›

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links

Marvel's First Mobile Open World RPG Announced

SystemSystem Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
edited March 2020 in News & Features Discussion

imageMarvel's First Mobile Open World RPG Announced

Netmarble and Marvel have announced Marvel’s first mobile open world RPG called MARVEL Future Revolution.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • mcrippinsmcrippins Member RarePosts: 1,642
    You lost me at mobile =[
    NorseGodTuor7McSleazLeiHngWeigastovski1lorddarkaKyleranAeanderAsm0deusTacticalZombehand 2 others.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Tuor7McSleazLeiHngWei[Deleted User][Deleted User]meerclarTacticalZombehrojoArcueid
  • alkarionlogalkarionlog Member EpicPosts: 3,584

    mcrippins said:

    You lost me at mobile =[



    marvel and mobile are reason to me enough to ignore
    Tuor7KyleranTacticalZombeh
    FOR HONOR, FOR FREEDOM.... and for some money.
  • WarlyxWarlyx Member EpicPosts: 3,368
    cool open world rpg , marvel? uhmm


    mobile? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    Tuor7KyleranTacticalZombehinfomatz
  • CygiCygi Member RarePosts: 257
    Yep, stopped reading at "mobile".
    Tuor7NorseGod
  • lahnmirlahnmir Member LegendaryPosts: 5,058
    Pffft amateurs, I stopped reading after Ma...

    /Cheers,
    Lahnmir
    [Deleted User]SamhaelTEKK3NKyleranmaskedweaselTacticalZombehTuor7rojoArcueid
    'the only way he could nail it any better is if he used a cross.'

    Kyleran on yours sincerely 


    'But there are many. You can play them entirely solo, and even offline. Also, you are wrong by default.'

    Ikcin in response to yours sincerely debating whether or not single-player offline MMOs exist...



    'This does not apply just to ED but SC or any other game. What they will get is Rebirth/X4, likely prettier but equally underwhelming and pointless. 

    It is incredibly difficult to design some meaningfull leg content that would fit a space ship game - simply because it is not a leg game.

    It is just huge resource waste....'

    Gdemami absolutely not being an armchair developer

  • WhiteLanternWhiteLantern Member RarePosts: 3,319
    I've played Future Fight on and off since launch. I'll at least give this one a look.
    I'm no platform snob.
    maskedweasel

    I want a mmorpg where people have gone through misery, have gone through school stuff and actually have had sex even. -sagil

  • k61977k61977 Member EpicPosts: 1,527
    Looks great but got that feeling it is most likely auto battle piece of crap. Can we please get another Marvel game that isn't mobile. Really wish someone could buy marvel heroes an get it going again.
  • UtinniUtinni Member EpicPosts: 2,209
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    rojoArcueid
  • UtinniUtinni Member EpicPosts: 2,209
    edited March 2020
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).

    So I guess you could consider less than half of something "almost all".
    I don't personally do math that way though.
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).
    Still. The highest rated/best of their console efforts is NOT a Disney licensed title. 

    Now, I'm not sure what list you are utilizing, but, taking you at your word, 5 of 12 games being mobile is NOT a good metric. 58% is still a failing grade.

    Not to mention, their actual console game titles haven't exactly been well regarded lately.

    MvCI has a terrible reputation that can largely be traced back directly to Disney's at-the-time intentional devaluing of the Xmen and FF licenses.

    MUA3 is largely viewed as mediocre at best, with core issues such as a bad camera, bad UI, and poor loading times that have yet to be addressed by developer Team Ninja.

    And while I'm not going to cast judgement on Marvel's Avengers, let's not pretend that the pre-release impressions have been glowing.
  • UtinniUtinni Member EpicPosts: 2,209
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).
    Still. The highest rated/best of their console efforts is NOT a Disney licensed title. 

    Now, I'm not sure what list you are utilizing, but, taking you at your word, 5 of 12 games being mobile is NOT a good metric. 58% is still a failing grade.

    Not to mention, their actual console game titles haven't exactly been well regarded lately.

    MvCI has a terrible reputation that can largely be traced back directly to Disney's at-the-time intentional devaluing of the Xmen and FF licenses.

    MUA3 is largely viewed as mediocre at best, with core issues such as a bad camera, bad UI, and poor loading times that have yet to be addressed by developer Team Ninja.

    And while I'm not going to cast judgement on Marvel's Avengers, let's not pretend that the pre-release impressions have been glowing.
    Ahh true you're right. Almost all of Marvel games are mobile because you don't like the ones that aren't. I understand you now.
    Aeander
  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).
    Still. The highest rated/best of their console efforts is NOT a Disney licensed title. 

    Now, I'm not sure what list you are utilizing, but, taking you at your word, 5 of 12 games being mobile is NOT a good metric. 58% is still a failing grade.

    Not to mention, their actual console game titles haven't exactly been well regarded lately.

    MvCI has a terrible reputation that can largely be traced back directly to Disney's at-the-time intentional devaluing of the Xmen and FF licenses.

    MUA3 is largely viewed as mediocre at best, with core issues such as a bad camera, bad UI, and poor loading times that have yet to be addressed by developer Team Ninja.

    And while I'm not going to cast judgement on Marvel's Avengers, let's not pretend that the pre-release impressions have been glowing.
    Ahh true you're right. Almost all of Marvel games are mobile because you don't like the ones that aren't. I understand you now.
    Ah. Disingenuous as ever, I see.
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,079
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).

    So I guess you could consider less than half of something "almost all".
    I don't personally do math that way though.
    You forgot to use the "hyperbole" multiplier.    :D

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,079
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).
    Still. The highest rated/best of their console efforts is NOT a Disney licensed title. 

