Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Nearly twenty years later, there is still no game like it...

2

Comments

  • flizzerflizzer Member RarePosts: 2,455
    We are now the old guys sitting on the porch lecturing the young' uns.  They dont want to play what we like. Bang your head against the wall or move on.  
  • goboygogoboygo Member RarePosts: 2,141
    Over 20 years later, there's still no game like UO. And pre-trammel, that's not a bad thing. It means game developers have learned from past mistakes.
    I don't think the word mistake means what you think it means.
  • psiicpsiic Member RarePosts: 1,642
    I was a Dread Lord Master Chef would make trays of deadly poison chocolate chip cookies and scatter them around for the unsuspecting noobs. One nibble and I would come out of hiding and take all their stuff.
    MrMelGibson
  • wifeaggro28wifeaggro28 Member UncommonPosts: 9
    Over 20 years later, there's still no game like UO.
    MO
  • Loke666Loke666 Member EpicPosts: 21,441
    We should be on 3Rd or 4th generation of the sandbox branch.
    Because themeparks have evolved so much as the more popular?
    They are still at second generation...
  • FakitFakit Member UncommonPosts: 2
    @Archlyte
    jajajaj
  • LynxJSALynxJSA Member RarePosts: 3,334
    Over 20 years later, there's still no game like UO. And pre-trammel, that's not a bad thing. It means game developers have learned from past mistakes.
    I would really like to see a 3D UO someday. Runescape seems to come the closest. Tried returning to UO and that game is really showing its age. Add to that the really sparse population, it was just really lacking.

    -- Whammy - a 64x64 miniRPG 
    RPG Quiz - can you get all 25 right? 
    FPS Quiz - how well do you know your shooters?  
  • ArchlyteArchlyte Member RarePosts: 1,405
    edited October 2016
    I think that the unfortunate reality is that people don't want to be challenged in the way that UO/SWG challenged players. The depth of systems and features is now considered "wasting" time while in development. If a game isn't understood and 100% predictable within a few hours of play then it's rejected and twitter begins its analysis. 

    Te bugs and bad design elements were certainly ther in those old games, but they were like early airplanes where the games now are more like fake exotic cars. They are designed to look like Ferraris but in reality they have a small 3 cylinder diesel (for simplicity) and take you no where near a different experience. 
    Hawkaya399
    MMORPG players are often like Hobbits: They don't like Adventures
  • Loke666Loke666 Member EpicPosts: 21,441
    LynxJSA said:
    I would really like to see a 3D UO someday. Runescape seems to come the closest. Tried returning to UO and that game is really showing its age. Add to that the really sparse population, it was just really lacking.

    To be fair is Shards online 3D, made by Garriot and seems pretty close to UO even if it still is in alpha state. The idea that you can create your own shard with the customized server settings your prefer and even custom content (Garriot said you even can make your own mechanics) is very good.

    I think you should have look on it , it might be what you and OP is looking for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So2pu_c80eo
  • EmeraqEmeraq Member UncommonPosts: 1,063
    Loke666 said:
    LynxJSA said:
    I would really like to see a 3D UO someday. Runescape seems to come the closest. Tried returning to UO and that game is really showing its age. Add to that the really sparse population, it was just really lacking.

    To be fair is Shards online 3D, made by Garriot and seems pretty close to UO even if it still is in alpha state. The idea that you can create your own shard with the customized server settings your prefer and even custom content (Garriot said you even can make your own mechanics) is very good.

    I think you should have look on it , it might be what you and OP is looking for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So2pu_c80eo
    Shards is made by Garriot?  I thought Shroud of the Avatar was his and Shards is Citadel right?
  • LimitationsLimitations Member UncommonPosts: 85
    Shards is made by Citadel, you are correct Eme

    Who said this won't be perfect after all we know what is right
    And the sounds of bodies clashing is enough to make them cry.
    You know this cannot be perfect even when it is feeling right.
    And the sound of bodies crashing echo through the night.

  • Rodney2016Rodney2016 Member CommonPosts: 2
     :) 
  • Loke666Loke666 Member EpicPosts: 21,441
    Emeraq said:
    Loke666 said:
    To be fair is Shards online 3D, made by Garriot and seems pretty close to UO even if it still is in alpha state. The idea that you can create your own shard with the customized server settings your prefer and even custom content (Garriot said you even can make your own mechanics) is very good.

