I wonder if they can counter sue Derek Smart for either libel, slander or cause of distress/harassment. Now that would be worth hearing and reading about. Also...what "investigative media"? All I see is this fool blowing smoke up people's arses.
Originally posted by adamlotus75 Continue to attack Smart, continue to miss the point. He has a lot of good points.
Smart also knows industry insiders. He will know a lot more than any of us about what is happening. For example he was the only guy that noticed that CR had hired his wife to senior management!
So? Erin Roberts (his sister) has been involved in many previous games. She is VERY capable. A good Choice and now involved in Squadron 42 for SC.
She? Correct me if I'm wrong but Erin Roberts is male.
Ugh typo. corrected.
yeah that wasn't a typo, that was you pretending to act like you knew something when you didn't and getting caught up in your ***********
Whatever man! It was an honest typo, as Erin is in general a female name.
But whatever feels your trolling needs man, ignoring everything else I wrote. /shrug
People throwing around words like "White-Knighting", "Black Knighting" have mostly no proper arguments.
"Hey I heard a word that fits my view and opinion.... let´s use it all the time if my arguments are weak."
It´s so easy and lame to call everyone who has a different opinion "White/Black Knight".
And that there are still people (or many alt accounts of Mr. Smart) defending Mr. Smarts actions and behavior. I can understand it (from a psychological POV) but still shake my head when I see the hate in between the lines (be it Mr. Smarts own posts/ alt accounts (the writing style is so easy to compare) or his followers).
Yes OF COURSE people that believe in SC defend it and sometimes this might be poisoning too.
But I believe in SC more than ever. After Mr. Smart reappeared and bragged about SC and Mr. Roberts I digged myself into SC information. And the amount of information is far beyond anything that has ever happened during the development of a game before. And I started having interest in gaming since 1984 and therefore have seen one or two games beeing developed, promoted, etc.
Fact is:
There are always haters! Changing minds over the internet is sadly a rare occurance. I have no problems admitting mistakes or misunderstanding someones POV mostly due to emotional posting.
But I have never seen haters or negative people changing their opinion on the internet. Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes.
you found all the informations? but what is there to show for it, i can promise a game and deliver heaps of information and concept art... doesn't mean there is a game at the end of the day.
I did some research for you. Searchengines are your best friend in such situations:
As I said: "Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes."
All this looks like a game in development to me. And it definetely looks like hard work. Will there be a game in the end? Hell why not? If not... well that would, of course, be pretty bad. But I really cannot see any blockers preventing the game to work in the end.
Do people really want others to fail? Yes of course... but due to different reasons.
I feel schadenfreude when people who behave negative, destructive, aggressive etc. fall over. But I´ll help them get up, talk to them and hope they learned something. If they keep on falling due to the same or similar reasons, they have to stand up by themselve and take responsibility. And if they stay resistant and are immune to feedback I feel pitty or start to laugh. My empathy for others stops when a certain line is crossed.
Derek Smart the guy who has been ripping off gamers by selling unfinished buggy products since the 90s..
Exactly! That guy hasn´t got a single succesful game on his name. Just all failed games nobody has ever heard of.
Every time that clown is in the media, it´s always negative! He is either fighting with someone, attacking someone, playing innocent victim, involved in controversies, plagiarism, etc. /Facepalm
Unlike Derek Smart´s track record, Chris Roberts isn´t ripping off anybody. Has been completely transparent, honest and open about everything since day one!
All these ships they are selling, is to support development of the game. All these ships won´t give you any unfair advantages as they will all be available ingame when they launch!
This has been absolutely made Clear right from the beginning! And everyone buying these ships knows this and does it, because they have money to spare and support Development.
I only bought the 50 bucks Pledge package myself With a starter ship and just patiently waiting for the game to release when it´s ready!
I am in no hurry for him to release the game. Got plenty of other games to play in meantime.
We got enough rushed buggy failed games the past years (Derek Smart looking at you)! I rather have Chris Roberts taking his time to deliver us a solid and complete game.
He has also not written the "promised" (?!) blog about the GameStar article about Line of Defense yet. Too embarrassing for him, i guess. I hope he does .... he will make himself even more of a fool ...
People throwing around words like "White-Knighting", "Black Knighting" have mostly no proper arguments.
"Hey I heard a word that fits my view and opinion.... let´s use it all the time if my arguments are weak."
