Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Crytek Filing Lawsuit Against CIG

1568101153

Comments

  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    edited December 2017
    Erillion said:
    Erillion said:
    Then please explain that "very clear meaning" from your perspective.


    Have fun
    CIG breached the contract.
    Maybe. We will know when we hear the other side. If we ever will.


    Have fun
    Hopefully what ever other side they have to say in settlement dispute or court is better than that hilariously inept reply they gave to the public back there.

    SlyLoK said:
    I forget which website I was reading. The discussion went around the file directories and names. In a recent SC video revealed file names and locations that matched cryengine and not lumberyard. So if they indeed did switch they likely just took what they wanted like the networking bits without migrating everything over.

    Doesn't matter either way. 


    By now I've seen at least three lumberyard users across various forums say things along those lines.  People who say "Lumberyard is a derivative of Cryengine so the fact that CiG's bug smasher screenshots show Cryengine code means nothing!" are spewing out their butts.

    Lumberyard is fully owned by Amazon and Amazon wants you to know that because the entire point of that venture is to market AMAZON, not Crytek considering that it's free to use.  They're going to scrub the thing quite fully, especially by NOW after Lumberyard's been around for several years.  Maybe if Lumberyard were new and Amazon didn't have time to clean it up yet but by now the idea that it'd have Cryengine messages that blatant is utterly ridiculous.

    Even CiG employees seem to refer to it as CryEngine in-house considering that latest Around The Verse video has a pretty blatant cut and edit at 21:40 before the video likely got editted to have the employee say "Lumberyard" instead of what he really said.

    Of course, since the whole complaint (that part of the complaint at least) is about marketting, the fact that CiG started marketting themselves as using Lumberyard is still a big deal and they probably switched to Lumberyard for at least some parts of development by now so assuming that what the complaint says about the contract is true, they've basically somehow managed to breach the exclusitivity clause of the contract AND are still using CryEngine too despite all the contract breaches at the same time.
  • kikoodutroa8kikoodutroa8 Member RarePosts: 565
    https://www.scribd.com/document/367101474/Crytek-v-CIG

    So Crytek did the whole ks "demo", while Robberts pretended it was some sort of home-made prototype.

  • rodarinrodarin Member EpicPosts: 2,611
    Erillion said:
    Erillion and Max - however much CIG are paying you it isnt enough, defending this crap must be painful. 
    It is not. Actually it is quite fun. 

    And for me personally I can answer: no payment. I am a backer and a fan. That is enough. 


    Have fun
    yet you claimed in another post about an apparent employee holiday party you said 'we' had fun. or something to that effect but it was clear you were intimating you were at the party with employees and that you were one of them. 

    relevant quotes and posts....


    This is good for Star Citizen!
    I am sure there is a celebration in CIG because of this.

    But hey, we may ask someone from the office.

    @Erillion What is the mood in the office these days?

    Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/470311/crytek-filing-lawsuit-against-cig/p6#URBA5hvxICWjO8S8.99





    coretex666 said:

    @Erillion What is the mood in the office these days?
    Excellent, thank you very much.

    Had our company X-Mas party yesterday. Davor Glühwein und Weihnachtsmarkt ;-)


    Have fun

    Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/470311/crytek-filing-lawsuit-against-cig/p6#URBA5hvxICWjO8S8.99



    but I suppose that was 'sarcasm' huh?
    gervaise1MaxBacon
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    rodarin said:
    Erillion said:
    Erillion and Max - however much CIG are paying you it isnt enough, defending this crap must be painful. 
    It is not. Actually it is quite fun. 

    And for me personally I can answer: no payment. I am a backer and a fan. That is enough. 


    Have fun
    yet you claimed in another post about an apparent employee holiday party you said 'we' had fun. or something to that effect but it was clear you were intimating you were at the party with employees and that you were one of them. 

    relevant quotes and posts....


    This is good for Star Citizen!
    I am sure there is a celebration in CIG because of this.

    But hey, we may ask someone from the office.

    @Erillion What is the mood in the office these days?

    Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/470311/crytek-filing-lawsuit-against-cig/p6#URBA5hvxICWjO8S8.99





    coretex666 said:

    @Erillion What is the mood in the office these days?
    Excellent, thank you very much.

    Had our company X-Mas party yesterday. Davor Glühwein und Weihnachtsmarkt ;-)


    Have fun

    Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/470311/crytek-filing-lawsuit-against-cig/p6#URBA5hvxICWjO8S8.99



    but I suppose that was 'sarcasm' huh?
    LOL.

