Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Star Citizen | Death of a Salesman | MMORPG

12122242627

Comments

  • BrenicsBrenics Member RarePosts: 1,939
    Shodanas said:
    Brenics said:
    Precusor said:
    Brenics said:
    Precusor said:
    For those who are interested.

    Derek Smart live stream is live now 
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntnxo_WGxfg 
    Is it over already?  Did I miss the Supreme Commander of bullshit?!!!  Damn it!
    LOL I found it funny, all the little kids swearing calling him the N word yet he is the mental one. 
    The abuse he was getting was way over the top.. I actually felt bad for him
    Makes you wonder the type of people will be playing SC if it ever releases! I wouldn't want to be in that community.
    DS brought this on himself and deserves every bit of flame directed at him and even more.

    As for the SC community, counting about 1 million people so far.. it won't miss much from you not being part of it.
    No one deserved what those people were doing. Believe me I wouldn't miss you guys either.
    I'm not perfect but I'm always myself!

    Star Citizen – The Extinction Level Event


    4/13/15 > ELE has been updated look for 16-04-13.

    http://www.dereksmart.org/2016/04/star-citizen-the-ele/

    Enjoy and know the truth always comes to light!

  • PrecusorPrecusor Member UncommonPosts: 3,589
    Shodanas said:
    DS brought this on himself and deserves every bit of flame directed at him and even more.

    As for the SC community, counting about 1 million people so far.. it won't miss much from you not being part of it.
    The abuse he was getting was disgusting.
  • AnnaTSAnnaTS Member UncommonPosts: 600
    It as already been mentioned what some of the Star Citizen  communtity is like so i am not surprised by this.

    But still what ever he has said doesn't give people the right to be racist.
  • ThourneThourne Member RarePosts: 757
    Treating someone like that isn't right.

    However, I'm fairly sure we all know if you start talking about any large group a small % of them will be asshats.
    So lets not act like it is an aberration specific to CIG backers even though we all agree it is wrong.
  • H0urg1assH0urg1ass Member EpicPosts: 2,380
    Erillion said:
    Brenics said:
    Makes you wonder the type of people will be playing SC if it ever releases! I wouldn't want to be in that community.
    The Goons are playing in EVE Online and are planning to move in force to Star Citizen. For some that means a rough ride. Especially for those that believe they can fly capital ships solo.

    As a reminder: the Goons originated out of the somethingaweful.com community.


    Have fun
    Goons aren't the only ones coming.  PL, TEST, Razor, NCdot, Spectre Fleet.... and myself included.  Lots of EVE players will definitely try SC out.  Then we'll all go back to our high skill point EVE characters and thirteen years worth of history and your carriers will be safe again.

    No one who is invested really quits EVE. lol
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    H0urg1ass said:

    No one who is invested really quits EVE. lol
    True ;-)


    Have fun
  • FomaldehydeJimFomaldehydeJim Member UncommonPosts: 673
    edited October 2015
    I've just read the cease and desist letter from SCs co-founder. He has single handedly just destroyed any case SC might have should this go to court. What a monumental idiot.
  • RavensworthRavensworth Member UncommonPosts: 78
    Red just curious you say "The number of employees alone means they’ve burned through the vast majority of the money they’ve raised." as a fellow journalist and Not a backer who supports neither side and is trying to submit my own story I am asking how you come to this conclusion. Is there something else or information you have that isn't mentioned in that statement that leads you to believed they have burned through their money other than less than 1% of their employees going on record claiming financial misdeeds?

    image
  • RavensworthRavensworth Member UncommonPosts: 78
    CrazKanuk said:
    I totally agree with regards to getting Squadron 42 out the door. I think that CR took the right steps in creating something modular, but something substantial needs to be published, even if just Act 1. Otherwise, why not? Are there serious dependency issues that simply cancel out any positives given for modular design? Who knows. S42 would be a big boon for them, though, if they can push it out in the next 6 months. At least give a release date for the module.
    Actually, I don't think the modular design was a Chris-idea. I've heard from multiple folks that it originated with Eric Peterson.
    Red in your article you say the following "The number of employees alone means they’ve burned through the vast majority of the money they’ve raised.". I have no axe to grind I am a fellow journalist and not an investor and not on either side. The rest of the article I was able to parse out the facts with one other exception that was opinion based. That being "Roberts is a poor leader." As a former platoon leader who has seen excellent platoon leaders utterly fail as company commanders though I see your point. This one though I am having trouble with. How did you reach the conclusion that the number of employees they have indicates their financial health. Is is that you have other sources or you are looking at something I am not seeing. Less than 2% of employees that have been "identified" have mentioned financial woes an none of those in the accounting department and no one has complained of layoffs or not receiving paychecks. I know it's there what am I missing?