It´s so easy and lame to call everyone who has a different opinion "White/Black Knight".
And that there are still people (or many alt accounts of Mr. Smart) defending Mr. Smarts actions and behavior. I can understand it (from a psychological POV) but still shake my head when I see the hate in between the lines (be it Mr. Smarts own posts/ alt accounts (the writing style is so easy to compare) or his followers).
Yes OF COURSE people that believe in SC defend it and sometimes this might be poisoning too.
But I believe in SC more than ever. After Mr. Smart reappeared and bragged about SC and Mr. Roberts I digged myself into SC information. And the amount of information is far beyond anything that has ever happened during the development of a game before. And I started having interest in gaming since 1984 and therefore have seen one or two games beeing developed, promoted, etc.
Fact is:
There are always haters! Changing minds over the internet is sadly a rare occurance. I have no problems admitting mistakes or misunderstanding someones POV mostly due to emotional posting.
But I have never seen haters or negative people changing their opinion on the internet. Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes.
you found all the informations? but what is there to show for it, i can promise a game and deliver heaps of information and concept art... doesn't mean there is a game at the end of the day.
I did some research for you. Searchengines are your best friend in such situations:
As I said: "Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes."
All this looks like a game in development to me. And it definetely looks like hard work. Will there be a game in the end? Hell why not? If not... well that would, of course, be pretty bad. But I really cannot see any blockers preventing the game to work in the end.
Do people really want others to fail? Yes of course... but due to different reasons.
I feel schadenfreude when people who behave negative, destructive, aggressive etc. fall over. But I´ll help them get up, talk to them and hope they learned something. If they keep on falling due to the same or similar reasons, they have to stand up by themselve and take responsibility. And if they stay resistant and are immune to feedback I feel pitty or start to laugh. My empathy for others stops when a certain line is crossed.
Back to topic...
Feed your head and open your eyes.
you're posting information and videos about the 1 module that's been released after 2 years and 85 million dollars... again, there is nothing to show, infact you can go play the module now... if you pay $60 for entry and then purchase ships to use ontop of it... and it's like 1 map space flight sim... literally a tech demo... thats all there is to show after so long and so much money, a tech demo... you'll get it eventually.
Your evidence is a tech demo and information posts / preorder ships half of which arent even in game or functional... again, nothing to show except some flashy artwork
People throwing around words like "White-Knighting", "Black Knighting" have mostly no proper arguments.
"Hey I heard a word that fits my view and opinion.... let´s use it all the time if my arguments are weak."
It´s so easy and lame to call everyone who has a different opinion "White/Black Knight".
And that there are still people (or many alt accounts of Mr. Smart) defending Mr. Smarts actions and behavior. I can understand it (from a psychological POV) but still shake my head when I see the hate in between the lines (be it Mr. Smarts own posts/ alt accounts (the writing style is so easy to compare) or his followers).
Yes OF COURSE people that believe in SC defend it and sometimes this might be poisoning too.
But I believe in SC more than ever. After Mr. Smart reappeared and bragged about SC and Mr. Roberts I digged myself into SC information. And the amount of information is far beyond anything that has ever happened during the development of a game before. And I started having interest in gaming since 1984 and therefore have seen one or two games beeing developed, promoted, etc.
Fact is:
There are always haters! Changing minds over the internet is sadly a rare occurance. I have no problems admitting mistakes or misunderstanding someones POV mostly due to emotional posting.
But I have never seen haters or negative people changing their opinion on the internet. Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes.
you found all the informations? but what is there to show for it, i can promise a game and deliver heaps of information and concept art... doesn't mean there is a game at the end of the day.
I did some research for you. Searchengines are your best friend in such situations:
As I said: "Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes."
All this looks like a game in development to me. And it definetely looks like hard work. Will there be a game in the end? Hell why not? If not... well that would, of course, be pretty bad. But I really cannot see any blockers preventing the game to work in the end.
Do people really want others to fail? Yes of course... but due to different reasons.
I feel schadenfreude when people who behave negative, destructive, aggressive etc. fall over. But I´ll help them get up, talk to them and hope they learned something. If they keep on falling due to the same or similar reasons, they have to stand up by themselve and take responsibility. And if they stay resistant and are immune to feedback I feel pitty or start to laugh. My empathy for others stops when a certain line is crossed.
Back to topic...
