60FPS PC GAMEPLAY - The Division

System

60FPS PC GAMEPLAY - The Division

On March 8th, Tom Clancy's The Division will simultaneously launch on PC with dedicated visual and technical optimizations that make New York City more immersive than ever. See some of the gameplay benefits of the PC version in this 60 FPS trailer, captured in 60 Frames Per Second on PC. For the best viewing experience, please make sure to watch on the most recent generation devices. Also available on Xbox One and PS4 on March 8th. View PC Specs on the Ubiblog: http://blog.ubi.com/the-divis

Read the full story here

rojoArcueid

60 fps gameplay is always exquisite, but i'll get the PS4 version at 30fps for the same reason i got GTAV on ps4 at 30fps. Hackers aint gonna ruin my experience.

Tasslehoff35

rojoArcueid said:

60 fps gameplay is always exquisite, but i'll get the PS4 version at 30fps for the same reason i got GTAV on ps4 at 30fps. Hackers aint gonna ruin my experience.

I would actually prefer to play it on my xb1 but my mmorpg friends are all picking it up on the PC.  None of us really saw any hacking during the beta let's hope they get the hacking locked down. 

SEANMCAD

but but but ubisoft I thought it didnt matter?....

RPGMASTERGAMER

Tasslehoff35 said:

rojoArcueid said:

60 fps gameplay is always exquisite, but i'll get the PS4 version at 30fps for the same reason i got GTAV on ps4 at 30fps. Hackers aint gonna ruin my experience.

I would actually prefer to play it on my xb1 but my mmorpg friends are all picking it up on the PC.  None of us really saw any hacking during the beta let's hope they get the hacking locked down. 

item and others stuft was players side on the players computer, the game got hacked in 12 hour with unlimited amo, items ect

mmorpg did even one news about that, the game will be hacker, hacker alway find a way

pick the console of the place you want to play and enjoy the game, console are usualy more safe but they can get hacker too

rojoArcueid

Tasslehoff35 said:

rojoArcueid said:

60 fps gameplay is always exquisite, but i'll get the PS4 version at 30fps for the same reason i got GTAV on ps4 at 30fps. Hackers aint gonna ruin my experience.

I would actually prefer to play it on my xb1 but my mmorpg friends are all picking it up on the PC.  None of us really saw any hacking during the beta let's hope they get the hacking locked down. 

I agree with playing where you friends are. Luckily with this particular game my friends that i know will be playing are also on console.

ElRenmazuo

I really like the style of music in the game, it sounds like new retro

Phry

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

rojoArcueid

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

SEANMCAD

rojoArcueid said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

yeah but didnt ubisoft say there wasnt any noticeable difference between 30 and 60?

ElRenmazuo

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

Or use Black Borders and retain good res+fps.  Worked out for The Evil Within, it looked like I was playing a movie.

SEANMCAD

Phry said:

At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales

they, or their koolaid drinking fans, will never admit it though

rojoArcueid

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

yeah but didnt ubisoft say there wasnt any noticeable difference between 30 and 60?

they cannot say that, you must be blind to not notice a difference between 30 and 60. But look at GTAV for example, not in a million years would i care about it at 60fps on the PC version full of hackers. I rather sacrifice the extra 30fps and have a clean gameplay. If the pvp was a separate unimportant map in the division then i would have considered it on PC without risking wasting my money.

Phry

ElRenmazuo said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

Or use Black Borders and retain good res+fps.  Worked out for The Evil Within, it looked like I was playing a movie.

The difference between 30fps and 60fps is not restricted to visuals, but in how the game 'handles' for 30fps games there is a certain degree of 'controller lag' that just is not present in a game that runs at 60fps, its not something that can be made to go away just by sticking the game behind a black border and adding a 'film grain' if anything thats a cheap tactic that few players find acceptable even in games that do run at 60 fps.

