Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Time for another F2P = the future thread

DihoruDihoru Member Posts: 2,731

After you watched the video where do you think F2P is going? Is it gonna go the way of the dodo? Is it going to supplant P2P as the predominant mode without causing its extinction? What are your thoughts?

 

Addendum: I line up 99% with the opinions displayed in that video.

 

Edit: Lovely forums do not love that video link, here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mhz9OXy86a0

image
«134

Comments

  • VengeSunsoarVengeSunsoar Member EpicPosts: 6,601

    It is no longer a question of if it will supplant p2p as the predominant form without causing it's extinction. That's already happened. P2p is now the very very small minority.

    I think things will even out. In a decade there will be a healthy mix and probably a few other options as well. P2p caused a lot of competition with each other, so f2p rose as the dominant form, a way to get past the $15 dollar limit and get people in the door. Eventually if its not already happening the competition among f2p will cause games too close and something else to spawn.

    Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it is bad.
  • mmoguy43mmoguy43 Member UncommonPosts: 2,770

    The developers that do F2P wrong will fail next to the developers that do P2P well. [Hypothetical]Heck, for P2P, not developing cash shop fluff could be a selling point to some players when the rest of the game updates are so good.

    Ultimately it comes down to if the game is fun in the long run to keep you playing and paying. So both have a right to thrive.

     

     

  • AeonbladesAeonblades Member Posts: 2,083

    Eh, a majority of MMO players still P2P games, even with the huge insurgency of F2P cash grabs. WoW is still sub and still the largest MMO by a long shot. With games like ESO and WildStar coming out sub based, I foresee more P2P in the coming years than large F2P games.

     

    The only major F2P game coming out in the near future is EQ:N afaik.

    Currently Playing: ESO and FFXIV
    Have played: You name it
    If you mention rose tinted glasses, you better be referring to Mitch Hedberg.

  • DihoruDihoru Member Posts: 2,731
    Originally posted by Aeonblades

    Eh, a majority of MMO players still P2P games, even with the huge insurgency of F2P cash grabs. WoW is still sub and still the largest MMO by a long shot. With games like ESO and WildStar coming out sub based, I foresee more P2P in the coming years than large F2P games.

     

    The only major F2P game coming out in the near future is EQ:N afaik.

    Archeage... The Repopulation... Gloria Victis.... Perpetuum Online has gone B2P... need I really continue?

    image
  • AeonbladesAeonblades Member Posts: 2,083
    Originally posted by Dihoru
    Originally posted by Aeonblades

    Eh, a majority of MMO players still P2P games, even with the huge insurgency of F2P cash grabs. WoW is still sub and still the largest MMO by a long shot. With games like ESO and WildStar coming out sub based, I foresee more P2P in the coming years than large F2P games.

     

    The only major F2P game coming out in the near future is EQ:N afaik.

    Archeage... The Repopulation... Gloria Victis.... Perpetuum Online has gone B2P... need I really continue?

    Archeage will probably have a pretty healthy population, but those others are going to go the way of the dodo I fear. Gloria Victis shows a little promise, but we'll just have to see.

    Currently Playing: ESO and FFXIV
    Have played: You name it
    If you mention rose tinted glasses, you better be referring to Mitch Hedberg.

  • lugallugal Member UncommonPosts: 671
    The future will not be f2p, it will be teired subscriptions.

    Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    The reviewer has a mishapen head
    Which means his opinion is skewed
    ...Aldous.MF'n.Huxley

  • nariusseldonnariusseldon Member EpicPosts: 27,775

    f2p is already dominant. LoL has more players than WoW, and TOR is only successful after turning f2p. Hence, i doubt there will be many p2p-only hold out except WoW.

     

  • MinoTaur3MinoTaur3 Member Posts: 64
    Yes, I agree

    image
  • NanfoodleNanfoodle Member LegendaryPosts: 10,915
    Fact is any good game thats fair with their payment model is the win. B2P, P2P and F2P all have some way for the company to make money. How greedy they are is where the problem sits. Why cant P2P have deals like family rates for 2+ subs on the same credit card. FF14 cheaper sub for playing just one char to get you in the door. Even F2P with a no pay to win. Gamers for the most part want to support the games they play. We are just stick of being microdinged for evey little thing we used to get included in our sub fee. 
  • KrimzinKrimzin Member UncommonPosts: 687

    I honestly dont care for F2P games.
    It gives griefers unending supplies of accounts to troll and spam.

