Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Will there ever be a popular/successful HARDCORE open-world PK/PvP

woodyflywoodyfly Member UncommonPosts: 62

It seems every mainstream game nowadays push out the "leveling hubs, pvp zones/battlegrounds" formula. The hardcore games are left in the dust and die off. Why are there no mainstream games with hardcore pvp that mimics real life better? it is the 'unpredictability' factor that keeps a game addicting. 

I was recently thinking about a reallly old game I used to play called xenimus. The game was lacking in all possibly ways except PvP, it was very addicting. I could jump anyone at any time using spammable teleport spell (think dbz combat). You could also invis yourself, it would hide your characters model and name, only showing a silhouette. 

Would you play a hardcore pvp game with the following main concepts?

1. A large open world : Non-streamlined and non-linear, no leveling hubs, no sense of being pushed in a certain leveling direction. You find your hunting spots, you never know where other people are at. You could be killed at any moment. Absolutely no NPC's teleporting you to a leveling zone. What we had in xenimus was a location recording system to move around using town portals (which others can enter as well)

2. Open world PK/PvP. Kill anyone on sight as you wish, perhaps a system of "good karma and bad karma" but ultimately, there is no punishment such as being 'red named' as many games do.

3. Semi equipment drop on death. Can be prevented with some special items but those are harder to find.

 

«134

Comments

  • CaldrinCaldrin Member UncommonPosts: 4,505

    Well to start with those type of games will never be as popular as themepark games.. a lot of people dont like to pvp and dont like to play games that just evolve around that..

    I love open world pvp games myself to the ponit that i find any themepark mmos very boring.

     

    If you want something like that go check out Darkfall or Mortal online.. or wait a bit and check out one of the numerous upcoming mmorpgs like The Repopulation, Gloria Victus and so on..

  • NaeviusNaevius Member UncommonPosts: 334

    No, such a game will never be 'popular'. it would always appeal to a minority.

    The more games become big business, with high development costs, the fewer such games will get produced. (Why spend money to appeal to a limited customer base?)
  • woodyflywoodyfly Member UncommonPosts: 62
    Originally posted by Caldrin

    Well to start with those type of games will never be as popular as themepark games.. a lot of people dont like to pvp and dont like to play games that just evolve around that..

    I love open world pvp games myself to the ponit that i find any themepark mmos very boring.

     

    If you want something like that go check out Darkfall or Mortal online.. or wait a bit and check out one of the numerous upcoming mmorpgs like The Repopulation, Gloria Victus and so on..

    I feel like a game with enough creativity could satisfy both player bases. Many games have done that with the 'safe zone maps' and 'pvp maps' but it always feels lackluster. The PvP maps always feel lousy with no effort, as if they had to split their budget and it went all towards the PvE content

  • woodyflywoodyfly Member UncommonPosts: 62
    Originally posted by Naevius

    No, such a game will never be 'popular'. it would always appeal to a minority.

    The more games become big business, with high development costs, the fewer such games will get produced. (Why spend money to appeal to a limited customer base?)

    has it ever been tried by a large company? I wanna live to see the day a big budget game like gw2 tackes it non-casual

  • CaldrinCaldrin Member UncommonPosts: 4,505

    The Repopulation might be what you have been waiting for so go check it out.. might get released end of the year or early next year :)

     

  • MaelwyddMaelwydd Member Posts: 1,123

    There are games like this out there. But they do not do very well. The market for such a game is not that big.

     

    So unless a company is going to produce such a game that is an evolved version that can keep its current niche playerbase and attrack others then it will remain a small market and so done my smaller companies.

    The main problem is, how do you design a game with these mechanics where the main goal of the intended audience is the drive others to the point of not wanting to play. You are building into the game design it's own auto destruct gene.

  • CrazKanukCrazKanuk Member EpicPosts: 6,130
    Originally posted by woodyfly
    Originally posted by Naevius

    No, such a game will never be 'popular'. it would always appeal to a minority.

    The more games become big business, with high development costs, the fewer such games will get produced. (Why spend money to appeal to a limited customer base?)

    has it ever been tried by a large company? I wanna live to see the day a big budget game like gw2 tackes it non-casual

    Large Company != Quality Game

     

    There are plenty of smaller companies, even independent companies, who are taking on MMOs. The majority of them are going to be themeparks, but there will be one or two that try something like this. Camelot Unchained is one where you'll probably see something like this. The Repopulation is another. If you're waiting for a large company to make this game, though, you'll be long dead before you see anything like that happen. At least in North America. In Asia you might see something sooner, since they have a greater focus on competitive gaming than in the west. 