Feed your head and open your eyes.
you're posting information and videos about the 1 module that's been released after 2 years and 85 million dollars... again, there is nothing to show, infact you can go play the module now... if you pay $60 for entry and then purchase ships to use ontop of it... and it's like 1 map space flight sim... literally a tech demo... thats all there is to show after so long and so much money, a tech demo... you'll get it eventually.
Your evidence is a tech demo and information posts / preorder ships half of which arent even in game or functional... again, nothing to show except some flashy artwork
You don´t even have made a proper investigation of my links. Your words expose you.
Sorry that after 2y9m development there is no complete game. Sorry that we are watching a game grow and evolve. Sorry that we are blind to see that this is vaporware and a huge scam.
And sorry that other people are doing their best to be successfull in what they are doing. I hope you know where my irony starts and where it ends.
I personally think it was ignored because I can condense his post and yours as follows:
"Oh my god they cut one feature out of hundreds! The sky is falling! THE SKY IS FALLING!"
That just about sums it up nicely.
Oh and...
Have fun!
Bren
Is that that best you can do? Pathetic.
Rather than give an explanation in their defence or provide some source to refute the poster's claim, you just pull out a strawman argument and completely miss the point while you attempt to (feebly) troll me. If you were trying to earn brownie points with the faithful, you not only failed to do so but also made a complete fool of yourself.
And in case you cant see past your blinders, the poster who I quoted openly admits that he is a Star Citizen supporter. But I guess its a dog eat dog world out there in the church of Chris(t) Roberts, because the second anyone of the flock question the Dear Leader's vision, he is branded a heretic and spat on by the rest of the fanatics.
If you fail to grasp the gravity of the situation, where Erin Roberts is very secretively talking about cutting back on PROMISED features while Chris Roberts is simultaneously doling out new spaceship jpegs, more promises and pipedreams to entice new /old backers into pledging (more) into their game rather than first delivering what they promised...then you sadly lack the intellect to have any coherent argument with. If they have to "cut one feature out of hundreds", then why does Chris Roberts promise them in the first place rather than just promise what they can achieve and deliver the 50 odd features which they can actually deliver? Oh, is it because he needs to more money for New features (amongst other things) while the old promised ones very stealthily get shit-canned?
You have failed to sufficiently white knight this game today. Perhaps try again another time after pointing out the obvious to that oblivious guy you see in the mirror.
My question still stands because I want to know, has Chris Roberts put out some statement (like that chairman post or whatever) repeating what Erin states about cutting down on features?
Well now lets review your posts here:
Labeling people... Check
Name calling... Check
Outright insulting people... Check
... and I'm the one who is Trolling?
You are right about one thing though I did use a Strawman Argument as that is all your previous post deserved. There are times when a Strawman is warranted like when someone is being as rediculus as the Strawman presented. The obvious is that you are in fact the one who is Trolling here. You obviously have no vested interest in this game other than putting people who believe in it down with insults and name calling. This is the very definition of Trolling.
I personally think it was ignored because I can condense his post and yours as follows:
"Oh my god they cut one feature out of hundreds! The sky is falling! THE SKY IS FALLING!"
That just about sums it up nicely.
Oh and...
Have fun!
Bren
Is that that best you can do? Pathetic.
Rather than give an explanation in their defence or provide some source to refute the poster's claim, you just pull out a strawman argument and completely miss the point while you attempt to (feebly) troll me. If you were trying to earn brownie points with the faithful, you not only failed to do so but also made a complete fool of yourself.
And in case you cant see past your blinders, the poster who I quoted openly admits that he is a Star Citizen supporter. But I guess its a dog eat dog world out there in the church of Chris(t) Roberts, because the second anyone of the flock question the Dear Leader's vision, he is branded a heretic and spat on by the rest of the fanatics.
If you fail to grasp the gravity of the situation, where Erin Roberts is very secretively talking about cutting back on PROMISED features while Chris Roberts is simultaneously doling out new spaceship jpegs, more promises and pipedreams to entice new /old backers into pledging (more) into their game rather than first delivering what they promised...then you sadly lack the intellect to have any coherent argument with. If they have to "cut one feature out of hundreds", then why does Chris Roberts promise them in the first place rather than just promise what they can achieve and deliver the 50 odd features which they can actually deliver? Oh, is it because he needs to more money for New features (amongst other things) while the old promised ones very stealthily get shit-canned?