    image
  • PrecusorPrecusor Member UncommonPosts: 3,589
    edited October 2015
    Red just curious you say "The number of employees alone means they’ve burned through the vast majority of the money they’ve raised." as a fellow journalist and Not a backer who supports neither side and is trying to submit my own story I am asking how you come to this conclusion. Is there something else or information you have that isn't mentioned in that statement that leads you to believed they have burned through their money other than less than 1% of their employees going on record claiming financial misdeeds?
    To answer that they would have to expose their source.. lol

    Hint

    https://archive.is/NLgJm#selection-117.30-117.37

    http://www.dereksmart.org/ 


    Post edited by Precusor on
  • Red_ThomasRed_Thomas Member RarePosts: 666
    edited October 2015
    Red just curious you say "The number of employees alone means they’ve burned through the vast majority of the money they’ve raised." as a fellow journalist and Not a backer who supports neither side and is trying to submit my own story I am asking how you come to this conclusion. Is there something else or information you have that isn't mentioned in that statement that leads you to believed they have burned through their money other than less than 1% of their employees going on record claiming financial misdeeds?
    Sorry, abandoned the internet for a while to spend some time with the wife.  =)

    No, they say they have about 300 employees.  In the tech/game industry you can roughly calculate the average salary at $100k/man-year.  I'm certain Santa Monica is significantly more than that, but I since I do most my business in Texas, I used our rates around here for the rough calculation.

    That takes the current budget to about $30 million/year for manning.  Then you can assume about a 10-20% G&A, so that takes it to a conservative $33-36 million/year.  A VERY conservative.  Overhead in Santa Monica is going to be significantly more.  Also, you'll have software licensing, which is very expensive, and property costs (also a lot more in CA).  They additionally have some big names doing voice acting in S42.  That's going to be anywhere from $50k to nearing $1 mil, depending on how many lines there are and whether they did motion-capture with the actors.  I think a rough guess of $45-50 million this year alone is probably a reasonable approximation.

    They didn't have the voice acting last year, so that would have kept costs down a bit.  They did have over 200 employees from what I understand, though.  That puts last year's budget around $25-30 million.  Then, however much they spent the year before that, which probably wasn't a lot.  Most folks working the first year were founding members and most of the time was spent ramping up.  The costs in 2013 probably weren't a lot, but even at $5 million, that gets it to about $75 million on the lower end.  Then, you have all the travel to conventions, multiple scouting trips to Canada, UK, Germany, and I've been told even Paris for some reason, and multiple folks have told me that CR doesn't fly coach or alone, then those numbers go up a little there, as well.

    So that's roughly how I did the math to figure they don't have much left.  Just the employees from 2013 is going to be over $50 million of the budget, and since they've really cut back the number in Austin and grown the number in CA, probably more than that.
    Post edited by Red_Thomas on
  • Red_ThomasRed_Thomas Member RarePosts: 666

    Precusor said:
    Red just curious you say "The number of employees alone means they’ve burned through the vast majority of the money they’ve raised." as a fellow journalist and Not a backer who supports neither side and is trying to submit my own story I am asking how you come to this conclusion. Is there something else or information you have that isn't mentioned in that statement that leads you to believed they have burned through their money other than less than 1% of their employees going on record claiming financial misdeeds?
    To answer that they would have to expose their source.. lol

    Hint

    https://archive.is/NLgJm#selection-117.30-117.37

    http://www.dereksmart.org/ 


    bzzzz   wrong.

