Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

lifetime subscription

I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

 

At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

«13

Comments

  • waynejr2waynejr2 Member EpicPosts: 7,771

    TOR will never have a lifetime sub.

    http://www.youhaventlived.com/qblog/2010/QBlog190810A.html  

    Epic Music:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAigCvelkhQ&list=PLo9FRw1AkDuQLEz7Gvvaz3ideB2NpFtT1

    https://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary_msdos?&sort=-downloads&page=1

    Kyleran:  "Now there's the real trick, learning to accept and enjoy a game for what it offers rather than pass on what might be a great playing experience because it lacks a few features you prefer."

    John Henry Newman: "A man would do nothing if he waited until he could do it so well that no one could find fault."

    FreddyNoNose:  "A good game needs no defense; a bad game has no defense." "Easily digested content is just as easily forgotten."

    LacedOpium: "So the question that begs to be asked is, if you are not interested in the game mechanics that define the MMORPG genre, then why are you playing an MMORPG?"




  • mrxennonmrxennon Member Posts: 209

    most people wouldnt want it, due to past mmo's going with lifetime subs have gone the f2p route or as some people say failed.

  • DOGMA1138DOGMA1138 Member UncommonPosts: 476

    ToR will not have a life time sub option, and honestly most people cannot afford it or dont want to spend 350$+ on a life time sub for a game they are not sure how long they will be playing or how long it will be kept on the same revnue model. These days it's quite common for games to switch to alternative revenue models alltough i do not belive that ToR will ever will, it might how ever will have to lower it's monthly sub costs especially when blizzard will start to do the same and they allready have to a point with their yearly sub + diablo 3 combo.

    I've also think that life time subs are counter productive from the player pov since they give up any leverge they have against the developer and publisher due to the fact that they give up all the money upfront. And also from the dev/publisher pov to me life time subs show that they do not belive in the longevity of the game adn want to capitlize as much as possible on the initial hype.

    Life time subs, especially if they are dominant with in a game just ruin it, the dev have no reason to adhere to the current player base and have to adhere only to the people who are still not playing the game which usualy turns into a dumb down / cas friendly fest.

  • KabaalKabaal Member UncommonPosts: 3,042

    It's very unlikely. Anyone who says 'never' is just guessing same as everyone else.

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 44,065

    Think of it as EA protecting you from future disappointment.

     

    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • AfterlifeAfterlife Member UncommonPosts: 256

    Lifetime subs are horrible...

  • APRIMEAPRIME Member UncommonPosts: 76

    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

  • demarc01demarc01 Member UncommonPosts: 429

    Originally posted by APRIME

    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )




  • APRIMEAPRIME Member UncommonPosts: 76

    Originally posted by demarc01

    Originally posted by APRIME


    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    " . . . they don't want you playing for free after 2 years or so."

     

    Pretty much says it all right there, dem.

  • LoekiiLoekii Member Posts: 430

    Originally posted by mrxennon

    most people wouldnt want it, due to past mmo's going with lifetime subs have gone the f2p route or as some people say failed.

    How are lifetime subscribers reacting when their game goes F2P?  

     

    I would imagine it causes some resentment.

    image

  • Einherjar_LCEinherjar_LC Member UncommonPosts: 1,055

    Originally posted by waynejr2

    TOR will never have a lifetime sub.

    Don't listen to the haters here OP.

     

    There was a thread on the official forums with yellow names responding stating they have NOT ruled out lifetime subs yet.

     

    So it still remains to be seen.

    Einherjar_LC says: WTB the true successor to UO or Asheron's Call pst!

  • AfterlifeAfterlife Member UncommonPosts: 256

    Originally posted by Loekii

    Originally posted by mrxennon

    most people wouldnt want it, due to past mmo's going with lifetime subs have gone the f2p route or as some people say failed.

    How are lifetime subscribers reacting when their game goes F2P?  

     

    I would imagine it causes some resentment.

    Yeah, pretty ticked off. I haven't got screwed like that personally because I know better, but I could imagine it would suck more than a little bit. I'm sure they throw in garbage like "auto upgrade to premium account" or something. Free credits?