You have failed to sufficiently white knight this game today. Perhaps try again another time after pointing out the obvious to that oblivious guy you see in the mirror.
My question still stands because I want to know, has Chris Roberts put out some statement (like that chairman post or whatever) repeating what Erin states about cutting down on features?
Well now lets review your posts here:
Labeling people... Check
Name calling... Check
Outright insulting people... Check
... and I'm the one who is Trolling?
You are right about one thing though I did use a Strawman Argument as that is all your previous post deserved. There are times when a Strawman is warranted like when someone is being as rediculus as the Strawman presented. The obvious is that you are in fact the one who is Trolling here. You obviously have no vested interest in this game other than putting people who believe in it down with insults and name calling. This is the very definition of Trolling.
Bren
... you didn't refute anything. He's still right. Also, it's ridiculous, with an i and an o.
I personally think it was ignored because I can condense his post and yours as follows:
"Oh my god they cut one feature out of hundreds! The sky is falling! THE SKY IS FALLING!"
That just about sums it up nicely.
Oh and...
Have fun!
Bren
Is that that best you can do? Pathetic.
Rather than give an explanation in their defence or provide some source to refute the poster's claim, you just pull out a strawman argument and completely miss the point while you attempt to (feebly) troll me. If you were trying to earn brownie points with the faithful, you not only failed to do so but also made a complete fool of yourself.
And in case you cant see past your blinders, the poster who I quoted openly admits that he is a Star Citizen supporter. But I guess its a dog eat dog world out there in the church of Chris(t) Roberts, because the second anyone of the flock question the Dear Leader's vision, he is branded a heretic and spat on by the rest of the fanatics.
If you fail to grasp the gravity of the situation, where Erin Roberts is very secretively talking about cutting back on PROMISED features while Chris Roberts is simultaneously doling out new spaceship jpegs, more promises and pipedreams to entice new /old backers into pledging (more) into their game rather than first delivering what they promised...then you sadly lack the intellect to have any coherent argument with. If they have to "cut one feature out of hundreds", then why does Chris Roberts promise them in the first place rather than just promise what they can achieve and deliver the 50 odd features which they can actually deliver? Oh, is it because he needs to more money for New features (amongst other things) while the old promised ones very stealthily get shit-canned?
You have failed to sufficiently white knight this game today. Perhaps try again another time after pointing out the obvious to that oblivious guy you see in the mirror.
My question still stands because I want to know, has Chris Roberts put out some statement (like that chairman post or whatever) repeating what Erin states about cutting down on features?
Well now lets review your posts here:
Labeling people... Check
Name calling... Check
Outright insulting people... Check
... and I'm the one who is Trolling?
You are right about one thing though I did use a Strawman Argument as that is all your previous post deserved. There are times when a Strawman is warranted like when someone is being as rediculus as the Strawman presented. The obvious is that you are in fact the one who is Trolling here. You obviously have no vested interest in this game other than putting people who believe in it down with insults and name calling. This is the very definition of Trolling.
Bren
... you didn't refute anything. He's still right. Also, it's ridiculous, with an i and an o.
Okay... My goal wasn't to refute anything just to point out his Trolling.
If I must answer his question though... No Chris Roberts hasn't said a word about what Erin was talking about as there is nothing to say. Erin was explaining how the Coop Feature would work... something never before explained. People assumed it would be in the Solo Campaign a certain way because of how is was very vaguely described in the past and it turned out to be a little different when explained with some details. Erin never said they were cutting features this is another assumption everyone is making. The Coop Feature is going to be during replays of the Campaign Missions and not during the actual Campaign itself which actually make sense since it is a SOLO CAMPAIGN as it's been billed right from day one.
This whole controversy is about people assuming something when the reality turned out to be a little different than what they had hoped for. There are no "Cut Features".
C'mon mmorpg.com- Its pretty obvious whats going on. let them pay for ads or something instead of all this paid hype spamming SC garbage all day long.
Anyone who doesnt see whats been going on here is blind. Someone posting 1000s of posts every time Chris roberts farts all day long is not only shady and dishonest (when we know they are paid advertisers using the forums) but reflects poorly on this site.
How much of the kickstart money went tot hese adbots? Could have better been used to make a game.