    Try Glassdoor.com and Salary.com to determine rough range of average salary, quoted numbers of employees, and then do the math.  It helps if you have some experience in business and know about the other sorts of costs that go with it, but just the salaries can give you a rough idea of budget.
  • Red_ThomasRed_Thomas Member RarePosts: 666
    CrazKanuk said:
    I totally agree with regards to getting Squadron 42 out the door. I think that CR took the right steps in creating something modular, but something substantial needs to be published, even if just Act 1. Otherwise, why not? Are there serious dependency issues that simply cancel out any positives given for modular design? Who knows. S42 would be a big boon for them, though, if they can push it out in the next 6 months. At least give a release date for the module.
    Actually, I don't think the modular design was a Chris-idea. I've heard from multiple folks that it originated with Eric Peterson.
    Red in your article you say the following "The number of employees alone means they’ve burned through the vast majority of the money they’ve raised.". I have no axe to grind I am a fellow journalist and not an investor and not on either side. The rest of the article I was able to parse out the facts with one other exception that was opinion based. That being "Roberts is a poor leader." As a former platoon leader who has seen excellent platoon leaders utterly fail as company commanders though I see your point. This one though I am having trouble with. How did you reach the conclusion that the number of employees they have indicates their financial health. Is is that you have other sources or you are looking at something I am not seeing. Less than 2% of employees that have been "identified" have mentioned financial woes an none of those in the accounting department and no one has complained of layoffs or not receiving paychecks. I know it's there what am I missing?
    No, I'd have to find it, but Roberts or someone was quoted as having over 300 employees on the project right now.  I started there, and then just did the math.

    But yeah, the leadership thing is mostly based on personal observations combined with comments from people around the project.  You know how it is when you watch the behavior and hear the conversation coming from inside a platoon that's well led verses one that's poorly led.  There's an air to Joes that have been empowered to execute their mission, and folks around CIG don't really have that.

    But the biggest leadership failure has frankly been the response to criticism.  Good leaders appreciate negative feedback and don't cast blame.  He's blamed the negativity on disgruntled former employees, which granted may be the truth.  Even if it is, a leader doesn't say that, though.  You express appreciation for the feedback and demonstrate that you're looking internally to determine if these feelings are indicative of a larger issue.  You say you'll address them immediately if it's found to be the case.

    Leaders say "I made that mistake" and "they made that success."  Chris has a tendency to get that backwards in my observation.  Not always, but often enough to catch my eye.

    That's the gist of my humint on the leadership subject.  Obviously, I have my own various sources with more details, but since I'm not naming anyone, I don't feel it would be appropriate to quote anyone anomalously.  =)
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    edited October 2015
    Red ... you may want to review your estimate. Have you taken into account the following information ?

    Around 260 CIG employees total. 160 of them in UK,  30 ish in Germany (numbers quoted from recent videos, interviews and reports). That leaves 70 ish in the USA. You know Austin numbers well, so you should have a good idea about the remaining number in California.

    Mocap and facial capture was done in UK. Actors did mocap + facial capture, including Gary Oldman and Gillian Anderson (it was shown in the video). I think Audio is also done mostly in UK.

    Very detailed employee numbers were given in the Review video at the beginning of the presentation, showing that this 260 employee number is a quite recent level.

    External contractor number seems to have gone down from 80ish to 50ish.

    Average salaries for programmers are significantly lower in UK and Germany compared to the US.  CIG devs have reported that salaries in Austin are comparatively high  (SWTOR revival and its need for programmers was cited as one of the reasons, competition seems stiff, benefits like sports studio access was named). Thats Austin compared to California  (outside Silicon Valley, of course).

    CIG seems to enjoy a 10 % tax reduction in the UK. Saves money.


    Have fun


    PS:
    From yesterdays presentation and older sources:

    Number of CIG employees

    Mid 2012       5
    Oct 2012       7
    Nov 2012       8
    Feb 2013      20
    Jun 2013      32
    Aug 2013      40
    Oct 2013      52
    Dec 2013     60
    Feb 2014     93
    Jun 2014    139
    Aug 2014   156
    Feb 2015   205
    Aug 2015   260


    Number of Star Citizens

    Mid 2012                   5
    Oct 2012          60447
    Nov 2012       101.711
    Feb 2013       121.197
    Jun 2013        134.000
    Aug 2013       195.994
    Oct 2013       248.109
    Dec 2013       ? (typo here, CIG wrote 195.994 again, the AUG number)
    Feb 2014       358.248
    Jun 2014       416.386
    Aug 2014      595.335
    Feb 2015      724.725
    Aug 2015      929.976





  • Red_ThomasRed_Thomas Member RarePosts: 666
    Erillion said:
    Red ... you may want to review your estimate. Have you taken into account the following information ?

    Around 260 CIG employees total. 160 of them in UK,  30 ish in Germany (numbers quoted from recent videos, interviews and reports). That leaves 70 ish in the USA. You know Austin numbers well, so you should have a good idea about the remaining number in California.