    I think you should have look on it , it might be what you and OP is looking for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So2pu_c80eo
    Shards is made by Garriot?  I thought Shroud of the Avatar was his and Shards is Citadel right?
    Ok, Im stupid and mixing up things (I blame that I have the flu). But Citadel do have Draconi who worked on the UO team ... Sorry.
  • WernerRealmWernerRealm Member CommonPosts: 7
    edited May 2018
    Neverwinter 
    Post edited by WernerRealm on
  • xidbmixidbmi Member CommonPosts: 7
    edited August 2018
    In FFXI you get a mog house, open world with roaming notorious monsters, guilds, traditional EQ style camps and you need a group to do alot of stuff (pservers anyway). Also player run economy and mostly all equipment, food, weapons, etc are made by players and traded or put on auction house. 
    Join us on Lastbossxi for focus on group play and community: https://discord.gg/ec6d8Br
  • WarWitchWarWitch Member UncommonPosts: 351
    I and my wife mis SWG so much, We had 13 accounts and told sorrowoney they were screwing it up, we even did a patition over 100k players.
  • XiaokiXiaoki Member EpicPosts: 4,045
    You misunderstood what I was saying :)
    SWG is basically post-Trammel UO in space (before they ruined it with NG).

    Most devs learned 20 years ago that a gankfest doesn't work as a MMORPG. UO before trammel was a recipe of a major failure to happen soon. Some devs sadly try to repeat that failure, but most understood that it just does not work.
    Pre-Trammel Ultima Online was a failure. EA was really close to shutting it down because over 70% of new players were being driven away.

    Trammel is what saved Ultima Online from an untimely death.



    This post(its a couple posts down) from Gordon "Tyrant" Walton should be required reading.
    [Deleted User]Lokero
  • GitmixGitmix Member UncommonPosts: 605
    SWG was good fun, I loved the city building, the crafting, the entertainer buffs etc. Many things about it were terrible though. I stopped playing it when WoW came out. WoW felt very shallow in comparison but at least it was polished.
  • ScorchienScorchien Member LegendaryPosts: 8,914
    And yet the most active UO servers , right now carry pre -Trammel rule sets , servers packed to the gills with players ... 24/7................. go figure
    Gdemami
  • vonryan123vonryan123 Member UncommonPosts: 516
    WarWitch said:
    I and my wife mis SWG so much, We had 13 accounts and told sorrowoney they were screwing it up, we even did a patition over 100k players.
    Come to swg:legends

    image
  • Hawkaya399Hawkaya399 Member RarePosts: 620
    edited May 2019
    noncley said:
    A vast, truly open world...

    ...Where you could build and decorate your own house...

    ...And create real, working towns...

    ...With bars, hospitals, shops and even malls...

    ...You could defend with automatic defences and NPC guards...

    ...And which, if you were unlucky, could be invaded and seized by player-armies...

    ...Where almost every object had a three-D representation that you could move and place...

    ...Where you could biologically manipulate almost any animal, train them and use them to hunt...

    ...Which was a sandbox - but also had discrete themeparks within that sandbox...

    ...Where you could build, customise and decorate vehicles that would travel across the instantless landscapes - or take you high above them...

    ...Where you could build and sell anything from food to clothes to guns to drugs to vehicles to candles...

    ...Where you could become rich or powerful or even strong far beyond the efforts of ordinary players - but where you could also reach the top of the tree without killing anything or anyone...

    Do you know what game I am talking about? And can you imagine how such a game would do today if it were bug-free and properly supported? ...IT WAS THE CHOSEN ONE!
    I have been keeping track of the "holy grail" sort of MMO for a long time, but the problem is my ideal is so incredibly niche, since it's NOT themepark-based and is more about simulation than game mechanics. I also prefer PvP, since I think PvE either isn't pushed far enough or never will reach the challenges of PvP. Right now I'm playing Wurm Online on Chaos--to give you an idea what I prefer, but I'd also consider MMO's like Mortal Online, Xsyon, RoA, The Repulation, Haven and Hearth and others.

    Here're my guesses noncley:
    1) Fallout Online (canceled, but large parts of it had been designed and even coded and modeled, so much so player-run towns could be made)
    2) Avalon (this is a MUD--maybe one of the most extensive sandboxes ever)
    3) The Repopulation
    4) Fallen Earth??? (doubtful i think--it's not full sandbox)
    5) Is it or is it not Star Wars Galaxies?

    But honestly I've seen many HUNDREDS of sandbox/sandbox-lite MMO's and I easily could be missing it. There're also many dozens of sandbox MUDs, and thye did this more than 20 years ago. There're so many more which reached Alpha or maybe even early Beta but never released. Therer'e so many obscure MMO's like Daimonin, so this is tough.
    Post edited by Hawkaya399 on
  • Hawkaya399Hawkaya399 Member RarePosts: 620
    edited May 2019
    Wizardry said:
    I thought swg looked way too dated to enjoy,contrary to belief graphics matter enough that they have to be bearable.Once a game is dated it is goodbye,nice game while lasted but time to find a better more improved version of.