    Are you THAT deep into conspiracy territory ?

    It was the X-Mas party of the Austrian company I work for. Which is neither CIG, nor RSI, nor Foundry 42. It is not even in the gaming industry. Or the advertising or entertainment industry.

    I was asked about the mood in the office. And i answered. Part of it in German, as i mentioned going to drink some hot spiced wine (Glühwein) and strolling through the Christmas Market (Weihnachtsmarkt).

    >>>> it was clear you were intimating you were at the party with employees and that you were one of them.  >>>>

    You have a fertile imagination ;-)  

    I gave an honest answer to the question asked. No sarcasm involved. You thought i was insinuating something that fit your narrative. You thought wrong.


    Have fun


    gervaise1
  • rodarinrodarin Member EpicPosts: 2,611
    Erillion said:
    rodarin said:
    Erillion said:
    Erillion and Max - however much CIG are paying you it isnt enough, defending this crap must be painful. 
    It is not. Actually it is quite fun. 

    And for me personally I can answer: no payment. I am a backer and a fan. That is enough. 


    Have fun
    yet you claimed in another post about an apparent employee holiday party you said 'we' had fun. or something to that effect but it was clear you were intimating you were at the party with employees and that you were one of them. 

    relevant quotes and posts....


    This is good for Star Citizen!
    I am sure there is a celebration in CIG because of this.

    But hey, we may ask someone from the office.

    @Erillion What is the mood in the office these days?

    Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/470311/crytek-filing-lawsuit-against-cig/p6#URBA5hvxICWjO8S8.99





    coretex666 said:

    @Erillion What is the mood in the office these days?
    Excellent, thank you very much.

    Had our company X-Mas party yesterday. Davor Glühwein und Weihnachtsmarkt ;-)


    Have fun

    Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/470311/crytek-filing-lawsuit-against-cig/p6#URBA5hvxICWjO8S8.99



    but I suppose that was 'sarcasm' huh?
    LOL.

    Are you THAT deep into conspiracy territory ?

    It was the X-Mas party of the Austrian company I work for. Which is neither CIG, nor RSI, nor Foundry 42. It is not even in the gaming industry. Or the advertising or entertainment industry.

    I was asked about the mood in the office. And i answered. Part of it in German, as i mentioned going to drink some hot spiced wine (Glühwein) and strolling through the Christmas Market (Weihnachtsmarkt).

    >>>> it was clear you were intimating you were at the party with employees and that you were one of them.  >>>>

    You have a fertile imagination ;-)  

    I gave an honest answer to the question asked. No sarcasm involved. You thought i was insinuating something that fit your narrative. You thought wrong.


    Have fun


    so why answer it the way you did? This was a series of comments DIRECTLY relating to morale at CiG and question in regard to 'people in the office'. Not YOUR office (if it isnt CIG which everyone knows it is)

    There is no conspiracy there its an answer to a question based on an escalating degree of posts about how CiG (employees) were feeling. And you said 'excellent' we had our xmas party... so why would you answer it that way when its a direct question about CiG and the employees?

    nice try though.

    everyone knows youre at least a paid shill if not an outright employee which arent mutually exclusive.
    ScotchUp
  • PhryPhry Member LegendaryPosts: 11,004
    Since C.I.G has a lawyer on the team, it begs the question of how this even happened in the first place, they must have looked at the contract after all, so why is this even happening? If this goes badly against C.I.G then it could literally destroy the company, how did the ball get dropped this badly? :o
    Octagon7711
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    Phry said:
    Since C.I.G has a lawyer on the team, it begs the question of how this even happened in the first place, they must have looked at the contract after all, so why is this even happening? If this goes badly against C.I.G then it could literally destroy the company, how did the ball get dropped this badly? :o
    Maybe they thought that Crytek was going to go bankrupt and thus not be a problem any more.  You'd have to be ridiculously arrogant and short-sightedto believe such a thing, but well, Chris Roberts and co are quite arrogant and short-sighted, and the choir of SC fanboys possibly only elevated those feelings.

