Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Will Blizzard do To War Craft what they did to SC?

I have no idea why they are dragging their feet. I can care less how many wow haters are on these boards, I started playing wow simply because of War Craft. If Blizzard made WC4 and set up the network as they did Star Craft, I wouldn't need wow. Nothing would please me more if they also made online game campaigns for WC in an RPG format where you gain rewards and achievements. There is so much they could do with WC4 I can't even begin to start. Anyone have info on this?

I have the right to like what I want!

Comments

  • Rockgod99Rockgod99 Member Posts: 4,640
    No info sorry. I've been waiting for a WC 4 forever. We will probably see one before Wow 2 since it will probably lay the ground work for the lore of that game.

    image

    Playing: Rift, LotRO
    Waiting on: GW2, BP

  • NakedFuryNakedFury Member UncommonPosts: 411

    I used to play WC3. I really liked it as an rts and(dont hate me) I think it is much better than Starcraft.


    image

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,063

    Originally posted by KarmaCry7

    I have no idea why they are dragging their feet. I can care less how many wow haters are on these boards, I started playing wow simply because of War Craft. If Blizzard made WC4 and set up the network as they did Star Craft, I wouldn't need wow. Nothing would please me more if they also made online game campaigns for WC in an RPG format where you gain rewards and achievements. There is so much they could do with WC4 I can't even begin to start. Anyone have info on this?

    I do believe you might have answered your own question. 

    You're asking them to create a single player title that they probably receive no more than 25 bucks revenue for it, when it might draw players away from a game that they direct bill 15.00 a month to every month?

    I can see why they might drag their feet a bit on that project.

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • FusionFusion Member UncommonPosts: 1,398

    The reason they arent doing WC 4 is because they're milking roughly hundred million (100) $ a month from WoW, so what's the need for WC 4. And how could they possibly do anything with Warcraft anymore since they've ruined the whole series and lore with WoW, unless they made a prequel to orcs & humans.

    http://neocron-game.com/ - now totally F2P no cash-shops or micro transactions at all.
  • warmaster670warmaster670 Member Posts: 1,384

    Originally posted by Kyleran

    Originally posted by KarmaCry7

    I have no idea why they are dragging their feet. I can care less how many wow haters are on these boards, I started playing wow simply because of War Craft. If Blizzard made WC4 and set up the network as they did Star Craft, I wouldn't need wow. Nothing would please me more if they also made online game campaigns for WC in an RPG format where you gain rewards and achievements. There is so much they could do with WC4 I can't even begin to start. Anyone have info on this?

    I do believe you might have answered your own question. 

    You're asking them to create a single player title that they probably receive no more than 25 bucks revenue for it, when it might draw players away from a game that they direct bill 15.00 a month to every month?

    I can see why they might drag their feet a bit on that project.

    This, dont expect to see something like that until they cant milk there massive fanboy base monthly.

     

    And if they do bring it out chances are it will have a monthly fee if they still have WC mmos going.

    Apparently stating the truth in my sig is "trolling"
    Sig typo fixed thanks to an observant stragen001.

  • EmhsterEmhster Member UncommonPosts: 913

    This is purely baseless thinking out loud stuff, but I don't think they are going to work on a next sequel of the Warcraft RTS since it shares its lore with World of Warcraft. That would mean putting the progression of the lore in World of Warcraft on hold (which is impossible), branching out (either a parallel story or a different world accessed through a Dark Portal) or revisiting an unexplored section of the lore before World of Warcraft.


     


    Hmm. When I come to think of it, a parallel story could bring some interesting twists, though I don't see it altering any major 'known' spots in Azeroth.


     


    Also SC2 is more of a personal story of the main character. The previous sequels, or at least the one of WC3, focused on larger scale wars, invasions, exploration without being attached to the main characters as much. So a parallel story in some uncharted land in WC4 could be feasible.

  • ArnstrongArnstrong Member Posts: 281

    Originally posted by Kyleran

    Originally posted by KarmaCry7

    I have no idea why they are dragging their feet. I can care less how many wow haters are on these boards, I started playing wow simply because of War Craft. If Blizzard made WC4 and set up the network as they did Star Craft, I wouldn't need wow. Nothing would please me more if they also made online game campaigns for WC in an RPG format where you gain rewards and achievements. There is so much they could do with WC4 I can't even begin to start. Anyone have info on this?

    I do believe you might have answered your own question. 

    You're asking them to create a single player title that they probably receive no more than 25 bucks revenue for it, when it might draw players away from a game that they direct bill 15.00 a month to every month?

    I can see why they might drag their feet a bit on that project.

    I don't like RTS.

    I might like an adventure WC game or a WC BG game on consoles.

    But indeed no one is waiting for WC4 except for a few nostalgic fans.

    I don't like RTS.

  • KarmaCry7KarmaCry7 Member Posts: 144

    Originally posted by Fusion

    The reason they arent doing WC 4 is because they're milking roughly hundred million (100) $ a month from WoW, so what's the need for WC 4. And how could they possibly do anything with Warcraft anymore since they've ruined the whole series and lore with WoW, unless they made a prequel to orcs & humans.

    The RTS and MMORPG fan base are not the same in the slightest. WoW is always going to have it's hardcore support base and so would WC4 . They could only make more money as many who left wow would buy WC4. I got into the wow lore because of WC and so did a lot of other players.

    I have the right to like what I want!

Sign In or Register to comment.