C'mon mmorpg.com- Its pretty obvious whats going on. let them pay for ads or something instead of all this paid hype spamming SC garbage all day long.
Anyone who doesnt see whats been going on here is blind. Someone posting 1000s of posts every time Chris roberts farts all day long is not only shady and dishonest (when we know they are paid advertisers using the forums) but reflects poorly on this site.
How much of the kickstart money went tot hese adbots? Could have better been used to make a game.
-have fun
"Fans who are extremely invested in a game continuously post about said game on game's forums!"
More news as it happens right here on Motherfucking Obvious News; channel 5.
C'mon mmorpg.com- Its pretty obvious whats going on. let them pay for ads or something instead of all this paid hype spamming SC garbage all day long.
Anyone who doesnt see whats been going on here is blind. Someone posting 1000s of posts every time Chris roberts farts all day long is not only shady and dishonest (when we know they are paid advertisers using the forums) but reflects poorly on this site.
How much of the kickstart money went tot hese adbots? Could have better been used to make a game.
-have fun
"Fans who are extremely invested in a game continuously post about said game on game's forums!"
More news as it happens right here on Motherfucking Obvious News; channel 5.
C'mon dude- You are either willfully blind or....
Ive been using forums since forever-I fanboy about some games myself ... There is a difference and its obvious. Even ifI was a SC fan (i'm neutral) I would see whats going on.
C'mon mmorpg.com- Its pretty obvious whats going on. let them pay for ads or something instead of all this paid hype spamming SC garbage all day long.
Anyone who doesnt see whats been going on here is blind. Someone posting 1000s of posts every time Chris roberts farts all day long is not only shady and dishonest (when we know they are paid advertisers using the forums) but reflects poorly on this site.
How much of the kickstart money went tot hese adbots? Could have better been used to make a game.
-have fun
"Fans who are extremely invested in a game continuously post about said game on game's forums!"
More news as it happens right here on Motherfucking Obvious News; channel 5.
C'mon dude- You are either willfully blind or....
Ive been using forums since forever-I fanboy about some games myself ... There is a difference and its obvious. Even ifI was a SC fan (i'm neutral) I would see whats going on.
-Have fun.
And jet fuel can't melt steel beams; or whatever tinfoil hat you want to wear today.
My friend, people are spending several THOUSAND dollars on a game that is still in development; you honestly mean to tell me that it is more likely RSI are paying people to post on MMORPG's forums than it is to assume some people are just really excited about this game?
Come on guy. Come on. RSI won't even pay to have good sound production at their Gamescom demo and you think they are paying some rando dude on the internet to post a ton of easily available information to a random news website?
I can understand his anger. Definitely not from his POV but from a psychological.
He can persue in life what he wants but all this anger / grudge / deviousness is irritating for people who follow him a bit. I guess it partly comes from becoming rich due to clever investments and living the cool life. I don´t wanna touch the depth psychology but...
Do you know the feeling when someone comes into a room or talks to you and you feel kind of strange or even intimidated (depending on the level of self esteem)?
Why does he describe himself in this blog? Why does he project his behavior and attitude on CR?
Just by following (and investigating) both records (DS and CR) one must be blind not to see how different both are.
Yes there are people who think people like DS are cool, that they talk the real shit and that they bring it.
*fake yawn* No please... that´s just dazzler behavior for the public and for ego boosting.
I know such people but most of them have changed for the better because they fell hard or were able (the least) to listen to others.
Derek has a big ass pillow and fears no consequences (but threatening others with banning, sueing, insulting) and lashes out when he feels his ego is attacked.
DS self esteem is not as high as might be suggested.
People with high self esteem just don´t act like that.
"Chris, in your case however, I made the exception because you’re a lying, fraudulent, egotistical, asshole who doesn’t care about the people around you"
Pissed off much he is, The Smarty !
That GamesCom demo must have really really hurt ....
But WAIT ... that was all an illusion ... we never saw nuffing ... because it was impossible ...it could never be created ....
And jet fuel can't melt steel beams; or whatever tinfoil hat you want to wear today.
My friend, people are spending several THOUSAND dollars on a game that is still in development; you honestly mean to tell me that it is more likely RSI are paying people to post on MMORPG's forums than it is to assume some people are just really excited about this game?
Come on guy. Come on. RSI won't even pay to have good sound production at their Gamescom demo and you think they are paying some rando dude on the internet to post a ton of easily available information to a random news website?
