There would still be rewards like mounts, pets, cosmetic gear, maybe temp buffs, just no epeen massaging rewards like bigger numbers. Imagine if you had a pool of abilities and attributes you could choose from and those made your character. That way you still get to customize your character, just without the wasted bar filling time.
Vast power gaps don't belong in games with PvP.
So I complete a quest, kill 100 orcs, and run a dungeon, all to get a foldable beach chair, a colorful umbrella, and a hacky sac ball?
Pass.
I imagine you wouldn't be killing 100 orcs in this example.
Perhaps collect 100 cute stuffed plush animals? (Using no kill, no harm capture techniques of course)
Bonus rewards for releasing them back into the wild.
I think it goes back to "why do we play."
I've been thinking about itemization a lot recently as I've been putting in the "quest" materials/items in my skyrim mod (which is several months overdue ) and while I enjoy getting cool new things/upgrades, definitely leveling, I don't just play to level or play to get new things.
It also goes back to the idea of mmorpg as game vs mmorpg as world.
Theme Park mmorpg's are constantly giving crap, whether you like it or not. In Lord of the Rings Online I am constantly getting "rewards" that I just don't use. I sell it for 2 silver 45 copper and I'm done with it.
I think regardless of "rewards" people need to find what they are doing fun or engaging or at least having meaning.
when in Lineage 2 I spent a good part of a Saturday doing a kill quest over and over because the money was good, it wasn't really a grind to me. I needed Adena, there was a quest (actually a few in the area) and doing them over and over allowed me to buy a new staff. Wasn't an issue and I got a brand new D grade staff hot damn.
But that in a sense is a bit more "world." There are ways of making money, you want something?; then do it!
With other games they have more "rides" more immediately fun stuff so that playing is definitely a reward in itself. At least up until the point that doing it more than a few times just isn't fun anymore.
So, in this non-leveling mmorpg, is there enough varied content to last until the next infusion of varied content or do players play it obsessively until they drop the game after a week until it gets the next update?
Seems there have been two options. Make MMORPG fun in their own right or trigger addictive psychological responses that want you to grind even if the action isn't fun + offer cash shop items to those who reject the matrix.
People say they want something fun but what exactly is that? Is it just dropping people in and having them raid? Some might find that fun and some might hate that. And for those who find it fun, how many raids are going to sustain them before they can't do it any more?
I don't think "grind" isn't fun. To me I like combat and would rather just combat enemies than take a quest, run to some glowy place, kill/collect/whatever 4 things and run back.
I DO enjoy, in Lord of the Rings online, riding through the countryside, seeing an orc fort or barracks or camp and staying there and fighting them. For some that's grinding but I just have my own narrative that supports it.
mmorpg's have issues because they are multi-player games where people "could" group up but they've attracted a lot of people who want them to be single player games and have stories that work better in single player games than multiplayer games.
You could have an mmorpg that allowed building (how many players get to build giant structures though? That could be problematic in certain games) trading, raiding, all without leveling. However, there is going to need to be built in reasons for people to do that. What can they do with their money, what do their buildings allow?
Maybe it's just one open ffa pvp game where there is no leveling but there is trading/building/raiding to support the pvp?
Can that work for a completely pve world for those who don't want ffa pvp? Possibly. Have npc armies attacking one's buildings, trade and raiding can support that.
I'm just not clear that everyone is on board with what this non-leveling game will look like. Because leveling does take time and that time does allow developers to work on other content. Is there an example of a similar game out there?
Even the developers for Guild Wars 2 felt they needed to change their game.
Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb."
For myself the idea of Fun is to actually have a ROLE playing game,where we live inside the world like you would expect to live if a real world. There is NO such thing as raiding in the real world. There is no such thing as yellow markers over people's heads There is no such thing as levels however we can say that someone is of a certain level of experience,so i can see where that idea derived from.
Just give me a game that feels like a world and makes sense,don't give me automated crap.lfg dungeons,automated travel,auto fishing,don't give me foolish looking combat like in BDO or somersaults or flips in the air,don't give me nonsense.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
It would take a VERY immersive world to pull this off, e.g., deep player economy (hardcore crafting, social trades, player cities, player shopping malls), complex and entertaining combat, and an endless supply of aesthetics (armor, clothing, weapons, cloaks, mounts).
Jedi Academy-style combat, Second Life-style social players, and a gigantic world.
I'm in!
Not really. In Most MMOs already, the majority of players are max level and play in the game world for years without leveling again until level expansion.
Take Guild Wars 2 for example. Most of us are level 80. The whole game scales. So imagine if there was no level. The game would pretty much be the exact same, minus the original 1 to 80 grind/gated....
makes no sence with no reward system. a bunch of donkeys without carrots, nope.
