Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Enough!

sadnebulasadnebula Member UncommonPosts: 263
 I'm fed up with companies releasing half assed games under one pretext or another,  and  then  expecting the gaming community  to foot the bill while they carry on  with sitting things right.

  Vanguard , while not the only, is the latest in this trend. A good game, yes, great, no. No new ground was broken here. it's the same old gaming system that doesn't allow players to create a bad char. just add a few points every lv.  buy your new spell every 2 lvs.  nothing new.

body runs, nothing new, ac had this in the late 90's. But all in all not a bad game just not the game that was hyped up at release.

  But  no matter how good this game is or  isn't  we should not have to pay to play an unfinished product. This is the only area that companies can get away with this in. Think about what you spend money on from week to week.  would you accept this type of workmanship in any of your other purchases ?  So why do we as a gaming community accept this and even defend this type action from the sigils, the soe's and others?

 Bottom line, the buck stops here. my 15 bucks is going back in my pocket until someone releases a game worth my money each month

That i enjoy.
«13

Comments

  • ThamorisThamoris Member UncommonPosts: 686

    Vanguard ( or any mmorpg for that matter ) costs the average gamer about 10-20 cents an hour to play over the course of a year. Less than a cup of coffee or a can of Coke.  How can one complain about playing a $30+ million production and yet only charge 10-20 cents an hour to play? Where else can one find such value? No mmorpg is EVER done..finished...optimized ect. Computer games in general always require some kind of patching to be done..some more..some less...but always some. I'm getting my value and then some out of Vanguard. If you can't handle that then I suggest you stick to your Xbox for the next 5-10 years...by then computers should be much more standardized.

     I don't recall anyone stating VG was going to be next gen....in fact...I recall the emphasis was on the fact that Sigil cherry picked what they thought was best in other mmo's and developed these features in VG. That's not next gen...that's just smart.

    Next gen will likely be virtual reality or something simular... perhaps massive enhancements to NPC AI..Their isn't much else that can be done in mmorpg's with the hardware available to your average consumer these days.

  • MarkajMarkaj Member Posts: 165
    I can't agree more. This half-finished generic mmo releasing with grandiose claims is a nasty habit and it must end! I wish VG was the last, but I know it is not. Unfortunately, a segment of the gaming community - albeit small - is eager to be milked over everything thrown at them and they never seem to learn. At least, let us hope that other gaming companies and developers would learn from this disaster. Sadly, VG has taken the level of gaming quality 10 years back.

    CONTRIBUTE INTO THE GAMING INDUSTRY! STOP PAYING FOR BORING COPYCATS, UNFINISHED BUGFESTS AND CRANKY JUNKWARE. BE A RESPONSIBLE GAMER!

  • energydrainenergydrain Member Posts: 52

    Lol I usually go against the current topic because I like to rebutt..But man...

    I agree with you guys completely

    Vanguard was ruined when it was announced that it's company went in bed with "The Star Wars Killers" (you know who i mean)

    On SWG lol..(that game is dead) i logged in for free trial..no players lol..i'm lookin around everywhere..no1

    SOE ruins w/e game it gets its hands on...now it got hold of Vanguard...It would be a nice game about now..but soon it's gunna go blank...no players..no one

    I was looking forward to it, but the minute I heard that SOE is now the developer, I erased it from my mind...

    I feel sorry for the people who pre-paid =(

    Fun Fact: No store in Toronto that received copies of Vanguard sold a single copy

    image

  • CharlizdCharlizd Member UncommonPosts: 923
    Well i'm on both sides of the fence with this 1 my main gripe is that i play EQ2 which in my eyes is a much prettier game than vanguard and is finished i might add and it runs flawlessly but then what (emphasise what) i can play in Vanguard i like but cant run it on settings any higher then the lowest there is which looks like crap! What i have been able to play however is not all that bad, ok so it is not any different to any of the others but at least its a new story to follow. i however will not continue to pay for this game due to the fact that my pc meets recommended specs but will still only run (half decently) on the lowest settings and still be laggy at that and go back to playing others that deserve to see my hard earned cash i really don't know why ppl stick up for this game maybe they have super pc specs and can enjoy more than me but from what i read it is very team based and by the looks of it most ppl are ditching it  so why stick up for something that is destined to die. (im sure you have your reasons to and please dont bitch back at me im just stating how i feel)
    Andrew "Charlizd" Phippen | Lead World Builder | The Saga of Lucimia MMORPG
  • xAlrythxxAlrythx Member Posts: 585
    Originally posted by Thamoris


