Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Next Everquest nugget

NanfoodleNanfoodle Member LegendaryPosts: 10,900
edited November 22 in General Gaming
Everquest 3 UPDATE: New Details straight from Darkpaw!

Lead designer confirms they are making a EQ1 reboot instead of some Everquest Next. Modern and 100% EQ1. Its right now in the concept stages. Does this excite you?

Full Video this info came from

Keeping EverQuest Alive, 25 Years Later - MinnMax Spotlight

Comments

  • TamanousTamanous Member RarePosts: 3,030
    Sticking to original playstyle for the original audience seems good. Keeping the scope of development within reach and cost seems good.

    Sure, appears fine to me for now.
    Nanfoodle

    You stay sassy!

  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 32,917
    edited November 22
    Tamanous said:
    Sticking to original playstyle for the original audience seems good. Keeping the scope of development within reach and cost seems good.

    Sure, appears fine to me for now.

    Well, he did say "modern in game play, visually and style."
    ScotNanfoodle
    Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb." 

    Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w


    Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547

    Try the "Special Edition." 'Cause it's "Special." https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/64878/?tab=description

    Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo 
  • TamanousTamanous Member RarePosts: 3,030
    Sovrath said:
    Tamanous said:
    Sticking to original playstyle for the original audience seems good. Keeping the scope of development within reach and cost seems good.

    Sure, appears fine to me for now.

    Well, he did say "modern in game play, visually and style."
    We'll have to see for sure. But a lot can be modernized and still have a game that requires group play in a much similar way.
    Sovrath

    You stay sassy!

  • hupahupa Member UncommonPosts: 177
    If it requires grouping it's not for me. But I hope it's a good EQ game for the group oriented players. 
    When you judge others, you do not define them, you define yourself

    - Earl Nightingale
  • cheyanecheyane Member LegendaryPosts: 9,404
    Exciting news for sure but years away.
    Garrus Signature
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 24,420
    Sovrath said:
    Tamanous said:
    Sticking to original playstyle for the original audience seems good. Keeping the scope of development within reach and cost seems good.

    Sure, appears fine to me for now.

    Well, he did say "modern in game play, visually and style."
    I have to say that's a red flag, but we won't really have a handle on the game until it goes into the inevitable early access.
Sign In or Register to comment.