Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Wouldn't OS X ports generate revenue for and interest in waning MMO's?

JWW8767JWW8767 Member UncommonPosts: 3

I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ...

Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X.

Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp). 

Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet.

Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)

Comments

  • PepeqPepeq Member UncommonPosts: 1,977
    I don't want a port, I want an actual client.  Most Mac ports are just the windows version stuffed into a wrapper.  It plays like crap because it was never written for OpenGL.  Anyone can stuff a game into a wrapper... whether it plays for crap is another thing.
  • waynejr2waynejr2 Member EpicPosts: 7,771
    Originally posted by JWW8767

    I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ...

    Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X.

    Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp). 

    Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet.

    Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)

    From your point of view it is trivial.  IN reality, it is not.   Your position is easy as you can just say something and don't have to spend resources to accomplish something.  In the real world, they do.

    If you think is was so trivial and at a trivial cost, every game would simply do it as it would be trivial.

    http://www.youhaventlived.com/qblog/2010/QBlog190810A.html  

    Epic Music:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAigCvelkhQ&list=PLo9FRw1AkDuQLEz7Gvvaz3ideB2NpFtT1

    https://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary_msdos?&sort=-downloads&page=1

    Kyleran:  "Now there's the real trick, learning to accept and enjoy a game for what it offers rather than pass on what might be a great playing experience because it lacks a few features you prefer."

    John Henry Newman: "A man would do nothing if he waited until he could do it so well that no one could find fault."

    FreddyNoNose:  "A good game needs no defense; a bad game has no defense." "Easily digested content is just as easily forgotten."

    LacedOpium: "So the question that begs to be asked is, if you are not interested in the game mechanics that define the MMORPG genre, then why are you playing an MMORPG?"




  • udonudon Member UncommonPosts: 1,803
    Originally posted by JWW8767

    I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ...

    Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X.

    Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp). 

    Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet.

    Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)

    Depending on the technology used to write the original game it might be near the original cost to develop the engine of the game again to port it.  Just a guess somewhere like 20-40% of the original cost.  I would bet most of the games that are ported where written using cross platform tools from the start making it a lot easier and cheaper task.

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,531

    As a fraction of the cost of developing a game, the cost of making a Mac version is going to be small but not trivial.  None of the artwork or writing needs to be redone, but you're adding a lot of debugging cost, at least if you expect the Mac version to be reasonably polished.  If you're using Visual Studio or DirectX to do Windows-specific stuff, that also has to be completely redone for a Mac version.

    But as a fraction of the revenue you'd get from a game, the extra revenue that you'd get from having a Mac version is also small.  It's much smaller than the OS marketshare that Mac has.  People don't pick an OS at random; it's well known that many games are Windows-only, so gamers are much less likely to buy a Mac than non-gamers.  Even gamers who do buy a Mac might still play your game without a Mac version via Bootcamp or because they also have a PC.  The extra revenue you get from having a Mac version is only the revenue from people who would not have played at all without a Mac version; revenue from people who buy a Mac version but would have bought a Windows version if there were no Mac version isn't attributable to the existence of a Mac version.

  • DarLorkarDarLorkar Member UncommonPosts: 1,082
    Originally posted by Quizzical

    As a fraction of the cost of developing a game, the cost of making a Mac version is going to be small but not trivial.  None of the artwork or writing needs to be redone, but you're adding a lot of debugging cost, at least if you expect the Mac version to be reasonably polished.  If you're using Visual Studio or DirectX to do Windows-specific stuff, that also has to be completely redone for a Mac version.

    But as a fraction of the revenue you'd get from a game, the extra revenue that you'd get from having a Mac version is also small.  It's much smaller than the OS marketshare that Mac has.  People don't pick an OS at random; it's well known that many games are Windows-only, so gamers are much less likely to buy a Mac than non-gamers.  Even gamers who do buy a Mac might still play your game without a Mac version via Bootcamp or because they also have a PC.  The extra revenue you get from having a Mac version is only the revenue from people who would not have played at all without a Mac version; revenue from people who buy a Mac version but would have bought a Windows version if there were no Mac version isn't attributable to the existence of a Mac version.