    Vanguard ( or any mmorpg for that matter ) costs the average gamer about 10-20 cents an hour to play over the course of a year. Less than a cup of coffee or a can of Coke.  How can one complain about playing a $30+ million production and yet only charge 10-20 cents an hour to play? Where else can one find such value? No mmorpg is EVER done..finished...optimized ect. Computer games in general always require some kind of patching to be done..some more..some less...but always some. I'm getting my value and then some out of Vanguard. If you can't handle that then I suggest you stick to your Xbox for the next 5-10 years...by then computers should be much more standardized.
     I don't recall anyone stating VG was going to be next gen....in fact...I recall the emphasis was on the fact that Sigil cherry picked what they thought was best in other mmo's and developed these features in VG. That's not next gen...that's just smart.
    Next gen will likely be virtual reality or something simular... perhaps massive enhancements to NPC AI..Their isn't much else that can be done in mmorpg's with the hardware available to your average consumer these days.



    "No mmorpg is EVER done..finished...optimized"    No mmorpg is EVER optimized? I agree with the done and finished parts but optimized? Alot of mmos have released in much better states than VSoH has. WoW had a rocky release but the game still ran quite well, most of the issues were from massive server overload. Don't mean to mention LotRO but it is looking to set the standard in the department of newly released mmos.

    You obviously never followed VSoH, you have just proved yourself not only a fanboi but a newcomer to VSoH. VSoH was hyped up to be next-gen numerous times by Brad himself. It was to follow "the vision" and be for the core gamers yada yada *insert brad hype here*, it has strayed very far from the vision. Exp weekends are the perfect example of visions going down the toilet.

    Next gen will include mmos like age of conan and aion who are adding new and exciting features to the jaded genre. Of course next gen can be considered a personal opinion. But AoC is radically advancing combat and Aion is going to be showing everyone how worlds and servers can really change based on player actions. Those features are pretty next-gen imo.

    I know you like VSoH just some of the things you say are extremely weird. Like if you can't handle it go play xbox. We can all handle bugs/patches etc. but some of us can't handle mmorpgs being released in beta stages. There is a difference between being unfinished and not ready for release and being unfinished and ready for release.

     

    Currently Playing: Everything but MMORPGs
    Cancelled: L2, FFXI, VSoH, LotRO, WAR, WoW
    Looking Forward To: SW:TOR

  • energydrainenergydrain Member Posts: 52

    dude omg sick point

    I noticed that skrewed P2P games and F2P games run on huge data for some reason instead of compressing...

    When I play normal P2P games like WoW and GW..my comp runs fine..When I open Last Chaos or the likes...My computer roars up like a 1980s car....And my CPU Usage whoops up 50%....Trust me, it's not pleasant...F2P games can't afford to compress their data and they torture my computer, for which I paid over 10,000 pounds...Thr problem isn't in my computer for sure...And also..omg...THE LAG...badly organized games LAG...I also tried Vanguard..my computer roared up, CPU Usage went to an enormous 94% and it froze..Had to call the mechanic and pay around 100 pounds for him to fix it...From then on, I haven't loaded up VG ever again...Mostly because I un-installed it xD

     

    I fell like a noob...too much Elites...

    image

  • IpcryssIpcryss Member UncommonPosts: 169
    Originally posted by sadnebula 

      But  no matter how good this game is or  isn't  we should not have to pay to play an unfinished product.



    I'm sorry, but I've grown really weary of this argument.  No one is forced to pay for anything.  Anyone who has done even the lightest research, i.e. read any number of posts on this site, knows that Vanguard continues to be unfinished.  Even the most ardent VanFans have acknowledged its continuing beta status.  Anyone who pays their good money for Vanguard and expects anything else has only themselves to blame. <rant over>

    image

  • godpuppetgodpuppet Member Posts: 1,416
    Originally posted by sadnebula

     I'm fed up with companies releasing half assed games under one pretext or another,  and  then  expecting the gaming community  to foot the bill while they carry on  with sitting things right.

