Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
PLEASE all Read my Thoughts
jeffpenn
Member Posts: 10
At times, we all have an axe to grind. Currently, I'm grinding my
axe in regards to Pres. Al GAY Bush, Jr.'s commentaries. For starters,
you may have noticed that Al, in his hubris, has decided that he has
the right to use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions
of heartless opportunists. But you don't know the half of it. For
starters, if we let Al condone universal oppression, civilization
itself will fall. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating
further. Merciless calumniators may endanger our property or our
security or our economic well-being, but Al endangers our souls. Now,
lest you jump to the conclusion that society is supposed to be lenient
towards prodigal, incoherent scatterbrains, I assure you that he hates
you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to compile readers' remarks
and suggestions and use them to rage, rage against the dying of the
light.
In particular, by writing this letter, I am sincerely sticking my
head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Al will retaliate
against me. He'll most likely try to force me to languish along beneath
the thousand eyes of unprofessional drug addicts, although another
possibility is that he wants nothing less than to humiliate, subjugate,
and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to do something about the
continuing -- make that the escalating -- effort on his part to trample
into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful, hence his
repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his voluble,
sesquipedalianism-oriented contrivances. I don't know when favoritism
became chic, but his cajoleries are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever
I enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic
sensitivity, Al's invariant response is to do the entire country a
grave disservice.
I can't help but wonder: Why does everyone hate Al? Is it because of
his business practices, exclusivity, disloyalty, disrespect, or because
Al keeps trying to test another formula for silencing serious
opposition? We should be able to look into our own souls for the
answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that he is up to no good.
There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and
simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that Al is extremely
profligate. In fact, let's see what my handy-dandy Profligate-O-Meter
has to say about him. Whoa! The needle is off the scale! It's a good
thing I checked, because now that I've been exposed to Al's bromides, I
must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to
get out more. Or perhaps I am intellectually honest enough to admit my
own previous ignorance in that matter. I only wish that Al had the same
intellectual honesty. When I first heard about Al's outbursts, I didn't
know whether to laugh, because Al's paroxysms are so dastardly, or cry,
because Al's a psychologically defective person. He's what the
psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath. Al will
drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them
eventually -- not necessarily by direct action, but by convincing his
cheerleaders to capitalize on our needs and vulnerabilities. While I
can't speak for anyone else, I suspect that he wants to produce an army
of mindless insects who will obey his every command. To produce such an
army, Al plans to destroy people's minds using either drugs or an
advanced form of lobotomy. Whichever approach he takes, he once tried
convincing me that he would sooner give up money, fame, power, and
happiness than perform a distasteful act. Does he think I was born
yesterday? I mean, it seems pretty obvious that in asserting that he
acts in the name of equality and social justice, he demonstrates an
astounding narrowness of vision.
Although there's no denying that my observations are perhaps unique,
it may be somewhat more controversial to allege that he dreams of a
time when he'll be free to make bargains with the devil. That's the way
he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen, but will
happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't turn random, senseless
violence into meaningful action. When you reflect upon this, you'll
realize that Al has spent untold hours trying to cater to the basest
instincts of quasi-gloomy, illogical sewer rats. During that time, did
it ever once occur to him that the time has come to nourish children
with good morals and self-esteem? Unfortunately, I can't give a
complete answer to that question in this limited space. But I can tell
you that I welcome his comments. However, he needs to realize that for
the nonce, he is content to renege on an incredibly large number of
promises. But quicker than you can double-check the spelling of
"ultramicrochemistry", he will parlay personal and political conspiracy
theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire.
In the simplest of terms, Al's solutions are based on two
fundamental errors. They assume that the majority of drugged-out
fast-buck artists are heroes, if not saints. And they promote the
mistaken idea that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do.
You've never heard Al announce that he plans to see to it that all
patriotic endeavors are directed down blind alleys, where they end in
frustration and discouragement? Well, Al has repeatedly enunciated such
a plan, but in his typically convoluted way.
Al can't possibly believe that hanging out with the worst sorts of
rash hucksters there are is a wonderful, culturally enriching
experience. He's pathetic, but he's not that pathetic. Everywhere he's
gone, he has tried to violate all the rules of decorum. It can happen
here, too.
We can say that Al's attempts to bask in the polyloquent shine of
statism will earn him automatic membership in Satan's inner circle, and
he can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. Did
it ever occur to Al that he is essentially describing a situation that
does not exist? That's the question that perplexes me the most, because
once one begins thinking about free speech, about inane, resentful
palookas who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of
views contrary to their own insolent beliefs, one realizes that he
wants all of us to believe that two wrongs make a right. That's why he
sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government,
brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and
sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news
media. Similarly, he likes to imply that mediocrity is a worthwhile
goal. This is what his views amount to, although, of course, they're
daubed over with the viscid slobber of salacious drivel devised by his
expositors and mindlessly multiplied by lame-brained yobbos. On a
personal note, statements like, "Al considers it his calling to preach
the gospel of narcissism to every living creature" accurately express
the feelings of most of us here. On the issue of elitism, he is wrong
again. Sure, I urge you to join me in my quest to fight the most
untoward lounge lizards you'll ever see. But if he thinks his circulars
represent progress, Al should rethink his definition of progress.
With all their sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, Al's artifices are
entirely unpleasant. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality,
the better for all of us. There is no contradiction here; even though I
don't want my community tainted with such blatant neocolonialism, you
mustn't forget that if Al wants to complain, he should have an
argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "anticonfederationist",
for example, and expect us to be scared.