    Ya, basically people that buy mac do not do it for gaming. The mac market (For gaming) would have to grow quite a bit to be worth the bother.

     

    A mac native game sold with a mac  system might make a bit of profit. But turning windows games into a port or even a mac version...no way that would help a game that was doing bad on windows.

  • Flyte27Flyte27 Member RarePosts: 4,574
    I've read that IOS games make a lot more money then Android games.  Of course that is the tablet market not the desktop market.  I personally never liked Apples approach of it just works and treat people like they are monkeys who don't want to learn anything.  I'm glad they haven't been able to take over the desktop market so far.  Linux would be the best, but it never will because there are too many distributions.  Windows is the best because it's more open then OSX and has access to a huge library of games that no other OS can compete with.  With that said I sure companies would make a lot of money off it.  I don't know why companies wouldn't develop for it.  Perhaps it just doesn't have enough market share compared to IOS.  Windows still has about 80-90% of the desktop market last time I checked.  Apple customers are always willing to throw money away though.  It is a proven fact.
  • RusqueRusque Member RarePosts: 2,785

    I don't think most people buy macs for gaming.

    Also, it's curious to think about what would have happened with Apple if Bungie hadn't defected to Microsoft. I remember reading Macworld back in the day and we were getting all the previews of Halo and the (small) Mac gaming community was very hyped, boy it was crushing when they bailed.

    In any case, I use my MacBook Pro for work and my PC for gaming. And I use a Note 3 as my phone, just to make sure everything thinks I'm crazy.

  • Superman0XSuperman0X Member RarePosts: 2,292
    Originally posted by JWW8767

    I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ...

    Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X.

    Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp). 

    Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet.

    Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)

    There are very few mac's that could run current games, that can not also run windows. Mac gamers just use bootcamp. Those that do not are a very small market, and the cost for recoding a game for OSX can be high. It is more likely that they would code the game for Steam (Linux).

  • NitthNitth Member UncommonPosts: 3,904


    Originally posted by JWW8767
    I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ...

    Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X.

    Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp). 

    Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet.

    Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)


    Directx binds games to windows.
    And the reason is because directx is arguably more robust and developer friendly.

    In a perfect world (no pun) Everyone would use OpenGl for superior cross compatibility
    but that's not gona happen anytime soon with opengl's design and Microsoft partner kickbacks to developers.

    image
    TSW - AoC - Aion - WOW - EVE - Fallen Earth - Co - Rift - || XNA C# Java Development

  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383

    I'm all for OS X ports. I often buy games just because they support OS X and I would like to see more of it.

    I own several Macintoshes.

    I game on them rarely, and when I do, it's usually via Steam In-Home Streaming from my Windows machine.

    The hardware is oriented different (less towards performance and more towards effiency and noise reduction), and even on natively supported games OS X just isn't the best performing, game-wise at least. And trying to upgrade an Apple for a new game - that just isn't reallt feasible anymore - if your machine can't handle the game, you need a new machine.

    I love my Macintoshes, but gaming on them is not something I advocate at all.

    That, and a struggling MMO is definitely not going to find a large audience just by porting to OS X .iOS maybe, but not OS X.

  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383


    Originally posted by Superman0X
    Originally posted by JWW8767 I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ... Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X. Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp).  Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet. Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)
    There are very few mac's that could run current games, that can not also run windows. Mac gamers just use bootcamp. Those that do not are a very small market, and the cost for recoding a game for OSX can be high. It is more likely that they would code the game for Steam (Linux).

    If you port the game to Steam/Linux, you are probably 95+% of the way to an OS X port - OpenGL and posix go a long way with that, and you mostly just have to deal with a few OS idiosyncrasies like file location conventions and default permissions and such.

