Face it: Its not SWTOR.....it's you.

Atlan99

Originally posted by Loke666

Originally posted by lizardbones

I agree with Tenebroso, but it applies to a lot of comments on this site, not just comments on ToR. People don't like (for instance) Darkfall, not because of the game's mechanical faults, but because they don't like FFA PvP. Very few people will highlight actual issues with the game that aren't opinions on the type of game it is.



Also, I've suggested that Tenebroso change their avatar to a cute coyote puppy to see if they can get away with calling people dorks. I don't expect it to actually work, but I do think it might be fun to watch.

No FFA PvP game have become very popular since UO, that is true.

But that does not neccesarily mean that the concept doesn´t work, Darkfalls problem is deeper than mechanics, it is very poorly coded and no poorly coded game will be big no matter what you do with it.

FFA PvP could work with the right mechanics and a good enough game.

The difference between TOR and Darkfall is that TOR is good doing what it is supposed to do. Not all of us like what TOR is supposed to do though, that does not mean it is a bad game just that I wont play it.

You sure it wasn't because one half of Darkfall's userbase killed, looted, pillaged the other half and made them ragequit?

Rocketeer

Originally posted by Tenebroso

What SWTOR did or didn't do isn't the cause of your frustration....how you choose to feel.about it all, is.

Ehrm ... couldn't this argument be used for pretty much every game? Even those that are really really horrible? Thats kinda like saying there are no bad games, movies, books or people, its ALL your attitude. Kinda admire that if thats the case ... is it part of some religion? Sounds too extreme for buddhism ...