    Seems a long shot that anyone could be THAT arrogant and short-sighted, but assuming Crytek has a case (which, contrary to SC fanboys' claims, all ACTUAL evidence seems to be the case), what other explanation is there?
    MaxBaconScotchUp
  • OrinoriOrinori Member RarePosts: 751
    Tiamat64 said:
    Phry said:
    Since C.I.G has a lawyer on the team, it begs the question of how this even happened in the first place, they must have looked at the contract after all, so why is this even happening? If this goes badly against C.I.G then it could literally destroy the company, how did the ball get dropped this badly? :o
    what other explanation is there?
    It was a calculated move and not an issue.
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    edited December 2017
    Orinori said:
    Tiamat64 said:
    Phry said:
    Since C.I.G has a lawyer on the team, it begs the question of how this even happened in the first place, they must have looked at the contract after all, so why is this even happening? If this goes badly against C.I.G then it could literally destroy the company, how did the ball get dropped this badly? :o
    what other explanation is there?
    It was a calculated move and not an issue.
    And he would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those meddling kids!
  • Octagon7711Octagon7711 Member LegendaryPosts: 9,004
    SlyLoK said:
    I forget which website I was reading. The discussion went around the file directories and names. In a recent SC video revealed file names and locations that matched cryengine and not lumberyard. So if they indeed did switch they likely just took what they wanted like the networking bits without migrating everything over.

    Doesn't matter either way. 
    To be a little more specific they said they saw cryengine 3 which was from the original agreement.  I think CR stated they modified the original engine to create a new engine which they called star-engine then worked with Amazon in Lumberyard.  Modification of the original means the original is still being used.  One of things Crytek wants is to have their original engine completely removed, which could mean rebuilding the game from square one.

    Since Crytek had big problems at the time and were laying off people, perhaps CR thought it was time to make a move and that they wouldn't be around much longer so they could be safely ignored.  But then they got a big bailout and hired top of the line legal help.  Legal experts who it would appear believe they have a decent case.

    But like someone else said, this is all speculation and really doesn't matter.

    "We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa      "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."  SR Covey

  • SpottyGekkoSpottyGekko Member EpicPosts: 6,916
    Phry said:
    ... how did the ball get dropped this badly? :o
    That's assuming that the ball was in fact "dropped"...

    Business lawsuits are often about making a fumble look like a drop, in the hope of extracting financial benefit. If a somewhat plausable case can be made, it may be worth it to "give it a shot". It often results in an out-of-court settlement, as the target may not be willing to go through the whole drawn-out proceedings for some reason. Money changes hands, nobody accepts culpability and it all passes into the history books...
  • rodarinrodarin Member EpicPosts: 2,611
    Its the Hillary Clinton effect no one thought Trump would win so they didnt even bother hiding all the laws they broke. Problem is there is no accountability in US government so all those criminals will get away with it. Unfortunately for Roberts and company the litigious system is much different an no one ever gets away with anything someone can sue them for.
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Phry said:
    Since C.I.G has a lawyer on the team, it begs the question of how this even happened in the first place, they must have looked at the contract after all, so why is this even happening? If this goes badly against C.I.G then it could literally destroy the company, how did the ball get dropped this badly? :o
    Cause you assume Ortwin is competent. If he was competent he wouldn't have been in the negotiations between cig and Crytek 
  • ErillionErillion Member EpicPosts: 10,328
    rodarin said:
    so why answer it the way you did? This was a series of comments DIRECTLY relating to morale at CiG and question in regard to 'people in the office'. Not YOUR office (if it isnt CIG which everyone knows it is)

    There is no conspiracy there its an answer to a question based on an escalating degree of posts about how CiG (employees) were feeling. And you said 'excellent' we had our xmas party... so why would you answer it that way when its a direct question about CiG and the employees?

    nice try though.

    everyone knows youre at least a paid shill if not an outright employee which arent mutually exclusive.
    I see you are still trying to bend reality to fit your narrative.  :-D


    Have fun
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    edited December 2017
    https://www.bticonsulting.com/litigation-outlook-fearsome-foursome/

    https://www.skadden.com/about/news-and-rankings/news/2017/09/bti-fearsome-five-litigation-team

    "For the seventh consecutive time, Skadden was named to the BTI Consulting Group's list of top litigation law firms. "The BTI Fearsome Five" included the five elite law firm litigation practices that general counsel would least want to face across the table in litigation. Based on 350 recent interviews with companies' leading legal decision-makers, BTI Litigation Outlook 2018 also noted Skadden as a Powerhouse in Class Actions, Complex Commercial Litigation, Complex Employment Litigation, IP Litigation, Product Liability Litigation, and Securities and Finance Litigation. "