  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383


    Originally posted by Rusque
    I don't think most people buy macs for gaming.Also, it's curious to think about what would have happened with Apple if Bungie hadn't defected to Microsoft. I remember reading Macworld back in the day and we were getting all the previews of Halo and the (small) Mac gaming community was very hyped, boy it was crushing when they bailed.In any case, I use my MacBook Pro for work and my PC for gaming. And I use a Note 3 as my phone, just to make sure everything thinks I'm crazy.

    I have always wondered that. I still have my Oni CD somewhere.

  • DaezAsterDaezAster Member UncommonPosts: 788
    The desktop market is dominated by windows by a huge margain and lots of mac owners actually own laptops not desktops so most likely no video card. Just not worth it as a developer I would think.
  • DarkswormDarksworm Member RarePosts: 1,081
    Originally posted by JWW8767

    I'm probably overlooking something obvious, so bear with me ...

    Every time I see a triple-A MMO that is losing subs or struggling with relative popularity, and they are Windows-only, I can't help but wonder why they don't port to OS X.

    Wildstar may or may not be floundering, struggling, losing subs, etc., but they spring to mind when I think of a game that has stumbled.  I'm sure they are still making plenty of money, but they could be making more by appealing to the Mac crowd (not all of us care to bother with Bootcamp). 

    Of course there was a time when a Mac version of anything was an expensive gamble, but nowadays that's obviously not the case.    So it seems like a no-brainer: not doing a Mac version of your MMO is tantamount to ignoring revenue that wants to throw itself into your wallet.

    Not sure if this has a point -- might just be a public rant -- but am I wrong here?  (I'm sure y'all will tell me if I am.)

    1.  DirectX vs OpenGL.  A lot of developers use DirectX, and those games do not run on Mac.  You can wrap the game like ArenaNet did with Guild Wars 2, but the Mac Client, wrapped, still performs worse than the Native Windows client (obviously) by a noticeable margin.

    2.  System Requirements.  You cannot just replace the GPU in an iMac easily (if at all) and most people get them with integrated graphics, because the systems are expensive enough without customizing them.  MMORPG developers have hopped onto the "we want to kill your PC" bandwagon the past few years and a lot of games won't play fluently on those specs.

    A lot of people I've run into play WoW simply because it's the only game on the market that is decent and runs decently on their PC.  I actually think that's more important than targeting OS X - taking a step back and designing games for more mainstream equipment.  Most people aren't religious about their game choices and most people simply aren't willing to spend potentially hundreds upgrading a PC when there is another game that runs well on it out there...

    3.  Because Windows can easily be run on Macs (Boot Camp) and a Windows License really isn't that expensive.  $100 for Windows 8.1 is cheaper than the graphics card upgrade some of these games force you to get to play them decently.

    Blizzard does both:

    1.  The game runs on modest specs very well.

    2.  They have a fully Native OS X Client.

    And they are winning because of it.

  • DarkswormDarksworm Member RarePosts: 1,081
    Originally posted by DaezAster
    The desktop market is dominated by windows by a huge margain and lots of mac owners actually own laptops not desktops so most likely no video card. Just not worth it as a developer I would think.

    That can be fixed by targeting higher end iGPUs like Iris Pro series and equivalent Radeon iGPUs.

    The Iris Pro is roughly equivalent to an Nvidia 650M.  As long as the machine has 8GB RAM, that should be more than fine for an MMORPG.

    MMORPGs that require better often end up locking a lot of people out of their game because most people would move on before they spent more money to play a video game (probably to WoW, which has no such issues) never mind even if you are between the Minimum and Recommended Requirements in a busy game world you can run into performance issues because there is potential for there to be upwards of hundreds of character avatars on the screen at a time interacting (i.e. in Mass PvP, Castle Siege, World Raids, and other similar situations).

    MMORPGs should not have system requirements similar to FPS and Single Player games for that reason (IMO, of course).  Focus more on the gameplay and content, IMO.

    This also makes the game more accessible, and opens up the possibility to pull in even more users to the game, which helps bring in more users (as they will recruit their friends, family, etc. most likely - people LOVE playing with IRL Friends/Family).

Sign In or Register to comment.