  • Einherjar_LCEinherjar_LC Member UncommonPosts: 1,055

    Originally posted by APRIME

    Originally posted by demarc01


    Originally posted by APRIME


    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    " . . . they don't want you playing for free after 2 years or so."

     

    Pretty much says it all right there, dem.

    You guys realize the average length of time a player subscribes to an MMO is 7 months?

     

    Also, see my post above.  As much as you want to guesstimate they won't offer them, on the official forums they have not ruled them out yet which means as of about a week ago they were still considering it.

     

    So basically you guys have no idea what you're talking about...

    Einherjar_LC says: WTB the true successor to UO or Asheron's Call pst!

  • niceguy3978niceguy3978 Member UncommonPosts: 2,051

    Originally posted by demarc01

    Originally posted by APRIME


    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    The only reason a developer would offer a lifetime sub is because they don't have enough faith in their game that they would expect people to play longer bring in more revenue.

  • Einherjar_LCEinherjar_LC Member UncommonPosts: 1,055

    Originally posted by Afterlife

    Originally posted by Loekii


    Originally posted by mrxennon

    most people wouldnt want it, due to past mmo's going with lifetime subs have gone the f2p route or as some people say failed.

    How are lifetime subscribers reacting when their game goes F2P?  

     

    I would imagine it causes some resentment.

    Yeah, pretty ticked off. I haven't got screwed like that personally because I know better, but I could imagine it would suck more than a little bit. I'm sure they throw in garbage like "auto upgrade to premium account" or something. Free credits?

    So then basically you're commenting on something you know nothing about?

     

    I have a lifetime sub to LOTRO.  You know what happened to us when the game went freemium?  Nothing.  That's right nothing.  The game carried on the same as it had before it went freemium with the exception that we could buy stuff in the item shop.

    Einherjar_LC says: WTB the true successor to UO or Asheron's Call pst!

  • Einherjar_LCEinherjar_LC Member UncommonPosts: 1,055

    Originally posted by niceguy3978

    Originally posted by demarc01


    Originally posted by APRIME


    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    The only reason a developer would offer a lifetime sub is because they don't have enough faith in their game that they would expect people to play longer bring in more revenue.

    Again, the average gamer only subs for 7 months so any developer offering a lifetime sub will come out ahead on average...assuming their offering lasts more than 7 months of course which SWTOR most definitely will.

    Einherjar_LC says: WTB the true successor to UO or Asheron's Call pst!

  • DOGMA1138DOGMA1138 Member UncommonPosts: 476

    Originally posted by Loekii

    Originally posted by mrxennon

    most people wouldnt want it, due to past mmo's going with lifetime subs have gone the f2p route or as some people say failed.

    How are lifetime subscribers reacting when their game goes F2P?  

     

    I would imagine it causes some resentment.

    Couple of games did it like LOTRO and STO, some others too i belive(dont remeber if AOC had it). Having a large amount of lifetime subs might even cause the game to go the (Not-So)Free 2 Play way in order to gain additional revenue, Blizzard is hoping to do it with the year subs + their new vanity *cough* cash * cough* shop service. Heck the new battle.net ballance that they are intreducing will create a unified digital currency which will be cross game and will allow you to pay for real stuff like WoW play time. There are allot of things happening in the MMO market today beyond the F2P lie.

    Honestly i'm glad that ToR so far is sticking to the original model - too many companies these days are looking for way too many creative ways in how to milk much more than 15$ from their costumers, in-game shops which aimed and causing as much impluse buys as you can have, in-game "virtual" currencies which you have to buy for real money and other crap is just wrong. Many of the so call "f2p" players pay way over the 15$ a month, i've seen people spend 50$+ on games like LoL and you kinda have too especially if you play on the competetive scene since "draw" matches require you to have X amount of champions and allot of them are constantly being "banned" by the community, also with every new champ the meta game changes and many times it will be required of you to have the new champ. Yes i know that you can buy LoL champs for "IP" and not just riot points but the prices for those champs, especially the new ones combined with the fact that you have to buy new runes for them allot of the times make it pretty much impossible to keep up with IP alone.

    Blizz's new scheme is the main reason why i never will go back to WoW why i've cancled my pre-order of Diablo 3 and why i am considering to stop playing SC2,  i am not buying the next title or any additional game from Blizzard ever again. They've turned Battle.net into Paypal(and actually will be working with PP for the bnet ballance to real money conversion crap) for me this is just wrong on so many levels and i hope the community will speak out against it.