    Crazkanuk

    ----------------
    Azarelos - 90 Hunter - Emerald
    Durnzig - 90 Paladin - Emerald
    Demonicron - 90 Death Knight - Emerald Dream - US
    Tankinpain - 90 Monk - Azjol-Nerub - US
    Brindell - 90 Warrior - Emerald Dream - US
    ----------------

  • GiffenGiffen Member UncommonPosts: 276
    No there will never be a popular game like that.  There can be niche games like that that survive but they won't be popular.  The griefers simply run out of victims after awhile and no griefer likes to actually fight another griefer so the PvP "fun" for them dries up.
  • QuirhidQuirhid Member UncommonPosts: 6,230
    Originally posted by woodyfly

    It seems every mainstream game nowadays push out the "leveling hubs, pvp zones/battlegrounds" formula. The hardcore games are left in the dust and die off. Why are there no mainstream games with hardcore pvp that mimics real life better? it is the 'unpredictability' factor that keeps a game addicting. 

    First, "mimicking real life" rarely makes for good gameplay. Second, these are games and as such they will never mimic real life to the extent you wished them to. The "unpredictability" factor you are talking about is appealing only to those with a tendency toward gambling. Like gambling, not everyone gets the so called "gambler's rush". And even if they can get it from gambling, it could still be hard to get from a game because it is just a game.

    I was recently thinking about a reallly old game I used to play called xenimus. The game was lacking in all possibly ways except PvP, it was very addicting. I could jump anyone at any time using spammable teleport spell (think dbz combat). You could also invis yourself, it would hide your characters model and name, only showing a silhouette. 

    Would you play a hardcore pvp game with the following main concepts?

    1. A large open world : Non-streamlined and non-linear, no leveling hubs, no sense of being pushed in a certain leveling direction. You find your hunting spots, you never know where other people are at. You could be killed at any moment. Absolutely no NPC's teleporting you to a leveling zone. What we had in xenimus was a location recording system to move around using town portals (which others can enter as well)

    Spread, unorganized content makes player encounters scarce and uneven which is not good content. Hubs create places to be, and people are more likely to interact and group with one another (of the same level). A PKer such as yourself should also appreciate the common travel routes that naturally form between these hubs.

    2. Open world PK/PvP. Kill anyone on sight as you wish, perhaps a system of "good karma and bad karma" but ultimately, there is no punishment such as being 'red named' as many games do.

    The game would solely revolve around the PK system because it is so disruptive to all other gameplay/content.

    3. Semi equipment drop on death. Can be prevented with some special items but those are harder to find.

    Leads to grind as you recover from defeats.

     

    No. Likely I wouldn't play a game like this. I doubt the combination of those 3 design decisions could ever produce a hit.

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • QuirhidQuirhid Member UncommonPosts: 6,230
    nvm

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • woodyflywoodyfly Member UncommonPosts: 62
    Originally posted by CrazKanuk
    Originally posted by woodyfly
    Originally posted by Naevius

    No, such a game will never be 'popular'. it would always appeal to a minority.

    The more games become big business, with high development costs, the fewer such games will get produced. (Why spend money to appeal to a limited customer base?)

    has it ever been tried by a large company? I wanna live to see the day a big budget game like gw2 tackes it non-casual

    Large Company != Quality Game

     

    There are plenty of smaller companies, even independent companies, who are taking on MMOs. The majority of them are going to be themeparks, but there will be one or two that try something like this. Camelot Unchained is one where you'll probably see something like this. The Repopulation is another. If you're waiting for a large company to make this game, though, you'll be long dead before you see anything like that happen. At least in North America. In Asia you might see something sooner, since they have a greater focus on competitive gaming than in the west. 

     

    Of course a large company doesn't mean a good game BUT at the minimum, a large company = quality graphics, quality ADVERTISING (big titles have MASSIVE hyping)

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Member LegendaryPosts: 25,507
    Non-consensual PVP tends to be popular with players who expect to be mostly doing the killing and not with players who expect to be mostly getting killed.  In MMORPGs where winning depends greatly on aggregate play time, it's necessarily the case that the bulk of the player base will mostly be getting killed rather than doing the killing.   So you can see why this doesn't naturally lead to popular games.
  • RidelynnRidelynn Member EpicPosts: 7,383

    Did they shut down Eve?

  • SomeHumanSomeHuman Member UncommonPosts: 560
    If Darkfall doesn't do it for you, maybe you should try some squad-based combat, like what you get in Battlefield (32 vs. 32) or similar FPS games.  Or something like Grimoire.  Is it PvP you want, or  open-world PvP and PvE simultaneously in a fantasy setting with RP?  If you want all that, I think Darkfall is your only choice, and I think it's also worth the time to give it a go.

