"Don't mistake a fun game for a good game... Checkers is fun to play but its not exactly the highest point of gaming design... and definatly not worth $60 plus $15 a month"
How about if we call it "BU". Because BU for "world versus world versus world" makes just as much sense as BU for "essence of celerity". And some Guild Wars players seem to accept the latter.
How about if we call it "BU". Because BU for "world versus world versus world" makes just as much sense as BU for "essence of celerity". And some Guild Wars players seem to accept the latter.
Can more than 2 factions fight in the same battle?
I'm no GW2 expert but from what I know, 3 servers are matched against eachother in world vs world vs world. So 3 servers fight it out for 2 weeks trying to control as much as they can of the battle objectives. The servers who do well get matched againts tougher servers the next 2 weeks while the ones who don't do well get matched against easier servers.
There are no 'factions', everyone on your server is your ally I think? and servers fight against eachother, something like that.
Comments
About about...
Three for all
"Don't mistake a fun game for a good game... Checkers is fun to play but its not exactly the highest point of gaming design... and definatly not worth $60 plus $15 a month"
Multi-Server Conquest or MSC
/thread.
"The problem with quotes from the Internet is that it's almost impossible to validate their authenticity." - Abraham Lincoln
I'm going to refer to it as DUBS.
I heard you like dubs, so I put some dubstep in your dubs, while you dubsy?
"The problem with quotes from the Internet is that it's almost impossible to validate their authenticity." - Abraham Lincoln
How about if we call it "BU". Because BU for "world versus world versus world" makes just as much sense as BU for "essence of celerity". And some Guild Wars players seem to accept the latter.
3WW - 3Way War
I thought that said Essence of Celery.
Threesome ...
As we have:
PvP
PvE
we could use:
SvS - Server vs Server
It could be use where we have more than 2 World/Server participating in battle. (I dont see point in repeat "vW" if more than 2 servers)
I have my fears so they don't have me.
+1
Worldwars.
Guildwars offcause have Worldwars.
WvW or Mist
thats how the devs call it, thats how I call it :P
How much WoW could a WoWhater hate, if a WoWhater could hate WoW?
As much WoW as a WoWhater would, if a WoWhater could hate WoW.
Mist (without Panda)
or
3W-RvR (no... that make it worst : )
triple penetration?
W3, PvP3 or World War 3.
RVR-
World Server PVP!!!
Hope to build full AMD system RYZEN/VEGA/AM4!!!
MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 10 or 11 HBM2?(bit unclear now))
MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
PSU:Corsair AX1200i
OS:Windows 10 64bit
I'm no GW2 expert but from what I know, 3 servers are matched against eachother in world vs world vs world. So 3 servers fight it out for 2 weeks trying to control as much as they can of the battle objectives. The servers who do well get matched againts tougher servers the next 2 weeks while the ones who don't do well get matched against easier servers.
There are no 'factions', everyone on your server is your ally I think? and servers fight against eachother, something like that.