Personally I think it'd be more vindicating if Star Citizen died by running out of funds before it got completed, or alternatively it gets "completed" but in an obvious horrifically rushed out sort of way (the two aren't completely mutually exclusive outcomes either). That'd do a lot more to prove the foolishness of the project than a death resulting from "Whoops, contract issues!" would.
If Star Citizen dies because of this lawsuit, white knights will always just claim "It would have been great if Crytek wasn't evil and didn't kill it!"
Personally I think it'd be more vindicating if Star Citizen died by running out of funds before it got completed, or alternatively it gets "completed" but in an obvious horrifically rushed out sort of way (the two aren't completely mutually exclusive outcomes either). That'd do a lot more to prove the foolishness of the project than a death resulting from "Whoops, contract issues!" would.
If Star Citizen dies because of this lawsuit, white knights will always just claim "It would have been great if Crytek wasn't evil and didn't kill it!"
More funny if they had an injunction slapped on them and then the judge grants disgorgement of profits
LoL keep wishing then. I'm sure it's right around the corner, 90 Degrees Top meme now in motion
It doesn't have to be fast. I'm fine with its backers continuing to pour their money into a hopeless cause. The inevitable will happen eventually anyways so there's no rush to that.
Personally I think it'd be more vindicating if Star Citizen died by running out of funds before it got completed, or alternatively it gets "completed" but in an obvious horrifically rushed out sort of way (the two aren't completely mutually exclusive outcomes either). That'd do a lot more to prove the foolishness of the project than a death resulting from "Whoops, contract issues!" would.
If Star Citizen dies because of this lawsuit, white knights will always just claim "It would have been great if Crytek wasn't evil and didn't kill it!"
More funny if they had an injunction slapped on them and then the judge grants disgorgement of profits
The biggest surprize in the Motion to Dismiss was the note on one of the items dismissed by the court. It essentially was taking Crytek's side by writing the amendment for them and saying (without actually saying) that the court will rule in Crytek's favor if they submit the amendment. Courts usually do this if they are unhappy with the other party; (CIG in this case) and is absolutely legal.
Unless there is a last minute settlement, we are going to get a court case out of this. Which means all the process that precedes it; including Discovery.
Win what though?
The judge ruled that CiG don't have to use CryEngine. Which means using Lumberyard is OK. This - for me - was the reason d'etre for the case (with money tied up in that). And with the ruling that they can use Lumberyard tends to draw a line under Crysis's involvement.
The ruling that SQ42 wasn't part of the agreement also explains why CiG said SQ42 was developed on Lumberyard. If the ruling was SQ42 included then OK, if not well SQ42 developed using Lumberyard (good for Amazon!).
The judge ruled that CiG don't have to use CryEngine. Which means using Lumberyard is OK. This - for me - was the reason d'etre for the case (with money tied up in that). And with the ruling that they can use Lumberyard tends to draw a line under Crysis's involvement.
The ruling that SQ42 wasn't part of the agreement also explains why CiG said SQ42 was developed on Lumberyard. If the ruling was SQ42 included then OK, if not well SQ42 developed using Lumberyard (good for Amazon!).
He doesn't know what he talks about. The MtD is ruled in favor of Crytek because the judge has to assume if there is any doubt on a complaint that it can't be dismissed and has to go to court (standard practice here). With it, they specifically were after the 2.1.2 point and not the 2.4, hence the footnote related to the same complaint on the other point (clarifying the court didn't dismiss the validity of the accusation, but the exclusivity point).
This does not confirm anything but that there are claims that can't be dismissed without discovery, hence they have to go to court.
That other guy posted another update over the amended complaint, interestingly there is wording updated on the complaint:
Things like CIG can't use another engine seem cut from it, they pretty much changed the word "use" to "promote" through their complaint.
His logic is interesting there, so if Crytek ends up agreeing with the court they could stop using Cryengine, then why would they be liable to keep promoting it after they did stop using it? That seems to be their new strategy.
LoL keep wishing then. I'm sure it's right around the corner, 90 Degrees Top meme now in motion
It doesn't have to be fast. I'm fine with its backers continuing to pour their money into a hopeless cause. The inevitable will happen eventually anyways so there's no rush to that.
Well we're fine with the haters hopeless cause that is the continuous crusade against Star Citizen lol
We get to follow the development of the most ambitious game ever made, play it's continuous updates and laugh in the face of those who keep trying to shut it down.
It's been going for years now lol . CIG is doomed, financial collapse yadayadayada. Star Citizen "can't be made", "tech isin't possible", "network won't let more than 8 players to play", "star marine doesn't exist", "planetary landings don't work, it's a separate level", "live gameplay demonstration is a cutscene" yadayadayada lol
Meanwhile with every update more and more features deemed "impossible" get added to the game, tested and polished, 1st pass mechanics and game systems that "finished and released games" could only dream of...
