It's because mmorpgs are not so popular anymore and they have to pay their staff, so they write about other games to try and make money.
They do write about minor patches for the games they do follow. I would guess the reason they don't follow patches and news on minor mmorpgs is that they don't have any staff playing those games, and it would be too costly to pay someone to play 50 hours of a game to be able to write something usefull, and then have very few people read it.
When I'm looking for mmorpg news this is still the site I go to. I don't know about any other sites that follow mmorpgs.(I don't read too many game sites either).
Mmorpgs will probably make it back someday. Right now other games are more popular.
Aren't the games voted up by the members of the site?
Also, the definition the definition of mmo/mmorpg whatever, seems to be morphing and online games that connect large amounts of people no matter how many can play together at once, seem to be included in the definition.
Much to the wailing and gnashing of teeth of some.
Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb."
It's because mmorpgs are not so popular anymore and they have to pay their staff, so they write about other games to try and make money.
They do write about minor patches for the games they do follow. I would guess the reason they don't follow patches and news on minor mmorpgs is that they don't have any staff playing those games, and it would be too costly to pay someone to play 50 hours of a game to be able to write something usefull, and then have very few people read it.
When I'm looking for mmorpg news this is still the site I go to. I don't know about any other sites that follow mmorpgs.(I don't read too many game sites either).
Mmorpgs will probably make it back someday. Right now other games are more popular.
Most of us don't get paid-we volunteer to write. I was actually just about to comment this on another thread, but I'm pretty deep into Runescape (3) right now! I haven't jumped into doing a column about it yet because I figured it would just be laughed off.
Aren't the games voted up by the members of the site?
Also, the definition the definition of mmo/mmorpg whatever, seems to be morphing and online games that connect large amounts of people no matter how many can play together at once, seem to be included in the definition.
Much to the wailing and gnashing of teeth of some.
Yes, the lists on the homepage are generated from the user powered ratings on each game page. On the old site we required 20 votes for a game to receive a score. On the new site it was lowered to 10.
I've set it back to 20 now to weed out some of the less rated games like Minecraft which only has 13 votes.
It's because mmorpgs are not so popular anymore and they have to pay their staff, so they write about other games to try and make money.
They do write about minor patches for the games they do follow. I would guess the reason they don't follow patches and news on minor mmorpgs is that they don't have any staff playing those games, and it would be too costly to pay someone to play 50 hours of a game to be able to write something usefull, and then have very few people read it.
When I'm looking for mmorpg news this is still the site I go to. I don't know about any other sites that follow mmorpgs.(I don't read too many game sites either).
Mmorpgs will probably make it back someday. Right now other games are more popular.
Most of us don't get paid-we volunteer to write. I was actually just about to comment this on another thread, but I'm pretty deep into Runescape (3) right now! I haven't jumped into doing a column about it yet because I figured it would just be laughed off.
I think you should be writing about Runescape.
This is a site that covers mmorpg's. It doesn't always have to be about new games. It can be about visiting games that are still running and still have a following. Maybe even turning people on to those games.
Like Skyrim? Need more content? Try my Skyrim mod "Godfred's Tomb."
Most of us don't get paid-we volunteer to write. I was actually just about to comment this on another thread, but I'm pretty deep into Runescape (3) right now! I haven't jumped into doing a column about it yet because I figured it would just be laughed off.
I think you should be writing about Runescape.
This is a site that covers mmorpg's. It doesn't always have to be about new games. It can be about visiting games that are still running and still have a following. Maybe even turning people on to those games.
This! I think anyone should write more about their mmos! I'd rather read about someones adventures in runescape because half of the games are mobile sometimes not even mmo thats being covered.
Most of us don't get paid-we volunteer to write. I was actually just about to comment this on another thread, but I'm pretty deep into Runescape (3) right now! I haven't jumped into doing a column about it yet because I figured it would just be laughed off.
I think you should be writing about Runescape.
This is a site that covers mmorpg's. It doesn't always have to be about new games. It can be about visiting games that are still running and still have a following. Maybe even turning people on to those games.
This! I think anyone should write more about their mmos! I'd rather read about someones adventures in runescape because half of the games are mobile sometimes not even mmo thats being covered.