    *skip*
    If you think that then it's clear to me you really don't care about the gameplay. I've never cared THAT much about graphics. I've met many players like myself. This is why I strongly doubt you're actually looking for this. Maybe you've convinced yourself you're looking for it, but in truth you're easily led by a leash.

    I'll confess graphics matter, if we're comparing something like Haven and Hearth to Dwarf Fortress. But honestly, Fallen Earth compard to Haven and Hearth doesn't matter as much to me. It's a bigger leap from text to 2d, IMHO. Text-based graphics really do rub me the wrong way, even though I think Avalon is probably hte most impressive sandbox out there.

    Avalon is also probably one of the oldest mmorpgs still in existence. 30 years at least. It has it all really, if you can stomach text gaming. However, if you get a good mud client, you might be able to improvise some graphics.... for example, some DF mods give it a graphical overhaul, even though it's still barebones.

    Oh ya, Dwarf Fortress is probably the most impressive single player sandbox. I've seen NOTHING like it. Therer're a lot of clones now, but they're cheap imitations of a masterpiece. DF is going to be remember historically. That's how amazing it's. It's original too. The clones will come and go like rain, like cheap imitation leather. Some might achieve higher populations, but never the credit that's due to the creators of DF and its long adventure. There'll be better sandboxes in the future, I won't deny that. DF is one attempt to attain the dream of a fully realized virtual reality. I applaud the attempt. I'm specifically targetting the clones piggybacking DF's achievements.

    Here's a link to four MUDs recommended by someone here at mmorpg.com.

    Here's another link about a possible client and graphical approach:
    Post edited by Hawkaya399 on
  • Hawkaya399Hawkaya399 Member RarePosts: 620
    edited May 2019
    Xiaoki said:
    You misunderstood what I was saying :)
    SWG is basically post-Trammel UO in space (before they ruined it with NG).

    Most devs learned 20 years ago that a gankfest doesn't work as a MMORPG. UO before trammel was a recipe of a major failure to happen soon. Some devs sadly try to repeat that failure, but most understood that it just does not work.
    Pre-Trammel Ultima Online was a failure. EA was really close to shutting it down because over 70% of new players were being driven away.

    Trammel is what saved Ultima Online from an untimely death.



    This post(its a couple posts down) from Gordon "Tyrant" Walton should be required reading.
    They went from 125k subs to 245k subs. This doesn't prove open world PvP is impossible or even incorrect, it's just unpopular. He/she even states in the post there were some negative consequences--although outweighed by the positives. You could make the game even more mainstream and the pops would jump from 245k to 1 million. This whole thing can go on and on until ti's Farmville or a variant of Fortnite or PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (a battle royale variant) or MOBA variant. The whole point of business is USUALLY to reach a bigger audience--in other words to grow. Reaching a bigger audience doesn't mean your previous audience is invalid. If this were true, most of the people posting in this thread are invalid because we're not playing the games--or sub/genre--with the highest pops.

    There's definitely an audience for it. There're multitudes of open world survival PvP MMO's. World's Adrift and Rust and MANY others are example of modern variants. Some fail worse than others, like Darkfall or Shadowbane. Some have tiny pops like Xsyon or Wurm Online or Mortal Online, and others. These're older examples. Just look at Steam--there're many more examples. MMORPG types tend to be hard to do because they're combining traditional RPG with the harsh open world pvp survival. It's a very small audience seeking both in the same game. This is why tye most succesfull open world pvp survival MMO's are more like a traditional FPS than a traditional MMORPG.

    The post you reference also says this:
    If I had the chance to do it again, (and we had different fiscal and time constraints), we would have done something more like keeping the current current worlds with the original ruleset (like we later did with the Seige Perilous shard, which was too late in my view), and make new shards with a more PvE ruleset

    That's in fact why many of these MMO's survive. Wurm ONline, for example, created non-PvP servers, and also created private servers with Wurm Unlimited. This allowed the smaller hardcore PvP players and open world survival enthusiasts to still get what they wanted while keeping pops up.

    Post edited by Hawkaya399 on
  • roger0486roger0486 Newbie CommonPosts: 10

    We Offer ATT BellSouth Email Support Contact Help Number for fix BellSouth Emails, Server like Login, Sign in, Password Recovery, Forget Password etc. Call BellSouth.net Email Help Number

    Get More Information http://bellsouth-email.contactsupporthelpnumber.com/

     http://bellsouth-email.contactsupporthelpnumber.com/bellsouth-email-contact-number-att-contact.php

    http://bellsouth-email.contactsupporthelpnumber.com/bellsouth-email-customer-service-number-usa.php

Sign In or Register to comment.