1. it doesnt matter 2. at best it barely even touches one of my 7 or so EXAMPLES that refer to a point 3. it doesnt address the core point at all even remotely.
for your reference here is the core point: back to a core point I made awhile back I think its rather silly to suggest that full complete AAA quality content in large amounts need to be made aviable at or near day 1 of a new technology. I dont think that is a pattern that is repeated anywhere else other than maybe consoles.
Why would someone even think that is an expected normal formula is something I cant imagine much like I cant imagine why some people think a Gear VR is literally the exact same experience quality as a Sony VR or an Oculus but it appears those people do exist
I don't disagree, you don't necessarily need a lot of launch content. However, I think with VR it boils down more to the viability of the whole. So we've got a Rift at work. The original dev kit was meh. There was very little to get excited about. The consumer model is gorgeous. It's very slick and the the sound is fantastic. HOWEVER, I did have some issues with simulation sickness. I played some EVE Valkyrie for like a half hour and it was amazing. It is completely immersive. However, I did feel awkward for a couple hours afterwards. So sickness is definitely a concern. I could see a lot of people returning their units if they have that same experience.
1. it doesnt matter if it can or not 2. its not even related to the poliferation of 4k 3. its not even tightly tied into the core point
you are venturing into going off topic.
Why are you not answering the question? Just answer the question.
Or.. admit you're wrong.. because everybody knows you are except you. Just answer the question.
I am not answering the question becuase its LIGHT YEARS away from the core point. its not even related to my example of the CORE POINT. I need you to focus on the CORE POINT. not the EXAMPLE when talking about the core point and then getting a few layers away from even the example that is a reference to the core point.
your off topic
you have gotten us so off topic I wonder if you even recall what the core point was that brought us to these examples
Another one of your issues is that you usually deal with people that won't call you out on your shit when you try to obfuscate it to seem like you're keeping on track with the original point. Unfortunately for you, that's just you trying to get out of showing yourself for what you truly are. Wrong.
Your Quote:
"'why isnt there any VR content that runs at the full resolution of the CV1?'
because none of the dev kits had that resolution.
If you are going to create a super hit game that takes 3 years to make its kinda nice to know what resolution you have at your disposal"
and your other quote
"In the late 90s it was time for me to buy a new TV so I bought one of the first 1080p TVs. There was literally nearly zero content for me to watch on it."
and then your question:
"When BlueRay came out pretty much on day one there is major content and a lot of it."
And all that can be put to rest when you answer the question....
"Can a 4K monitor play a 1080p game? Yes or no?"
If a 4K monitor can play games with lower resolution -- then games could be developed for a set irregardless of what the final resolution is. Games don't need ot use that full resolution.. in fact none of the sets out there have games with 4K resolution, so your point is simply invalidated that VR is on the market today... so developers didn't make games not because of resolution at all. This is you making shit up as an excuse for them.
If you answer YES to a 4K monitor can play a 1080P game, then you can also answer "YES" when the question of, could Blu Ray Drives still play Standard Definition Movies. We all know it's true.. content is backwards compatible... Blu Ray players were just a step up in quality, but you always could and always would be able to play regular DVDs.
Lets go back to the final point.. You bought a 1080P TV... that had ZERO content.. you watched a demo channel you said.. Well thats bullshit. I owned plenty of 1080P TVs, and I've watched standard definition TV on them... even to this day you can watch standard definition on it. That doesn't change a thing.
So last time...
Can a 4k monitor play 1080P games? Yes or No?
like I said
1. it doesnt matter 2. at best it barely even touches one of my 7 or so EXAMPLES that refer to a point 3. it doesnt address the core point at all even remotely.
for your reference here is the core point: back to a core point I made awhile back I think its rather silly to suggest that full complete AAA quality content in large amounts need to be made aviable at or near day 1 of a new technology. I dont think that is a pattern that is repeated anywhere else other than maybe consoles.
Why would someone even think that is an expected normal formula is something I cant imagine much like I cant imagine why some people think a Gear VR is literally the exact same experience quality as a Sony VR or an Oculus but it appears those people do exist
Answer the question Sean.
Can a 4k monitor play 1080P games? Yes or No?
There's no postulating, there's no getting out of it... I explained the reasons why the answer matters, and it does, because you seem to have an excuse for everything. So answer the question so the people know you understand you are wrong. The people need to know the self-described VR fanboy understands that it has nothing to do with the resolution why Developers wasted 4 years of development kits and VR has mostly meager demos planned for the forseeable future.
The people are waiting....
Can a 4K monitor play 1080P games? Yes or No?
dude....the 'people' arent waiting other than you and your other accounts. just telling you as a side note
I don't have any other accounts. You can report me if you think I do, MMORPG moderators would definitely check into that. But plenty of people here have forum-sparred with you... I think they are all interested in the answer to this question. Will Sean finally tell the truth and answer the question with the correct answer? Or will he be stubborn and answer the question incorrectly out of spite? We all know the answer. You know the answer. We all know the impact.. now we just want you to answer it.
Yeah I was disappointed myself. Specially with the XWing VR "experience" not being a full game. Definitely pushed me to wait even longer before getting into VR, if ever. Possibly late 2017 if its still around then.
Yeah I was disappointed myself. Specially with the XWing VR "experience" not being a full game. Definitely pushed me to wait even longer before getting into VR, if ever. Possibly late 2017 if its still around then.
late 2017 is much more likely a time for people to take a second look.
Right now things are moving a lot faster than I had predicted. I didnt expect full games at this point and I didnt expect AAAs to even be talking about it much less announcing projects but even with that said from time to time even I have thought about canceling and waiting until we are more 'thick into it'. its too early right now
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Comments
I don't disagree, you don't necessarily need a lot of launch content. However, I think with VR it boils down more to the viability of the whole. So we've got a Rift at work. The original dev kit was meh. There was very little to get excited about. The consumer model is gorgeous. It's very slick and the the sound is fantastic. HOWEVER, I did have some issues with simulation sickness. I played some EVE Valkyrie for like a half hour and it was amazing. It is completely immersive. However, I did feel awkward for a couple hours afterwards. So sickness is definitely a concern. I could see a lot of people returning their units if they have that same experience.
Crazkanuk
----------------
Azarelos - 90 Hunter - Emerald
Durnzig - 90 Paladin - Emerald
Demonicron - 90 Death Knight - Emerald Dream - US
Tankinpain - 90 Monk - Azjol-Nerub - US
Brindell - 90 Warrior - Emerald Dream - US
----------------
Can a 4K monitor play 1080P games? Yes or No?
Right now things are moving a lot faster than I had predicted. I didnt expect full games at this point and I didnt expect AAAs to even be talking about it much less announcing projects but even with that said from time to time even I have thought about canceling and waiting until we are more 'thick into it'. its too early right now
Please do not respond to me, even if I ask you a question, its rhetorical.
Please do not respond to me