Levels arent the reward. Guild Wars 2 shows how flawed and useless the old leveling system is. It's not needed. Its grandfathered mechanics. A levelless world still has objectives and goals. Yiu just have freedom to go anywhere and do anything in whatever order you want. Developers can still give you a path as well if you need guidance. Like meta boss train in GW2 for example.
i am not in, when play mmos i want to slay dragons, i want to go where no man has gone before, i want to be a fricken SUPERHERO....
What that have to do with levels though? Listen to yourself. All that right there has nothing to do with level grind. A level 60 in Vanilla WoW was killing dragons and all that. So why do that same character need to be level 95 now to kill a dragon? See what I am saying here?
ye, its called real life, take a walk outside for a bit
But even RL has leveling. My wife issued a early morning EPIC QUEST Yesterday of grilling for 8 people & my cooking skill was leveled by +2 evident by the perfectly charred outside crust of the steaks while the inside was pink and juicy... Sadly this quest didn't reward any gold or beer just cooking XP & a sweaty forehead....
That's not leveling. Learning new skills and leveling are different. My warrior learned 3 new skills; Stab, Leap, Stomp.
I enjoy improving my character in a game, watching them grow. It's why I play games. Improving their skills and abilities as they learn is the number one activity I look for in a game. That's just me, though.
Generally speaking, I think this idea would skyrocket because that is basically what the playerbase wants right now... "Right Now!" So many rush to endgame now, bypassing the journey, that I think this concept has a great appeal.
Leveling is not the journey. That's why people skip it. It's a grandfathered mechanic from old sub based MMOs. Not needed at all. A journey is about explorations. Nothing is more exploreable than a world with no level barriers.
It could definitely work. Levels and gear caps are ultimately just ways to introduce time-sinks to a game. Admittedly time-sinks are necessary for mmo's because a developer can't churn out content at the same speed players can play it.
We just need a developer to find a way to add time-sinks to a game that are still as engaging as the intermittent reward cycle of vertical progression.
Clearly a game with no vertical progression wouldn't be for everyone. As shown in some of the responses here some personality types respond best to that type of system. I think people who would find it most engaging would have shifted their expectations or be willing to. I think a desire to explore systems and the game world would probably be the main motivation for playing.
I disagree. All that level content never gets touched again once your majorly player population hits endgame. Look at WoW for example and Rift. Most people played in the max level zones and moved away from leveling zones. That's 90% of the actual ingame content useless and a waste of resources since most will never touch it again. In a levelless system that content would all be endgame. Look at GW2. A max level in GW2 is playing in a low level area because the whole game scales. It's a useless grandfathered mechanic. It's there because older mmos did it. That's all
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
There would still be rewards like mounts, pets, cosmetic gear, maybe temp buffs, just no epeen massaging rewards like bigger numbers. Imagine if you had a pool of abilities and attributes you could choose from and those made your character. That way you still get to customize your character, just without the wasted bar filling time.
Vast power gaps don't belong in games with PvP.
So I complete a quest, kill 100 orcs, and run a dungeon, all to get a foldable beach chair, a colorful umbrella, and a hacky sac ball?
Pass.
What MMO are you playing now days. How much you want to bet that game is doing something similar?
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
RPG's without levels/skill levels are horrible.... character advancement is a staple of why people play RPG's. If you want a drop in explore no levels... Action/Adventure games are that way...
You want a company to develop a MMOAAG ... sure I support you 100%, but don't change RPG's into AAG
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
RPG's without levels/skill levels are horrible.... character advancement is a staple of why people play RPG's. If you want a drop in explore no levels... Action/Adventure games are that way...
You want a company to develop a MMOAAG ... sure I support you 100%, but don't change RPG's into AAG
How would that change anything? Level scaling basically conceding that there is a desire for that.
It makes sense with themepark side of things. Leveling is already refined that you don't encounter anything you can't easily defeat. It goes by fast. Then you play levelless end game. A lot of denial about it though.
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
MMORPG is not for everyone, nor SHOULD it be. So what? If YOU don't like the "bad gameplay" (opinion there) and "grind", why do YOU even want to play them?
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
- Al
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse. - FARGIN_WAR
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
MMORPG is not for everyone, nor SHOULD it be. So what? If YOU don't like the "bad gameplay" (opinion there) and "grind", why do YOU even want to play them?
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
Right they are not for everyone. I largely don't play MMORPG. But a lot of people on this forum are not happy with the state of genre. Yet as has been the case since I have been on these forums those with alternate ideas get told to play other games.
Used to be told to go play quake and it changes as the next hot online game type comes around. It is basically an insult that your ideas don't belong and neither do you. It is an asshole move because largely the people who say don't even understand the discussion. Just different is bad.
Sorry to tell you this but you can play a role in MMORPG without vertical progression because you have other players to play roles with. 90% of content played in the genre is levelless or level scaled. MMORPG are not directly RPG.