    But don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit.
    ScotchUpMaxBaconBabuinix
  • SpottyGekkoSpottyGekko Member EpicPosts: 6,916
    Tiamat64 said:
    https://www.bticonsulting.com/litigation-outlook-fearsome-foursome/

    https://www.skadden.com/about/news-and-rankings/news/2017/09/bti-fearsome-five-litigation-team

    "For the seventh consecutive time, Skadden was named to the BTI Consulting Group's list of top litigation law firms. "The BTI Fearsome Five" included the five elite law firm litigation practices that general counsel would least want to face across the table in litigation. Based on 350 recent interviews with companies' leading legal decision-makers, BTI Litigation Outlook 2018 also noted Skadden as a Powerhouse in Class Actions, Complex Commercial Litigation, Complex Employment Litigation, IP Litigation, Product Liability Litigation, and Securities and Finance Litigation. "



    But don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit.
    Hmmm... "The Fearsome Five", eh ?

    Crytek have picked their champion, which leaves CIG with a choice of four...

    Or perhaps CR will decide to represent CIG himself ? ;)
  • OrinoriOrinori Member RarePosts: 751
    edited December 2017
    Tiamat64 said:
    https://www.bticonsulting.com/litigation-outlook-fearsome-foursome/

    https://www.skadden.com/about/news-and-rankings/news/2017/09/bti-fearsome-five-litigation-team

    "For the seventh consecutive time, Skadden was named to the BTI Consulting Group's list of top litigation law firms. "The BTI Fearsome Five" included the five elite law firm litigation practices that general counsel would least want to face across the table in litigation. Based on 350 recent interviews with companies' leading legal decision-makers, BTI Litigation Outlook 2018 also noted Skadden as a Powerhouse in Class Actions, Complex Commercial Litigation, Complex Employment Litigation, IP Litigation, Product Liability Litigation, and Securities and Finance Litigation. "



    But don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit.
    What they have claimed with as much exaggeration and bluster they could muster seems very weak. There does not appear to be much to it. Just looks like there was probably a breach and they are looking for compensation and CIG are slow to get to the table. I don't think its a big deal at all and pretty common.

    The biggest thing to me looks like the good faith issue but that is an odd one and might only land on Ortwin himself (might make for some nice leverage though). I did have to study some Law (contract) in another country, but I am no lawyer and really there isn't much to comment on at the moment at all.
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    edited December 2017
    Tiamat64 said:
    https://www.bticonsulting.com/litigation-outlook-fearsome-foursome/

    https://www.skadden.com/about/news-and-rankings/news/2017/09/bti-fearsome-five-litigation-team

    "For the seventh consecutive time, Skadden was named to the BTI Consulting Group's list of top litigation law firms. "The BTI Fearsome Five" included the five elite law firm litigation practices that general counsel would least want to face across the table in litigation. Based on 350 recent interviews with companies' leading legal decision-makers, BTI Litigation Outlook 2018 also noted Skadden as a Powerhouse in Class Actions, Complex Commercial Litigation, Complex Employment Litigation, IP Litigation, Product Liability Litigation, and Securities and Finance Litigation. "



    But don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit.
    Hmmm... "The Fearsome Five", eh ?

    Crytek have picked their champion, which leaves CIG with a choice of four...

    Or perhaps CR will decide to represent CIG himself ? ;)
    CiG's co-founder Ortwin is a lawyer (and ex-Crytek employee) but (allegedly) because he is co-founder as well as an ex-Crytek employee, he can't claim client-attorney privilege with CiG.  IE, if the case goes to court, all communications he had with CiG can conceivably be brought to light. Normally a client and attorney's communications with each other are allowed to be kept secret.  It's potentially going to be a lot of fun seeing how much dirt is in there.

    Orinori said:
    What they have claimed with as much exaggeration and bluster they could muster seems very weak. There does not appear to be much to it. Just looks like there was probably a breach and they are looking for compensation and CIG are slow to get to the table. I don't think its a big deal at all and pretty common.

    Yep.  Don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden, one of the top five law firms you don't want to find on the opposite end of the litigation table from you, wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit, so they'd certainly take a case where their side only consists of much exaggeration and bluster they could muster with not much to it!

