Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Early Access Lift Off Imminent

ShelassaShelassa MMORPG.COM Staff UncommonPosts: 616
edited January 2016 in News & Features Discussion

imageEarly Access Lift Off Imminent

Ethan Casner and team have put out a new trailer and information that announces that early access to Divergence Online simply awaits Steam giving it the literal green light to open. Considered by developers to be the "spiritual successor to Star Wars: Galaxies", the game has had its ups and downs over its eight years in development but now, with core features in place, the game is ready to launch for $40, with a $30 price tag during launch week.

Read the full story here


Post edited by SBFord on
«1

Comments

  • SpottyGekkoSpottyGekko Member EpicPosts: 6,916
    Is this the longest-running MMO development project in history ?

    After 8 years, they are "ready for Early Access" ! Full game will probably launch around 2023 then ? :D
  • darkedone02darkedone02 Member UncommonPosts: 581
    SpottyGekko said:
    Is this the longest-running MMO development project in history ?



    After 8 years, they are "ready for Early Access" ! Full game will probably launch around 2023 then ? :D


    better late then never.

    image

  • rodarinrodarin Member EpicPosts: 2,611
    Another SWG 2.0? I always love hearing this nonsense. SWG WASNT that great to begin with people just have selective memories.

    This game will have 10 people playing it within a month. Open PvP everywhere, full loot, perma-death (sort of). AND a sub. The contributors and guys who have bought in will be there but thats about it. Probably be akin to Fallen Earth in population. start out with a couple thousand people then within a couple months a few hundred.

    But FE still has (apparently) enough people still logging in to make it profitable (except they went FTP and were bought out a few years ago). But just because servers are still open doesnt mean its worth playing.

    Seriously these games need to stop comparing themselves to other games (especially failed games) and just hope its good enough for people to play. I am just waiting for the first "its Vanguard 2.0'' game to come out.
  • lemonhead78lemonhead78 Member UncommonPosts: 31
    Perhaps I am too optimistic, but they have come a long way. It looks pretty cool. I will keep my eye on it.
  • titanofdoomtitanofdoom Member UncommonPosts: 263
    8 years for those abysmal graphics? I wouldn't impede on my pc's honour installing that awful looking drab trash!
    Perennially extricating the extraneous
  • OzmodanOzmodan Member EpicPosts: 9,726
    edited January 2016
    Can you spell Rip-Off?  Not only does it have no features close to what Star Wars Galaxies was, it looks like some 6 year old made it.
  • PygozPygoz Member UncommonPosts: 20
    edited January 2016
    Ozmodan said:
    Can you spell Rip-Off?  Not only does it have no features close to what Star Wars Galaxies was, it looks like some 6 year old made it.
    Do you know what 6 year olds can make, that's right they can play with some blocks etc, they have no understanding of programs like Autodesk 3DS Max or Maya or Zbrush. Not to even start about the programming of the game. Don't even go there man, you have no idea what you are talking about.
  • MrSnufflesMrSnuffles Member UncommonPosts: 1,117
    This looks horrible. Seems to be a mix between Entropia and SWG. In fact it does look like the old Entropia engine. Pretty sure it is.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    "It's pretty simple, really. If your only intention in posting about a particular game or topic is to be negative, then yes, you should probably move on. Voicing a negative opinion is fine, continually doing so on the same game is basically just trolling."
    - Michael Bitton
    Community Manager, MMORPG.com

    "As an online discussion about Star Citizen grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Derek Smart approaches 1" - MrSnuffles's law

    "I am jumping in here a bit without knowing exactly what you all or talking about." 
    - SEANMCAD

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
  • thunderclesthundercles Member UncommonPosts: 510
    The hate is strong in this thread.
  • SplattrSplattr Member RarePosts: 577
    Pygoz said:
    Ozmodan said:
    Can you spell Rip-Off?  Not only does it have no features close to what Star Wars Galaxies was, it looks like some 6 year old made it.
    Do you know what 6 year olds can make, that's right they can play with some blocks etc, they have no understanding of programs like Autodesk 3DS Max or Maya or Zbrush. Not to even start about the programming of the game. Don't even go there man, you have no idea what you are talking about.
    Too much coffee this morning? You forgot to add that he said it looked like only one 6 year old made it when there is obviously more than 1 person working on it. Relax a little bit, I am pretty sure he wasn't being literal, just trying to express his belief that the graphics suck.