    Mocap and facial capture was done in UK. Actors did mocap + facial capture, including Gary Oldman and Gillian Anderson (it was shown in the video). I think Audio is also done mostly in UK.

    Very detailed employee numbers were given in the Review video at the beginning of the presentation, showing that this 260 employee number is a quite recent level.

    External contractor number seems to have gone down from 80ish to 50ish.

    Average salaries for programmers are significantly lower in UK and Germany compared to the US.  CIG devs have reported that salaries in Austin are comparatively high  (SWTOR revival and its need for programmers was cited as one of the reasons, competition seems stiff, benefits like sports studio access was named). Thats Austin compared to California  (outside Silicon Valley, of course).

    CIG seems to enjoy a 10 % tax reduction in the UK. Saves money.


    Have fun
    I think the tax break in the UK is actually 25%, from what I've been told.  I don't do work over there, so no personal experience.

    Austin rates may be higher for Austin, and that may be true because I know two other studios have had trouble filling slots, but it's for very specific developers.  Though, I'm thinking it might have been the art-side, not the persistent world, which is what Austin's supposed to be in charge of.

    Also, Austin high for Austin does not mean Austin high for California.  CA is insane.  That's why so many tech jobs have been leaving CA for TX.  The taxes alone are less, but we also have cheaper people, cheaper property, and way cheaper power.  Besides, there aren't many folks left working in Austin.  Place was a ghost town last time I was over there.

    But fair point.  If you take 40 away, that's about $4-6 million less this year.  Super roughly.  That's not budgetary numbers, but if I were looking to do business with folks, that's the rough number I might use as a first cut to see if they're healthy.  Doesn't mean anything other than a warning sign.
  • Red_ThomasRed_Thomas Member RarePosts: 666
    btw, @Erillion I'm not suggesting those numbers are proof of anything at all, just a super rough guestimate of baseline costs to date.  It's just a really rough: "this is about how much they've spent," and for every employee I'm off in the rough calculation, there's a ton of other stuff that I'm not calculating.  There's no telling what execs are being paid, which throws it off.  We also don't know what their utilities costs or license costs are.

    So The number is only there as a generic starting point for conversation.  Sort of like when you say there are a million backers.   We know there aren't a million backers because there are probably a lot of us who snagged two or more accounts, but it's a good number to use as a rough starting point if you wanted it in a conversation.
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    @Red_Thomas

    Food for thought:

    Well, according to the RSI website there are currently 765.773 paying accounts with one or more ships (=UEE Fleet Captains).  I am sure that does not mean there are 765.773 genuine persons as some will have multiple accounts, but if I guess half a million persons that should not be too far off.  995.187 forum accounts have been created by ??? people.

    When it comes to programmer salaries in California i can only listen to what two of my friends have to say. One is working for Google, the other for Intel. They tell my that the salaries around Silicon Valley are TOP, but you need it because prices are so high, especially for living. Salaries in Redmond, Washington (not California), near Seattle also seem to be high. Salaries in other parts of California are pretty average according to them, below average near universities. If we believe some of the older Glassdoor reviews of CIG (they seem to be legit to me, in contrast to an influx of more recent Glassdoor reviews full of rubbish like alien abduction etc.)  the salaries paid by CIG for the normal, non manager employee is slightly below average.

    I suspect that even for higher level execs the salary is not too high, which may have been the reason why some execs have left or have been "headhunted" by larger companies. I remember that CIG's first CFO was poached away by the creators of "World of Tanks" with an offer she could not refuse.

    When it comes to license cost i can not say anything definite. But I can share with you a rumour that i heard from the German GameStar magazine. In 2014 they did an extended piece on CryTek and its big financial troubles. An unnamed group of White Knight investors seem to have helped CryTek in the middle of 2014 and Chris Roberts was said to have had a hand in that. A good deal on the CryEngine license and several CryTek key engineers were named as the reward for Chris Roberts. In 2015 the CIG Frankfurt Studio was founded, with some of the best CryEngine programmers from CryTek. And no hurt feelings whatsoever from CryTek.
    But as i said ... that is only a rumour. My point:  I think they are not paying a lot of license fees.

    Judging by what i have seen on pictures of their various studios they are not exactly renting high price office space at No.#1 locations. So i assume their overhead cost w.r.t. infrastructure is manageable.

    When it comes to gaming events like GamesCon they clearly have not rented a lot of expensive booth space on the fairground itself. The CIG booth was comparatively small. They had their main events outside in nearby (presumably cheaper) location.