May I ask you to take a look at all the stuff fans have done? For free? Because they believe and support this game development. You definitely have seen fan made stuff before. There are whole communities surrounding Star Citizen.
C'mon mmorpg.com- Its pretty obvious whats going on. let them pay for ads or something instead of all this paid hype spamming SC garbage all day long.
Anyone who doesnt see whats been going on here is blind. Someone posting 1000s of posts every time Chris roberts farts all day long is not only shady and dishonest (when we know they are paid advertisers using the forums) but reflects poorly on this site.
How much of the kickstart money went tot hese adbots? Could have better been used to make a game.
-have fun
"Fans who are extremely invested in a game continuously post about said game on game's forums!"
More news as it happens right here on Motherfucking Obvious News; channel 5.
C'mon dude- You are either willfully blind or....
Ive been using forums since forever-I fanboy about some games myself ... There is a difference and its obvious. Even ifI was a SC fan (i'm neutral) I would see whats going on.
-Have fun.
And jet fuel can't melt steel beams; or whatever tinfoil hat you want to wear today.
My friend, people are spending several THOUSAND dollars on a game that is still in development; you honestly mean to tell me that it is more likely RSI are paying people to post on MMORPG's forums than it is to assume some people are just really excited about this game?
Come on guy. Come on. RSI won't even pay to have good sound production at their Gamescom demo and you think they are paying some rando dude on the internet to post a ton of easily available information to a random news website?
hahahahaha- Some "conspiracies" are real. Even Government ones. (not talking about 911) and i could give a list starting even before Hitler blamed the jews for burning the riechshtag (sp?) which was actually done by the SS to cause outrage against the jews and show how evil they were.... People said "there are no conspiracies, fools" and "why would Hitler destroy his own buildings" and "idiots, he SAID it was the jews.The Government wouldnt lie"- The people who knew the truth about that were also laughed at until History proved them right (although many were gassed and dead before the truth was known)
Anyone who thinks conspiracies never happen is far more ignorant than a person who thinks everything is a conspiracy.
I laugh thogh that you think viral marketing is a conspiracy when almost every company budgets for it..But its hard to discuss truths with cultists who want to willing keep drinking the KoolAid.
And yes- This is paid viral marketing. And you a fool or blind if you cannot see it.
Comments
Derek Smart the guy who has been ripping off gamers by selling unfinished buggy products since the 90s..
For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson
Whatever man! It was an honest typo, as Erin is in general a female name.
But whatever feels your trolling needs man, ignoring everything else I wrote. /shrug
I did some research for you. Searchengines are your best friend in such situations:
https://www.google.de/search?q=star+citizen&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAmoVChMI0pOEkZqUxwIVBHdyCh0OLgbt&biw=1920&bih=965&bav=on.2,or.&bvm=bv.99556055,d.bGQ
https://www.google.de/search?q=star+citizen&biw=1920&bih=965&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAmoVChMIqu_TmpqUxwIVK55yCh2ejg3f&dpr=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK2XG_raxJkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkAaLd0FdK0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owyD117J3WU
https://www.google.de/search?q=star+citizen+presentation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=qzLDVfXCBoPpywP_w69w#tbm=vid&q=star+citizen+leak
As I said: "Even if the evidences are right in front of their eyes."
All this looks like a game in development to me. And it definetely looks like hard work. Will there be a game in the end? Hell why not? If not... well that would, of course, be pretty bad. But I really cannot see any blockers preventing the game to work in the end.
Do people really want others to fail? Yes of course... but due to different reasons.
http://www.livescience.com/17398-schadenfreude-affirmation.html
I feel schadenfreude when people who behave negative, destructive, aggressive etc. fall over. But I´ll help them get up, talk to them and hope they learned something. If they keep on falling due to the same or similar reasons, they have to stand up by themselve and take responsibility. And if they stay resistant and are immune to feedback I feel pitty or start to laugh. My empathy for others stops when a certain line is crossed.
Back to topic...
Feed your head and open your eyes.
Exactly! That guy hasn´t got a single succesful game on his name. Just all failed games nobody has ever heard of.
Every time that clown is in the media, it´s always negative! He is either fighting with someone, attacking someone, playing innocent victim, involved in controversies, plagiarism, etc. /Facepalm
Unlike Derek Smart´s track record, Chris Roberts isn´t ripping off anybody. Has been completely transparent, honest and open about everything since day one!
