Well, it will be an mmofps, so that was an assumption of mine.
Seems like a lot of things of yours are assumptions. I mean jesus, you already put Eve Pre-Dust514
Can you at least have some faith in CCP? Even if Dust514 does affect the soveignty, that can be an amazing thing! Think of their becoming top clans or "mercenaries" who play Dust514, and hiring them and becoming affiliated with them and forming alliances would add to the meta gaming and politics already in Eve.
DUST514, will only be playable on consoles, will influence sovereignty and will require a subscription. So unless you are willing to get another account ( I normally already have 2 EVE accounts, I really don't want a third ) AND get a console, AND in my case, a new LCD TV / Monitor ( so I can attach the XBOX and the PC on the same LCD TV / Monitor ) you will not able to play this. I predict that, unless CCP integrates DUST514 in the current EVE Online connected by WIS, allowing EVE players to play DUST514 with their current subscription on the PC ( but with a new character ), the last bastion of mmorpg vision will crumble, and CCP will have pulled their very own NGE.
I'm good on this; I have a 17" laptop for EVE, an Xbox 360 with a 19" HDTV, already have my Xbox Live Subscription...
And we don't know enough about it all to even think we may NEED a new character. You may just travel from planet to planet, land your ship, and go FPS.
And I have a second 17" LCD TV, with component cable hookups, if I want to play EVE Online on my TV, and have Dust514 on.
I don't think it's going to be as much of a problem honestly. It will probably require an install on your Xbox 360 though...so expect to pay $60 for a new game. The idea sounds awesome to me; I'm willing to pay for it.
The way they could ruin this for me though; is by making it 'Just another FPS'. I want to see the CCP, or EVE Online impact on the game...hell, I would love to be able to look up and see ships in orbit, in real time with what's going on in EVE Online. Hell, I'd love some new modules for my ships for orbital bombardment on motherships...have your corporation/alliance on the ground, while you hold your mothership above, bombarding the planet to help them; or offering support vehicles.
They held a carrot on a stick, and I was prepared to wait years for the carrot, but they gave the carrot to console players.
They hold the carrot and you blame them for being a donkey?
They never promised atmospheric flight, ground combat or planetary interaction implemented in EVE. That is the donkey in you making you to think so and the same goes for your rage over Dust.
They did not promise ( my mistake ), they lead us to believe it might be possible one day, don't make me look up all the quotes from the Devs! They even have shown us a video with atmospheric flight with EVE ships, but you will probably also say that video does not exist.
I guess I was wrong and I am a donkey for following the carrot, but I won't be a donkey anymore I made my conclusions, so unless something changes during the next three months, I am done with it.
If you are interested in subscription or PCU numbers for MMORPG's, check out my site : http://mmodata.blogspot.be/ Favorite MMORPG's : DAoC pre ToA-NF, SWG Pre CU-NGE, EVE Online
Originally posted by CyberWiz Originally posted by Gdemami
Originally posted by CyberWizThey held a carrot on a stick, and I was prepared to wait years for the carrot, but they gave the carrot to console players.
They hold the carrot and you blame them for being a donkey? They never promised atmospheric flight, ground combat or planetary interaction implemented in EVE. That is the donkey in you making you to think so and the same goes for your rage over Dust.
They did not promise ( my mistake ), they lead us to believe it might be possible one day, don't make me look up all the quotes from the Devs! They even have shown us a video with atmospheric flight with EVE ships, but you will probably also say that video does not exist. I guess I was wrong and I am a donkey for following the carrot, but I won't be a donkey anymore I made my conclusions, so unless something changes during the next three months, I am done with it.
hmm, this reminds me of a post about the announced WOW movie
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements: Information in this press release that involves Blizzard Entertainments expectations, plans, intentions or strategies regarding the future are forward-looking statements that are not facts and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Blizzard Entertainment generally uses words such as "outlook," "will," "could," "would," "might," "remains," "to be," "plans," "believes," "may," "expects," "intends," "anticipates," "estimate," future," "plan," "positioned," "potential," "project," "remain," "scheduled," "set to," "subject to," "upcoming" and similar expressions to help identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause Blizzard Entertainments actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements set forth in this release include, but are not limited to, sales levels of Blizzard Entertainments titles, shifts in consumer spending trends, the impact of the current macroeconomic environment, the seasonal and cyclical nature of the interactive game market, Blizzard Entertainments ability to predict consumer preferences among competing hardware platforms (including next-generation hardware), declines in software pricing, product returns and price protection, product delays, retail acceptance of Blizzard Entertainments products, adoption rate and availability of new hardware and related software, industry competition, rapid changes in technology and industry standards, protection of proprietary rights, litigation against Blizzard Entertainment, maintenance of relationships with key personnel, customers, vendors and third-party developers, domestic and international economic, financial and political conditions and policies, foreign exchange rates, integration of recent acquisitions and the identification of suitable future acquisition opportunities, Activision Blizzards success in integrating the operations of Activision Publishing and Vivendi Games in a timely manner, or at all, and the combined companys ability to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies of the transaction to the extent, or in the timeframe, anticipated, and the other factors identified in Activision Blizzards most recent annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon information available to Blizzard Entertainment and Activision Blizzard as of the date of this release, and neither Blizzard Entertainment nor Activision Blizzard assumes any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements believed to be true when made may ultimately prove to be incorrect. These statements are not guarantees of the future performance of Blizzard Entertainment or Activision Blizzard and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond its control and may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.
it seems that CCP needs to post block of legaleze about forward looking statments to protect themselves from idiots as well.
