Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

I'm beggining to not take any reviews IGN has to say seriously when it comes to mmorpgs

EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384

is it just me? Or many of the mmorpgs IGN hails and praises are really crappy or underdeveloped mmorpgs?

For example, three of the mmorpgs they really gave rave reviews for was SWG, Shadowbane, and Sims online

Anyone else noticed this?  I understand some game reviwers, we will not agree with...but some of the things they said about these games makes me wonder how much money they got paid to say it

People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

Comments

  • KnowledgeKnowledge Member UncommonPosts: 140
    I'm going to have to agree with this one.  I've always taken IGN seriously but when it comes to MMORPGs they haven't a clue.  I'm guessing they don't play these games long enough to give a real review or they are getting a nice ammount of pocket change to hype these games up.  Either way, when it comes to single player games I'll definately try one that gets a good review from IGN but on the Massively Multiplayer side of things they can take those reviews and shove em up their ....well, you know what I'm saying. image

    True Knowledge is Knowing that you Know Knothing!

  • |MaguS||MaguS| Member Posts: 317
    IGN just gives bad reviews hands down... for the best reviews head over to gamespot.com they are tough as balls...

  • EnigmaEnigma Member UncommonPosts: 11,384



    Originally posted by |MaguS|
    IGN just gives bad reviews hands down... for the best reviews head over to gamespot.com they are tough as balls...




    gamespot gave a rather horrid review on SWG's 3 month review.

    My wife posted it in the SWG forums and received a 2 week ban...no warning ...nothing....

    so Gamespot has won my trust

    People who have to create conspiracy and hate threads to further a cause lacks in intellectual comprehension of diversity.

  • |MaguS||MaguS| Member Posts: 317
    I love reading/watching thier low reviews... like go look at games that scored below 4.0, its funny as hell!

  • KnowledgeKnowledge Member UncommonPosts: 140
    Honestly,  I prefer to count on good old hands-on experience.  Pretty trusty IMHO.  Best review you can get.

    True Knowledge is Knowing that you Know Knothing!

  • YordoYordo Member Posts: 831
    Yes, I agree that IGN always sucks up to certain companies and gives great reviews...probably because they are getting paid the big bucks.  Also, Gamespot does give really good reviews.  Whenever they praise a game, you know that it really is good because most games they come right out and say if it's bad or has horrible potential.  Gamespy also has decent reviews, but not as good as Gamespot.

    ::Yordo::
    EQ2 Guild Search
    UXO, Lineage 2, KO, Guild Wars, Dragon Empires, City of Heroes

  • ianubisiianubisi Member Posts: 4,201

    As the official provider of forums for some MMOGs (Horizons, I believe they handled DAoC at one time...maybe others too) you have to wonder if there's a little corroboration.

    It's very hard to be objectively critical if you're biting the hand that feeds you.

  • KoltraneKoltrane Member UncommonPosts: 1,049



    Originally posted by Knowledge
    Honestly,  I prefer to count on good old hands-on experience.  Pretty trusty IMHO.  Best review you can get.



    Absolutely, there is no better method of determining a game's worth than by rolling up your sleeves and playing it.  However, this is not possible for all games or even a majority, so I depend on reviews from a variety of sources.  Rotten Tomatoes is the best movie review website I have seen because they collect numerous reviews from around the web and give a score based on the consensus view.  I wish something like that were available for games.

    The best review team I have found is that at Computer Games magazine.  While I think they tend to give titles the benefit of the doubt, they have no compunction about skewering a lousy game, and will often do it to a title that has taken out a full-page ad in the same issue.  They gave SW:G a fair review IMHO, and Tom Chick stuck the knife in and twisted it with his facetious column on becoming a master dishwasher in a Corellian cantina.

    IGN seems to be a little less likely to point out flaws, but no review entity is perfect.  I do have a new found respect for gamespot after the above post.  Banning someone for re-posting a critical piece?  Please!

    Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate. (written on the SW:G CD)

    A: 73% E: 73% S: 40% K: 13%

    -----

    Old timer.

  • Kurtz13Kurtz13 Member UncommonPosts: 46



    Originally posted by Koltrane



    Originally posted by Knowledge
    Honestly,  I prefer to count on good old hands-on experience.  Pretty trusty IMHO.  Best review you can get.


    Absolutely, there is no better method of determining a game's worth than by rolling up your sleeves and playing it.  However, this is not possible for all games or even a majority, so I depend on reviews from a variety of sources.  Rotten Tomatoes is the best movie review website I have seen because they collect numerous reviews from around the web and give a score based on the consensus view.  I wish something like that were available for games.

    The best review team I have found is that at Computer Games magazine.  While I think they tend to give titles the benefit of the doubt, they have no compunction about skewering a lousy game, and will often do it to a title that has taken out a full-page ad in the same issue.  They gave SW:G a fair review IMHO, and Tom Chick stuck the knife in and twisted it with his facetious column on becoming a master dishwasher in a Corellian cantina.

    IGN seems to be a little less likely to point out flaws, but no review entity is perfect.  I do have a new found respect for gamespot after the above post.  Banning someone for re-posting a critical piece?  Please!


    Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate. (written on the SW:G CD)

    A: 73% E: 73% S: 40% K: 13%



    Gamespot.com, baby. Not only do they do their own reviews, but they also have the users review the game, and give an average user mark. And finally, they show the marks given to the game by all the other major review places on the net.

Sign In or Register to comment.