Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Mafia 3 Benchmarks

MalaboogaMalabooga Member UncommonPosts: 2,977
edited October 2016 in Hardware
m3_1920

Thumbnail

Post edited by Malabooga on

Comments

  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    Pretty harsh for 1080p

    Why are the two charts using the same cpu  I7 5960 and gpu Gtx 1080 so much different?

    I think were in bad need for some optimizations and some driver updates.

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383
    edited October 2016
    laserit said:
    Pretty harsh for 1080p

    Why are the two charts using the same cpu  I7 5960 and gpu Gtx 1080 so much different?

    I think were in bad need for some optimizations and some driver updates.
    I was thinking the same thing. Something isn't adding up here. The GPU scores all look suspiciously low across the board for 1080p, or the settings are not congruent between the two different tests (despite the label VHQ). I have a hard time believing that a GTX1060 or greater is required to achieve >=30fps on a x99 Broadwell 8 core.

    I've heard it's glitchy, and the initial release was 30fps capped, but 1.01 was released earlier that supposedly uncaps the FPS, and we are seeing FPS over 30, but no where near where I would expect it.
  • OhhPaigeyOhhPaigey Member RarePosts: 1,517
    Ridelynn said:
    laserit said:
    Pretty harsh for 1080p

    Why are the two charts using the same cpu  I7 5960 and gpu Gtx 1080 so much different?

    I think were in bad need for some optimizations and some driver updates.
    I was thinking the same thing. Something isn't adding up here. The GPU scores all look suspiciously low across the board for 1080p, or the settings are not congruent between the two different tests (despite the label VHQ). I have a hard time believing that a GTX1060 or greater is required to achieve >=30fps on a x99 Broadwell 8 core.

    I've heard it's glitchy, and the initial release was 30fps capped, but 1.01 was released earlier that supposedly uncaps the FPS, and we are seeing FPS over 30, but no where near where I would expect it.
    I have a GTX 970 ACX 2.0 and i5 3570k, 16gb of ram ect and the game was not even playable for me. I refunded it and downloaded it on console. Much better.
    When all is said and done, more is always said than done.
  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 7,591
    OhhPaigey said:
    Ridelynn said:
    laserit said:
    Pretty harsh for 1080p

    Why are the two charts using the same cpu  I7 5960 and gpu Gtx 1080 so much different?

    I think were in bad need for some optimizations and some driver updates.
    I was thinking the same thing. Something isn't adding up here. The GPU scores all look suspiciously low across the board for 1080p, or the settings are not congruent between the two different tests (despite the label VHQ). I have a hard time believing that a GTX1060 or greater is required to achieve >=30fps on a x99 Broadwell 8 core.

    I've heard it's glitchy, and the initial release was 30fps capped, but 1.01 was released earlier that supposedly uncaps the FPS, and we are seeing FPS over 30, but no where near where I would expect it.
    I have a GTX 970 ACX 2.0 and i5 3570k, 16gb of ram ect and the game was not even playable for me. I refunded it and downloaded it on console. Much better.
    Ouch

    Makes me wonder why the publisher wouldn't delay the PC release. Seems to do much more harm then good, releasing it in such a state.

    I'll be waiting for another patch or two, maybe a driver update before I make the purchase ;) 

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

Sign In or Register to comment.