Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Is it me or my Benchmark result is weird??

vega151vega151 Member Posts: 57

Hello everyone!

 

Just wanted a general opinion on the benchmark I did (3 times in a row): got 4000 on low and 2600 on high... Okay so basically I should be able to run this game at default settings... Hmmm... Default settings... The thing is that I have an i7 920 @ 2.66GHz, 6 gigs of RAM and an nVidia GeForce 295 GTX... Oh and I have a resolution of 1650x1050 (yeah I'm part of the weirdos out there that have a 16:10 monitor....).

 

Quite frankly I was expecting to come out in the 6000 at the very least... Is the benchmark really accurate? Do you guys see a problem / bottleneck on my system? Or should I expect to be able to run the game on high settings and disregard the benchmark results?

 

EDIT: I'm not a super geek regarding computers, my friend is usually taking care of buying me my system since he knows more than me... So feel free to recommend upgrades if something is kinda ''lacking'' on my setup or if you see a potential bottleneck...

Comments

  • SwaneaSwanea Member UncommonPosts: 2,401

    Originally posted by vega151

    Hello everyone!

     

    Just wanted a general opinion on the benchmark I did (3 times in a row): got 4000 on low and 2600 on high... Okay so basically I should be able to run this game at default settings... Hmmm... Default settings... The thing is that I have an i7 920 @ 2.66GHz, 6 gigs of RAM and an nVidia GeForce 295 GTX...

     

    Quite frankly I was expecting to come out in the 6000 at the very least... Is the benchmark really accurate? Do you guys see a problem / bottleneck on my system? Or should I expect to run it on high settings and disregard the benchmark results?

    Uh, I have an I7 8something, and I was around 5200 low, and 3300ish high...

  • Robdc84Robdc84 Member Posts: 156

    Originally posted by vega151

    Hello everyone!

     

    Just wanted a general opinion on the benchmark I did (3 times in a row): got 4000 on low and 2600 on high... Okay so basically I should be able to run this game at default settings... Hmmm... Default settings... The thing is that I have an i7 920 @ 2.66GHz, 6 gigs of RAM and an nVidia GeForce 295 GTX...

     

    Quite frankly I was expecting to come out in the 6000 at the very least... Is the benchmark really accurate? Do you guys see a problem / bottleneck on my system? Or should I expect to run it on high settings and disregard the benchmark results?

     god only knows. on low i got 5500 and high i got 2600. i have amd 955x4 at 3.20 and 4gb of drr3 1600. and an ati 5770 1gb drr5. i think the bench mark is off maybe

    image
    IN THE FACE!

  • vega151vega151 Member Posts: 57

    Okay so if I got it right you guys have similar rigs to mine and getting a better result? Weird... Any ideas of what it could be? o_O

     

    And by the way yes, I have the latest nVidia driver... Running on Win 7 64 bits too.

  • XzenXzen Member UncommonPosts: 2,607

    Originally posted by vega151

    Okay so if I got it right you guys have similar rigs to mine and getting a better result? Weird... Any ideas of what it could be? o_O

     

    And by the way yes, I have the latest nVidia driver... Running on Win 7 64 bits too.

    I have 2 gtx 295s and got a simmilar score. being that the 295 has two gpus is it possible that the bench is only utilizeing only one of the gpus on the 295?

  • vega151vega151 Member Posts: 57

    Yeah that is my guess too.... Because quite frankly the rig I have is supposed to run pretty much anything on the market right now with either high, real high or extreme graphic details without any problems...

     

    Or so I was told... So I could be wrong...

     

    I'm a noob ><

  • jbgunzjbgunz Member UncommonPosts: 27

    Yeah its weird cause with my system i7 860@3.3 4gig ripjaws ddr3 1600mhz and a gtz260 216c im scoring 4100 low. Which no offence to the op my system is pumpin out more horse power then the amd guy and scoring lower then him. I mean even the gtx260 has proven alot better benchmarks then the 5770. Anyways somthing has to be up.

  • SwaneaSwanea Member UncommonPosts: 2,401

    ah yeah, I remember them saying something, on certain cards, it only recognizes one of them, which is why you are getting such a low score.

     

    There is a tread explaining the exact details on their forums.

  • MisterSrMisterSr Member UncommonPosts: 928

    Originally posted by jbgunz

    Yeah its weird cause with my system i7 860@3.3 4gig ripjaws ddr3 1600mhz and a gtz260 216c im scoring 4100 low. Which no offence to the op my system is pumpin out more horse power then the amd guy and scoring lower then him. I mean even the gtx260 has proven alot better benchmarks then the 5770. Anyways somthing has to be up.

    Yeah, my computer is quad core, 8 gigs, ddr 3, graphics card is GTS 250 (in some aspects is better than GTX 260, memory wise has more capacity and is actually DX 10) and I scored like a 2500, this can't be right because I can run Mass Effect 2 no problems all bells and whistles. What is this nonsense? 

  • vega151vega151 Member Posts: 57

    So is there a tweak out there, an update or something so the Benchmark would consider my 2 GPUs?

     

    Pretty sure I would top the score chart if it's the case, would probably run in the 7-8000...

  • KryptyKrypty Member UncommonPosts: 454

    I scored much, much higher. I got 7400 on low - however - I use a i7 920 @ 3.8GHz and a 5850 overclocked past a 5870's settings.

     

    You'd be amazed how huge the results can be from overclocking.

Sign In or Register to comment.