Originally posted by nurgles hmm, this reminds me of a post about the announced WOW moviefrom here http://www.blizzard.com/us/press/090721.html Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements: Information in this press release that involves Blizzard Entertainments expectations, plans, intentions or strategies regarding the future are forward-looking statements that are not facts and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Blizzard Entertainment generally uses words such as "outlook," "will," "could," "would," "might," "remains," "to be," "plans," "believes," "may," "expects," "intends," "anticipates," "estimate," future," "plan," "positioned," "potential," "project," "remain," "scheduled," "set to," "subject to," "upcoming" and similar expressions to help identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause Blizzard Entertainments actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements set forth in this release include, but are not limited to, sales levels of Blizzard Entertainments titles, shifts in consumer spending trends, the impact of the current macroeconomic environment, the seasonal and cyclical nature of the interactive game market, Blizzard Entertainments ability to predict consumer preferences among competing hardware platforms (including next-generation hardware), declines in software pricing, product returns and price protection, product delays, retail acceptance of Blizzard Entertainments products, adoption rate and availability of new hardware and related software, industry competition, rapid changes in technology and industry standards, protection of proprietary rights, litigation against Blizzard Entertainment, maintenance of relationships with key personnel, customers, vendors and third-party developers, domestic and international economic, financial and political conditions and policies, foreign exchange rates, integration of recent acquisitions and the identification of suitable future acquisition opportunities, Activision Blizzards success in integrating the operations of Activision Publishing and Vivendi Games in a timely manner, or at all, and the combined companys ability to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies of the transaction to the extent, or in the timeframe, anticipated, and the other factors identified in Activision Blizzards most recent annual report on Form 10-K and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements in this release are based upon information available to Blizzard Entertainment and Activision Blizzard as of the date of this release, and neither Blizzard Entertainment nor Activision Blizzard assumes any obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements believed to be true when made may ultimately prove to be incorrect. These statements are not guarantees of the future performance of Blizzard Entertainment or Activision Blizzard and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond its control and may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations.
it seems that CCP needs to post block of legaleze about forward looking statments to protect themselves from idiots as well.
Blizzard proved they are teh best again. This hurts :-(
Comments
Well, it will be an mmofps, so that was an assumption of mine.
Seems like a lot of things of yours are assumptions. I mean jesus, you already put Eve Pre-Dust514
Can you at least have some faith in CCP? Even if Dust514 does affect the soveignty, that can be an amazing thing! Think of their becoming top clans or "mercenaries" who play Dust514, and hiring them and becoming affiliated with them and forming alliances would add to the meta gaming and politics already in Eve.
I only see this as a win / win situation.
I'm good on this; I have a 17" laptop for EVE, an Xbox 360 with a 19" HDTV, already have my Xbox Live Subscription...
And we don't know enough about it all to even think we may NEED a new character. You may just travel from planet to planet, land your ship, and go FPS.
And I have a second 17" LCD TV, with component cable hookups, if I want to play EVE Online on my TV, and have Dust514 on.
I don't think it's going to be as much of a problem honestly. It will probably require an install on your Xbox 360 though...so expect to pay $60 for a new game. The idea sounds awesome to me; I'm willing to pay for it.
The way they could ruin this for me though; is by making it 'Just another FPS'. I want to see the CCP, or EVE Online impact on the game...hell, I would love to be able to look up and see ships in orbit, in real time with what's going on in EVE Online. Hell, I'd love some new modules for my ships for orbital bombardment on motherships...have your corporation/alliance on the ground, while you hold your mothership above, bombarding the planet to help them; or offering support vehicles.
They hold the carrot and you blame them for being a donkey?
They never promised atmospheric flight, ground combat or planetary interaction implemented in EVE. That is the donkey in you making you to think so and the same goes for your rage over Dust.
They did not promise ( my mistake ), they lead us to believe it might be possible one day, don't make me look up all the quotes from the Devs! They even have shown us a video with atmospheric flight with EVE ships, but you will probably also say that video does not exist.
I guess I was wrong and I am a donkey for following the carrot, but I won't be a donkey anymore
I made my conclusions, so unless something changes during the next three months, I am done with it.
If you are interested in subscription or PCU numbers for MMORPG's, check out my site :
http://mmodata.blogspot.be/
Favorite MMORPG's : DAoC pre ToA-NF, SWG Pre CU-NGE, EVE Online
They hold the carrot and you blame them for being a donkey?
They never promised atmospheric flight, ground combat or planetary interaction implemented in EVE. That is the donkey in you making you to think so and the same goes for your rage over Dust.
They did not promise ( my mistake ), they lead us to believe it might be possible one day, don't make me look up all the quotes from the Devs! They even have shown us a video with atmospheric flight with EVE ships, but you will probably also say that video does not exist.
I guess I was wrong and I am a donkey for following the carrot, but I won't be a donkey anymore
hmm, this reminds me of a post about the announced WOW movie
from here
http://www.blizzard.com/us/press/090721.html
it seems that CCP needs to post block of legaleze about forward looking statments to protect themselves from idiots as well.
it seems that CCP needs to post block of legaleze about forward looking statments to protect themselves from idiots as well.
Blizzard proved they are teh best again. This hurts :-(