Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Anet: "endgame is not 100% completed"
This discussion has been closed.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
What a fantastic source!
I cannot wait to go to some other forum and find an english translation of a second-hand account for something overheard in a conference and wave it from of the fans and tell them in no uncertain terms that it is PROOF!
Why not? Everytime you attempt to call out said trolls and flamers you get a warning. ce le vie I say.
Everything you need to know about Elder Scrolls Online
Playing: GW2
Waiting on: TESO
Next Flop: Planetside 2
Best MMO of all time: Asheron's Call - The first company to recreate AC will be the next greatest MMO.
No kidding right?
2 weeks ago -- "GW2 doesn't have an endgame, all there is is WvW, so if you want PvE, GW2 will fail in that department" (or something along those lines)
1 week ago -- Silent because they were shown what "endgame" in GW2 will be, and everyone saying "endgame starts at level 1"
Now -- "Even ANet says it's endgame so all you fanbois can stop saying endgame starts at level 1!" Even though his "information" is not from ANet, it's from some random dude who "says" he heard ANet devs talking about this.
Just saying, I think if ANet were talking about it, more than 1 person would be reporting this, then it would be mroe believable.
The "Youtube Pro": Someone who watches video's on said subject, and obviously has a full understanding of what is being said about such subject.
See you in game on Friday? But the 3 day head start is not supposed to start until 12:00am PST on Saturday. LOL
My theme song.
Corrected that for you because its the same thing said by devs for every game.
Time for haters to stop saying their game is different or better because they just cant stand the idea of a new game coming out that someone else likes.
Me too, plus I have a full-time job. :P
The only important thing for me is how frequently they do content updates (of various types) and fixes.
Even if your endgame is "finished", you don't gain much if you leave it un-updated for months. As long as people know new things are lurking around the corner and you retain a solid interest in those things, they'll stay.
Fixes, well, it should be obvious that you need to be able and fix + update your game with new content at the same time.
Feel free to use my referral link for SW:TOR if you want to test out the game. You'll get some special unlocks!
FTFY
Those games are straight up sandboxes. Are you serious with this nonsense? Seriously some of the GW2 zealots on this forum are absolutely ridiculous. Why don't ya throw Eve in there too, because that's definitely comparable to what GW2 offers. Have you even played MMOs before, or are you just regurgitating nonsense you read somewhere?
Wait. Does this mean that the OP started a thread based on factually inaccurate information in order to denigrate GW2?
Again?
How long do we have to wait before the OP's retraction and apology for creating a frenzy over nothing?
"Loading screens" are not "instances".
Your personal efforts to troll any game will not, in fact, impact the success or failure of said game.
OP: Here is an OFFICIAL answer to your post:
http://www.guildwars2guru.com/topic/51308-gamescom-when-its-ready-authenticators-gvg/page__st__270
I guess it´s time for the haters to stfup.
You'll have to wait for him to put up a poll asking if they should apologize or not.
Then wait for him to try and claim it all adds up to him not having to apologize, even if 100% voted for him to, perhaps by saying that while they all would like him to apologize they also like when he doesn't, which means 100% in his favor and not 100% against him.
Apparently an ArenaNet developer has debunked this as pure fiction.
Re: SWTOR
"Remember, remember - Kakk says 'December.'"
In the other thread, otinanai123 said the following:
"As I said before IMO leakers are more reliable than the developers 5 days before release. There is no way Anet would admit that the endgame isn't done even if it was true. There have been more leakers saying the same things and we can't ignore them forever.
I admit though, I should have added "leak" or "rumor" in the title."
Though I disagree with you otinanai123, about leakers, I am glad that you at least agreed with me about how you should have added "leak" or "rumor" in the title. I guess that's really all I wanted. As to whether or not we should believe leaks, I tend to stay away from them.
End game doesn't have to mean the fun part of the game..
At GW2 u can have fun after lvl 2 and at the journey to the cap level.. after that there has to be some kind of end game content and sure must be fun as well... that end part is not completely finished so dont rush like crazy to the cap level cause u might be dissapointed.. just enjoy the journey! ;-)
If in 1982 we played with the current mentality, we would have burned down all the pac man games since the red ghost was clearly OP. Instead we just got better at the game.
I think it's because the dev said "almost" all false, and "pretty much" not true.
And the monday at work starts to look like a good one with this posts addition.
Now lets get cracking and take this bad boy to 1000 pages.
The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what's true.
Carl Sagan-