Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
3.3 (late) Brings Nothing New to Development
This discussion has been closed.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Keyword in there is "may", they were not working for me when I played, maybe have worked for him. Nobody lied.
Is @Babuinix wrong or are you?
As for the rest, doors, elevators working for me expect some unresponsive or delays at times, truck stops are not empty for me, FOIP works (data not networked but again the patch notes disclaimer I quoted, there for a reason), so...
I asked because, his first reply, @Babuinix called me a liar for saying that old issues like doors, elevators, crashes, and now FOIP isn't working in some degree.
You just admitted YOU were the liar. Because you stated they did not work, you didn't state they bugged occasionally, if you are being that nitpicky then be careful because the one who lives on the glass house...
Should they "stop their whining"?
Is "stop your whining" CIG's official position?
Do new players deserve to be attacked on the official forums for asking if anyone else is having this problem?
Do you think CIG would be better off not releasing a ship until there are doors on it/doors open?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anyway, you should be expecting that from the LIVE build of the game, not the PTU, especially if it is a new ship, if you go to the PTU you even find REPLACEME assets on the ships, some areas and planets that are new assets being implemented, it's just the nature of PTU.
I am being blinded by such thoughtful and deep arguments. fuuun
Should they "stop their whining"?
Is "stop your whining" CIG's official position?
Do new players deserve to be attacked on the official forums for asking if anyone else is having this problem?
Do you think CIG would be better off not releasing a ship until there are doors on it/doors open?
2) If you go to the official forum with the same tone as in this thread, having a go at this issue present on the PTU builds, I can't think of anything more effective you could do to piss off the entire forum. Like, even Reddit, and Reddit is always salty.
3) The ship has not been released to proper terms, testing can have ships in a more or less raw form, CIG are just doing what they created the Evocati and the PTU for, and since they did, the LIVE builds of the updates are FAR more stable than they ever were before, so the workflow works.
Answer #2 You skipped my second question. I'll assume this is your answer to question 3.
Answer #4 Because you skipped a question, I'll assume this is your answer to question 4.
Is "stop your whining" CIG's official position?
It's not going to be the devs fault if some players see the PTU has some sort of headstart, it really is broken and it's often put with heavy telemetry and debug on their or our client's side to track issues and get the build stable enough to release.
Can you provide a link that "stop your whining", in regards to ship doors not working, is CIG's position?
BTW, glad you're here to answer these questions. Thanks.
It could be good money after bad. I still think it could trudge along nicely and die at the 80% point. . except they will find someone to invest more money.
SO HAPPY! about the FPS. . the FOIP I don't care about because they partnered with someone and it didn't seem to take away from development.
Please give a release year for S42.
Wa min God! Se æx on min heafod is!
I'll just reorder your answers to match the order of my questions, since one question was skipped. Ok, champ?
I thought you would be logical enough to understand that, but I guess you're on nitpicky mode. Didn't work out for you when you tried it little ago //eyeroll
Thanks for your answer. I'll put this back together and we can go from there.
Play the PTU if you want to contribute to reporting and get issues fixed, it won't enjoyable for people bothered by disruptive bugs.
Like this guy: (we were talking about one severe PTU spawning bug)
1. Thanks for your honesty. Hope everyone understands that this is how they will be treated and spoken to, after they pledge who have issues, questions or concerns.
2. Eventually, you answered no. But, continued to elude that CIG's Disclaimer is basically saying this, in your opinion.
I wonder, does this apply to everyone that purchased a ship or the purchases after they changed the Disclaimer to stop massive refunds and court battles they went through?
Also, we could never have this conversation on the Official Forums (censorship), but I wonder what CIG thinks of your position and your understanding of their Disclaimer. You know, "Piss off, you should have read the fine print we just changed again" position?
Not a smart way to represent CIG.
3. What is the correct "tone" a player should use when their $45 - $27,000 ship doesn't release with doors/working doors to be able to fly said ship?
4. Your answer was yes, CIG is making the right decision to release broken ships to Live.
Not many people agree with how you describe what is and isn't an alpha. I know you are wrong. It's a tech demo. A Pre-Alpha at best.
The Dev that programs a cash register, follows the same exact industry standards and best practices as coding software the size of Star Citizen. There is no difference. Industry Standards and Best Practice. Scope has ZERO effect on them.
You said the known issues that I mentioned in my OP where passed by Internal QA. Here's how software travels (simplified):
Dev Sandbox Environment
Internal QA
Evocati (They are unqualified players who just spend more on the game, nobodys)
Test Server
Live (Production)
Live is the final version (called Production). All Live software is the final version (until later patches, etc). This is CIG saying "Ok world, this is our best for you to see". Marketing gets to "technically" claim they have, for example, FOIP. Even though it's not fully implemented or working. But, "technically" FOIP is in the game, in a used car salesman tactic.
And please, I'm not trying to write a novel here, I kept this development process as simple and short as possible. Try to restrain yourself.
I found your opinions very telling. Especially how players with problems should be treated. Funny they never make podcasts about that part of the Star Citizen experience.
Did you guys pay attention to EA? You know how they make good games but nobody buys them now because they talk racist shit to customers on social media? Don't do that. Don't talk smack to your customers. It's bad for you.
Lots of arguing, jabbing and floundering. Very entertaining. Can I ask a question to both sides of this:
You come here to bash the game or you come here to defend the game. Like or hate, both sides are entitled to their opinions. Development has been a long process. Some would contend that this isn't a development process, others believe it is. Neither side possess a clairvoyant, so whether it will release or won't, in a bad or good condition, is impossible to tell. (Yes, impossible. You can guess, even make an educated or experienced guess. It's a guess all the same.)
It's a forum to discuss and both sides aren't going to see eye to eye, but we'll come right back to jump down each others throats once again, shortly after, for another thread.
The question is: Why does either side fight so hard for this? Leave the fanboys to love their game and the haters to hate it...
Or, continue this cycle of drama and provide people like me with a zesty read. What does it matter in the end I suppose?