SEANMCAD

rojoArcueid said:

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

yeah but didnt ubisoft say there wasnt any noticeable difference between 30 and 60?

they cannot say that, you must be blind to not notice a difference between 30 and 60. But look at GTAV for example, not in a million years would i care about it at 60fps on the PC version full of hackers. I rather sacrifice the extra 30fps and have a clean gameplay. If the pvp was a separate unimportant map in the division then i would have considered it on PC without risking wasting my money.

I would rather somoene like ubisoft to come out and simply say 'we were mistaken' rather then try to change the conversation into hackers.


as an example

Derros

Perfect, I just built a new computer to replace my 6 year old one.

rojoArcueid

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

yeah but didnt ubisoft say there wasnt any noticeable difference between 30 and 60?

they cannot say that, you must be blind to not notice a difference between 30 and 60. But look at GTAV for example, not in a million years would i care about it at 60fps on the PC version full of hackers. I rather sacrifice the extra 30fps and have a clean gameplay. If the pvp was a separate unimportant map in the division then i would have considered it on PC without risking wasting my money.

I would rather somoene like ubisoft to come out and simply say 'we were mistaken' rather then try to change the conversation into hackers.


as an example

i didnt change the conversation into hackers, go read my first post on this thread, i said that is the main reason im not getting the glorified 60fps version on PC, hackers. And gave another example (GTAV) which is a very relevant game plagued with them on PC to this day.

Also, Ubi already said on an interview the console version will have graphic settings that you can change to increase FPS over visuals. That is always good.

http://gamerant.com/the-division-console-frame-rate/

SEANMCAD

rojoArcueid said:

i didnt change the conversation into hackers, go read my first post on this thread, i said that is the main reason im not getting the glorified 60fps version on PC, hackers. And gave another example (GTAV) which is a very relevant game plagued with them on PC to this day.

Also, Ubi already said on an interview the console version will have graphic settings that you can change to increase FPS over visuals. That is always good.

http://gamerant.com/the-division-console-frame-rate/

dont overthink what I said it was not directed to you its why I said 'as an example'

Tasslehoff35

SEANMCAD said:

Phry said:

At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales

they, or their koolaid drinking fans, will never admit it though

There are multiple flavors.  Some will put all their eggs in one basket even change their signature on random sites to show their flavor.  Even when that company jacks up the price from $300 to $600 that person will continue to make desperate attempts to justify the companies shady practices.  That person will then spam other games and cry about those companies while defending his one and only basket.  

SEANMCAD

Tasslehoff35 said:

SEANMCAD said:

Phry said:

At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales

they, or their koolaid drinking fans, will never admit it though

There are multiple flavors.  Some will put all their eggs in one basket even change their signature on random sites to show their flavor.  Even when that company jacks up the price from $300 to $600 that person will continue to make desperate attempts to justify the companies shady practices.  That person will then spam other games and cry about those companies while defending his one and only basket.  

even though using another forum to make points from a different forum wouldnt be classified as being very clever I did respond to your post in that other forum and I fail to see the problem 

Tasslehoff35

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

yeah but didnt ubisoft say there wasnt any noticeable difference between 30 and 60?

they cannot say that, you must be blind to not notice a difference between 30 and 60. But look at GTAV for example, not in a million years would i care about it at 60fps on the PC version full of hackers. I rather sacrifice the extra 30fps and have a clean gameplay. If the pvp was a separate unimportant map in the division then i would have considered it on PC without risking wasting my money.

I would rather somoene like ubisoft to come out and simply say 'we were mistaken' rather then try to change the conversation into hackers.


as an example

You should worry about Oculus not Unisoft.  

Phry

rojoArcueid said:

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

SEANMCAD said:

rojoArcueid said:

Phry said:

Kind of feel sorry for people who get this game on console, 30 fps is, without doubt the worst possible choice, they would be better off reducing the resolution so that 60 fps was achievable, for a shooter game, any shooter game for that matter, 60 fps is really the minimum acceptable.
At least now they understand that 30fps on PC would have cost them sales, still, poor console owners, they end up with an inferior product for no good reason.

why poor console owners? i have a gaming PC too, and the reason i gave above for choosing the console version is more than enough to justify it. True, 30fps is lame in 2016, but a hacker free experience trumps 60fps in my book.

yeah but didnt ubisoft say there wasnt any noticeable difference between 30 and 60?

they cannot say that, you must be blind to not notice a difference between 30 and 60. But look at GTAV for example, not in a million years would i care about it at 60fps on the PC version full of hackers. I rather sacrifice the extra 30fps and have a clean gameplay. If the pvp was a separate unimportant map in the division then i would have considered it on PC without risking wasting my money.