      Vanguard , while not the only, is the latest in this trend. A good game, yes, great, no. No new ground was broken here. it's the same old gaming system that doesn't allow players to create a bad char. just add a few points every lv.  buy your new spell every 2 lvs.  nothing new.

    body runs, nothing new, ac had this in the late 90's. But all in all not a bad game just not the game that was hyped up at release.

      But  no matter how good this game is or  isn't  we should not have to pay to play an unfinished product. This is the only area that companies can get away with this in. Think about what you spend money on from week to week.  would you accept this type of workmanship in any of your other purchases ?  So why do we as a gaming community accept this and even defend this type action from the sigils, the soe's and others?

     Bottom line, the buck stops here. my 15 bucks is going back in my pocket until someone releases a game worth my money each month

    That i enjoy.
    I feel the same way mate. Sadly, all you will hear from the gaming community is excuses. "Vanguard released becuase Sigil ran out of money", why is that our problem? Fact is, if people refrained from buying the game SoE would come to the conclusion that the only way to make money is to release a finished product.



    Sadly people dont, they get hyped up, and buy it, as a result SoE will continue to push out buggy and unfinished MMO's.



    Unfortunately, im guilty of buying Vanguard, my excuse was that ive got bugger all else to play.

    ---
    image

  • ThonyThony Member Posts: 215
    Originally posted by sadnebula

     I'm fed up with companies releasing half assed games under one pretext or another,  and  then  expecting the gaming community  to foot the bill while they carry on  with sitting things right.

      Vanguard , while not the only, is the latest in this trend. A good game, yes, great, no. No new ground was broken here. it's the same old gaming system that doesn't allow players to create a bad char. just add a few points every lv.  buy your new spell every 2 lvs.  nothing new.

    body runs, nothing new, ac had this in the late 90's. But all in all not a bad game just not the game that was hyped up at release.

      But  no matter how good this game is or  isn't  we should not have to pay to play an unfinished product. This is the only area that companies can get away with this in. Think about what you spend money on from week to week.  would you accept this type of workmanship in any of your other purchases ?  So why do we as a gaming community accept this and even defend this type action from the sigils, the soe's and others?

     Bottom line, the buck stops here. my 15 bucks is going back in my pocket until someone releases a game worth my money each month

    That i enjoy.
    Nvm, seems some people have totaly different kind of problems thats not game related i can tell you that.
  • energydrainenergydrain Member Posts: 52

    I agree with you on some points...Not others...True, no one is forcing us to pay for Vanguard...But this isn't a discussion about the payment of Vanguard..We're discussing its quality...You'd know that if you had read the posts....The quality went from good to VERY BAD when SOE took over...Have you ever played SWG? SPRPG-Single Player Role Playing Game. SOE ruined it so bad that absolutely no one plays it now...If you login for at least free trial, you'll see..My prediction is that the same will happen to Vanguard..With SOE at the rains, the horse (in this case VG) won't last long...You'll see...It will loose all it's players and only the database, ruined by SOE will remain. My advice? Stop Playing VG and get yourself a good game unless you want to be the only person in the whole world playing that game.

    image

  • VesaviusVesavius Member RarePosts: 7,908
    Originally posted by energydrain


    I agree with you on some points...Not others...True, no one is forcing us to pay for Vanguard...But this isn't a discussion about the payment of Vanguard..We're discussing its quality...You'd know that if you had read the posts....The quality went from good to VERY BAD when SOE took over...Have you ever played SWG? SPRPG-Single Player Role Playing Game. SOE ruined it so bad that absolutely no one plays it now...If you login for at least free trial, you'll see..My prediction is that the same will happen to Vanguard..With SOE at the rains, the horse (in this case VG) won't last long...You'll see...It will loose all it's players and only the database, ruined by SOE will remain. My advice? Stop Playing VG and get yourself a good game unless you want to be the only person in the whole world playing that game.

     

    /shrug

    SoE handle EQ2 just fine. It's never looked or played better, or had more good things to do. It really is time to let SWG go... I mean.. We get it ok? No need to keep on banging the same worn out drum over something thats dead and gone.