    And he is correct in that the graphics are not top notch. The UI is obviously incomplete:



    Character models are a poor quality, and is that a dinosaur in the middle of their base? Looks like more programming is needed, though my 7 year old (one year older than the stated age of the devs) would like it left that way:


    Gunfire sfx are weak. Muzzle flash and lens flare are great ideas, but not if I can't see the middle of the screen when it happens:

    I personally prefer floating trees, but the OP may not:

    Long distance view shots are subpar:

    I personally can look past all this if the gameplay is awesome, and hopefully the graphics will improve before the offical launch. The OP sounds like he feels the graphics at this stage are unacceptable and used hyperbole to get his point across. Perhaps instead of ranting about his post you could show some real proof that he has "no idea what you are talking about."

  • SEANMCADSEANMCAD Member EpicPosts: 16,775
    System said:
    imageEarly Access Lift Off Imminent


    Read the full story here

    what in the love of god is up with the music choice in the linked video

    Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.

    Please do not respond to me

  • GeezerGamerGeezerGamer Member EpicPosts: 8,857
    As soon as I see the words "Early Access" I'm out.
  • psiicpsiic Member RarePosts: 1,642
    More like Repopulation 2.0, this game looks like and promises all the same failures as Repopulation did.
  • SEANMCADSEANMCAD Member EpicPosts: 16,775
    psiic said:
    More like Repopulation 2.0, this game looks like and promises all the same failures as Repopulation did.
    repop failed because of crafting?

    interesting....

    Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.

    Please do not respond to me

  • FacelessSaviorFacelessSavior Member UncommonPosts: 188
    rodarin said:
    Another SWG 2.0? I always love hearing this nonsense. SWG WASNT that great to begin with people just have selective memories.



    This game will have 10 people playing it within a month. Open PvP everywhere, full loot, perma-death (sort of). AND a sub. The contributors and guys who have bought in will be there but thats about it. Probably be akin to Fallen Earth in population. start out with a couple thousand people then within a couple months a few hundred.



    But FE still has (apparently) enough people still logging in to make it profitable (except they went FTP and were bought out a few years ago). But just because servers are still open doesnt mean its worth playing.



    Seriously these games need to stop comparing themselves to other games (especially failed games) and just hope its good enough for people to play. I am just waiting for the first "its Vanguard 2.0'' game to come out.


    Actually, The Developer caved to the vocal pve crowd over at massively a few months ago. The same crowd that shoots down every open world, pvp game said they'd donate if there was a pve server, and Ethan decided he'd stretch his already thin resources and make one. For what it's worth.
  • SEANMCADSEANMCAD Member EpicPosts: 16,775
    rodarin said:
    Another SWG 2.0? I always love hearing this nonsense. SWG WASNT that great to begin with people just have selective memories.



    This game will have 10 people playing it within a month. Open PvP everywhere, full loot, perma-death (sort of). AND a sub. The contributors and guys who have bought in will be there but thats about it. Probably be akin to Fallen Earth in population. start out with a couple thousand people then within a couple months a few hundred.



    But FE still has (apparently) enough people still logging in to make it profitable (except they went FTP and were bought out a few years ago). But just because servers are still open doesnt mean its worth playing.



    Seriously these games need to stop comparing themselves to other games (especially failed games) and just hope its good enough for people to play. I am just waiting for the first "its Vanguard 2.0'' game to come out.