    When i buy a game i want to know what am i paying for and how much upfront, i sure as hell dont want to see in game stores and other crap in it. I dont mind vanity off-game vanity stores for pets, mounts and other in game crap aslong as they are not directly tied into the game, they are not being abused by the publishers, they are not built to catch impulsive buyers and dont sell any advantage what so ever. Blizzard is breaking all of those rules, because once you allow people to buy gold, and  buy and sell items directly for real money you enable people to buy in game advantages for hard earned cash just to get a % of the proffits. This allways was considered one of the big NO's in any MMO/Competetive Online Game the real world equivilent of this is for Visa to work directly with black market / illegal traders for a cut of the proffits.

  • jpnzjpnz Member Posts: 3,529

    Originally posted by demarc01

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    Based upon projections of '900k Box sales in NA alone' there is no way SWTOR won't return the investment cost on day 1.

    Unless EA is now falsifying their earnings report that is.

    Gdemami -
    Informing people about your thoughts and impressions is not a review, it's a blog.

  • AntariousAntarious Member UncommonPosts: 2,846

    Originally posted by Afterlife

    Originally posted by Loekii


    Originally posted by mrxennon

    most people wouldnt want it, due to past mmo's going with lifetime subs have gone the f2p route or as some people say failed.

    How are lifetime subscribers reacting when their game goes F2P?  

     

    I would imagine it causes some resentment.

    Yeah, pretty ticked off. I haven't got screwed like that personally because I know better, but I could imagine it would suck more than a little bit. I'm sure they throw in garbage like "auto upgrade to premium account" or something. Free credits?

     

    I'm pretty sure when I read the lotro faq (as an example).   Anyone that had paid for a lifetime sub was converted to the top tier of their model.   Its the tier where you pretty much still pay a sub fee... people who had lifetime subscriptions get that at no cost.. so they really didn't get screwed over.

     

    My issue with lifetime subs has nothing to do with a game going F2P.   My issue is its a path to failure or at least that's my opinion.   At the so far standard of around $200...

     

    They target buyer is really someone that will play a month or a few months and then go away.   Its the same mentality as F2P..  Sure you can go into a game for "free".   Well guess what... the only way that works is if for every free person someone else is spending more than 2 normal subs.   The entire idea is to get you to think "free" and spend more than a subscription per month on crap from a shop.

     

    So when you offer a lifetime subscription if the retention rate of "lifers" was very high you would simply lose a lot of money.   Imagine if 99% of people in all of these mmo's going f2p simply stop paying anything but kept playing...

     

    As a customer tho if you intend to play long enough then a lifetime subscription is a great deal.

     

    As a company outside of continued growth past the time you offered a lifetime sub..   I mean you either need those people to leave or a continuous stream of new people paying to make up for it.. if things don't work out right then you lose money.

     

    That eventually comes back to bite the "llifer" in the dark side.   There are 3 MMO's I can think of off the top of my head that offered this option... Of those 3 the only 1 I can think of that might be doing ok is lotro.. and I really have no idea how its doing.   It certainly is low key enough that if I hadn't played it at launch I wouldn't even know it exists.

     

    Oh if it got lost in there I don't like the lifetime subscription offer because its based on some very flawed logic on the business side.   How that business does... actually will affect my game experience if  I stuck around that long.

     

    /end ramble

  • niceguy3978niceguy3978 Member UncommonPosts: 2,051

    Originally posted by Einherjar_LC

    Originally posted by niceguy3978


    Originally posted by demarc01


    Originally posted by APRIME


    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    The only reason a developer would offer a lifetime sub is because they don't have enough faith in their game that they would expect people to play longer bring in more revenue.

    Again, the average gamer only subs for 7 months so any developer offering a lifetime sub will come out ahead on average...assuming their offering lasts more than 7 months of course which SWTOR most definitely will.

    Exactly.  If a developer thinks that their game is good enough that their subs will play longer than the 19 months or so it takes for the player to recoup their investment then there's no reason to offer a lifetime sub.  