I would rather somoene like ubisoft to come out and simply say 'we were mistaken' rather then try to change the conversation into hackers.


as an example

i didnt change the conversation into hackers, go read my first post on this thread, i said that is the main reason im not getting the glorified 60fps version on PC, hackers. And gave another example (GTAV) which is a very relevant game plagued with them on PC to this day.

Also, Ubi already said on an interview the console version will have graphic settings that you can change to increase FPS over visuals. That is always good.

http://gamerant.com/the-division-console-frame-rate/

During beta, The Division had a lot of hackers because the game was totally unprotected, one would hope that the released version would not be in the same pitiful state.
Yes Ubi have said that the console versions will have graphical settings, whether that will enable players to enjoy the game at 60 fps or not, will have to wait and see, although even if they just increase the framerate to 45 fps, that would be a significant improvement, although even if they reduced the games resolution to 720p so that it would run at 60 fps i would imagine that would be an acceptable thing for most players.
 If Ubi really did give players on console that kind of option to choose whether the game ran at 30fps with better graphics, or 60 fps with just 'good' graphics, then it would be something of a 'revolution' for them, particularly in view of their previous games, but in a seriously good way.

SEANMCAD

I would be very impressed with ubisoft if they made a statement regarding the 60fps possible for PC as it relates to their 'cinematic' statement, other than 'we have it now'

I can think of one statment that could address it, give them an 'out' and make them look for saying it.

'even though we still agree with our orginal statement of cinematic (which we know is BS) we felt it good to give PC gamers what they prefer. Clearly not in all cases but we do want to try and help them have the options they see as important'

or

'that statement we made was bollocks so we are fixing it'

maskedweasel

Phry said:

rojoArcueid said:

SEANMCAD said:

i didnt change the conversation into hackers, go read my first post on this thread, i said that is the main reason im not getting the glorified 60fps version on PC, hackers. And gave another example (GTAV) which is a very relevant game plagued with them on PC to this day.

Also, Ubi already said on an interview the console version will have graphic settings that you can change to increase FPS over visuals. That is always good.

http://gamerant.com/the-division-console-frame-rate/

During beta, The Division had a lot of hackers because the game was totally unprotected, one would hope that the released version would not be in the same pitiful state.
Yes Ubi have said that the console versions will have graphical settings, whether that will enable players to enjoy the game at 60 fps or not, will have to wait and see, although even if they just increase the framerate to 45 fps, that would be a significant improvement, although even if they reduced the games resolution to 720p so that it would run at 60 fps i would imagine that would be an acceptable thing for most players.
 If Ubi really did give players on console that kind of option to choose whether the game ran at 30fps with better graphics, or 60 fps with just 'good' graphics, then it would be something of a 'revolution' for them, particularly in view of their previous games, but in a seriously good way.

I honestly don't know if any real graphics boost would be seen, I didn't mess with the graphics on the XB1, as I wasn't having any framerate issues.  I didn't try playing it on my PC either though,  but chances are it would have gotten much better framerates if it wasn't locked. 

But gameplay will always beat graphics... and framerate  at anything above 24 FPS is considered playable to me.  I mean, for all I know it could get substantially worse later on in the game.. but I guess I'll find out in 2 weeks. 

SlyLoK

I got it for PC because I got $20 off through GMG. Couldnt find a deal for PS4.

maskedweasel

SlyLoK said:

I got it for PC because I got $20 off through GMG. Couldnt find a deal for PS4.

I LOVE GMG.  I wish I could have gotten it for XB1 on GMG.  I get all my new games there, they have the best deals.