    B2P with a Sub is the best way.

    Just because I'm a gamer doesn't mean I drive a Honda.
    Best Duo Ever

    Lets see your Battle Stations /r/battlestations
    Battle Station 
  • WarlyxWarlyx Member EpicPosts: 3,368
    Originally posted by Nanfoodle
    Fact is any good game thats fair with their payment model is the win. B2P, P2P and F2P all have some way for the company to make money. How greedy they are is where the problem sits. Why cant P2P have deals like family rates for 2+ subs on the same credit card. FF14 cheaper sub for playing just one char to get you in the door. Even F2P with a no pay to win. Gamers for the most part want to support the games they play. We are just stick of being microdinged for evey little thing we used to get included in our sub fee. 

    thisx10000, p2p , b2p , good f2p i dont mind , just want to have fun , and dont feel like im just a walking wallet.

  • KarteliKarteli Member CommonPosts: 2,646

    "Build a good game, and the money will come."

     

    Excellent quote from the video, even though there were many other good parts too.

     

    It's just a universal quote that companies run by accountants can't grasp, independent of the monetization model.  Cash grabs have a high chance of returns, but I think people are wising up rapidly, having been eventually burned by everything from small apps to large MMO's.  I won't miss cash grabs, believe me.

    Want a nice understanding of life? Try Spirit Science: "The Human History"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8NNHmV3QPw&feature=plcp
    Recognize the voice? Yep sounds like Penny Arcade's Extra Credits.

  • gmaba01gmaba01 Member Posts: 21

    Just curious, is there such a thing as a sub/pay for in-game time? I've only seen sub-based mmos that offer 30 days, but those are calendar days...

  • AroukosAroukos Member Posts: 571
    Originally posted by gmaba01

    Just curious, is there such a thing as a sub/pay for in-game time? I've only seen sub-based mmos that offer 30 days, but those are calendar days...

     

    I agree with a model in which you pay for a certain amount oh hours instead of days. Not like Asia pay/hour, but lets say a card that for 15$ gives you 400+ hours ( a full month is about 700 hours).

  • gmaba01gmaba01 Member Posts: 21
    Originally posted by Aroukos
    Originally posted by gmaba01

    Just curious, is there such a thing as a sub/pay for in-game time? I've only seen sub-based mmos that offer 30 days, but those are calendar days...

     

    I agree with a model in which you pay for a certain amount oh hours instead of days. Not like Asia pay/hour, but lets say a card that for 15$ gives you 400+ hours ( a full month is about 700 hours).

     

    Yea. I only get around 60 - 100 (if I'm lucky) hours a month to play. That considered, subscriptions, while not being that expensive, don't give as much value as other games. 

     

  • DihoruDihoru Member Posts: 2,731
    Originally posted by Krimzin

    I honestly dont care for F2P games.
    It gives griefers unending supplies of accounts to troll and spam.

    B2P with a Sub is the best way.

    People get trolled in P2P and B2P games too (see that recent ESO thread with someone complaining due to a nearly nude archer running around his instance). Nice try at logic though.

    image
  • ReklawReklaw Member UncommonPosts: 6,495

    I still believe in time we have stronger regulations concurning F2P games. They might even fall under a new made gambling law. Just guessing.

    Now definitly not saying al F2P games are like gambling because there are a few that do a really good job at really being F2P like my own experiance with RIFT and think Neverwinter stands a good second place. Others I tried often hit me with a paywall or became very limited in gameplay/feature's unless when using a sub or cashshop.

  • NanfoodleNanfoodle Member LegendaryPosts: 10,915
    Originally posted by Dihoru
    Originally posted by Krimzin

    I honestly dont care for F2P games.
    It gives griefers unending supplies of accounts to troll and spam.

    B2P with a Sub is the best way.

