Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Best Party/Team MMORPG
ZeTaKa
Member UncommonPosts: 28
I love play in party/team, and hate play solo time, What is the best game, for never play solo? I try CoV but have a problem, only is team or duel, i need a item trade and craft, but with team 24h/365 days :-)
That exist? and sorry for my sucks english 
Comments
I Think Guildwars is very much involved with teams :P, but thats just me :P
I find it amazing that by 2020 first world countries will be competing to get immigrants.
I try GW in beta, and dont like the system of game and team, and play FFXI 4 moths and get hated to stay 1 or 2 or 3 hours, in city for play in team 1 hour, for i lose all the time for get party.
And i love PSU, but is only repeat repeat and repeat, no much items and get "tendonitis" / "tendinitis" for play too many hours with gamepad
. and for that im looking for MMORPG.
For no repeat answers, i try, GW, WoW (i hate it), EQ2, FFXI, MoX, CoV and D&D
maybe you dont like MMO's?
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a robot foot stomping on a human face -- forever."
[URL=http://www.ff-fan.com/chartest]Which Final
WoW is Anti-Party... From what I've read i'd wait until vanguard, they've said their design stratagy was 20% solo play 20% raiding and 60% small group play.. .and you're pretty similar to me in mmo taste
after 6 or so years, I had to change it a little...
to back that up with links to "reports" that have come out during beta
3 or 4? Or just going to spew that shit out because its the
current fad to VG bash?
to back that up with links to "reports" that have come out during beta
3 or 4? Or just going to spew that shit out because its the
current fad to VG bash?
Current fad, my ass. I've been slamming Brad McQuaid since he was involved with EQ1. If you don't Vanguard is an extension of his "EQ1 vision" then more fool you buddy.
I won't even go into his appalling attitude toward his player-base either, apart to say I hope he changes it in time for Vanguard's release.
to back that up with links to "reports" that have come out during beta
3 or 4? Or just going to spew that shit out because its the
current fad to VG bash?
Current fad, my ass. I've been slamming Brad McQuaid since he was involved with EQ1. If you don't Vanguard is an extension of his "EQ1 vision" then more fool you buddy.
I won't even go into his appalling attitude toward his player-base either, apart to say I hope he changes it in time for Vanguard's release.
Domi have you even READ what they hope to accomplish from the game. Its an EQ clone, by the creator of EQ. Open your eyes. Anybody who jumps on the "Vanguard will save the world" is just as lame as anybody who claimed "Dark and Light will save the genre"
Edit: as for a team game, Id go with WoW or EVE if you want a game that last a long time. Both are heavily reliant on guilds/corps
after 6 or so years, I had to change it a little...
You need to quote the right guy, buddy. Admittedly, this board doesn't do quoting as well as some.
Spam post +1
after 6 or so years, I had to change it a little...
WoW is not anti-group. Damn people who never played the game should not make comments about it. You can group in WoW all the way to 60 if that is what you want to do. If all you want to do is run dungeons then that is up to you. If by anti-group you mean not forcing you to group via out dated and lame gameplay mechanics in order to level then maybe you are right in that respect.
Games I've played/tried out:WAR, LOTRO, Tabula Rasa, AoC, EQ1, EQ2, WoW, Vangaurd, FFXI, D&DO, Lineage 2, Saga Of Ryzom, EvE Online, DAoC, Guild Wars,Star Wars Galaxies, Hell Gate London, Auto Assault, Grando Espada ( AKA SoTNW ), Archlord, CoV/H, Star Trek Online, APB, Champions Online, FFXIV, Rift Online, GW2.
Game(s) I Am Currently Playing:
GW2 (+LoL and BF3)
to back that up with links to "reports" that have come out during beta
3 or 4? Or just going to spew that shit out because its the
current fad to VG bash?
Current
fad, my ass. I've been slamming Brad McQuaid since he was involved with
EQ1. If you don't Vanguard is an extension of his "EQ1 vision" then
more fool you buddy.
I won't even go into his appalling
attitude toward his player-base either, apart to say I hope he changes
it in time for Vanguard's release.
Domi
have you even READ what they hope to accomplish from the game. Its an
EQ clone, by the creator of EQ. Open your eyes. Anybody who jumps on
the "Vanguard will save the world" is just as lame as anybody who
claimed "Dark and Light will save the genre"
Edit: as for a team
game, Id go with WoW or EVE if you want a game that last a long time.
