They made a post (funcom) they know there are performance issues with the latest patch and it will be improved with next patch. Dont panic , the game is not even live yet. They are making some really big improvements in the last couple weeks but of course some things get tweaked in ways they didnt expect.
I agree with this. Wait and stay tuned to feedback that all is clear here.
All mobile GPU's are rubbish for gaming. While I'm not saying TSW runs as smoothly as can be, if your expecting to play any modern dx11 game on a laptop other than at low setting at 30-40 fps your dreaming.
Not true, my 7970M has the same performance as 5870 desktop GPU. I can run 1920x1080 with everything set tomthe max smoothly even in mass PvP. But then those GPU are only available in Alienware laptops and Clevo stuff.
Best MMO experiences : EQ(PvE), DAoC(PvP), WoW(total package) LOTRO (worldfeel) GW2 (Artstyle and animations and worlddesign) SWTOR (Story immersion) TSW (story) ESO (character advancement)
Originally posted by Tdo my rig: Asus G53sx. with i7 gtx560 16gb ram win7 64b and just getting 25-30 fps on medium settings. is it really that demanding that people need monster rigs to play this game smoothly? , if so then i think funcom has shoot them selfs in the foot right from the start.
I was getting 60+ FPS on high and 40+ on Ultra the first 2 BEW's, this latest BWE I had to run it on low and was still getting no better then 30fps. I dunno what they did but it made it worse.
Playing: GW2 Waiting on: TESO Next Flop: Planetside 2 Best MMO of all time: Asheron's Call - The first company to recreate AC will be the next greatest MMO.
I can play AoC with all settings on maximum, and get 75 fps (the cap) consistently. In BW4, I was getting around 40 fps even when I was in non-crowded areas. In BF3 and Skyrim (with HD textures) I get 50+ and they look better than TSW.
Edit: off topic, but if you play BF3 on max settings, you'd never play COD again...it looks so realistic it's scary.
Originally posted by Tdo my rig: Asus G53sx. with i7 gtx560 16gb ram win7 64b and just getting 25-30 fps on medium settings. is it really that demanding that people need monster rigs to play this game smoothly? , if so then i think funcom has shoot them selfs in the foot right from the start.
Well one of our computers is a Asus P5Q Deluxe with a Q8200 OC@2.9 ghz, Radeon HD4890OC, 8gb ram with Win 7 x64 and a Intel SSD and it gets those frame rates on ultra.
Comments
I agree with this. Wait and stay tuned to feedback that all is clear here.
Not true, my 7970M has the same performance as 5870 desktop GPU. I can run 1920x1080 with everything set tomthe max smoothly even in mass PvP. But then those GPU are only available in Alienware laptops and Clevo stuff.Best MMO experiences : EQ(PvE), DAoC(PvP), WoW(total package) LOTRO (worldfeel) GW2 (Artstyle and animations and worlddesign) SWTOR (Story immersion) TSW (story) ESO (character advancement)
I was getting 60+ FPS on high and 40+ on Ultra the first 2 BEW's, this latest BWE I had to run it on low and was still getting no better then 30fps. I dunno what they did but it made it worse.
Everything you need to know about Elder Scrolls Online
Playing: GW2
Waiting on: TESO
Next Flop: Planetside 2
Best MMO of all time: Asheron's Call - The first company to recreate AC will be the next greatest MMO.
I can play AoC with all settings on maximum, and get 75 fps (the cap) consistently. In BW4, I was getting around 40 fps even when I was in non-crowded areas. In BF3 and Skyrim (with HD textures) I get 50+ and they look better than TSW.
Edit: off topic, but if you play BF3 on max settings, you'd never play COD again...it looks so realistic it's scary.
game was running fine for me
Intel i7 @4.5ghz
8GB ram
2 x ATI 6850 (HAd to turn off Crossfire because it makes all the text in game mess up)
Win 7 x64
Well one of our computers is a Asus P5Q Deluxe with a Q8200 OC@2.9 ghz, Radeon HD4890OC, 8gb ram with Win 7 x64 and a Intel SSD and it gets those frame rates on ultra.