    Actually, The Developer caved to the vocal pve crowd over at massively a few months ago. The same crowd that shoots down every open world, pvp game said they'd donate if there was a pve server, and Ethan decided he'd stretch his already thin resources and make one. For what it's worth.
    well and if people would release their grip on playing only MMOs for just a second they would notice that there is now no shortage of crafting/home base building games out there now

    Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.

    Please do not respond to me

  • Hashcow101Hashcow101 Member UncommonPosts: 105
    This game is a complete rip off of swg if you look at lil things you can tell its just a repolished version of swg, and repolished is being used strongly.

    Examples,

    The cloning bay in the first scene is exactly the same layout to the tee as in swg.

    The resource icons for crafting are the exact same.

    The surveying screen for crafting is the exact same.

    Ui menu screens have the exact same layout and style.

    Note all these thing were noticed in less then two minutes of video footage. I see this company getting a giant lawsuit over this. In my opinion this is the biggest fake / ripoff that devlopers can pull.

    "May Your Head Explode And Blood Swell From The Wound"
    - Hashcow

  • LordCeonLordCeon Member UncommonPosts: 47
    looks like the graphic of a 1990s mmo T_T

    image
  • faidedfaided Member UncommonPosts: 111
    If you want to be the Spiritual Successor to SWG that is fine by me. I don't agree with the "SWG 2.0" thing and I also will NEVER back this project. They BLATANTLY used SWG textures and even looks like a few models as well in this project.

    This project has even gone as far as to completely COPY the surveying system. If I wanted to play SWG I would just play the EMU. If I want better graphics ill load in a texture pack.

    Lastly, you can be "The next SWG" without copying directly with no clear innovation. This project is just sad.
  • TybostTybost Member UncommonPosts: 629
    Music used in the official trailer is apparently copyrighted.

    But anyway... it looks more like SWG 1.5 - I'm surprised Divergence hit #1 on the steam greenlight when last month AQ3D Greenlight only reached #4 (not that you can compare the two) just surprised that a game with a solid background and followers failed to reach at least #2 interest, and that's while having an active Kickstarter running.

    I just bought into an Early Access game about a week ago (Squad) and it will be in E-A for about a year (great game, high recommend), wondering how long Divergence will be under E-A wrappings.
  • SpiiderSpiider Member RarePosts: 1,135
    If you can make crafting essential and pvp interessting I'm in. Ripoff or not, I would rather play a sci fi swhw lookalike than wow original (yeah original LOL seriously...)

    No fate but what we make, so make me a ham sandwich please.

  • alakramalakram Member UncommonPosts: 2,301
    mmm looks interesting



  • AonevmAonevm Member UncommonPosts: 26
    edited January 2016
    the official site is empty except a big popup saying we require flash lol
  • reeereeereeereee Member UncommonPosts: 1,636
    8 years for those abysmal graphics? I wouldn't impede on my pc's honour installing that awful looking drab trash!
    I dunno, I can't name a single indie MMO that has better graphics than what I'm seeing in the video.  The walking animation is a bit clunky looking but... yeah if that's too ugly to install I guess that also rules out every indie MMO and everything ever made on the hero engine?
  • StimzStimz Member UncommonPosts: 79
    Hashcow101 said:
    This game is a complete rip off of swg if you look at lil things you can tell its just a repolished version of swg, and repolished is being used strongly.



    Examples,



    The cloning bay in the first scene is exactly the same layout to the tee as in swg.



    The resource icons for crafting are the exact same.



    The surveying screen for crafting is the exact same.



    Ui menu screens have the exact same layout and style.



    Note all these thing were noticed in less then two minutes of video footage. I see this company getting a giant lawsuit over this. In my opinion this is the biggest fake / ripoff that devlopers can pull.


    They state in one of their videos that they remade everything to be as close to SWG as possible, as far as building/extractors and such at least. But I guess you didn't care to research a bit before bashing it. I think It's awesome that they are doing that.

    image

Sign In or Register to comment.