    Have fun


  • MrSnufflesMrSnuffles Member UncommonPosts: 1,117

    Or everyone's does. I just find it amusing that while all these people are busy running around this issue like mental patients watching their asylum burn, the people who are actually interested in this game are still giving CIG huge bunches of money. And again I doubt that people with thousands of dollars in disposable income to burn on a gamble to support their hobby are the kind of people who are uneducated buffoons.

    There's just such a disparity between what the internet lynch mob is saying vs what the people with actual monetary support for SC are doing.
    Most of these "wealthy" people are betting to sell limited ships on the grey market to make a profit. That is the main reason you see all these sales. Without the grey market the total amount raised would be a lot lower. 

    Do some research and see ho many packages and ships are up for sale. It's staggering.

    People are greedy and if they think they can make easy money they will try.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    "It's pretty simple, really. If your only intention in posting about a particular game or topic is to be negative, then yes, you should probably move on. Voicing a negative opinion is fine, continually doing so on the same game is basically just trolling."
    - Michael Bitton
    Community Manager, MMORPG.com

    "As an online discussion about Star Citizen grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Derek Smart approaches 1" - MrSnuffles's law

    "I am jumping in here a bit without knowing exactly what you all or talking about." 
    - SEANMCAD

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591

    Or everyone's does. I just find it amusing that while all these people are busy running around this issue like mental patients watching their asylum burn, the people who are actually interested in this game are still giving CIG huge bunches of money. And again I doubt that people with thousands of dollars in disposable income to burn on a gamble to support their hobby are the kind of people who are uneducated buffoons.

    There's just such a disparity between what the internet lynch mob is saying vs what the people with actual monetary support for SC are doing.
    Most of these "wealthy" people are betting to sell limited ships on the grey market to make a profit. That is the main reason you see all these sales. Without the grey market the total amount raised would be a lot lower. 

    Do some research and see ho many packages and ships are up for sale. It's staggering.

    People are greedy and if they think they can make easy money they will try.

    Yes.... good old fashioned speculation. It causes grief in pretty much every facet of our lives.

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • VrikaVrika Member LegendaryPosts: 7,990
    Erillion said:
    When it comes to license cost i can not say anything definite. But I can share with you a rumour that i heard from the German GameStar magazine. In 2014 they did an extended piece on CryTek and its big financial troubles. An unnamed group of White Knight investors seem to have helped CryTek in the middle of 2014 and Chris Roberts was said to have had a hand in that. A good deal on the CryEngine license and several CryTek key engineers were named as the reward for Chris Roberts. In 2015 the CIG Frankfurt Studio was founded, with some of the best CryEngine programmers from CryTek. And no hurt feelings whatsoever from CryTek.
    But as i said ... that is only a rumour. My point:  I think they are not paying a lot of license fees.
    @Erillion ;

    According to Erin Roberts they did "an outright buyout of the engine" already in 2013. 
    Source: https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/2895381/#Comment_2895381

    They might have gained some good CryTek engineers back in 2014 when CryTek was in trouble, but that wouldn't have affected the buyout price of the engine at all.
     
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    @Vrika

    Thank you for that link. So they outright bought it, completely re-worked it and pay no license fees.


    Have fun
  • Red_ThomasRed_Thomas Member RarePosts: 666
    Erillion said:
    @Vrika

    Thank you for that link. So they outright bought it, completely re-worked it and pay no license fees.


    Have fun
    For the engine, no.  They'll have a lot of other tools and software that they do pay for, though.  The art stuff in particular is pretty expensive.

    Not that it matters a whole lot.  It takes cash to build a game, and I wouldn't blast them for saying they've spent money on that stuff.
  • GorillaGorilla Member UncommonPosts: 2,235
    I personally think that people that pledge funds through crowdfunding should enjoy similar levels of accountability and protection that regular investors would.  

    Can you access companies tax returns in the USA? you can for a  modest fee in the UK.
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    Gorilla said:
    I personally think that people that pledge funds through crowdfunding should enjoy similar levels of accountability and protection that regular investors would.  

    Can you access companies tax returns in the USA? you can for a  modest fee in the UK.

    Honest question:


    Even private, limited, companies?

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • GorillaGorilla Member UncommonPosts: 2,235
    Yeah absolutely. I suspect that's not the case stateside. There's quite a lot of info available on the Companies House website. Of course if companies haven't filed you can't get the information but late filings are usually indicative of 'issues'.
Sign In or Register to comment.