Next convention comes, CIG showcases another major milestone updates of their tech and plans for the future, the backers support it by giving them millions of dollars and the haters screech because once again their yearly FUD campaign failed.
I don't see the problem here a MTD is almost everytime dismissed in this case 2.1 was way to watered down and the other thing is where California does not allow punitve damages in copyright cases.
The Judge said 2.4 has been broken by CIG and CryTech jumped on.
Next thing is a discover and if CIG did everything right and has clean books the trial will decide how much damage compensation CryTech will get.
To show off a Judge in bad light is very unrespectful, months ago you said that judge gee has a strong connection to space stuff cause her father and now just because the MTD was not granted you are accusing the judge of not knowing her job ...
Obviously the case is not an easy one and there are many discussions over it, so no judge would have granted the MTD.
This behaviour is like a 6years old whose candys have been stolen.
A little hint, no lawyer who wants to work in the court system would expose himself on youtube with half-a**ed opinions without knowing the complete picture.
Sombody asked if there could be jail time because of this case - answer is: No, because civil law is just for money noone ever got in jail for civil law stuff - ... but there are many cases where in the discovery they found stuff that falls under the criminal legislation (i.e. like hiding money from the IRS) which could lead to jail time.
Until then CryTech is still suing CIG, there will be a discovery process and there will be a trial someday.
When you have cake, it is not the cake that creates the most magnificent of experiences, but it is the emotions attached to it. The cake is a lie.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
If there isn't a last minute settlement there will be discovery as it is a standard procedure in a court case. And what Crytek/Skadden is asking for is very thorough; there are 69 items in total.
Some of the items it is wanting are; 21) DOCUMENTS sufficient to identify the funds, contributions, or support provided to DEFENDANTS by any PERSONS or entities.
54) All federal or state tax returns filed by or on behalf of DEFENDANTS.
55) All quarterly or annual financial statements of DEFENDANTS.
58) Documents sufficient to identify each version or iteration of agreements or contracts with the DEFENDANTS' past, present or potential suppliers, contractors and customers.
As shown by the recent 'Prenda Legal Copywrite' case, a civil discovery can also lead to a criminal investigation / trial.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Oh what would be the internet without it's "punishers" fighting for the law of righteousness and justice in the gaming world...
You do understand the irony of this, yes? Replace it with "defenders" and you become very self-referential....
Oh but there's no irony. I'm right here in the Star Citizen thread posting video-game content in a video-game forum. A game that I play, like and support by sharing it's media and news...
The haters, trolls, cynics, doubters... well they don't really add anything besides noise lol
It's been the same since some disgruntled backers made it their life goal to see CIG and Star Citizen go down lol
Now how do you put on such obsessive minds that people who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it lol?
But hey, The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on...
Oh what would be the internet without it's "punishers" fighting for the law of righteousness and justice in the gaming world...
You do understand the irony of this, yes? Replace it with "defenders" and you become very self-referential....
Oh but there's no irony. I'm right here in the Star Citizen thread posting video-game content in a video-game forum. A game that I play, like and support by sharing it's media and news...
The haters, trolls, cynics, doubters... well they don't really add anything besides noise lol
It's been the same since some disgruntled backers made it their life goal to see CIG and Star Citizen go down lol
Now how do you put on such obsessive minds that people who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it lol?
But hey, The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on...
No, you spend just as much time baiting and trolling as you do merely posting content.
Oh what would be the internet without it's "punishers" fighting for the law of righteousness and justice in the gaming world...
You do understand the irony of this, yes? Replace it with "defenders" and you become very self-referential....
Oh but there's no irony. I'm right here in the Star Citizen thread posting video-game content in a video-game forum. A game that I play, like and support by sharing it's media and news...
The haters, trolls, cynics, doubters... well they don't really add anything besides noise lol
It's been the same since some disgruntled backers made it their life goal to see CIG and Star Citizen go down lol
Now how do you put on such obsessive minds that people who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it lol?
But hey, The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on...
So you post what you like and others post what they like, that way everyone is happy...
Being a critic is far more useful than being a propagandist anyway. One spurs discussions, the other does nothing. No one really talks about the videos or the pictures you post, no one talks in depth about mechanics or features in the game, there is virtually zero discussion about the content of the actual game. Instead almost all of it is around the drama, that seems to be Star Citizen's achievement, a one hundred and ninety two million dollar drama mill....
