's a totally unrealistic standard, which is probably why you brought it up.


    Cautious, not unrealistic.   Roberts is not reliable.  


    Though if you are a die hard believer in the game, you should continue to buy these ships.  Otherwise the production will start to founder under the weight of it's bad management.  

    If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.

  • MrSnufflesMrSnuffles Member UncommonPosts: 1,117
    Distopia said:
    Distopia said:

    Thanks for posting this to make it clear again. (Mine got mod edited away when I said it about the rules and the spamming.)

    This whole thread is just all about spamming the advertising of ships you can buy and allowed by this website.
    If they viewed it as advertising they'd act on it as being so would they not?

     I don't see it that way, just looks like information on various ships, their designs as well as developmental status. Nothing in the TOS I see against that. Although I wonder what it says about following a poster into every thread they're in accusing them of being paid, a shill or what have you, I wonder if that would be harassment or trolling when done enough?
    Seems like you are following me.
    Right, can't recall interacting with you in any way on this forum before but whatever you say there chief.. BTW I was referring to Snuffles :)
    What? You following me?
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    "It's pretty simple, really. If your only intention in posting about a particular game or topic is to be negative, then yes, you should probably move on. Voicing a negative opinion is fine, continually doing so on the same game is basically just trolling."
    - Michael Bitton
    Community Manager, MMORPG.com

    "As an online discussion about Star Citizen grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Derek Smart approaches 1" - MrSnuffles's law

    "I am jumping in here a bit without knowing exactly what you all or talking about." 
    - SEANMCAD

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
  • goobsnewsgoobsnews Member UncommonPosts: 220
    I hope the work on their ships is going better than their work on the systems...since they only exist in text files and concept art I mean.
  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Member RarePosts: 2,100
    How much for this ship?



  • goobsnewsgoobsnews Member UncommonPosts: 220
    Ahhh the human centipede by RSI, a sturdy ship to be sure.
  • ThourneThourne Member RarePosts: 757
    Man I just can't unsee that and right before bed.
    Some of those contortions are gonna invade my dreams I just know it.
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    edited February 2016
    Looks like CIG corrected a typo on the homepage (top of the homepage, in green letters)

    Free fly week now lasts until February 8th (the full announced week), not February 1st.

    As mentioned before by another poster, this time you do NOT need to pay for a basic pledge package first - so this time its completely free to help test the current Alpha build. Keep in mind, this is NOT a feature complete demo version.This is a not-feature complete Alpha build with the following features enabled:

    https://robertsspaceindustries.com/feature-list



    Have fun

  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329

    Sneak Peek


    Have fun
  • NomadMorlockNomadMorlock Member UncommonPosts: 815
    Still waiting for the next generation of the 300 Series. Interior design, cargo answers, etc...
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    Still waiting for the next generation of the 300 Series. Interior design, cargo answers, etc...
    --> maybe interesting for you:

    "News From Around The Verse
    Los Angeles
    • Redoing the stats of the 325A (Stats overhaul, not a rebuild on the ship.) "

    Have fun


  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    Free fly week extended until February 14 th.
    (see green letters on top of official homepage)


    Have fun
  • TheYear1500TheYear1500 Member UncommonPosts: 531
    Erillion said:

    Sneak Peek


    Have fun
    Ah the ship that was stated to come out last month.  
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    MISC Reliant interior design (Researcher - Variant A)



    there are many more pictures, also for other variants- thats just an example. Alas, cannot link the pictures directly.


    Have fun
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    MISC Starfarer - new Art Sneak peak

    26:28 – Art Sneak Peek

    Also quite a few new pictures on Facebook etc. on the Xi'an Scout "Reliant". The following picture is from the subscriber art vault.

    httpsrobertsspaceindustriescommediar5mjrk2c5ofzcrsourceXian_scout_lightingjpg


    Have fun


  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    edited February 2016
    Ideas for Endeavor Science Ship interior design (with pictures)

    https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/312711/ideas-endeavor-interior-design

    If CIG has not hired that guy, By Grabthar's Hammer they should do it !!

    https://www.artstation.com/artist/sofianmoumene


    Have fun



  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,329
    edited February 2016
    New Idris Interior shots (WIP Work in progress) from the subscriber picture vault (there are more, cannot link it directly):









    Have fun
Sign In or Register to comment.