Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Star Trek Online: Exclusive Screenshots, Part One

Every two weeks through the end of the year, we are going to give you some exclusive screenshots that show off the look of Star Trek Online. To begin, we have three exclusive screenshots. Two show ships in space making dramatic turns in varied environments, and the third is a character shot of someone working away in engineering.

Check out all three images here.

Dana Massey
Formerly of MMORPG.com
Currently Lead Designer for Bit Trap Studios

«1

Comments

  • OdelaOdela Member Posts: 120

    Looks pretty, but nothing too special.

     

    TOR is still way more promising.

  • Night_HawkeNight_Hawke Member Posts: 41

    sweet looking screenies. the olympic looks awesome!

  • brad813brad813 Member Posts: 103

    Really looking forward to going where no man has gone before.

  • brad813brad813 Member Posts: 103

    The Old Republic will be no better or worse than Star Trek Online.  No real way to compare them since they are two different experiences, just as the movies were.  I never understood the point of comparing Star Wars and Star Trek.  Totally different.  Granted nobody can deny the impact Star Trek has had on the modern world.  We owe everything from cell phones to tele-transportation devices(still experimental, but I know the Duke University physics department has one of the tele-transportation device sites) to Star Trek.  So far all we have from Star Wars, in real life is cinema effects, though I certainly cannot discount that being in the industry myself.  Star Wars is simply designed around fantasy where Star Trek was based off of real science.  Both have their place in the canon of classic Science Fiction.

  • VhalnVhaln Member Posts: 3,159

     



    Originally posted by brad813

     

    The Old Republic will be no better or worse than Star Trek Online.  





     

    One's being made by Bioware, and the other by Cryptic. After seeing what Cryptic does when they no longer have NCSoft behind them.. um yeah, I think one sci-fi MMO just might be a big giant head and shoulders above the other.

     

    When I want a single-player story, I'll play a single-player game. When I play an MMO, I want a massively multiplayer world.

  • SomeOldBlokeSomeOldBloke Member UncommonPosts: 2,167

    As I've been a big trekky since the early 70s I want to get excited about this game... but it just isn't doing it for me. I agree with the previous poster, TOR will be better.

  • jawapetjawapet Member Posts: 79

    Really like the third one, with what looks to be some sort of science vessel... However this game is third on my personal hype list, more excited for TOR.

    image

  • brad813brad813 Member Posts: 103

    All I am saying is you have to take each experience for what it is.  I am a big time trekkie(even to the point I know what some of the Star Trek actors are doing right now.............I know one of the TNG actors is now an adjunct professor at USC Theater out in Los Angeles, for example.).  I am also a big fan of Star Wars.  These are things I grew up with.  Each game will play differently because each one will have a different context it is set in.  As such, it will affect game play style. I just see each one in this light is all.  I am planning to play both personally, assuming I get time to in between classes, rehearsals, and sleep.  Has anyone heard what the difference will be between the standard edition and the collector's edition yet.  I know that Gamestop.com is including a special constitution class ship as a bonus.  The blue phasers they mentioned for it makes it sound pretty cool to be honest.

  • DeaconXDeaconX Member UncommonPosts: 3,062

    The one with the guy in what looks like engineering is my fave - looks great.

    image

    Why do I write, create, fantasize, dream and daydream about other worlds? Because I hate what humanity does with this one.

    BOYCOTTING EA / ORIGIN going forward.

  • brad813brad813 Member Posts: 103

    Vhalan, Cryptic did an excellent job with Champions Online(although a couple minor tweaks were needed), but if you really look at The Old Republic, it will amount to a sci-fi version of the traditional fantasy mmo.  Sure you will have force powers(can you say magic), but it really won't feel much different in play style I don't think.  However, I am willing to be proven wrong, but with the Star Wars Universe being primarily ground based, you have limitations to what you can do with it.  The space component of Star Trek Online gives it a unique concept, and once they have the ground part working too it should be good all around.  Plus, unlike previous Star Trek games, this will not be scripted based off the movies or shows.  It looks like they took the last two movies as a starting point to allow players to develop the universe further.  It also seems to me they are planning for parallel universe story lines.  You should remember Cryptic developed City of Heroes, one of the best MMOs in the past 5 years, on it's own before NCSoft bought the rights to it.  I tend to think NCSoft tends to take a good idea and ruin it by adding new "features" that end up acting more as restrictions.

  • jmd10222jmd10222 Member Posts: 427

    Nice screens. I cant wait to get ahold of this game

  • buegurbuegur Member UncommonPosts: 457

    I think its great we have two new Sci-fi grade A titles to look forward to in the coming months.  I am really excited about being able to play Klingons in STO and hope that the Romulans will be added in an expansion.

  • synergisynergi Member UncommonPosts: 133
    Originally posted by brad813


    The Old Republic will be no better or worse than Star Trek Online.  No real way to compare them since they are two different experiences, just as the movies were.  I never understood the point of comparing Star Wars and Star Trek.  Totally different.  Granted nobody can deny the impact Star Trek has had on the modern world.  We owe everything from cell phones to tele-transportation devices(still experimental, but I know the Duke University physics department has one of the tele-transportation device sites) to Star Trek.  So far all we have from Star Wars, in real life is cinema effects, though I certainly cannot discount that being in the industry myself.  Star Wars is simply designed around fantasy where Star Trek was based off of real science.  Both have their place in the canon of classic Science Fiction.