    Vanguard was scrwed a *long* time before SoE got their fingers in it. All they did is enforce a release date on it in return for the use of their resources, which is very fair imho considering MS had dumped Sigil for their ineptitude and how long they have had to make this pig's ear out of the silk purse that they had been given...

    I bought VG, and now I'm back with EQ2. Both SoE, but honestly worlds apart.

  • AmatheAmathe Member LegendaryPosts: 7,630
    Originally posted by Thamoris


     I don't recall anyone stating VG was going to be next gen....



    That's because you are a fanboi who hides from inconvenient facts. From among the million places Brad boasted of this, try Sigil's website:

    http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:xEDDYDO3PIYJ:www.sigilgames.com/team/bradmcquaid.html+vanguard+mcquaid+third+generation&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us

    "Currently, Brad is involved with Sigil's next generation massively multiplayer online RPG to be co-published by Sony Online Entertainment: Vanguard: Saga of Heroes."

    "In January of 2002, Brad McQuaid and Jeff Butler formed Sigil Games Online, Inc., a new company dedicated to the development of next generation of massively multiplayer games."

    "While it's too early to reveal some of the truly third generation features in Vanguard: Saga of Heroes, suffice it to say that Brad feels the industry has only scratched the surface in terms of where MMOGs can and will head ..."

    EQ1, EQ2, SWG, SWTOR, GW, GW2 CoH, CoV, FFXI, WoW, CO, War,TSW and a slew of free trials and beta tests

  • energydrainenergydrain Member Posts: 52

    bwaha srry bout "banging on the same worn out drum" over and over again...didn't realise it lol

    just wanted to making my point

    neways, about EQ....it's only good because SoE doesn't have the majority of the developing..the things players need fixed: SoE's doing...the things players like about EQ: another company

    VG was skrewed before SoE had it because of lack of publicity...if no1 knows, no1 buys

    the meaning of mmorpg life lol....

     

     

    image

  • 0k210k21 Member Posts: 866
    *blinks and peers at Gods and Heroes which is being published by SOE*....... Oh my god.... It's an invasion of the SOE MMORPG's! Run for the hills! *flees*

    Quoting people doesn't make you clever, in fact, it makes you all the more stupid for not bothering to read the quotes you post in the first place.

  • energydrainenergydrain Member Posts: 52

    Lol i better stop chatting or I'll be late for school =S

    Peace out

    My email will update me with the latest on this topic and I'll make some posts after I come back from school on it lol

    Looks like I'm going to gather round 30 points with the posts I'm doin today

    Fun Facts:

    GaH is being born

    EQ lives

    VG: SoH is dying

    SWG is dead

    Omg will SOE stop skrewing up games????

    We should have a general discussion about how we all hate SoE...

    image

  • EuthorusEuthorus Member Posts: 491
    Originally posted by Amathe

    Originally posted by Thamoris


     I don't recall anyone stating VG was going to be next gen....



    That's because you are a fanboi who hides from inconvenient facts. From among the million places Brad boasted of this, try Sigil's website:

    http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:xEDDYDO3PIYJ:www.sigilgames.com/team/bradmcquaid.html+vanguard+mcquaid+third+generation&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us

    "Currently, Brad is involved with Sigil's next generation massively multiplayer online RPG to be co-published by Sony Online Entertainment: Vanguard: Saga of Heroes."

    "In January of 2002, Brad McQuaid and Jeff Butler formed Sigil Games Online, Inc., a new company dedicated to the development of next generation of massively multiplayer games."

    "While it's too early to reveal some of the truly third generation features in Vanguard: Saga of Heroes, suffice it to say that Brad feels the industry has only scratched the surface in terms of where MMOGs can and will head ..."

    That post was FTW. Btw some very fragile bleeding heart vanboii reported me before for pointing out the obvious on another post.

    FUNCOM - putting the FUN in disFUNctional !

  • 0k210k21 Member Posts: 866
    Totally agreed, I'm sick of seeing games that have been really badly developed and half-finished, even World of Warcraft with it's 'polish' feels like it has bits missing, especially with the fact that there are many just plainly static NPC's and areas out there that haven't been filled yet in the original world and the texturing and modelling (from a 3D modellers perspective) looks rushed and unprofessional, i could go on, but I'm not going to bother since players always use the excuse "MMORPG's are always constantly in development, live with it" that excuse by both players AND developers is not going to work anymore with me because I always have to wait a year or two when a new game comes out to see if they actually bother to fix any of the bugs and glitches I hear about on the forums.