All these ships they are selling, is to support development of the game. All these ships won´t give you any unfair advantages as they will all be available ingame when they launch!
This has been absolutely made Clear right from the beginning! And everyone buying these ships knows this and does it, because they have money to spare and support Development.
I only bought the 50 bucks Pledge package myself With a starter ship and just patiently waiting for the game to release when it´s ready!
I am in no hurry for him to release the game. Got plenty of other games to play in meantime.
We got enough rushed buggy failed games the past years (Derek Smart looking at you)! I rather have Chris Roberts taking his time to deliver us a solid and complete game.
Cheers
Nope.
Maybe the doxing into Sandi Gardiners private life and educational background did not give him enough ammo ?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
He has also not written the "promised" (?!) blog about the GameStar article about Line of Defense yet. Too embarrassing for him, i guess. I hope he does .... he will make himself even more of a fool ...
Have fun
you're posting information and videos about the 1 module that's been released after 2 years and 85 million dollars... again, there is nothing to show, infact you can go play the module now... if you pay $60 for entry and then purchase ships to use ontop of it... and it's like 1 map space flight sim... literally a tech demo... thats all there is to show after so long and so much money, a tech demo... you'll get it eventually.
Your evidence is a tech demo and information posts / preorder ships half of which arent even in game or functional... again, nothing to show except some flashy artwork
What is artwork:
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/artwork.html
Also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_perception
You don´t even have made a proper investigation of my links. Your words expose you.
Sorry that after 2y9m development there is no complete game. Sorry that we are watching a game grow and evolve. Sorry that we are blind to see that this is vaporware and a huge scam.
And sorry that other people are doing their best to be successfull in what they are doing. I hope you know where my irony starts and where it ends.
Maybe you´ve heard of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle
Please do the transfer of learning by yourself.
Welcome to reality.
That's the thing, soon as you call these jokers out they go into defense mode and bring up Derek Smart.
He can't answer your question because the fool has no answer.
The mug.
Funny thing... this topic is actually called:
Derek Smart´s "New" List of Demands
It is about SC/CR and LoD/DS... really believe me. WHY DON´T YOU BELIEVE MEEEE??? *crying out loud*
“Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.”
- Euripides, Bacchae
Me not going into defense mode. Bring it on *giggles*
Well now lets review your posts here:
Labeling people... Check
Name calling... Check
Outright insulting people... Check
... and I'm the one who is Trolling?
You are right about one thing though I did use a Strawman Argument as that is all your previous post deserved. There are times when a Strawman is warranted like when someone is being as rediculus as the Strawman presented. The obvious is that you are in fact the one who is Trolling here. You obviously have no vested interest in this game other than putting people who believe in it down with insults and name calling. This is the very definition of Trolling.
Bren
while(horse==dead)
{
beat();
}
... you didn't refute anything. He's still right. Also, it's ridiculous, with an i and an o.
Okay... My goal wasn't to refute anything just to point out his Trolling.
If I must answer his question though... No Chris Roberts hasn't said a word about what Erin was talking about as there is nothing to say. Erin was explaining how the Coop Feature would work... something never before explained. People assumed it would be in the Solo Campaign a certain way because of how is was very vaguely described in the past and it turned out to be a little different when explained with some details. Erin never said they were cutting features this is another assumption everyone is making. The Coop Feature is going to be during replays of the Campaign Missions and not during the actual Campaign itself which actually make sense since it is a SOLO CAMPAIGN as it's been billed right from day one.
This whole controversy is about people assuming something when the reality turned out to be a little different than what they had hoped for. There are no "Cut Features".
Bren
while(horse==dead)
{
beat();
}
Watch the GamesCom demo and weep, Derek Smart !
We are watching live that which is "impossible to make" and raise our glasses to you !
ROFL
Have fun
PS:
Derek Smarts twitter comment :
"OMG!! I am watching the live feed right now. This is what $85m buys you. Yes, it's all over."
Watch the demo, see for yourself ....
at least THERE you see more than a black screen with a glowing mini map... thats not LOD ;-)
And AC2.0 did not crash during the demo, not once for 10 players.
Not like the 68 crashes of LOD during 6 hours of LOD journalist playtesting ...