    Gaming since 1985; Online gaming since 1995; No End in Sight! My YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8POVoJ8fdOseuJ4U1ZX-oA

  • tmann50tmann50 Member UncommonPosts: 70
    Why do you keep up with these threads? This type of game is almost always doomed to fail because the vast majority of players are not at all interested in playing this type of game, where most players end up victimized by a few players....it can only rarely,  if ever be the core of a game and almost every attempt will fail...just not wanted by the vast majority of players and money talks.
  • wutaewutae Member UncommonPosts: 74
    Originally posted by woodyfly
    Originally posted by CrazKanuk
    Originally posted by woodyfly
    Originally posted by Naevius

    No, such a game will never be 'popular'. it would always appeal to a minority.

    The more games become big business, with high development costs, the fewer such games will get produced. (Why spend money to appeal to a limited customer base?)

    has it ever been tried by a large company? I wanna live to see the day a big budget game like gw2 tackes it non-casual

    Large Company != Quality Game

     

    There are plenty of smaller companies, even independent companies, who are taking on MMOs. The majority of them are going to be themeparks, but there will be one or two that try something like this. Camelot Unchained is one where you'll probably see something like this. The Repopulation is another. If you're waiting for a large company to make this game, though, you'll be long dead before you see anything like that happen. At least in North America. In Asia you might see something sooner, since they have a greater focus on competitive gaming than in the west. 

     

    Of course a large company doesn't mean a good game BUT at the minimum, a large company = quality graphics, quality ADVERTISING (big titles have MASSIVE hyping)

    www.camelotunchained.com open world pvp. Hopefully with a release in 2015. 

    The tip for
    The win is
    cooperation.

  • DamonVileDamonVile Member UncommonPosts: 4,818
    Originally posted by Ridelynn

    Did they shut down Eve?

    I don't think space is what people are thinking when they say open world.

  • JacxolopeJacxolope Member UncommonPosts: 1,140
    Originally posted by Robokapp
    EVE Online will be out in 2003.

    Yeah keep telling yourself that...

    I hear they are laying off the entire staff on this Eve idea and focusing solely on WOD...

    -@ OP. No. It will never work. The reasons are many and its complex-  But...No. 

  • General-ZodGeneral-Zod Member UncommonPosts: 868
    Originally posted by Quizzical
    Non-consensual PVP tends to be popular with players who expect to be mostly doing the killing and not with players who expect to be mostly getting killed.  In MMORPGs where winning depends greatly on aggregate play time, it's necessarily the case that the bulk of the player base will mostly be getting killed rather than doing the killing.   So you can see why this doesn't naturally lead to popular games.

    This

    Too many sheep's and not enough wolves (regarding player mentality

    image
  • jusomdudejusomdude Member RarePosts: 2,706

    You pretty much described Darkfall exactly in your OP. If anyone is going to make that type of game popular it would be an indie dev.

    I wouldn't count on it... Turns out not many people like being victimized.

    Consensual PvP >>>>>>> FFA PvP.

  • firefly2003firefly2003 Member UncommonPosts: 2,527
    No there won't to many toxic players in those types of games....

  • General-ZodGeneral-Zod Member UncommonPosts: 868

    I think it could work but the developers would need 2 things that aren't common among most devs

           Balls and Millions of dollars.

    You can find Devs with one or the other but never both.

    image
  • General-ZodGeneral-Zod Member UncommonPosts: 868
    Originally posted by firefly2003
    No there won't to many toxic players in those types of games....

    Percentage of Toxic players depend on who your asking...

    A consensual PvPer would consider alot more things toxic than a player that used to FFA PvP.

    image
  • JacxolopeJacxolope Member UncommonPosts: 1,140
    Originally posted by jusomdude

    You pretty much described Darkfall exactly in your OP. If anyone is going to make that type of game popular it would be an indie dev.

    I wouldn't count on it... Turns out not many people like being victimized.

    Consensual PvP >>>>>>> FFA PvP.

    Yup, or Moortal Online.

     

    Both games fell victim to their own playerbase.

    All the promises of a "sandbox" world has left us - Years later- With an Open World Arena PVP game with little to no sand.

     

    -And it happens everytime...Every..Single...Fucking..Time.

    I am done supporting this model having been burned every time in the past with promises for a sandbox and ending up with a kill on sight FPS game with griefers, gankers and nothing to really do outside of PVP.

    If this could ever be balanced somehow- I would play.

     

    It worked in UO but the times and playerbase were very differnt back then. They were able to gain a good mix of playstyles amongst their players which could not happen today- All you will attract is PVPers and thus the devs will cater to those people at the detriment of the vision itself.

    They destroy their own game- Every time...

  • KanethKaneth Member RarePosts: 2,286
    Originally posted by General-Zod

    I think it could work but the developers would need 2 things that aren't common among most devs

           Balls and Millions of dollars.

    You can find Devs with one or the other but never both.

    Pretty much this. Although, the few who do have both are also intelligent enough to understand where their maximum potential returns are going to come from as well.

Sign In or Register to comment.