Both are heavily reliant on guilds/corps
Yes
I have read what they hope to accomplish, and it seems quite different
from what EQ was. Ive been following the game since Sigil first
announced it was being worked on, and I by NO means think this game is
going to "save" the genre. That opinion is about as stupid as the
"Vanguard is an EQ clone because the creator of EQ is working on it
ZOMGZZ!"
Have you READ the forums lately? The hardcore
playerbase is absolutley devasted, they were looking for another EQ
style game and are absolutley shocked at the way VG has started to
implement things that move it towards the casual side.
By the way, I'm still waiting for links that prove that "every report" has said the game is dull and the gameplay is outdated.
I hate MMO fanbois, but I hate those who instantly spit out negative comments about MMO's with NO proof to back themselves up.
Its like people saying " I hate Bush!!", but have no freaking idea WHY
they hate him, they just say it because everyone else is saying
it. I don't like Bush either, but I have some damn good reasons
for not liking him.
I would actually suggest Phantasy Star Universe for the Xbox 360 if you want a team game...That game is pure 90% team for exp/items/cash.
No PvP in it yet though but the Voice Chat incorporated into the game makes it 20x better than the PC version. Also no one is hacking the 360 one (yet) like the PC is just one huge hack fest.
So get that if you like teams and hard leveling.
/Ash
I mean anti-party as in you almost never party and partying has completely no purpose(as apposed to leveling solo... there is just no bonus...) I played for over a year and wanted to do nothing but party... guess what... the furthest i got was a lvl 54 lock... 99% of the gamers on the normal servers and PvP servers are powergamers who solo up to 60 as fast as they can and say 'oh you want to party shove it where the sun don't shine you damned carebear.' and the people on the RP and RP-PvP servers don't even bother RPing and do the same old thing... it's a game where there is no reason to actually party to level... I mean I never got a party outside a looting instance where i was ordered to pass on everything and if i didn't pass, i got kicked from party... and I don't call a chaotic group of guildies fighting over tier armor a party... I've taken more that enough crap from blizzard's WoW department to be able to bad mouth them at this point after over a year of subscription to a sub par single player game with a massive chat channel...
oh and they're not outdated game mechanics that force you to party nor are they lame however I respect your right to have an opinion no matter how much it angers me to hear it.
well back on topic(an sorry for my rant... have had a bad day)... if not Vanguard; Ragnarok 2 in what i believe is a quote from gravity(not 100% sure...) "Killing one strong creature has been redesigned to be far more effective than killing multiple weaker enemies. Grouping has also been made far more beneficial to those in the group." so that might catch your interest when it's released.
My Brute - Dare to challenge?
I sleep with a pillow under my gun.
I mean anti-party as in you almost never party and partying has completely no purpose(as apposed to leveling solo... there is just no bonus...) I played for over a year and wanted to do nothing but party... guess what... the furthest i got was a lvl 54 lock... 99% of the gamers on the normal servers and PvP servers are powergamers who solo up to 60 as fast as they can and say 'oh you want to party shove it where the sun don't shine you damned carebear.' and the people on the RP and RP-PvP servers don't even bother RPing and do the same old thing... it's a game where there is no reason to actually party to level... I mean I never got a party outside a looting instance where i was ordered to pass on everything and if i didn't pass, i got kicked from party... and I don't call a chaotic group of guildies fighting over tier armor a party... I've taken more that enough crap from blizzard's WoW department to be able to bad mouth them at this point after over a year of subscription to a sub par single player game with a massive chat channel...
oh and they're not outdated game mechanics that force you to party nor are they lame however I respect your right to have an opinion no matter how much it angers me to hear it.
well back on topic(an sorry for my rant... have had a bad day)... if not Vanguard; Ragnarok 2 in what i believe is a quote from gravity(not 100% sure...) "Killing one strong creature has been redesigned to be far more effective than killing multiple weaker enemies. Grouping has also been made far more beneficial to those in the group." so that might catch your interest when it's released.
Raiding, instances, battlegrounds... elite quests.
Only game I know that gives you the option of more partying is FFXI...
WoW lets you do either way, group being more efficient.
after 6 or so years, I had to change it a little...
MMORPG's w/ Max level characters: DAoC, SWG, & WoW
Currently Playing: WAR
Preferred Playstyle: Roleplay/adventurous, in a sandbox game.