Being a critic is far more useful than being a propagandist anyway. One spurs discussions, the other does nothing. No one really talks about the videos or the pictures you post, no one talks in depth about mechanics or features in the game, there is virtually zero discussion about the content of the actual game. Instead almost all of it is around the drama, that seems to be Star Citizen's achievement, a one hundred and ninety two million dollar drama mill....
That's only the SC achievement because of the "drama propagandists" that don't miss a chance to post anything negative that ever happens or someone says on SC here, now isn't it?
It's thanks to the never-ending effort from the around same dozen people on this forum that we're able to keep SC on the homepage for years and years, so props to all us! \o/
Being a critic is far more useful than being a propagandist anyway. One spurs discussions, the other does nothing. No one really talks about the videos or the pictures you post, no one talks in depth about mechanics or features in the game, there is virtually zero discussion about the content of the actual game. Instead almost all of it is around the drama, that seems to be Star Citizen's achievement, a one hundred and ninety two million dollar drama mill....
That's only the SC achievement because of the "drama propagandists" that don't miss a chance to post anything negative that ever happens or someone says on SC here, now isn't it?
It's thanks to the never-ending effort from the around same dozen people on this forum that we're able to keep SC on the homepage for years and years, so props to all us! \o/
Typical whiteknight answer, the company can do no wrong so therefore every word spoken against them has to be manufactured... But even if what you were saying is true, so what of it? Do you really think that being on the front page is some sort of achievement? Do you really think people constantly seeing "CIG fucks up yet again!" is magically going to make them want to get involved and spend their money?
Typical whiteknight answer, the company can do no wrong so therefore every word spoken against them has to be manufactured... But even if what you were saying is true, so what of it? Do you really think that being on the front page is some sort of achievement? Do you really think people constantly seeing "CIG fucks up yet again!" is magically going to make them want to get involved and spend their money?
If the discussion from those who come with that narrative was actually reasonable and not 90% hyperbole, 10% content, I'd consider that argument.
But it's a good thing, the more doom and gloom talk the haters keep on spitting out around here, the more visible the reality gap will be, especially as the game continues to develop and the same people keep trying to strip the game of any merit in every way they can. This could be similar to NMS on that aspect, so much bad was said that when they did a comeback it had one enormous impact.
Typical whiteknight answer, the company can do no wrong so therefore every word spoken against them has to be manufactured... But even if what you were saying is true, so what of it? Do you really think that being on the front page is some sort of achievement? Do you really think people constantly seeing "CIG fucks up yet again!" is magically going to make them want to get involved and spend their money?
If the discussion from those who come with that narrative was actually reasonable and not 90% hyperbole, 10% content, I'd consider that argument.
But it's a good thing, the more doom and gloom talk the haters keep on spitting out around here, the more visible the reality gap will be, especially as the game continues to develop and the same people keep trying to strip the game of any merit in every way they can. This could be similar to NMS on that aspect, so much bad was said that when they did a comeback it had one enormous impact.
Well that's just untrue. There's been quite a few threads started over the years with zero ill will yet no fans get involved or there are just a couple of replies. It's the drama that the whiteknights like, it gives them something to fight for because the game sure as hell isn't providing the entertainment.
The only visibility we're seeing is the one where previous claims of module/feature/game coming this week/month/year/next year is nothing but wishful thinking.
I don't think people strip the game of any merit out of spitefulness, I think it's more a case of "lol, this is what you've got for 6 years, 192 million and 500 staff, WTF? How can you defend this shit?"
NMS had a great comeback but 4 weeks later and its almost forgotten, numbers have dropped by 75% and continue downwards at the same rate. It's great getting numbers but it's holding on to them that's important.
I don't think you're getting it. It's one rather interesting thing that is relevant to the general public perception and expectations.
So when this forum is pretty much all about drama, and how bad everything is, and that SC will never release, or it is a scam, or it will fail and be super bad, etc... What is being done is lowering expectations to the point generally on this forum, people don't expect SC to even release.
So that sets the bar very low thanks to the endless naysaying, and this is where the interesting part comes, with CIG able to release SC and release something good enough even if it just lives partially to is promise, the comeback on the general public is huge, this because in the first place the expectations were as low as "the game will never release".
If you think about it, it's quite interesting to see what is actually happening here, in proper fact, even if you'd find it WTF, it'd be worse if everyone was hyping SC to oblivion in here, hence for me, the naysaying ongoing for years is a wildcard on how this will play out.
Comments
If Star Citizen dies because of this lawsuit, white knights will always just claim "It would have been great if Crytek wasn't evil and didn't kill it!"
True. Less vindicating but more entertaining.
Then introduce mandatory response <I don't want SC to fail I'm just obsessed with the prospect of its failure!>.
May your faith be with Crytek, may the failure of this project be as the 90 days prophet prophesied. Amen.
