So, transparency is an issue. Will Escapist take Chris Roberts up on his offer here?
"If you guys are willing to do a proper piece then I’m happy to engage. You’re invited to visit all of our four studios, meet the developers making the game and see how we’re building one of the most ambitious PC games first hand."
Comments
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14979-Chairmans-Response-To-The-Escapist
When you're ready to be reasonable I'll respond again. Until then, I'm not responding.
"We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." SR Covey
The game devs aren't exactly gonna start bad mouthing a company with the boss eye balling em over the reporters shoulder are they.
To be honest if this mess is true it's the normal guys who bought into the game I feel sorry for.
"Derek Smart is on to our long con! Our campaign to make the Internet believe his games are shit is falling apart!"
Sorry, had to.
LOL. You're such a poser. Get out of here with the Derek Smart non-sense.
*facepalm* I'm done pointing out that this actually a bad idea for CIG, trouble or no trouble.
And as I stated "if" this is true I feel sorry for the normal none frothing guys who backed the game.
The raging fan club deserve everything they get whichever way this thing plays out.
It reminds me of MWO but on a massive scale the same thing happened with that, the devs promised all sorts n the game that actually released is a mess and the fans of that were exactly the same all through development, anyone that raised a concern were shot down and even now the devs surround themselves with the yes men of the community.
To me yes men have caused more problems in game development than anyone even trolls as they just get ignored, but to constantly agree with anything a dev pumps out is just flat out bad.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
That is the reason they do not care about the delays. Once the game goes live the ships are in the game to find, no longer to buy.
As long as this game does NOT come out a good portion of this community stands to profit.
This is why CIG did not do what every other MMO does: LOCK DOWN 3RD PARTY SALES.
They stand to make more money as long as the game does not go live, all sides do.
The game appears to be funded like a ponzi scheme. There is not enough money to finish what was promised. They keep making new ships to attempt to fund what was previously promised. They do not have enough to make everything they promised as of right now. Maybe they are hoping to catch up by releasing more ships, but they won't and will always be behind with cash flow.
The chairman of this game has a proven track record of nothing good. Everything that this game is accused of he has done to his previous projects. He has been sued by Kevin Costner for BREACH OF CONTRACT - HE DID NOT MAKE THE MONEY THAT WAS PROMISED TO KEVIN AND WOULD NOT PAY HIM. Sound familiar?
People are only trusting this guy because they are making money. Hopefully there are no Americans who aren't alerting the IRS to their new income (cough, yea right.)
So yes. At this point I am one of those who demands to see what they have done with every last cent of their cash. I live in the USA, this company operates out of the USA, this company is walking around with their hand out asking for money, this company allows a grey market for likely the sole purpose of creating this fan base, this company needs to be looked into as it can kill crowdfunding when it fails.
It will fail at its promises. We need to stop it before it brings down the entire model.
Makes me sick to my stomach knowing that nice guys like DS can't catch a break while these armchair sitters are taking coffee breaks & hamfisting their way through game development with their fancy chairs & such. Why not sit on cinder blocks? Too good for cinder blocks, aye Roberts? Fat cat.
What a world.
I think the point if they answered questions, it would raise more questions. At any point where they got tired of the endless questions, people could point to it as lack of transparency. It is a childish little game.
Epic Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAigCvelkhQ&list=PLo9FRw1AkDuQLEz7Gvvaz3ideB2NpFtT1
https://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary_msdos?&sort=-downloads&page=1
Kyleran: "Now there's the real trick, learning to accept and enjoy a game for what it offers rather than pass on what might be a great playing experience because it lacks a few features you prefer."
John Henry Newman: "A man would do nothing if he waited until he could do it so well that no one could find fault."
FreddyNoNose: "A good game needs no defense; a bad game has no defense." "Easily digested content is just as easily forgotten."
LacedOpium: "So the question that begs to be asked is, if you are not interested in the game mechanics that define the MMORPG genre, then why are you playing an MMORPG?"
They can be transparent and yet someone will still point at something and call it a lack of transparency.
Epic Music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAigCvelkhQ&list=PLo9FRw1AkDuQLEz7Gvvaz3ideB2NpFtT1
https://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary_msdos?&sort=-downloads&page=1
Kyleran: "Now there's the real trick, learning to accept and enjoy a game for what it offers rather than pass on what might be a great playing experience because it lacks a few features you prefer."
John Henry Newman: "A man would do nothing if he waited until he could do it so well that no one could find fault."
FreddyNoNose: "A good game needs no defense; a bad game has no defense." "Easily digested content is just as easily forgotten."
LacedOpium: "So the question that begs to be asked is, if you are not interested in the game mechanics that define the MMORPG genre, then why are you playing an MMORPG?"
A takedown of the letter.
Chris Roberts use nearly every propaganda technique in the book to smear anyone who might disagree with him.
I am seriously worried about this game.