Is there any way to hide the disgusting anime-soft-porn pictures on MMORPG.com?

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

Scorchien

Mensur said:

I am all for for big tits and chicks with Dicks.. but this Anime soft porn makes my wife always angry. 

not that there is anything wrong with that

Ungood

Wargfoot said:

Ungood said:

Drawing a Cartoon that looks young and sexy does not make you Pedo.

Wanting to have sex with young children is what makes you a Pedo.

If you look at a cartoon and get sexual urges, that is called Fictosexual.

Just wanted to help people use the right terms, and I am suddenly wondering if calling people "Ficto" sounds as dirty and I am imagining it to sound. 

Thanks!

You seem to know a lot about this stuff for a guy who just got here.

I am offended.

I'll have you know I have been a raging know-it-all asshat on these forums for years! 

KnightFalz

Wargfoot said:

KnightFalz said:

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

Child porn??? Where in hell did that come from. You know the real problem is with the people who look at anime and connect children to it.

The Wiki for the game puts the age of some of the girls at under 18.
I didn't connect it to children, the developer did.

I'll put you down for "Okay with the sexual exploitation of children in video games."

I grew up even since I was a little girl watching anime. Calling me for the sexual exploitation of children is what is wrong with you. You are the sicko here seeing children in anime.

Nobody here is attacking anime or children in anime.
You're free to join the actual conversation at any time.

Other than consistently, throughout this conversation, in actuality.

Same offer I made another poster.
Feel free to join the actual conversation at any time.

You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

KnightFalz

Wargfoot said:

KnightFalz said:

You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.

Please stay on topic: We've moved on to Ungood being a know-it-all asshat.

Oh, I see. I did miss that shift.

Kyleran

KnightFalz said:

Wargfoot said:

KnightFalz said:

You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.

Please stay on topic: We've moved on to Ungood being a know-it-all asshat.

Oh, I see. I did miss that shift.

Well yeah, but who here isn't?

olepi

Just rename it to Sex Worker and be done with it.

Amaranthar

Judging from the defenders here of little girls faces on voluptuous women's bodies in the never ending sex-sells marketing ploys, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it has worked. 

KnightFalz

Amaranthar said:

Judging from the defenders here of little girls faces on voluptuous women's bodies in the never ending sex-sells marketing ploys, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it has worked. 

Sex sells, as always.

One would think the voluptuous bodies would be enough to signify they weren't little girls, but apparently some here know enough well endowed female children so as to create this degree of confusion.

Or, they know it's BS and continue on regardless in the hope they can cause such confusion in others for some reason, which seems a tad more likely.

Either way, there is nothing "little girl" about these images.

kitarad

There are many creatures in fantasy and art that look young but are ancient. The associations we make in our heads to real life people isn't real. Those characters don't exist outside of the artist's imagination.

In Japanese manga and anime schoolgirls in the stories wear incredibly short skirts. The school is a setting for many stories. When an interviewer interviewed some schoolgirls and asked if they did that in school. Their answer was that schools have regulations and they cannot wear skirts like that in school. They do however fold the waist to make the skirt shorter outside of school, it is not influenced by manga or anime but a pop star from the 90's called Namie Amuro.

When you grow up watching these anime and reading manga, manhwa(Korean) you make a clear distinction between art style and story from real life. Exposure to them makes a difference and also an understanding of cultural differences. Which in some of the posters' view is to excuse grown men fantasizing about little girls in grown women's bodies. Bear in mind they don't exist. What you are imagining is in your head.

This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.

This game that you're complaining about is playable by kids in real life?  Is it open to all ages?

HidesBehindShadow

I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.

Scot

HidesBehindShadow said:

I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.

I have no issues with the ads but this is just mud throwing. We cannot read people's minds at all, though social media and indeed all news media seem to suggest we can.

Ungood

KnightFalz said:

Amaranthar said:

Judging from the defenders here of little girls faces on voluptuous women's bodies in the never ending sex-sells marketing ploys, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it has worked. 

Sex sells, as always.

One would think the voluptuous bodies would be enough to signify they weren't little girls, but apparently some here know enough well endowed female children so as to create this degree of confusion.

Or, they know it's BS and continue on regardless in the hope they can cause such confusion in others for some reason, which seems a tad more likely.

Either way, there is nothing "little girl" about these images.

Well I checked their steam charts, and, I have to admit, you're right, it seems putting up that Soft Core Porn ads on gaming sights worked. They near to doubled tripled their numbers.

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

kitarad

Scot said:

HidesBehindShadow said:

I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.

I have no issues with the ads but this is just mud throwing. We cannot read people's minds at all, though social media and indeed all news media seem to suggest we can.

Ahh but it is okay with you that someone said I am okay with sexual exploitation of children in video games because I didn't see children in the art.

Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

Everything that you're imagining is on you and don't assume that everyone looking at the images are interpreting them the same you do. This is what happens when people try to push their morality and ideas on others based on fictional drawings and games.

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

kitarad

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.

Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...

I already addressed it.



Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

kitarad

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.

Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...

I already addressed it.



Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

I've not equated animated pornographic images with the sexual exploitation of children.

You seem to be backing yourself up into a weird position that if something is animated it cannot possibly be offensive or inappropriate. 

I'm done with you until you can actually contribute.

kitarad

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

Wargfoot said:

kitarad said:

This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.

Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...

I already addressed it.



Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

I've not equated animated pornographic images with the sexual exploitation of children.

You seem to be backing yourself up into a weird position that if something is animated it cannot possibly be offensive or inappropriate. 

I'm done with you until you can actually contribute.

Your only objection is that children are being portrayed as sexual workers but all the violence and killing they do in the game does not raise any issues. You don't find that offensive.

If a character hatches out of an egg and then in 5 days is running around slicing and dicing and killing things that violence does not seem inappropriate or offensive but if this 5 day old becomes a sexual worker it is offensive and inappropriate. Do you know how ridiculous your position is? 

[Deleted User]

The user and all related content has been deleted.

kitarad

olepi said:

As the title says, I'm disgusted with the soft-core porn cartoons on the MMORPG home page. Young girls with gigantic boobs spilling out of their clothes. Short-short skirts. Skin tight swimsuits. I'm sure there are plenty of other websites for those who like to look at these types of pictures.

Is there any way to turn them off?

This is the topic. It is about the images. Nothing about the game itself.

Who is the one that researched the game and found out the ages of the characters. It is convenient for you now to hide behind the topic when the question of violence is brought in. Then you should have stuck to the images and not gone on to talk about the game because the violence is then an issue. 

Why is your research on the ages of the characters more relevant than the violence? Why is the ages of the children only important as far as the sex work and not the violence?

Don't hide behind the topic.

olepi

kitarad said:

olepi said:

As the title says, I'm disgusted with the soft-core porn cartoons on the MMORPG home page. Young girls with gigantic boobs spilling out of their clothes. Short-short skirts. Skin tight swimsuits. I'm sure there are plenty of other websites for those who like to look at these types of pictures.

Is there any way to turn them off?

This is the topic. It is about the images. Nothing about the game itself.

Who is the one that researched the game and found out the ages of the characters. It is convenient for you now to hide behind the topic when the question of violence is brought in. Then you should have stuck to the images and not gone on to talk about the game because the violence is then an issue. 

Why is your research on the ages of the characters more relevant than the violence?

I am willing to tolerate fantasy violence in a video game. Probably very few video games don't have some kind of conflict as a fundamental part of the game.

What I objected to was the obvious child-like characters (the game says they are children) who also have greatly exaggerated sexual features. And the use of this as a sales strategy.

kitarad

Well that is bogus. At least be consistent.