    Keep telling yourself that, Star Citizen fan.  Keep the faith strong! Just don't contribute more than $35.00.  Orinori said he didn't, so he doesn't have much to lose (not that it matters, because this case is in CiG's bag!)
    MaxBaconScotchUpBabuinix
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    edited December 2017
    Tiamat64 said:
    Yep.  Don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden, one of the top five law firms you don't want to find on the opposite end of the litigation table from you, wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit, so they'd certainly take a case where their side only consists of much exaggeration and bluster they could muster with not much to it!

    Keep telling yourself that, Star Citizen fan.  Keep the faith strong! Just don't contribute more than $35.00.  Orinori said he didn't, so he doesn't have much to lose (not that it matters, because this case is in CiG's bag!)
    Man, you are on a rampage of fear monger. "The Sky is Falling, everyone run in panic and scream!"

    I guess everyone can go home now, you have already ruled the case. lol
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    edited December 2017
    MaxBacon said:
    Tiamat64 said:
    Yep.  Don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden, one of the top five law firms you don't want to find on the opposite end of the litigation table from you, wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit, so they'd certainly take a case where their side only consists of much exaggeration and bluster they could muster with not much to it!

    Keep telling yourself that, Star Citizen fan.  Keep the faith strong! Just don't contribute more than $35.00.  Orinori said he didn't, so he doesn't have much to lose (not that it matters, because this case is in CiG's bag!)
    Man, you are on a rampage of fear monger. "The Sky is Falling, everyone run in panic and scream!"

    I guess everyone can go home, you have already ruled the case. lol
    Be strong, Bacon.  I believe in you!

    BTW, Bacon is delicious!
    ScotchUp
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    edited December 2017
    Tiamat64 said:
    Be strong, Bacon.  I believe in you!
    And so does Derek in you.
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,545
    MaxBacon said:
    Tiamat64 said:
    Be strong, Bacon.  I believe in you!
    And so does Derek in you.
    Really?  Sweet.  Never met the guy but it's always good to know that I have another admirer.
    ScotchUp
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    Tiamat64 said:
    Really?  Sweet.  Never met the guy but it's always good to know that I have another admirer.
    Don't worry, he sees everything SC related (not a joke btw), I'm sure he will see and admire your work here.
  • rodarinrodarin Member EpicPosts: 2,611
    MaxBacon said:
    Tiamat64 said:
    Yep.  Don't worry Star Citizen fans. Skadden, one of the top five law firms you don't want to find on the opposite end of the litigation table from you, wouldn't actually care about their reputation or win record and is just in it for the money and doesn't actually care whether or not they lose the case or whether or not the case has any merit, so they'd certainly take a case where their side only consists of much exaggeration and bluster they could muster with not much to it!

    Keep telling yourself that, Star Citizen fan.  Keep the faith strong! Just don't contribute more than $35.00.  Orinori said he didn't, so he doesn't have much to lose (not that it matters, because this case is in CiG's bag!)
    Man, you are on a rampage of fear monger. "The Sky is Falling, everyone run in panic and scream!"

    I guess everyone can go home now, you have already ruled the case. lol
    See this is the base problem in the real world (not SC fantasyland) when youre doing shady shit, have been caught numerous times doing other shady shit (didnt they already settle one lawsuit?) it IS time to worry, or at least take a step back and let some reality sink in. Theyre getting sued by their 'founding' 'partner' the guys who you know have been there since day one. This after at least a year and half, maybe more of the other side trying ot work it out and Cig and company and all their hubris not only ignoring them but doubling down.

    Even if you didnt like these guys before they are now a cliche villain in some bad TV show. So now you HAVE to hate them. Unless you work for them or have so much money tied up in them its a financial disaster if (when) this thing finally implodes.

    If you rad some of what is said the monetary issues might be the least of their worries, there is a good possibility of jail time. I know that will cause the white knights heads to explode but if you actually read the thing it intimates more than civil wrong doing.

    Like I said i just pray no one settles the money trail gets exposed and we see just how far these guys (CiG) have gone in scamming people.
    MaxBacon
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member LegendaryPosts: 7,846
    edited December 2017
    rodarin said:
    Like I said i just pray no one settles the money trail gets exposed and we see just how far these guys (CiG) have gone in scamming people.
    The real world does not play by your realities blinded by bias and theory crafting stating what the reality is. And thankfully, bias has no place in justice, unlike this forum and this discussion.
This discussion has been closed.