Why not both? I don't understand why it is such a big deal that they have "news" about games from other genres as well as MMORPGs.
It's because mmorpgs are not so popular anymore and they have to pay their staff, so they write about other games to try and make money.
They do write about minor patches for the games they do follow. I would guess the reason they don't follow patches and news on minor mmorpgs is that they don't have any staff playing those games, and it would be too costly to pay someone to play 50 hours of a game to be able to write something usefull, and then have very few people read it.
When I'm looking for mmorpg news this is still the site I go to. I don't know about any other sites that follow mmorpgs.(I don't read too many game sites either).
Mmorpgs will probably make it back someday. Right now other games are more popular.
Massively Overpowered is the other major site which focuses on MMOs / MMORPGS, but no real forums to speak of, more of a news site than anything else.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
I have no idea what intrigues people about Minecraft.....THe graphics are so bad it isn't even slightly amusing.
It's called gameplay and fun. I didn't really know about this game or played it until one day I was babysitting one of my nephews. He played it and asked about it so we fired it up together (With my niece who joined in). And we had a blast. I overlooked the simple graphics and focused on the game with them. It's a fun game plain and simple.
Honestly I've played many minecraft servers with more players on them than most MMORPg's.
Not that I care about this discussion these days, but what does population have to do with it?
Because Massively Multiplayer means population? lol
But what does that have to do with the “overall” population of non mmos?
Just to be clear here, being an mmo doesn’t mean you have a lot of players. It’s the design principles behind it that make it an mmo. Having a lot of players that play your game does not make it an mmo.
Are people actually trying to justify Minecraft as being a quality game....sigh.
My opinion is that a game should have a bare minimum of 200 votes to receive a score 10-20 is imo a joke.Then again idc because what the heck does a score mean to me,i make my own scores,i have my own criteria for good and bad games,i don't need any score to tell me about game design. Furthermore,i don't buy games based on a "score"meaning someone else's opinion. I have seen what the industry has turned into,tons of people all vying to make money off of the gaming industry. There is only one person who should make money,the developer's/publishers.The rest should be making money from other means,advertising whatever.As soon as we get people involved with profits from the game,then we get biased reviews,bad reviews.
As to the MMO argument,i have said it several times, a LOGIN SCREEN does NOT make a mmo.The actual game design is what determines a MMO.Then again why do i care what someone calls a game,everything is marketing gimmicks now a days,i still choose my games by myself.
Login screens have been used more to facilitate cash shops than leading gamer's into an actual mmo design.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
Take a look at the new site layout and consider some of the recent articles. They appear to be shifting (in a big way) to mobile games, just like they shifted from MMORPGs to any and all games. That's where the money will be. I had a post deleted from the most recent editorial posted ("MMORPGs are Thriving, and Other Problems) because I mentioned where I think their money will be coming from in the (near?) future. Take a guess where that might be.
Take a look at the new site layout and consider some of the recent articles. They appear to be shifting (in a big way) to mobile games, just like they shifted from MMORPGs to any and all games. That's where the money will be. I had a post deleted from the most recent editorial posted ("MMORPGs are Thriving, and Other Problems) because I mentioned where I think their money will be coming from in the (near?) future. Take a guess where that might be.
(I expect this one might be deleted too.)
Eh, your post is still there. And I think you missed the point of that other article if you think it was shifting anything *for* mobile games.
Take a look at the new site layout and consider some of the recent articles. They appear to be shifting (in a big way) to mobile games, just like they shifted from MMORPGs to any and all games. That's where the money will be. I had a post deleted from the most recent editorial posted ("MMORPGs are Thriving, and Other Problems) because I mentioned where I think their money will be coming from in the (near?) future. Take a guess where that might be.
(I expect this one might be deleted too.)
Eh, your post is still there. And I think you missed the point of that other article if you think it was shifting anything *for* mobile games.
That article is probably the worst disguised promo ever seen.
Take a look at the new site layout and consider some of the recent articles. They appear to be shifting (in a big way) to mobile games, just like they shifted from MMORPGs to any and all games. That's where the money will be. I had a post deleted from the most recent editorial posted ("MMORPGs are Thriving, and Other Problems) because I mentioned where I think their money will be coming from in the (near?) future. Take a guess where that might be.