    Now, I'm not sure what list you are utilizing, but, taking you at your word, 5 of 12 games being mobile is NOT a good metric. 58% is still a failing grade.

    Not to mention, their actual console game titles haven't exactly been well regarded lately.

    MvCI has a terrible reputation that can largely be traced back directly to Disney's at-the-time intentional devaluing of the Xmen and FF licenses.

    MUA3 is largely viewed as mediocre at best, with core issues such as a bad camera, bad UI, and poor loading times that have yet to be addressed by developer Team Ninja.

    And while I'm not going to cast judgement on Marvel's Avengers, let's not pretend that the pre-release impressions have been glowing.
    Ahh true you're right. Almost all of Marvel games are mobile because you don't like the ones that aren't. I understand you now.
    Oh yes, you have to apply the "hater" factorial to the entire result.

    ;)
    Aeander

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    Kyleran said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).

    So I guess you could consider less than half of something "almost all".
    I don't personally do math that way though.
    You forgot to use the "hyperbole" multiplier.    :D
    Hyperbole is an acceptable form of rhetoric. It may not be an argument but it is a valid rhetorical device. It gets the point forward, and it does so bluntly and often amusingly.

    Not that there is even much hyperbole involved.
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,079
    edited March 2020
    Aeander said:
    Kyleran said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).

    So I guess you could consider less than half of something "almost all".
    I don't personally do math that way though.
    You forgot to use the "hyperbole" multiplier.    :D
    Hyperbole is an acceptable form of rhetoric. It may not be an argument but it is a valid rhetorical device. It gets the point forward, and it does so bluntly and often amusingly.

    Not that there is even much hyperbole involved.
    Just one of the many tools of the trade.

      >:)

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    edited March 2020
    Kyleran said:
    Aeander said:
    Kyleran said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).

    So I guess you could consider less than half of something "almost all".
    I don't personally do math that way though.
    You forgot to use the "hyperbole" multiplier.    :D
    Hyperbole is an acceptable form of rhetoric. It may not be an argument but it is a valid rhetorical device. It gets the point forward, and it does so bluntly and often amusingly.

    Not that there is even much hyperbole involved.
    Just one of the many tools of the trade.

      >:)
    Yep. A sledgehammer. But sometimes the situation calls for exactly that.


    Also, 5 mobile games of the same IP? Holy shit. Are we actually going to pretend that this quantity is good, necessary, and not at all harmful to Marvel's perception as a license?
  • DekahnDekahn Member UncommonPosts: 107
    Ugh more mobile junk.
    AeanderTuor7NorseGod
  • UtinniUtinni Member EpicPosts: 2,209
    Aeander said:
    Kyleran said:
    Aeander said:
    Kyleran said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    Utinni said:
    Aeander said:
    So many Marvel Games, almost all of which are mobile guff.

    Because Disney is a shitheel of a company. 
    Less than half of their games are mobile(5 out of their current 13 titles). Did you forget MvC, Spiderman(one of the best games of the decade), UA, the Avengers title SE is making? I get that it's hip to hate on the big companies but making things up to do fit your narrative is pretty sad.
    Is Spiderman actually Disney licensed? I'm pretty sure Sony owns the Spiderman rights.
    Sony owns the rights but its complicated when it comes to MCU. It's still a Marvel title though, hence why I included it in a rebuttle saying almost all marvel games are mobile. Disney still owns the other 12 titles (of which only 5 are mobile).

    So I guess you could consider less than half of something "almost all".
    I don't personally do math that way though.
    You forgot to use the "hyperbole" multiplier.    :D
    Hyperbole is an acceptable form of rhetoric. It may not be an argument but it is a valid rhetorical device. It gets the point forward, and it does so bluntly and often amusingly.

    Not that there is even much hyperbole involved.
    Just one of the many tools of the trade.

      >:)
    Yep. A sledgehammer. But sometimes the situation calls for exactly that.


    Also, 5 mobile games of the same IP? Holy shit. Are we actually going to pretend that this quantity is good, necessary, and not at all harmful to Marvel's perception as a license.
    That's almost all of the marvel games on the market right now. I can't believe this.
  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,197
    It ain't the game I wanted, but it's probably the closest to marvel heroes that I'll get.



  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    maskedweasel said:
    It ain't the game I wanted, but it's probably the closest to marvel heroes that I'll get.
    Man, don't break my heart like that.  :(
    infomatz
  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member LegendaryPosts: 12,197
    Aeander said:
    maskedweasel said:
    It ain't the game I wanted, but it's probably the closest to marvel heroes that I'll get.
    Man, don't break my heart like that.  :(
    Hugs? 


    It is kinda sad, I know.  I don't trust netmarble. I know I'm an idiot though. I know I'll drop cash for the costumes I want, as long as they have the characters I like. 

    I'm not convinced the Avengers is going to give me the characters I want to play. I don't like netmarble, but at least they go deep in future fight with the characters you can play as. Though that game is trash.



  • AeanderAeander Member LegendaryPosts: 8,067
    maskedweasel said:
    Aeander said:
    maskedweasel said:
    It ain't the game I wanted, but it's probably the closest to marvel heroes that I'll get.
    Man, don't break my heart like that.  :(
    Hugs? 


    It is kinda sad, I know.  I don't trust netmarble. I know I'm an idiot though. I know I'll drop cash for the costumes I want, as long as they have the characters I like. 

    I'm not convinced the Avengers is going to give me the characters I want to play. I don't like netmarble, but at least they go deep in future fight with the characters you can play as. Though that game is trash.
    I'm hoping Marvel's Avengers will be better than people expect.


    But it will probably never let me play as my Ragin Cajun.
Sign In or Register to comment.