  • APRIMEAPRIME Member UncommonPosts: 76

    Originally posted by niceguy3978

    Originally posted by Einherjar_LC


    Originally posted by niceguy3978


    Originally posted by demarc01


    Originally posted by APRIME


    Originally posted by Gaborik

    I have played LOTRO since Beta and one thing I would have done different is purchase the Lifetime Subscription at lauch.  Will TOR have this option?  I would do this option if it was available.  

     

    At $299.99 (lotro price at lauch) it would take 19 months before you playing for free (14.99/month).  

    http://www.gamesradar.com/ea-predicts-10-year-lifespan-for-star-wars-the-old-republic/

    Assuming someone subscribes for 10 years (and the game hasn't gone F2P or shut down by then), that would be what . . . about $1800?

     

    I'm sure they wouldn't mind offering a lifetime sub for $1800.  They'd LOSE money at a $300 lifetime sub past 19 months, to use your example. 

     

    Don't see why a company would want to lose money over the course of a game's life if they think it's gonna be popular.

     

    Life time subs are a gamble for players and a cash injection for developers. The reason they dont cost $1800 (LOL btw) is because the player takes a gamble on the sub and the Developer gets a boost of up-front capital.

    SWtoR wont offer a lifetime not because they are a *bad idea* but because the amount of pre-orders they have already made is netting them a massive cash injection. WIll it make back thier initial outlay? Nope, but they have the backing of EA to soak that and time to recoup over the next year or so.

    Turbine offered lifetimes with LotRO to get back a chunk of thier outlay, and it worked out pretty well for them. Bioware just does not need to do that so no, they wont because they dont want you playing for free after 2 years or so. (Obviously Bioware feels thier game will last past this point, which is good news for us players! )

    The only reason a developer would offer a lifetime sub is because they don't have enough faith in their game that they would expect people to play longer bring in more revenue.

    Again, the average gamer only subs for 7 months so any developer offering a lifetime sub will come out ahead on average...assuming their offering lasts more than 7 months of course which SWTOR most definitely will.

    Exactly.  If a developer thinks that their game is good enough that their subs will play longer than the 19 months or so it takes for the player to recoup their investment then there's no reason to offer a lifetime sub.  

     

    Agreed.  Pretty much killed your own argument for having lifetime subs.

  • GaborikGaborik Member Posts: 251
    Its amazing how ignorant some people are. Going F2P would not hurt your lifetime, to play a full game like lotr or conan you need to pay a subcription (or lotro lots of deeds and quest). If you dont have a clue why make a comment?
  • GameboyMarcGameboyMarc Member UncommonPosts: 395

    Originally posted by Kyleran

    Think of it as EA protecting you from future disappointment.

     

    ^This

    image
  • KelvrekKelvrek Member Posts: 86
    The average MMO player doesn't sub to a game for two years. Look at the population drops after a new game has been out for a few months. Odds are that two out of three lifers would have quit playing long before the break-even of the lifetime sub. As far as freemium games, hardcore competitive players should just sub instead of buying a la carte via the cash shop, and lifers lose nothing from the game changing revenue models. They get the same content as subscribers and can buy vanity items in the cash shop with their monthly stipend. Not to mention the population boost and the chance to keep their game from shutting down. By the way, those freemium games don't need someone to pay twice the normal monthly sub to stay in the black. A casual player who spends two dollars a month in the cash shop is contributing more than if they had never played the game, and there are millions of casual players out there spending small amounts. These casual players are what makes freemium games profitable, not the fools who can't control their spending. You know what they say about a fool and his money...
  • BladestromBladestrom Member UncommonPosts: 5,001

    forgetting mmorgs for a second, regardless of industry, why on earth would you pay a company for hte lifetime for their services, its foolhardy.  Pay them as they go, pay them if and when they earn it.  

    rpg/mmorg history: Dun Darach>Bloodwych>Bards Tale 1-3>Eye of the beholder > Might and Magic 2,3,5 > FFVII> Baldur's Gate 1, 2 > Planescape Torment >Morrowind > WOW > oblivion > LOTR > Guild Wars (1900hrs elementalist) Vanguard. > GW2(1000 elementalist), Wildstar

    Now playing GW2, AOW 3, ESO, LOTR, Elite D

Sign In or Register to comment.