    Bug Testing and Development is for Alpha and Beta phases, not the released product.

    Quoting people doesn't make you clever, in fact, it makes you all the more stupid for not bothering to read the quotes you post in the first place.

  • AtlanNorAtlanNor Member UncommonPosts: 38
    Yep, I feel the same way about games being released in beta and claiming to be filled with ground-breaking features that just aren't there.  Some of the stuff in the pipe does seem interesting because they are trying new things.  I'd like to see more skills based games and less class based.  The part about paying for something that's unfinished, well here's where the argument with myself comes in.  I'm bored with WoW, AC is my all time favorite but I can't get past the graphics (graphics junkie), Vanguard just isn't ready or "new", and EQ2 I just can't seem to play for very long.  However, I get the need for my MMO fix so I'll play WoW with my Wife (who loves it) and I'll re-up an account for a month or so just to be able to play something else.  Already I've cancelled and renewed and cancelled again my Vanguard account just because I'm dying for something to play but just can't find anything that keeps my interest.  But I keep doing it because I'm hoping for something to grab me.  I wonder how many people are the same way, they just pay because there is nothing else and they like playing MMO's.  It's sad really, I know, but after a long day at work and after I get the kids to bed I just want to get away for an hour or so.  Still looking, still hoping.....
  • SchluupsSchluups Member Posts: 11

    1) Brad has explained about ten times what he ment by next-generation/third generation mmo...

    2) Brad is not responsible for what others (not under his "command") say...

    3) CEOs aren't the best source usually for objectivity about theyr product..

    Zomg, I'm fed up of people speaking as if they could manage a billion worth company, market products, develop them etc when they can't even:

    1) get info that has been spammed over and over, all over the place, with a cherry on the top

    2) get the common sense of a 5 years old

    NB: Don't take it personaly but you'r just the last one of a serie of f00ls that are getting on the nerves of people that enjoy Vanguard, or want to give it a fair chance.

    What you can say is Brad does communicate alot and usually very honestly and precisely. Some times he doesn't achieves his aim.. like everybody else.

    Anyway, as was said, YOU (the OP) MUST BE BLIND to ignore the state of Vanguard...

    And I still got that nude photo of Yoda for thoses in that kind of stuff

  • HexxeityHexxeity Member Posts: 848
    Originally posted by Ipcryss

    Originally posted by sadnebula 

      But  no matter how good this game is or  isn't  we should not have to pay to play an unfinished product.



    I'm sorry, but I've grown really weary of this argument.  No one is forced to pay for anything.  Anyone who has done even the lightest research, i.e. read any number of posts on this site, knows that Vanguard continues to be unfinished.  Even the most ardent VanFans have acknowledged its continuing beta status.  Anyone who pays their good money for Vanguard and expects anything else has only themselves to blame. <rant over>


    This was not true upon release.  Around that time, there was this huge surge of positivity from the Vanbois (and/or stealth marketers), claiming that things had improved SO much in the last couple of weeks of beta.  A lot of people were tricked into paying good money for a terrible game that they would never have bought otherwise.
  • 0k210k21 Member Posts: 866
    erm... Schluups you er.... Could perhaps not insult people by calling them fools and 5 year olds before telling them "Don't take it personaly"..... I'm not even going to reply anymore, try reading the posts and looking at what has been written and quoted before blindly insulting and flaming people? Doubt you could do that to be honest, but it's up to you. Though then again, if this thread shows the hint of sanity about it and allows people to post their own opinions without being flamed for it I might just decide to post anyway.

    Quoting people doesn't make you clever, in fact, it makes you all the more stupid for not bothering to read the quotes you post in the first place.

  • ThalosVipavThalosVipav Member Posts: 273

    Quick...everyone jump on the "Bash SOE" bandwagon.

    This is just getting old. Yes, SOE PUBLISHES Vanguard. Sigil develops it. There is a difference.

    First, I am not a SOE fan. In fact I am an SWG Vet. I have no love for them. However, lay blame where it is due at least in the rants you spew onto this forum.

