It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I've seen various posts like the following and I have become curious to see how important graphics are to players.
Originally posted by ZenoLoc
I'm looking forward to Roma Victor even though the graphics look somewhat sub-par. I just want back into a game with a good crafting skills setup, large areas to explore and sandbox based.
IMO, graphics are merely eye-candy. I'm far more interested in gameplay issues like character development, community atmosphere, combat, server performance, etc. Am I in the minority regarding this?
/discuss
Comments
Graphics == Gameplay.
Mediocre Graphics, Great Gameplay - Not Interested
Great Graphics, Mediocre Gameplay - Not Interested
Mediocre Graphics, Mediocre Gameplay - Not Interested
If I am going to pay $50 up front and $15 a month, I want both Great Graphics and Great Gamplay!
'Nuff Said.
I voted for important. I can play a game that is slightly dated in graphics by a year or 2 but not much after that. I'd spend to much time laughing at the poor models and wouldn't be able to really get into it.
When it comes to mmos they also have to be 3D. Diablo style has come and gone when it comes to mmos yet if done with good graphis it is just fine for single player rpgs.
In America I have bad teeth. If I lived in England my teeth would be perfect.
Here is my formula:
Good Graphics + Good Gameplay = Great Game
Bad Graphics + Good Gameplay = Good Game
Good Graphics + Bad Gameplay = Pretty Game
Bad Graphics + Bad Gameplay = Bad Game
I'll play a game with poor graphics, but it needs great gameplay.
Even so, people still play korean clones like Lineage 2 and other games where you can't even do a simple thing like binding your keys and are forced to use some 6 year old solution by only using a mouse which completely amazes me.
http://kompaniet.mine.nu :+: #kompaniet @ QuakeNet
No longer visiting MMORPG.com.
I won't play a game with subpar graphics, no matter how good the gameplay is. And I won't play a game that's got awesome graphics if I get bored playing after a few minutes.
IMO, graphics are merely eye-candy. I'm far more interested in gameplay issues like character development, community atmosphere, combat, server performance, etc. Am I in the minority regarding this?
/discuss
I agree. I am more interested in character development and gameplay.
Of course it is a matter of what one thinks a good gameplay is, for me its mass pvp battle with as little lag as possible in non-instanced environment.
If you settle for 20 vs 20 battle in instance or just mobs, then i guess you can have uber eyecandy too.
Personally, i dont understand people that want uber graphics in a MMORPG. If i want uber graphics, i go play Oblivion or some other spg where lag is a non-factor.
Well graphics are obveously quite important to some exstent, i mean what would be the point in spending all this money on my computer if i was to play a game that required very little computer technology.
As for gaming, in my opinion, gameplay keeps me hucked and addicted to a game much more than graphics. I mean... how many hours can you spend looking at game graphics and saying 'Awww aint that pretty' without geting bored? Character development and gameplay should be much more important to game developers than all these fantsy graphics i think...
I have played alot of games and thought to myself though... for example Ragnarok and Pristontale... How can i pay £X.XX ammount per month for this game, charatcer development, gameplay might be good, but with graphics like this, i carnt let myself do it.
Finding a good balance between Graphics, Gameplay, Character development and also less mentioned areas such as sound, and chating functions is also key to a good game. For example i liked the graphics, Mass PvP in RF Onlinr but the chating functions was terrible, i actualy quit playing it becuase of that... being abit picky, but i couldnt stand it
So to summerise, Graphics is not the be all and end all - Games can still be great without 'Up-to-date' graphics in my view.
For me gameplay >>> graphics. Graphics are great to keep you occupied when starting out or finding new areas just for the oooh and aaah factor, but sooner or later you will get bored of them, only the gameplay is likely to keep you addicted in the long run. I think some devs spend more time tweaking the graphics than the gameplay.
One of the graphic engines that annoys me most is the one belonging to EQ2 - many people say it has astonishing graphics and its engineered for next gen systems, but TBH i think the engine is crap. All the EQ2 devs did was write a shoddy engine that you could tweak to the moon and back, granted it looks quite nice on a high-end rig but it only looks good BECAUSE you threw enough processing power at the game to run a small country, not because it was written well. Reading the forums and from personal experience I can also say it isnt too smart when running on ATI cards.
If you played face of mankind you know graphics dont do f... about gameplay
tbh the new graphics have ruined the new gameplay/versions they brought the game down thru the engine upgrades, dont believe me go check it out @ forum.fomportal.com
it used to be great.. greatest mmorpg EVAH. its like planetside but then in corridors n stuff death makes you drop everything
No thanks to crappy 3D engines and crappy 2D engines.
CLICK HERE TO GET A LIST OF FREE MMO LISTS!!!
looks like you dont believe me ...
this gameplay rocked : ( old engine )
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4347964897464481858&q=face+of+mankind
heres the new engine n stuff crap :
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2381746021819273062&q=face+of+mankind
yea the new stuff is gay and annoying
The graphics have to be good enough for us to see the artwork put into the game. DAoC's graphics are just fine for me (with the updated graphics engine). I found that EQ2's graphics were a bit much and that their artwork was horrible. Lineage 2 had good artwork and good enough graphics to show that artwork. WoW had nice artwork and good enough graphics for it too. These are just some examples. I think 2nd generation and some of the first generation with an updated engine are just fine for me. These highly detailed graphics game that are coming out soon and that have already made an appearance are just over done and contribute to the lag factor.
So my vote was cast for somewhat important. I don't want to see a 2D MMO nor do I want to see a character chiseled out of a block, but too high end--of a graphics game can create too much lag, so a lot of graphics isn't desirable either.
I don't like MMORPG's with bad graphics. I'd rather spend my time on a better looking game. a game like RuneScape (for example) has horrible graphics and "okay" gameplay. It's fun for a few minutes but it's just a time waster. If I want to get into an MMORPG the graphics should be amazing, or else I'm not paying. That said, some games that have AMAZING graphics and sub-par graphics are still "playable". But Roma Victor is probably the only game I would want to get into, even though it has okay graphics.