    This is in no way a debate on the differences between Star Wars and Star Trek. Many of us love both. I for one always loved Star Trek more. This was in fact more of a debate on the direction of how the Trek game is being developed.  Like playing ''as'' your ship. The comments about not making it a simulator.  While no one wants a complete simulator, many want a lot of the features in the Trek shows and movies and it seems a lot of the Trek experience is being left out.

    I wasn't excited over TOR either but Bioware knows how to sell their game. Now I'm with everyone else here that thinks TOR will be better. We could be wrong but so far Cryptic hasn't shown much to get excited about. They show a fleet of ships and I think half ass because I want to be ''in'' my ship not ''be'' my ship.

     

    But to each its own.

     

    And I agree, Star Trek and Gene's vision has done a lot for tech but that has nothing to do with this game.

    "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees,"

  • KylrathinKylrathin Member Posts: 426

    The main thing TOR has going for it right now over STO is it's not scheduled to be released for consoles.  As big of a Trek fan as I am, as soon as I heard that it turned me off to this game completely.

    There's a sucker born every minute. - P.T. Barnum

  • synergisynergi Member UncommonPosts: 133
    Originally posted by Kylrathin


    The main thing TOR has going for it right now over STO is it's not scheduled to be released for consoles.  As big of a Trek fan as I am, as soon as I heard that it turned me off to this game completely.

    Another excellent point Kylrathin.

    "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees,"

  • RuynRuyn Member Posts: 1,052

    What MMO looks to be more of a single player game?  Star Trek or Star Wars TOR?  It's a close call.  They may both be winners in the department...with the players being the losers.

  • TerranahTerranah Member UncommonPosts: 3,575

    I'm more interested in the nonspaceship avatars.  If the game is more of an EVE experience with your people avatars as tacked on extra I will probably pass.

     

    But yeah, i'm a major Star Trek fan so I will probably change my mind.  Still though.

  • imershonimershon Member UncommonPosts: 73
    Originally posted by Terranah


    I'm more interested in the nonspaceship avatars.  If the game is more of an EVE experience with your people avatars as tacked on extra I will probably pass.

    I have to second this opinion.

    I was unaware this was being released for consoles as well - this automatically gives it a ZERO for me purely due to the necessary dumbing down required for console's inherent limitations for interface/memory/graphic hardware.

    It also means more developer resources are trivialised on creating crossplatform compatibility instead of focusing on more ingame content and a single platform's strengths.

    I'm sure there are types of MMO that suit console style of play better than on a pc - but whenever I see a developer attempting to crossplatform an MMO I immediately think of one thing GREED and my answer to this is.... NEXT.

     

    DEFINITION OF REALITY: Graphics ok, Sound ok, Gold drops need more work...

  • natuxatunatuxatu Member UncommonPosts: 1,364

    I know too little about STO at this point but so far TOR sounds very promising, not just in its design (being able to use the world around you to take cover ect) but also in the graphics and the epic story that is promised. So STO has a lot of stuff it needs to do before it could it even think about reaching the popularity of SW, from a gamers point of view. (I'm not talking about the general popularity between Star Strek and Star Wars.)

    image

  • OdelaOdela Member Posts: 120
    Originally posted by Ruyn


    What MMO looks to be more of a single player game?  Star Trek or Star Wars TOR?  It's a close call.  They may both be winners in the department...with the players being the losers.

     

    You admit elsewhere you're unsure whether you think TOR is a single player MMO.

     

    Almost no information that can support that hypothesis has been revealed, your argument is invalid.

  • BrenelaelBrenelael Member UncommonPosts: 3,821

    The Screen shots look great in my opinion. I think this game is going to pleasantly surprise a lot of people when it releases. I love how people get hung up on one little missing feature and it's the end of the world. This game is going to offer so much that to turn your back on it for such a small reason is just silly. For a pre-beta game I'd say it's looking pretty amazing.

     

    Bren

    while(horse==dead)
    {
    beat();
    }

  • AbeSimpsonAbeSimpson Member Posts: 24

    It's not like you have to pick sides....

    I'm going to play both. =)



    Screenies look great btw !!

    Playing:
    CS:S, Waiting to try out TOR.
    Played: Sword of the New World, Infantryzone, Ragnarok Online,RF Online, Fury, Tabula Rasa, Star Wars Galaxies, Cosmic Rift....

  • CohasCohas Member UncommonPosts: 152

    nice looking good

    Have No Fear Cohas is here!!!
    image

  • DarrenWrightDarrenWright Member Posts: 13

    The Olympic class looks very different from what i was expecting, maybe its just the angle of the picture, but its a very cool pic !!



    I am really excited about STO, sooner it comes out the better :)



    Cant wait to Boldy go, where no Player has gone before lol.

     

     

    Darren Wright

  • tad284tad284 Member UncommonPosts: 9

     Screens look good, but I was also hoping for more of an "in the ship" game.  Seems like it would be a much more fulfilling rpg, and a more accurate ST game if a group of players had to manage one ship, not a ship per player.  I want a real crew, not 30 people bringing 30 ships.  Just seems a bit weird to me for a Star Trek game.  

Sign In or Register to comment.