You are going to tell me WoW would not be a MMORPG if everyone started at end game? It would be the same game basically.
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
MMORPG is not for everyone, nor SHOULD it be. So what? If YOU don't like the "bad gameplay" (opinion there) and "grind", why do YOU even want to play them?
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
People mistakenly assume RP in MMORPG stands for Role Playing, it actually means Regular Progression, a core pillar in fact.
Now progression can come in many forms besides levels, but without solid progression mechanics there really is no game play.
A game with no progression is akin to mountain climbing by circling the base instead of going for the top.
I'm sure it would still be an adventure but who really bothers doing it? But hey, for those who enjoy it, feel free to call it mountain circling, just don't mess with our climbing, or MMORPGs.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
MMORPG is not for everyone, nor SHOULD it be. So what? If YOU don't like the "bad gameplay" (opinion there) and "grind", why do YOU even want to play them?
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
People mistakenly assume RP in MMORPG stands for Role Playing, it actually means Regular Progression, a core pillar in fact.
Now progression can come in many forms besides levels, but without solid progression mechanics there really is no game play.
The story of two hunters Fred and Bob.
20 years ago they built their guns by hand before they could hunt. This was their tradition and they looked forward to it. After the building part they got into their real joy hunting.
As time went along new kids came along and they didnt want to waste time building guns. Manufacturers streamlined the parts so the build didn't take long at all. Fred bitches and moans about this. Bob embraced the changes because he is tired of building guns.
Bob admits his real joy is hunting and not gun building. Bob expresses he wants to buy a store bought gun. Fred tells Bob he is better off skeet shooting then hunting with that fake gun. Fred looks at his gun and Bob's gun and they are identical despite him building his gun. Fred refuses to accept it.
There would still be rewards like mounts, pets, cosmetic gear, maybe temp buffs, just no epeen massaging rewards like bigger numbers. Imagine if you had a pool of abilities and attributes you could choose from and those made your character. That way you still get to customize your character, just without the wasted bar filling time.
Vast power gaps don't belong in games with PvP.
So I complete a quest, kill 100 orcs, and run a dungeon, all to get a foldable beach chair, a colorful umbrella, and a hacky sac ball?
Pass.
Isn't GW2 like that? and it is in your played list. I take it you don't like it much.
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
MMORPG is not for everyone, nor SHOULD it be. So what? If YOU don't like the "bad gameplay" (opinion there) and "grind", why do YOU even want to play them?
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
People mistakenly assume RP in MMORPG stands for Role Playing, it actually means Regular Progression, a core pillar in fact.
Now progression can come in many forms besides levels, but without solid progression mechanics there really is no game play.
The story of two hunters Fred and Bob.
20 years ago they built their guns by hand before they could hunt. This was their tradition and they looked forward to it. After the building part they got into their real joy hunting.
As time went along new kids came along and they didnt want to waste time building guns. Manufacturers streamlined the parts so the build didn't take long at all. Fred bitches and moans about this. Bob embraced the changes because he is tired of building guns.
Bob admits his real joy is hunting and not gun building. Bob expresses he wants to buy a store bought gun. Fred tells Bob he is better off skeet shooting then hunting with that fake gun. Fred looks at his gun and Bob's gun and they are identical despite him building his gun. Fred refuses to accept it.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Isn't no leveling at all in a multiplayer setting basically what battle royal is?
That's more of what I was thinking but BR games have no ability customization and are still loot based. Whoever finds the best guns/ammo/shields has a pretty good advantage.
That's a ridiculous comparison. Endgame in WoW and Endgame in GW2 is nothing like Battle Royal. The world is fully exploreable. In GW2 all my characters are level 80. I even level skipped my Revenant to max level and did my own exploration once I skipped to max level.
You are holding forth GW2 as your example, probably the MMORPG with a design I could not be less interested in.
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
Uh, you realized MMORPG players are vast minority of players and stuff like that is part of the reason. Tried to introduce people into MMORPG and bad gameplay and grinds drive them away.
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
MMORPG is not for everyone, nor SHOULD it be. So what? If YOU don't like the "bad gameplay" (opinion there) and "grind", why do YOU even want to play them?
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
People mistakenly assume RP in MMORPG stands for Role Playing, it actually means Regular Progression, a core pillar in fact.
Now progression can come in many forms besides levels, but without solid progression mechanics there really is no game play.
The story of two hunters Fred and Bob.
20 years ago they built their guns by hand before they could hunt. This was their tradition and they looked forward to it. After the building part they got into their real joy hunting.
As time went along new kids came along and they didnt want to waste time building guns. Manufacturers streamlined the parts so the build didn't take long at all. Fred bitches and moans about this. Bob embraced the changes because he is tired of building guns.