    Yes, SOE screwed SWG...after 2 strong years. All the bugs, all the patchs, and all the crap people still loved the game, and obviously, still do. (Yes, I am one of the people who really miss pre-CU SWG)

    Now...EQ2. started horrible. SOE changed a bunch of things, revamped the game, and now...a much better game that actually has people playing it and enjoying it.

    So..other then SWG, what has SOE killed? Matrix? Hardly, that game was dead when they bought it. Planetside? Never played it but I have heard it was alright. EQ1? nope. Hell, even EQOA for the PS2 did well for itself.

    I guess my point is at least point blame where it should be. I play Vanguard. I enjoy Vanguard. However I will freely admit, like most that play it even though all the trolls wont admit it, there are alot of bugs. But I give Sigil credit with the fact they are trying to better the game.

    At least SOE knows how to manage patch downloads and billing( this is from my experience, i have seen the "OMG SOE is still charging me after I cancelled!!!" threads. I have cancelled several times with SOE and have never had a problem. Maybe these people should learn to read through everything and make sure they follow all the CORRECT steps for doing something instead of just assuming the company is trying to screw them. You want this, go subscribe to Dark and Light and then talk to me about billing issues. I still get e-mails from those people and I never even logged into their game ). Unlike some other MMO's who's downloader sucks so bad you may or may not get the recent patch unless you go to a mirror site to get what blizzard just released. Whoops...the name just slipped out...

    I have played alot of MMO's and honestly I have had less problems with games published by SOE then any other. And I'll be sitting back giggling to myself when all the "next big game"s get tanked in these forums as well. Cause the only thing that flows freely on this site is hate towards whatever game the most recent batch of trolls decides they hate. Played LOTR, got bored. Have watched AoC...doesnt look earthshattering to me but I may give it a shot. Darkfall looks interesting. Tabula Rosa looks like it could be very interesting and, at least theres no dwarves and elves.

    I often wonder how much the tune would change for some people if their "next big game" lost it's publisher and SOE picked it up.

    At any rate, let me say again, I have no love for SOE and Vanguard is indeed bugged but jesus, at least try to follow topic instead of just jumping in and bashing SOE just for the sake of bashing them. Personally I agree with SOE forcing Sigil to release Vanguard, finished or not, after all...they had been working on it for 4+ years. Sh*t or get off the pot, as the saying goes.

    Thalos Vipav
    Star Wars Galaxies: R.I.P.

  • ThalosVipavThalosVipav Member Posts: 273
    Originally posted by Hexxeity

    Originally posted by Ipcryss

    Originally posted by sadnebula 

      But  no matter how good this game is or  isn't  we should not have to pay to play an unfinished product.



    I'm sorry, but I've grown really weary of this argument.  No one is forced to pay for anything.  Anyone who has done even the lightest research, i.e. read any number of posts on this site, knows that Vanguard continues to be unfinished.  Even the most ardent VanFans have acknowledged its continuing beta status.  Anyone who pays their good money for Vanguard and expects anything else has only themselves to blame. <rant over>


    This was not true upon release.  Around that time, there was this huge surge of positivity from the Vanbois (and/or stealth marketers), claiming that things had improved SO much in the last couple of weeks of beta.  A lot of people were tricked into paying good money for a terrible game that they would never have bought otherwise.

    obviously you never played it cause in couple weeks prior to release and just after Sigil DID patch alot fo things and fixed some major performance issues. They took care of alot of the play killing bugs.

    oh wait...I must be a vanboi or a "steath marketer" please. I play the game and like it. I dont hide that. However, I highly doubt that I "convinced" anyone to buy the game. No one held a gun to anyones head and said "buy this game or else" Dont blame other people cause you cant think for yourself, bottom line.

    Thalos Vipav
    Star Wars Galaxies: R.I.P.

  • PraxusPraxus Member Posts: 266
    Wow how many frickin times do you see posts like this? I mean I understand where you're coming from; but this point has already been made 10 billion times, why start a new thread on it?
  • swede2swede2 Member Posts: 975

    vanguard is finished enough for me and my wife and my son , if you dont like the game dont play it lol that simple

Sign In or Register to comment.