    People get trolled in P2P and B2P games too (see that recent ESO thread with someone complaining due to a nearly nude archer running around his instance). Nice try at logic though.

    Ya I have yet to see a payment model where it made a difference in how many jerks played. Much like people with access to a credit card be it their own or their moms and people who dont, there are jerks in every pool of player, rich, broke or in between. Matter of fact with microtransactions like name change and server change options even sub service makes it easy for jerks to get away with a lot.

  • nbtscannbtscan Member UncommonPosts: 862
    Games need to be developed with F2P in mind to be successful from its inception.  Games that convert from P2P to F2P failed to deliver and need a quick buck to pay back their investors.  Larger studios such as Blizzard and Square-Enix can support their own games.  FFXIV was a huge failure its first launch.  Any other studio would have collapsed or converted to F2P, but they had the resources to actually turn the game around.  I'm not sure if it's reached profitability yet or not though.
  • DEAD.lineDEAD.line Member Posts: 424

    So, am i the only one that wants B2P with paid cosmetics, DLC, expansions, etc?

    The only thing that makes me uneasy on F2P is that, since devs need first and foremost to recover the investement, if there's no box or sub, the cash shop might get heavy from the start.

    Besides that, i can see F2P being the future. Even mmos that launch with subs will probably convert to F2P/B2P eventually, imo. As long as your not trying to milk your playerbase, it's all good.

  • NanfoodleNanfoodle Member LegendaryPosts: 10,915
    Originally posted by nbtscan
    Games need to be developed with F2P in mind to be successful from its inception.  Games that convert from P2P to F2P failed to deliver and need a quick buck to pay back their investors.  Larger studios such as Blizzard and Square-Enix can support their own games.  FFXIV was a huge failure its first launch.  Any other studio would have collapsed or converted to F2P, but they had the resources to actually turn the game around.  I'm not sure if it's reached profitability yet or not though.

    SWToR was failing till they went F2P, SoE moved all of their products from P2P to F2P and did it with style. I dont agree with you at all. Just takes devs putting their heads together and being creative and not being greedy.

  • nariusseldonnariusseldon Member EpicPosts: 27,775
    Originally posted by Skuall
    Originally posted by Nanfoodle
    Fact is any good game thats fair with their payment model is the win. B2P, P2P and F2P all have some way for the company to make money. How greedy they are is where the problem sits. Why cant P2P have deals like family rates for 2+ subs on the same credit card. FF14 cheaper sub for playing just one char to get you in the door. Even F2P with a no pay to win. Gamers for the most part want to support the games they play. We are just stick of being microdinged for evey little thing we used to get included in our sub fee. 

    thisx10000, p2p , b2p , good f2p i dont mind , just want to have fun , and dont feel like im just a walking wallet.

    Ignore the cash shop and have free fun. I do that, and there is no problem.

  • nariusseldonnariusseldon Member EpicPosts: 27,775
    Originally posted by Nanfoodle
    Originally posted by Gorwe
    I just want good games.

    Please?

    ;( ;(

     

    I agree, but some good games have been broken by bad implementation of payment models =-

    "good" is subjective. People who play must think they are fun.

  • GeezerGamerGeezerGamer Member EpicPosts: 8,857

    Some of you guys seem to be forgetting something. Hybrid models are both F2P AND P2P. You cannot call Rift and SWTOR F2P only anymore than you can call WoW P2P only. WoW, Rift, & SWTOR, all have some level of F2P and yet still earn revenue from subscriptions. P2P isn't going anywhere.

    And those were just 3 off the top of my head. How many other games are currently still operating that still earn revenues from subscribers?

  • DihoruDihoru Member Posts: 2,731
    Originally posted by GeezerGamer

    Some of you guys seem to be forgetting something. Hybrid models are both F2P AND P2P. You cannot call Rift and SWTOR F2P only anymore than you can call WoW P2P only. WoW, Rift, & SWTOR, all have some level of F2P and yet still earn revenue from subscriptions. P2P isn't going anywhere.

    And those were just 3 off the top of my head. How many other games are currently still operating that still earn revenues from subscribers?

    Big difference between F2P and unlimited trial.

    image
Sign In or Register to comment.