(I expect this one might be deleted too.)
Eh, your post is still there. And I think you missed the point of that other article if you think it was shifting anything *for* mobile games.
That article is probably the worst disguised promo ever seen.
Promo for what?! Lolol my goodness, I don't even know where to begin...
Take a look at the new site layout and consider some of the recent articles. They appear to be shifting (in a big way) to mobile games, just like they shifted from MMORPGs to any and all games. That's where the money will be. I had a post deleted from the most recent editorial posted ("MMORPGs are Thriving, and Other Problems) because I mentioned where I think their money will be coming from in the (near?) future. Take a guess where that might be.
(I expect this one might be deleted too.)
Eh, your post is still there. And I think you missed the point of that other article if you think it was shifting anything *for* mobile games.
That article is probably the worst disguised promo ever seen.
Promo for what?! Lolol my goodness, I don't even know where to begin...
Yes, I can see that you aren't following. No matter. Nothing going to change anything anyways. We're all just spectators.
If you want more MMORPG articles, check out https://massivelyop.com/. It has more coverage of true MMOs with fewer fluff pieces. mmorpg.com is a better place for fans to discuss the genre, in my opinion.
Comments
They do write about minor patches for the games they do follow. I would guess the reason they don't follow patches and news on minor mmorpgs is that they don't have any staff playing those games, and it would be too costly to pay someone to play 50 hours of a game to be able to write something usefull, and then have very few people read it.
When I'm looking for mmorpg news this is still the site I go to. I don't know about any other sites that follow mmorpgs.(I don't read too many game sites either).
Mmorpgs will probably make it back someday. Right now other games are more popular.
Also, the definition the definition of mmo/mmorpg whatever, seems to be morphing and online games that connect large amounts of people no matter how many can play together at once, seem to be included in the definition.
Much to the wailing and gnashing of teeth of some.
Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w
Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547
Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo
Most of us don't get paid-we volunteer to write. I was actually just about to comment this on another thread, but I'm pretty deep into Runescape (3) right now! I haven't jumped into doing a column about it yet because I figured it would just be laughed off.
I've set it back to 20 now to weed out some of the less rated games like Minecraft which only has 13 votes.
- MMORPG.COM Staff -
This is a site that covers mmorpg's. It doesn't always have to be about new games. It can be about visiting games that are still running and still have a following. Maybe even turning people on to those games.
Godfred's Tomb Trailer: https://youtu.be/-nsXGddj_4w
Original Skyrim: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/109547
Serph toze kindly has started a walk-through. https://youtu.be/UIelCK-lldo
This! I think anyone should write more about their mmos! I'd rather read about someones adventures in runescape because half of the games are mobile sometimes not even mmo thats being covered.
Why not both? I don't understand why it is such a big deal that they have "news" about games from other genres as well as MMORPGs.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Just to be clear here, being an mmo doesn’t mean you have a lot of players. It’s the design principles behind it that make it an mmo. Having a lot of players that play your game does not make it an mmo.
My opinion is that a game should have a bare minimum of 200 votes to receive a score 10-20 is imo a joke.Then again idc because what the heck does a score mean to me,i make my own scores,i have my own criteria for good and bad games,i don't need any score to tell me about game design.
Furthermore,i don't buy games based on a "score"meaning someone else's opinion.
I have seen what the industry has turned into,tons of people all vying to make money off of the gaming industry.
There is only one person who should make money,the developer's/publishers.The rest should be making money from other means,advertising whatever.As soon as we get people involved with profits from the game,then we get biased reviews,bad reviews.
As to the MMO argument,i have said it several times, a LOGIN SCREEN does NOT make a mmo.The actual game design is what determines a MMO.Then again why do i care what someone calls a game,everything is marketing gimmicks now a days,i still choose my games by myself.
Login screens have been used more to facilitate cash shops than leading gamer's into an actual mmo design.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
I had a post deleted from the most recent editorial posted ("MMORPGs are Thriving, and Other Problems) because I mentioned where I think their money will be coming from in the (near?) future.
Take a guess where that might be.
(I expect this one might be deleted too.)
Once upon a time....
Once upon a time....
No matter. Nothing going to change anything anyways. We're all just spectators.
Once upon a time....
Philosophy of MMO Game Design