The judge ruled that CiG don't have to use CryEngine. Which means using Lumberyard is OK. This - for me - was the reason d'etre for the case (with money tied up in that). And with the ruling that they can use Lumberyard tends to draw a line under Crysis's involvement.
The ruling that SQ42 wasn't part of the agreement also explains why CiG said SQ42 was developed on Lumberyard. If the ruling was SQ42 included then OK, if not well SQ42 developed using Lumberyard (good for Amazon!).
This does not confirm anything but that there are claims that can't be dismissed without discovery, hence they have to go to court.
Things like CIG can't use another engine seem cut from it, they pretty much changed the word "use" to "promote" through their complaint.
His logic is interesting there, so if Crytek ends up agreeing with the court they could stop using Cryengine, then why would they be liable to keep promoting it after they did stop using it? That seems to be their new strategy.
It's been going for years now lol . CIG is doomed, financial collapse yadayadayada. Star Citizen "can't be made", "tech isin't possible", "network won't let more than 8 players to play", "star marine doesn't exist", "planetary landings don't work, it's a separate level", "live gameplay demonstration is a cutscene" yadayadayada lol
When you have cake, it is not the cake that creates the most magnificent of experiences, but it is the emotions attached to it.
The cake is a lie.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
If you want a new idea, go read an old book.
In order to be insulted, I must first value your opinion.
And what Crytek/Skadden is asking for is very thorough; there are 69 items in total.
Some of the items it is wanting are;
21) DOCUMENTS sufficient to identify the funds, contributions, or support provided to DEFENDANTS by any PERSONS or entities.
54) All federal or state tax returns filed by or on behalf of DEFENDANTS.
55) All quarterly or annual financial statements of DEFENDANTS.
58) Documents sufficient to identify each version or iteration of agreements or contracts with the DEFENDANTS' past, present or potential suppliers, contractors and customers.
As shown by the recent 'Prenda Legal Copywrite' case, a civil discovery can also lead to a criminal investigation / trial.
Original - http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3748466&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=4551#post462019951 (paywall)
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-07-15-through-gritted-teeth-star-citizen-developer-gives-player-whopping-usd2500-refund
CIG is sued by Crytek
https://www.polygon.com/2017/12/14/16776300/crytek-star-citizen-lawsuit-cig-rsi
EX-Backer StreetRoller sues Chris Roberts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojx7VcbowYQ
Rudy told me so.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
It's the usual... <I don't want SC to fail I'm just obsessed with the prospect of its failure!>
Being a critic is far more useful than being a propagandist anyway. One spurs discussions, the other does nothing. No one really talks about the videos or the pictures you post, no one talks in depth about mechanics or features in the game, there is virtually zero discussion about the content of the actual game.
Instead almost all of it is around the drama, that seems to be Star Citizen's achievement, a one hundred and ninety two million dollar drama mill....
It's thanks to the never-ending effort from the around same dozen people on this forum that we're able to keep SC on the homepage for years and years, so props to all us! \o/
Typical whiteknight answer, the company can do no wrong so therefore every word spoken against them has to be manufactured...
But even if what you were saying is true, so what of it? Do you really think that being on the front page is some sort of achievement? Do you really think people constantly seeing "CIG fucks up yet again!" is magically going to make them want to get involved and spend their money?
But it's a good thing, the more doom and gloom talk the haters keep on spitting out around here, the more visible the reality gap will be, especially as the game continues to develop and the same people keep trying to strip the game of any merit in every way they can. This could be similar to NMS on that aspect, so much bad was said that when they did a comeback it had one enormous impact.
The only visibility we're seeing is the one where previous claims of module/feature/game coming this week/month/year/next year is nothing but wishful thinking.
I don't think people strip the game of any merit out of spitefulness, I think it's more a case of "lol, this is what you've got for 6 years, 192 million and 500 staff, WTF? How can you defend this shit?"
NMS had a great comeback but 4 weeks later and its almost forgotten, numbers have dropped by 75% and continue downwards at the same rate. It's great getting numbers but it's holding on to them that's important.
So when this forum is pretty much all about drama, and how bad everything is, and that SC will never release, or it is a scam, or it will fail and be super bad, etc... What is being done is lowering expectations to the point generally on this forum, people don't expect SC to even release.
So that sets the bar very low thanks to the endless naysaying, and this is where the interesting part comes, with CIG able to release SC and release something good enough even if it just lives partially to is promise, the comeback on the general public is huge, this because in the first place the expectations were as low as "the game will never release".
If you think about it, it's quite interesting to see what is actually happening here, in proper fact, even if you'd find it WTF, it'd be worse if everyone was hyping SC to oblivion in here, hence for me, the naysaying ongoing for years is a wildcard on how this will play out.