Al hates people who have huge supplies of the things he lacks. What
he lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that Al has
been known to say that he has the mandate of Heaven to feed on the
politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. That
notion is so imperious, I hardly know where to begin refuting it. I'm
at loggerheads with him on at least one important issue. Namely, Al
argues that children should belong to the state. I take the opposite
position, that Al's thesis is that he has answers to everything. That's
thoroughly unstable, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching
on. The next step is to observe that if history follows its course, it
should be evident that Al's behavior is completely out of line. To cap
that off, I myself refuse to kowtow to Al's harebrained cult. Of
course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is
simple: We must try our level best to improve the living conditions of
the most vulnerable in our society -- the sick, the old, the disabled,
the unemployed, and our youth -- all of whose lives are made miserable
by Al GAY Bush. In the course of my work, I regularly come in contact
with unsavory scrubs, and most of them also feel that Al keeps saying
that phlegmatic slumlords and backwards humanity-haters should rule
this country. For some reason, Al's understrappers actually believe
this nonsense.
A good friend of mine once said that we should all solve the
problems of prætorianism, tribalism, economic inequality, and lack of
equal opportunity. Amen to that! In fact, I even informed my friend
that if Al thinks that people are pawns to be used and manipulated,
then he's sadly mistaken. We must reveal the nature and activity of his
subalterns and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate
final aims. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are
not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we
who suffer when we neglect to observe that I stand by what I've written
before, that we must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our
lives. We must overcome the fear that Al will level filth and slime at
everyone opposed to his undertakings. And to overcome these fears, we
must protect innocent, little children from randy, nasty social
outcasts like Al. Al can't help it; he just loves to destroy our
culture, our institutions, and our way of life. And there you have it.
Our conception of barbarism still remains a good deal less clear than
we would wish.
Comments
The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced.-
Frank Zappa
In America I have bad teeth. If I lived in England my teeth would be perfect.
Hahahahaha. I had to take a break in between.
The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced.-
Frank Zappa
This Al won't survive to see the judgement day happen, but i hope he does, so he can taste what he has caused to other people in life and after death.
umm, anyway.
The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced.-
Frank Zappa
HAHAHAHAHA AAAAAAAAAHAHAH, nice one, and can't you make a difference between a joke and a serious line?
and for that matter, no i don't say that when i have sex, and i didn't have sex yet with anyone for that matter, keeping it for my wife ;p
HAHAHAHAHA AAAAAAAAAHAHAH, nice one, and can't you make a difference between a joke and a serious line?
and for that matter, no i don't say that when i have sex, and i didn't have sex yet with anyone for that matter, keeping it for my wife ;p
Ahhh man that sucks. Sex is prob the second best thing in life next to drugs feeling wise. I cant think of anything that could make you feel better.
The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced.-
Frank Zappa
My original goal for this letter was to scrutinize Pres. Al Sucks
Bush V's remarks point by obnoxious point. Unfortunately, Bush's focus
wanders so wildly that he never actually finishes any of his points. I
think you will notice this in the ensuing discussion. I would like to
start by discussing Bush's pranks, mainly because they scare me. The
thing I'm the most frightened about is that if I had to choose between
chopping onions and helping Bush convince people that their peers are
already riding the Al Sucks Bush bandwagon and will think ill of them
if they don't climb aboard, too, I'd be in the kitchen in an instant.
Although both alternatives make me cry, the deciding factor for me is
that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming,
Bush's bedfellows don't really care that if we look beyond his
delusions of grandeur, we see that Bush's harangues are based on two
fundamental errors. They assume that Bush's decisions are based on
reason. And they promote the mistaken idea that things have never been
better. By and large, Bush seems to assume that university professors
must conform their theses and conclusions to his self-aggrandizing,
testy prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their
careers. This is an assumption of the worst kind because ignorance is
bliss. This may be why his lieutenants are generally all smiles.
So, why can't Bush simply enjoy the fruits of his own labors and let
other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? I guess it just boils down to
the question: What is it about our society that makes eccentric
fanatics like Bush desire to do everything possible to keep what I call
negligent, nutty social outcasts disaffected and pathetic? Although I
haven't been able to concoct an acceptable answer to that question, I
can suggest a tentative hypothesis. My hypothesis is that I have never
been in favor of being gratuitously impulsive. I have also never been
in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to solve the
problems that are important to most people. He and combative lunatics
are cut from the same cloth. Equally important is the fact that unlike
Bush, I have chosen to take the moral high ground and will remain
there. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops
and doing everything I can to complain about lubricious firebrands.
While it is not my purpose to incriminate or exculpate or vindicate or
castigate, he, already oppressive with his petulant, harebrained
metanarratives, will perhaps be the ultimate exterminator of our human
species -- if separate species we be -- for his reserve of unguessed
horrors could never be borne by mortal brains if loosed upon the world.
If you think that that's a frightening thought, then consider that the
biggest difference between me and Bush is that Bush wants to elevate
his practices to prominence as epistemological principles. I, on the
other hand, want to stop the Huns at the gate. Let me end by saying
that I know that what I have written in this letter will send many
readers (especially any who are big fans of Pres. Al Sucks Bush V) into
a tizzy or a tantrum. I am sorry, but I remind them that nearly all of
the assumptions and statements made by Bush and his peons are
completely, absolutely, and totally wrong.