Bob admits his real joy is hunting and not gun building. Bob expresses he wants to buy a store bought gun. Fred tells Bob he is better off skeet shooting then hunting with that fake gun. Fred looks at his gun and Bob's gun and they are identical despite him building his gun. Fred refuses to accept it.
Comments
I don't think "grind" isn't fun. To me I like combat and would rather just combat enemies than take a quest, run to some glowy place, kill/collect/whatever 4 things and run back.
I DO enjoy, in Lord of the Rings online, riding through the countryside, seeing an orc fort or barracks or camp and staying there and fighting them. For some that's grinding but I just have my own narrative that supports it.
mmorpg's have issues because they are multi-player games where people "could" group up but they've attracted a lot of people who want them to be single player games and have stories that work better in single player games than multiplayer games.
You could have an mmorpg that allowed building (how many players get to build giant structures though? That could be problematic in certain games) trading, raiding, all without leveling. However, there is going to need to be built in reasons for people to do that. What can they do with their money, what do their buildings allow?
Maybe it's just one open ffa pvp game where there is no leveling but there is trading/building/raiding to support the pvp?
Can that work for a completely pve world for those who don't want ffa pvp? Possibly. Have npc armies attacking one's buildings, trade and raiding can support that.
I'm just not clear that everyone is on board with what this non-leveling game will look like. Because leveling does take time and that time does allow developers to work on other content. Is there an example of a similar game out there?
Even the developers for Guild Wars 2 felt they needed to change their game.
Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w
Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547
Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo
There is NO such thing as raiding in the real world.
There is no such thing as yellow markers over people's heads
There is no such thing as levels however we can say that someone is of a certain level of experience,so i can see where that idea derived from.
Just give me a game that feels like a world and makes sense,don't give me automated crap.lfg dungeons,automated travel,auto fishing,don't give me foolish looking combat like in BDO or somersaults or flips in the air,don't give me nonsense.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
Take Guild Wars 2 for example. Most of us are level 80. The whole game scales. So imagine if there was no level. The game would pretty much be the exact same, minus the original 1 to 80 grind/gated....
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Learning new skills and leveling are different.
My warrior learned 3 new skills; Stab, Leap, Stomp.
That's different from my Warrior leveled.
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Philosophy of MMO Game Design
Oh yes, that useless leveling mechanic grandfathered in from older MMOS, WOW Classic stands poised to be the most successful MMORPG (re) launch this year.
Whether you like it or not, you are in the minority, gamers love their progression, the more the better, it's what built the RPG / MMORPG genres.
You are looking for what we used to call Adventure games like Kings Quest, Myst and the like.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
RPG's without levels/skill levels are horrible.... character advancement is a staple of why people play RPG's. If you want a drop in explore no levels... Action/Adventure games are that way...
You want a company to develop a MMOAAG ... sure I support you 100%, but don't change RPG's into AAG
Also, if someone is looking for a game world to play it with other players recommend a single player game, FPS, MOBA or BR is just an asshole move.
It makes sense with themepark side of things. Leveling is already refined that you don't encounter anything you can't easily defeat. It goes by fast. Then you play levelless end game. A lot of denial about it though.
Trying to say "MMORPG" without progression is an asshole move, too. Drop the "RPG" at the end and I will listen more attentively
- Al
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.- FARGIN_WAR
Used to be told to go play quake and it changes as the next hot online game type comes around. It is basically an insult that your ideas don't belong and neither do you. It is an asshole move because largely the people who say don't even understand the discussion. Just different is bad.
Sorry to tell you this but you can play a role in MMORPG without vertical progression because you have other players to play roles with. 90% of content played in the genre is levelless or level scaled. MMORPG are not directly RPG.
You are going to tell me WoW would not be a MMORPG if everyone started at end game? It would be the same game basically.
Now progression can come in many forms besides levels, but without solid progression mechanics there really is no game play.
A game with no progression is akin to mountain climbing by circling the base instead of going for the top.
I'm sure it would still be an adventure but who really bothers doing it? But hey, for those who enjoy it, feel free to call it mountain circling, just don't mess with our climbing, or MMORPGs.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
20 years ago they built their guns by hand before they could hunt. This was their tradition and they looked forward to it. After the building part they got into their real joy hunting.
As time went along new kids came along and they didnt want to waste time building guns. Manufacturers streamlined the parts so the build didn't take long at all. Fred bitches and moans about this. Bob embraced the changes because he is tired of building guns.
Bob admits his real joy is hunting and not gun building. Bob expresses he wants to buy a store bought gun. Fred tells Bob he is better off skeet shooting then hunting with that fake gun. Fred looks at his gun and Bob's gun and they are identical despite him building his gun. Fred refuses to accept it.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Philosophy of MMO Game Design