Is there a rule here about paid viral marketers?
C'mon mmorpg.com- Its pretty obvious whats going on. let them pay for ads or something instead of all this paid hype spamming SC garbage all day long.
Anyone who doesnt see whats been going on here is blind. Someone posting 1000s of posts every time Chris roberts farts all day long is not only shady and dishonest (when we know they are paid advertisers using the forums) but reflects poorly on this site.
How much of the kickstart money went tot hese adbots? Could have better been used to make a game.
-have fun
"Fans who are extremely invested in a game continuously post about said game on game's forums!"
More news as it happens right here on Motherfucking Obvious News; channel 5.
C'mon dude- You are either willfully blind or....
Ive been using forums since forever-I fanboy about some games myself ... There is a difference and its obvious. Even ifI was a SC fan (i'm neutral) I would see whats going on.
-Have fun.
*** raises a beer live at GamesCom ***
Thats the Smartphone internet ! Get used to it !
Thats how crowdfunding works ! Every backer is a promoter ;-)
Have fun
And jet fuel can't melt steel beams; or whatever tinfoil hat you want to wear today.
My friend, people are spending several THOUSAND dollars on a game that is still in development; you honestly mean to tell me that it is more likely RSI are paying people to post on MMORPG's forums than it is to assume some people are just really excited about this game?
Come on guy. Come on. RSI won't even pay to have good sound production at their Gamescom demo and you think they are paying some rando dude on the internet to post a ton of easily available information to a random news website?
He is in rage once again. He really needs this for his ego.
http://www.dereksmart.org/2015/08/interstellar-raiders/
I can understand his anger. Definitely not from his POV but from a psychological.
He can persue in life what he wants but all this anger / grudge / deviousness is irritating for people who follow him a bit. I guess it partly comes from becoming rich due to clever investments and living the cool life. I don´t wanna touch the depth psychology but...
Do you know the feeling when someone comes into a room or talks to you and you feel kind of strange or even intimidated (depending on the level of self esteem)?
Why does he describe himself in this blog? Why does he project his behavior and attitude on CR?
Just by following (and investigating) both records (DS and CR) one must be blind not to see how different both are.
Yes there are people who think people like DS are cool, that they talk the real shit and that they bring it.
*fake yawn* No please... that´s just dazzler behavior for the public and for ego boosting.
I know such people but most of them have changed for the better because they fell hard or were able (the least) to listen to others.
Derek has a big ass pillow and fears no consequences (but threatening others with banning, sueing, insulting) and lashes out when he feels his ego is attacked.
DS self esteem is not as high as might be suggested.
People with high self esteem just don´t act like that.
"Chris, in your case however, I made the exception because you’re a lying, fraudulent, egotistical, asshole who doesn’t care about the people around you"
Pissed off much he is, The Smarty !
That GamesCom demo must have really really hurt ....
But WAIT ... that was all an illusion ... we never saw nuffing ... because it was impossible ...it could never be created ....
Derek Smart said so himself. ;-)
Have fun
May I ask you to take a look at all the stuff fans have done? For free? Because they believe and support this game development. You definitely have seen fan made stuff before. There are whole communities surrounding Star Citizen.
Sneak peak:
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/citizens
And thats only what´s has been gathered infrequently from CIG from time to time. Soon a new section for fan made stuff will be added to the RSI page.
They is a ton of stuff in the forums and around the web.
So please... any of you guys who are critical towards Star Citizen.
YES I completely understand that you raise an eyebrow and critical questions. But do your research first.... please.
hahahahaha- Some "conspiracies" are real. Even Government ones. (not talking about 911) and i could give a list starting even before Hitler blamed the jews for burning the riechshtag (sp?) which was actually done by the SS to cause outrage against the jews and show how evil they were.... People said "there are no conspiracies, fools" and "why would Hitler destroy his own buildings" and "idiots, he SAID it was the jews.The Government wouldnt lie"- The people who knew the truth about that were also laughed at until History proved them right (although many were gassed and dead before the truth was known)
Anyone who thinks conspiracies never happen is far more ignorant than a person who thinks everything is a conspiracy.
I laugh thogh that you think viral marketing is a conspiracy when almost every company budgets for it..But its hard to discuss truths with cultists who want to willing keep drinking the KoolAid.
And yes- This is paid viral marketing. And you a fool or blind if you cannot see it.